REVIEW 5 cited by
AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A Survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
To address the challenges of digital intelligence in the digital economy, artificial intelligence-generated content (AIGC) has emerged. AIGC uses artificial intelligence to assist or replace manual content generation by generating content based on user-inputted keywords or requirements. The development of large model algorithms has significantly strengthened the capabilities of AIGC, which makes AIGC products a promising generative tool and adds convenience to our lives. As an upstream technology, AIGC has unlimited potential to support different downstream applications. It is important to analyze AIGC's current capabilities and shortcomings to understand how it can be best utilized in future applications. Therefore, this paper provides an extensive overview of AIGC, covering its definition, essential conditions, cutting-edge capabilities, and advanced features. Moreover, it discusses the benefits of large-scale pre-trained models and the industrial chain of AIGC. Furthermore, the article explores the distinctions between auxiliary generation and automatic generation within AIGC, providing examples of text generation. The paper also examines the potential integration of AIGC with the Metaverse. Lastly, the article highlights existing issues and suggests some future directions for application.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
"I Cannot Write This Because It Violates Our Content Policy": Understanding Content Moderation Policies and User Experiences in Generative AI Products
GAI tools' content moderation policies are comprehensive in scope but thin on user reporting and appeals, and Reddit users report frequent frustration with opaque moderation decisions.
-
Generative Ghost: Investigating Ranking Bias Hidden in AI-Generated Videos
Text-video retrieval models systematically rank AI-generated videos above semantically matched real videos, driven by both visual and temporal cues and amplified by AI content in training data.
-
Modeling Human Responses to Multimodal AI Content
A 154K-post study reports that humans identify AI content best when text and images are both present and inconsistent, and offers metrics plus an LLM agent for human-aligned responses.
-
FlashDP: Private Training Large Language Models with Efficient DP-SGD
FlashDP fuses per-sample gradient computation, norm calculation, clipping, and noise addition into a cache-friendly block-wise all-reduce workflow that avoids explicit per-sample gradient storage and redundant recomputation.
-
AI-Generated Content in Landscape Architecture: A Survey
A survey paper that maps current and potential uses of AI-generated content across landscape architecture's design, construction, and management phases.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.