Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Calculating Semantic Similarity between Academic Articles using Topic Event and Ontology

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1711.11508 v1 pith:PZX3XV2A submitted 2017-11-30 cs.CL cs.AIcs.IR

Calculating Semantic Similarity between Academic Articles using Topic Event and Ontology

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.IR
keywords semanticsimilarityacademicarticlestopicdocument-leveleventsfocus
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Determining semantic similarity between academic documents is crucial to many tasks such as plagiarism detection, automatic technical survey and semantic search. Current studies mostly focus on semantic similarity between concepts, sentences and short text fragments. However, document-level semantic matching is still based on statistical information in surface level, neglecting article structures and global semantic meanings, which may cause the deviation in document understanding. In this paper, we focus on the document-level semantic similarity issue for academic literatures with a novel method. We represent academic articles with topic events that utilize multiple information profiles, such as research purposes, methodologies and domains to integrally describe the research work, and calculate the similarity between topic events based on the domain ontology to acquire the semantic similarity between articles. Experiments show that our approach achieves significant performance compared to state-of-the-art methods.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. An LLM-Powered Semantic Alignment Framework for Journal Recommendation

    cs.IR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    An LLM semantic-matching framework for journal recommendation reports 40.23% Top-3 accuracy on 23,609 statistics articles from 49 journals without task-specific training.