Pith. sign in

REVIEW 11 cited by

Accelerating Deep Learning by Focusing on the Biggest Losers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1910.00762 v1 pith:T6PBMGKW submitted 2019-10-02 cs.LG stat.ML

Accelerating Deep Learning by Focusing on the Biggest Losers

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords selective-backpropexampleforwardtrainingacceleratesdeepexamplesfaster
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper introduces Selective-Backprop, a technique that accelerates the training of deep neural networks (DNNs) by prioritizing examples with high loss at each iteration. Selective-Backprop uses the output of a training example's forward pass to decide whether to use that example to compute gradients and update parameters, or to skip immediately to the next example. By reducing the number of computationally-expensive backpropagation steps performed, Selective-Backprop accelerates training. Evaluation on CIFAR10, CIFAR100, and SVHN, across a variety of modern image models, shows that Selective-Backprop converges to target error rates up to 3.5x faster than with standard SGD and between 1.02--1.8x faster than a state-of-the-art importance sampling approach. Further acceleration of 26% can be achieved by using stale forward pass results for selection, thus also skipping forward passes of low priority examples.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 11 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Initialization is Half the Battle: Generating Diverse Images from a Guidance Potential Posterior

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    DivIn samples initial noise from a guidance potential posterior via Langevin dynamics to improve diversity in class-to-image and text-to-image generation.

  2. Disagreement-Regularized Importance Sampling for Adversarial Label Corruption

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    DR-IS selects low-contamination subsets via bounded rank-disagreement in proxy ensembles under an ε-contamination model, with O(√(log(N/δ)/K)) concentration rates that certify separation when the expectation gap Δ' is...

  3. Online Data Selection Is Implicit Alignment

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Online SFT data selection acts as an implicit preference model, shifting refusal rates, verbosity, and sycophancy in directions predictable from the selected data's attribute mixture.

  4. K-ABENA: K-Adaptive Backpropagation with Error-based N-exclusion Algorithm : (Compensated Loss-Based Sample Exclusion with Unbiased Gradient Estimation)

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    K-ABENA combines threshold-based sample exclusion with Horvitz-Thompson inverse-probability reweighting to achieve unbiased gradient estimation while saving 28-54% of per-epoch backward-pass compute.

  5. Selecting Samples on Graphs: A Unified Dataset Pruning Framework for Lossless Training Acceleration

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A graph-based unified dataset pruning framework that formulates pruning as MWCP, derives a greedy algorithm with formal approximation guarantees, and demonstrates substantial training acceleration on ImageNet.

  6. Policy-based Foveated Imaging and Perception

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A task-aware policy learned via reinforcement learning allocates high-resolution pixels on dual-stream sensors in real time, outperforming fixed or non-predictive baselines under tight pixel budgets in both simulation...

  7. The Long-Term Effects of Data Selection in LLM Fine-Tuning

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Short-term data selectors in multi-stage LLM fine-tuning can slow future learning and increase forgetting, formalized as myopic selection with a proposed LHAS objective to address it.

  8. CHERRY: Compressed Hierarchical Experts with Recurrent Representational Yield

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    CHERRY combines selective ground-truth token training, recurrent depth compression from 48 to 6 layers, and mixture-of-efficient-experts to achieve competitive loss with fewer parameters on a 1.8B Korean model.

  9. RCAP: Robust, Class-Aware, Probabilistic Dynamic Dataset Pruning

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    RCAP introduces class-aware probabilistic pruning that uses closed-form per-class fractions updated by loss and high-loss sampling to preserve worst-group accuracy at high pruning rates.

  10. Learning to Reason at the Frontier of Learnability

    cs.LG 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A curriculum sampling questions with high variance in success rate improves reinforcement learning performance for LLM reasoning tasks.

  11. Step-Video-T2V Technical Report: The Practice, Challenges, and Future of Video Foundation Model

    cs.CV 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Step-Video-T2V describes a 30B-parameter text-to-video model with custom Video-VAE, 3D DiT, flow matching, and Video-DPO that claims state-of-the-art results on a new internal benchmark.