REVIEW 2 cited by
Learn over Past, Evolve for Future: Forecasting Temporal Trends for Fake News Detection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Fake news detection has been a critical task for maintaining the health of the online news ecosystem. However, very few existing works consider the temporal shift issue caused by the rapidly-evolving nature of news data in practice, resulting in significant performance degradation when training on past data and testing on future data. In this paper, we observe that the appearances of news events on the same topic may display discernible patterns over time, and posit that such patterns can assist in selecting training instances that could make the model adapt better to future data. Specifically, we design an effective framework FTT (Forecasting Temporal Trends), which could forecast the temporal distribution patterns of news data and then guide the detector to fast adapt to future distribution. Experiments on the real-world temporally split dataset demonstrate the superiority of our proposed framework. The code is available at https://github.com/ICTMCG/FTT-ACL23.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Each Fake News is Fake in its Own Way: An Attribution Multi-Granularity Benchmark for Multimodal Fake News Detection
The authors introduce AMG, an attribution-labeled multimodal fake news benchmark with five fake patterns, plus MGCA, a clue-alignment model that outperforms baselines on it.
-
The Truth Becomes Clearer Through Debate! Multi-Agent Systems with Large Language Models Unmask Fake News
TED uses structured pro/con debates between LLM agents plus a graph-based analysis model to detect fake news more accurately than prior methods on two benchmark datasets.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.