Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

What's Left? Concept Grounding with Logic-Enhanced Foundation Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.16035 v1 pith:XSBWRUHF submitted 2023-10-24 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CLcs.LGstat.ML

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CLcs.LGstat.ML
keywords leftdomainsmodelsconceptsfoundationlanguageprogramacross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent works such as VisProg and ViperGPT have smartly composed foundation models for visual reasoning-using large language models (LLMs) to produce programs that can be executed by pre-trained vision-language models. However, they operate in limited domains, such as 2D images, not fully exploiting the generalization of language: abstract concepts like "left" can also be grounded in 3D, temporal, and action data, as in moving to your left. This limited generalization stems from these inference-only methods' inability to learn or adapt pre-trained models to a new domain. We propose the Logic-Enhanced Foundation Model (LEFT), a unified framework that learns to ground and reason with concepts across domains with a differentiable, domain-independent, first-order logic-based program executor. LEFT has an LLM interpreter that outputs a program represented in a general, logic-based reasoning language, which is shared across all domains and tasks. LEFT's executor then executes the program with trainable domain-specific grounding modules. We show that LEFT flexibly learns concepts in four domains: 2D images, 3D scenes, human motions, and robotic manipulation. It exhibits strong reasoning ability in a wide variety of tasks, including those that are complex and not seen during training, and can be easily applied to new domains.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Generative Physical AI in Vision: A Survey

    cs.CV 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A structured review that categorizes physics-aware generative models in vision into explicit-simulation and implicit-learning families and proposes six integration paradigms.

  2. Neuro-Symbolic Frameworks: Conceptual Characterization and Empirical Comparative Analysis

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A facet-based comparison of DeepProbLog, Scallop, and DomiKnowS with efficiency measurements on four toy tasks, identifying challenges for future neurosymbolic frameworks.

Pith tools