Pith. sign in

REVIEW 10 cited by

Temporal Data Meets LLM -- Explainable Financial Time Series Forecasting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.11025 v1 pith:T43CKFCY submitted 2023-06-19 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CLq-fin.ST

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CLq-fin.ST
keywords financialmodelseriestimeexplainablehistoricalknowledgellms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper presents a novel study on harnessing Large Language Models' (LLMs) outstanding knowledge and reasoning abilities for explainable financial time series forecasting. The application of machine learning models to financial time series comes with several challenges, including the difficulty in cross-sequence reasoning and inference, the hurdle of incorporating multi-modal signals from historical news, financial knowledge graphs, etc., and the issue of interpreting and explaining the model results. In this paper, we focus on NASDAQ-100 stocks, making use of publicly accessible historical stock price data, company metadata, and historical economic/financial news. We conduct experiments to illustrate the potential of LLMs in offering a unified solution to the aforementioned challenges. Our experiments include trying zero-shot/few-shot inference with GPT-4 and instruction-based fine-tuning with a public LLM model Open LLaMA. We demonstrate our approach outperforms a few baselines, including the widely applied classic ARMA-GARCH model and a gradient-boosting tree model. Through the performance comparison results and a few examples, we find LLMs can make a well-thought decision by reasoning over information from both textual news and price time series and extracting insights, leveraging cross-sequence information, and utilizing the inherent knowledge embedded within the LLM. Additionally, we show that a publicly available LLM such as Open-LLaMA, after fine-tuning, can comprehend the instruction to generate explainable forecasts and achieve reasonable performance, albeit relatively inferior in comparison to GPT-4.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 10 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Dual-Prototype Disentanglement: A Context-Aware Enhancement Framework for Time Series Forecasting

    cs.LG 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A model-agnostic module that retrieves common and rare prototype patterns improves forecasting error on many standard benchmarks, but not on all reported cases.

  2. Time Series Foundation Models for Multivariate Financial Time Series Forecasting

    q-fin.GN 2025-07 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    Pretrained TTM shows large transfer and sample-efficiency gains in three financial forecasting tasks relative to training from scratch, but methodological flaws including possible look-ahead bias weaken the quantitati...

  3. AI Analyst: Framework and Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models for Financial Time Series Report Generation

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs such as GPT-4o can generate coherent financial reports from time series data, and a proposed highlighting system categorizes report segments by whether they stem from data, reasoning, or external knowledge.

  4. SMT-AD: a scalable quantum-inspired anomaly detection approach

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    SMT-AD detects anomalies via superposed multiresolution bond-dimension-1 MPOs with Fourier embedding, claiming competitive baseline performance and linear parameter scaling.

  5. A Survey of Reasoning and Agentic Systems in Time Series with Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The authors organize LLM-based time series reasoning into three exclusive topologies (direct, chain, branch) crossed with four objectives, and use them to label 125 papers, benchmarks, and resources.

  6. Causal Graph Fuzzy LLMs: A First Introduction and Applications in Time Series Forecasting

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CGF-LLM combines fuzzy time series and PCMCI causal graphs into text input for fine-tuned GPT-2, reporting improved one-step-ahead forecast NRMSE and a reduction in token count on four datasets.

  7. Mind the XAI Gap: A Human-Centered LLM Framework for Democratizing Explainable AI

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An in-context LLM framework that produces dual expert and non-expert explanations, evaluated on well-being clustering with a user study and LIME-alignment metrics.

  8. AI Trading: Evaluating Large Language Models for Technical Market Analysis

    cs.LG 2026-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A comparative evaluation claims GPT-4 Turbo and FinGPT outperformed the S&P 500 in a 2023 simulated backtest, but flawed baselines and missing code/data undermine the result.

  9. On Identifying Why and When Foundation Models Perform Well on Time-Series Forecasting Using Automated Explanations and Rating

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    On four public datasets, Gradient Boosting with hand-built features beat Chronos, Llama, and ARIMA on most accuracy metrics, while Chronos only led on financial sMAPE.

  10. Forecast-Then-Optimize Deep Learning Methods

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey and M5 benchmark arguing that optimizing forecasts after generation, through ensembles and meta-learners, adds more value than replacing base forecasting models.

Pith tools