Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

When Do Annotator Demographics Matter? Measuring the Influence of Annotator Demographics with the POPQUORN Dataset

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.06826 v2 pith:XEGSNAML submitted 2023-06-12 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CYcs.HCcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CYcs.HCcs.LG
keywords annotatorannotatorsbackgroundconsidereddatasetdemographicspopquornbackgrounds
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Annotators are not fungible. Their demographics, life experiences, and backgrounds all contribute to how they label data. However, NLP has only recently considered how annotator identity might influence their decisions. Here, we present POPQUORN (the POtato-Prolific dataset for QUestion-Answering, Offensiveness, text Rewriting, and politeness rating with demographic Nuance). POPQUORN contains 45,000 annotations from 1,484 annotators, drawn from a representative sample regarding sex, age, and race as the US population. Through a series of analyses, we show that annotators' background plays a significant role in their judgments. Further, our work shows that backgrounds not previously considered in NLP (e.g., education), are meaningful and should be considered. Our study suggests that understanding the background of annotators and collecting labels from a demographically balanced pool of crowd workers is important to reduce the bias of datasets. The dataset, annotator background, and annotation interface are available at https://github.com/Jiaxin-Pei/potato-prolific-dataset .

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Partition, Prompt, Aggregate: Statistical Self-Consistency in Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    LLM probability estimates violate the law of total probability across partitions, and subgroup-aggregated estimates often beat direct population-level estimates (the macro fallacy).

  2. ModelCitizens: Representing Community Voices in Online Safety

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A community-annotated toxicity dataset with conversational context shows that models trained on ingroup labels outperform state-of-the-art moderation APIs.

Pith tools