Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

GLOBE-CE: A Translation-Based Approach for Global Counterfactual Explanations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.17021 v2 pith:SHQNXLFL submitted 2023-05-26 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CYstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CYstat.ML
keywords explanationsglobalcounterfactualglobe-ceassociatedcurrentdatasetsefficient
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Counterfactual explanations have been widely studied in explainability, with a range of application dependent methods prominent in fairness, recourse and model understanding. The major shortcoming associated with these methods, however, is their inability to provide explanations beyond the local or instance-level. While many works touch upon the notion of a global explanation, typically suggesting to aggregate masses of local explanations in the hope of ascertaining global properties, few provide frameworks that are both reliable and computationally tractable. Meanwhile, practitioners are requesting more efficient and interactive explainability tools. We take this opportunity to propose Global & Efficient Counterfactual Explanations (GLOBE-CE), a flexible framework that tackles the reliability and scalability issues associated with current state-of-the-art, particularly on higher dimensional datasets and in the presence of continuous features. Furthermore, we provide a unique mathematical analysis of categorical feature translations, utilising it in our method. Experimental evaluation with publicly available datasets and user studies demonstrate that GLOBE-CE performs significantly better than the current state-of-the-art across multiple metrics (e.g., speed, reliability).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Explanations as Bias Detectors: A Critical Study of Local Post-hoc XAI Methods for Fairness Exploration

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Aggregated local explanations from LIME, SHAP, and DiCE can flag group-level unfairness, but the results shift with aggregation method and protected attribute removal, so explanations must be used cautiously as bias d...

Pith tools