Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Deep learning to achieve clinically applicable segmentation of head and neck anatomy for radiotherapy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1809.04430 v3 pith:QTBR75ZB submitted 2018-09-12 cs.CV cs.LGcs.NEphysics.med-phstat.ML

classification cs.CVcs.LGcs.NEphysics.med-phstat.ML
keywords clinicalmodelpracticeheadneckoarsperformanceradiotherapy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Over half a million individuals are diagnosed with head and neck cancer each year worldwide. Radiotherapy is an important curative treatment for this disease, but it requires manual time consuming delineation of radio-sensitive organs at risk (OARs). This planning process can delay treatment, while also introducing inter-operator variability with resulting downstream radiation dose differences. While auto-segmentation algorithms offer a potentially time-saving solution, the challenges in defining, quantifying and achieving expert performance remain. Adopting a deep learning approach, we demonstrate a 3D U-Net architecture that achieves expert-level performance in delineating 21 distinct head and neck OARs commonly segmented in clinical practice. The model was trained on a dataset of 663 deidentified computed tomography (CT) scans acquired in routine clinical practice and with both segmentations taken from clinical practice and segmentations created by experienced radiographers as part of this research, all in accordance with consensus OAR definitions. We demonstrate the model's clinical applicability by assessing its performance on a test set of 21 CT scans from clinical practice, each with the 21 OARs segmented by two independent experts. We also introduce surface Dice similarity coefficient (surface DSC), a new metric for the comparison of organ delineation, to quantify deviation between OAR surface contours rather than volumes, better reflecting the clinical task of correcting errors in the automated organ segmentations. The model's generalisability is then demonstrated on two distinct open source datasets, reflecting different centres and countries to model training. With appropriate validation studies and regulatory approvals, this system could improve the efficiency, consistency, and safety of radiotherapy pathways.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DynoDINO: Harnessing Dynamic Latent Information from DINO Features for Multi-Phase Medical Image Segmentation

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A gated difference-residual fusion of DINO features improves multi-phase CT lesion boundary metrics, but sacrifices Dice overlap and fails when the early phase is missing.

  2. CRISP-SAM2: SAM2 with Cross-Modal Interaction and Semantic Prompting for Multi-Organ Segmentation

    eess.IV 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A text-guided SAM2 variant with cross-modal attention, semantic prompt generation, and a similarity-sorted memory bank achieves top Dice and surface scores on seven public multi-organ CT datasets.

  3. Pixel-wise Modulated Dice Loss for Medical Image Segmentation

    eess.IV 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A pixel-wise modulated Dice loss, weighting each pixel by its prediction error, reports improved segmentation accuracy on Kvasir, ACDC, and MSSEG benchmarks.

  4. Seamless and Efficient Interactions within a Mixed-Dimensional Information Space

    cs.HC 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A thesis that three design strategies, multimodal AI, context-aware placement, and combined 2D/3D views, make mixed-dimensional information spaces seamless and efficient, demonstrated with three systems.

  5. Multimodal HIE Lesion Segmentation in Neonates: A Comparative Study of Loss Functions

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    On the BONBID-HIE validation split, a 3D U-Net trained with Tversky-HausdorffDT loss reached the best Dice (0.50) and NSD (0.53), outperforming standalone Dice, Focal, and Hausdorff losses.

Pith tools