Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Explainable AI for Safe and Trustworthy Autonomous Driving: A Systematic Review

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.10086 v2 pith:2WH6G2L5 submitted 2024-02-08 cs.RO cs.AIcs.CVcs.HCcs.LG

classification cs.ROcs.AIcs.CVcs.HCcs.LG
keywords interpretableexplainablesafetrustworthyautonomouschallengecontributionsdriving
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) shows promising applications for the perception and planning tasks in autonomous driving (AD) due to its superior performance compared to conventional methods. However, inscrutable AI systems exacerbate the existing challenge of safety assurance of AD. One way to mitigate this challenge is to utilize explainable AI (XAI) techniques. To this end, we present the first comprehensive systematic literature review of explainable methods for safe and trustworthy AD. We begin by analyzing the requirements for AI in the context of AD, focusing on three key aspects: data, model, and agency. We find that XAI is fundamental to meeting these requirements. Based on this, we explain the sources of explanations in AI and describe a taxonomy of XAI. We then identify five key contributions of XAI for safe and trustworthy AI in AD, which are interpretable design, interpretable surrogate models, interpretable monitoring, auxiliary explanations, and interpretable validation. Finally, we propose a modular framework called SafeX to integrate these contributions, enabling explanation delivery to users while simultaneously ensuring the safety of AI models.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Perspectives on Explanation Formats From Two Stakeholder Groups in Germany: Software Providers and Dairy Farmers

    cs.HC 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Software providers in German dairy farming misjudge which explanation formats farmers prefer and trust, favoring rule-based displays while farmers favor time series.

  2. MIND-CAVs: Multi-Intelligence Negotiation and Decision System for CAVs based on Intent-Driven Autonomy

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Intent-sharing with edge-based arbitration improves simulated highway maneuver efficiency and safety over isolated, FCFS, and MARL baselines.

Pith tools