Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

How to Bridge the Gap between Modalities: Survey on Multimodal Large Language Model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.07594 v3 pith:G5ZECB57 submitted 2023-11-10 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CVcs.MM

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CVcs.MM
keywords datallmsmultimodalalignmentmllmsmodalitymethodscapabilities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We explore Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), which integrate LLMs like GPT-4 to handle multimodal data, including text, images, audio, and more. MLLMs demonstrate capabilities such as generating image captions and answering image-based questions, bridging the gap towards real-world human-computer interactions and hinting at a potential pathway to artificial general intelligence. However, MLLMs still face challenges in addressing the semantic gap in multimodal data, which may lead to erroneous outputs, posing potential risks to society. Selecting the appropriate modality alignment method is crucial, as improper methods might require more parameters without significant performance improvements. This paper aims to explore modality alignment methods for LLMs and their current capabilities. Implementing effective modality alignment can help LLMs address environmental issues and enhance accessibility. The study surveys existing modality alignment methods for MLLMs, categorizing them into four groups: (1) Multimodal Converter, which transforms data into a format that LLMs can understand; (2) Multimodal Perceiver, which improves how LLMs percieve different types of data; (3) Tool Learning, which leverages external tools to convert data into a common format, usually text; and (4) Data-Driven Method, which teaches LLMs to understand specific data types within datasets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Abstractive Visual Understanding of Multi-modal Structured Knowledge: A New Perspective for MLLM Evaluation

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark, M3STR, renders knowledge-graph subgraphs as images and shows current MLLMs score near random on anomaly detection and poorly on entity counting.

  2. Unified Multimodal Understanding via Byte-Pair Visual Encoding

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Priority-guided byte-pair encoding of quantized image patches plus curriculum training yields an 8B discrete-token MLLM competitive with continuous-embedding models on VQA and multimodal benchmarks.

  3. Towards LLM-Centric Multimodal Fusion: A Survey on Integration Strategies and Techniques

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Multimodal LLMs can be organized by fusion mechanism, fusion level, representation paradigm, and training paradigm, with 125 models classified accordingly.

  4. Align is not Enough: Multimodal Universal Jailbreak Attack against Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    An alternating image-text optimization produces a universal adversarial suffix and image that transfer across open multimodal LLMs more effectively than single-modality jailbreaks.

Pith tools