REVIEW 2 cited by
VideoDex: Learning Dexterity from Internet Videos
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
To build general robotic agents that can operate in many environments, it is often imperative for the robot to collect experience in the real world. However, this is often not feasible due to safety, time, and hardware restrictions. We thus propose leveraging the next best thing as real-world experience: internet videos of humans using their hands. Visual priors, such as visual features, are often learned from videos, but we believe that more information from videos can be utilized as a stronger prior. We build a learning algorithm, VideoDex, that leverages visual, action, and physical priors from human video datasets to guide robot behavior. These actions and physical priors in the neural network dictate the typical human behavior for a particular robot task. We test our approach on a robot arm and dexterous hand-based system and show strong results on various manipulation tasks, outperforming various state-of-the-art methods. Videos at https://video-dex.github.io
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
DexMachina: Functional Retargeting for Bimanual Dexterous Manipulation
DexMachina uses decaying virtual object controllers as a curriculum to train bimanual dexterous policies that track demonstrated object states, and reports large gains over baselines on a new six-hand benchmark.
-
mimic-one: a Scalable Model Recipe for General Purpose Robot Dexterity
mimic-one reports up to 93.3% out-of-distribution success on three real-world dexterous tasks using a diffusion policy, a custom 16-DoF hand, and a teleoperation data-collection recipe with self-correction trajectories.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.