Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

An Evaluation of Knowledge Graph Embeddings for Autonomous Driving Data: Experience and Practice

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.00344 v1 pith:SQSHCVER submitted 2020-02-29 cs.AI cs.CVcs.LGcs.ROcs.SYeess.SY

classification cs.AIcs.CVcs.LGcs.ROcs.SYeess.SY
keywords kgesembeddingsautonomousdatadetaildrivinginformationalknowledge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The autonomous driving (AD) industry is exploring the use of knowledge graphs (KGs) to manage the vast amount of heterogeneous data generated from vehicular sensors. The various types of equipped sensors include video, LIDAR and RADAR. Scene understanding is an important topic in AD which requires consideration of various aspects of a scene, such as detected objects, events, time and location. Recent work on knowledge graph embeddings (KGEs) - an approach that facilitates neuro-symbolic fusion - has shown to improve the predictive performance of machine learning models. With the expectation that neuro-symbolic fusion through KGEs will improve scene understanding, this research explores the generation and evaluation of KGEs for autonomous driving data. We also present an investigation of the relationship between the level of informational detail in a KG and the quality of its derivative embeddings. By systematically evaluating KGEs along four dimensions -- i.e. quality metrics, KG informational detail, algorithms, and datasets -- we show that (1) higher levels of informational detail in KGs lead to higher quality embeddings, (2) type and relation semantics are better captured by the semantic transitional distance-based TransE algorithm, and (3) some metrics, such as coherence measure, may not be suitable for intrinsically evaluating KGEs in this domain. Additionally, we also present an (early) investigation of the usefulness of KGEs for two use-cases in the AD domain.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Rate-Informed Discovery via Bayesian Adaptive Multifidelity Sampling

    cs.RO 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    BAMS combines Gaussian-process-based adaptive sampling with low- and high-fidelity simulators to discover rare AV failures and estimate their rate more efficiently than Monte Carlo and importance-sampling baselines.

  2. Knowledge Graphs: The Future of Data Integration and Insightful Discovery

    cs.AI 2024-12 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

    A survey of knowledge graph concepts, construction methods, and applications; it contributes no new model, dataset, or experimental result.

Pith tools