Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Networks' modulation: How different structural network properties affect the global synchronization of coupled Kuramoto oscillators

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.03099 v1 pith:67ZBYW3O submitted 2023-02-24 nlin.AO cs.NEnlin.CDq-bio.NC

classification nlin.AOcs.NEnlin.CDq-bio.NC
keywords differentglobalnodeswhendegreenetworkpropertiessynchrony
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In a large variety of systems (biological, physical, social etc.), synchronization occurs when different oscillating objects tune their rhythm when they interact with each other. The different underlying network defining the connectivity properties among these objects drives the global dynamics in a complex fashion and affects the global degree of synchrony of the system. Here we study the impact of such types of different network architectures, such as Fully-Connected, Random, Regular ring lattice graph, Small-World and Scale-Free in the global dynamical activity of a system of coupled Kuramoto phase oscillators. We fix the external stimulation parameters and we measure the global degree of synchrony when different fractions of nodes receive stimulus. These nodes are chosen either randomly or based on their respective strong/weak connectivity properties (centrality, shortest path length and clustering coefficient). Our main finding is, that in Scale-Free and Random networks a sophisticated choice of nodes based on their eigenvector centrality and average shortest path length exhibits a systematic trend in achieving higher degree of synchrony. However, this trend does not occur when using the clustering coefficient as a criterion. For the other types of graphs considered, the choice of the stimulated nodes (randomly vs selectively using the aforementioned criteria) does not seem to have a noticeable effect.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools