Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

TEACh: Task-driven Embodied Agents that Chat

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.00534 v3 pith:3AKKIO4O submitted 2021-10-01 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CLcs.RO

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CLcs.RO
keywords languageteachcommandercompleteembodiedfollowerinformationnatural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Robots operating in human spaces must be able to engage in natural language interaction with people, both understanding and executing instructions, and using conversation to resolve ambiguity and recover from mistakes. To study this, we introduce TEACh, a dataset of over 3,000 human--human, interactive dialogues to complete household tasks in simulation. A Commander with access to oracle information about a task communicates in natural language with a Follower. The Follower navigates through and interacts with the environment to complete tasks varying in complexity from "Make Coffee" to "Prepare Breakfast", asking questions and getting additional information from the Commander. We propose three benchmarks using TEACh to study embodied intelligence challenges, and we evaluate initial models' abilities in dialogue understanding, language grounding, and task execution.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Better Slow than Sorry: Introducing Positive Friction for Reliable Dialogue Systems

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper proposes a taxonomy of positive friction movements in dialogue and provides simulated and correlational evidence that they improve task success and user mental-state modeling.

Pith tools