REVIEW 2 cited by
A Longitudinal Analysis of YouTube's Promotion of Conspiracy Videos
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Conspiracy theories have flourished on social media, raising concerns that such content is fueling the spread of disinformation, supporting extremist ideologies, and in some cases, leading to violence. Under increased scrutiny and pressure from legislators and the public, YouTube announced efforts to change their recommendation algorithms so that the most egregious conspiracy videos are demoted and demonetized. To verify this claim, we have developed a classifier for automatically determining if a video is conspiratorial (e.g., the moon landing was faked, the pyramids of Giza were built by aliens, end of the world prophecies, etc.). We coupled this classifier with an emulation of YouTube's watch-next algorithm on more than a thousand popular informational channels to obtain a year-long picture of the videos actively promoted by YouTube. We also obtained trends of the so-called filter-bubble effect for conspiracy theories.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Datasets for Navigating Sensitive Topics in Recommendation Systems
Two benchmark datasets link user-preference data (MovieLens, Archive of Our Own) with community content-warning labels to study sensitive-content exposure in recommender systems.
-
Evaluating AI capabilities in detecting conspiracy theories on YouTube
Zero-shot text LLMs detect conspiracy YouTube videos with high recall but low precision, a fine-tuned RoBERTa remains competitive, and thumbnails add little value.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.