Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Evaluating and Improving Continual Learning in Spoken Language Understanding

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.10427 v1 pith:LFQCTQU4 submitted 2024-02-16 cs.CL cs.AIcs.SDeess.AS

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.SDeess.AS
keywords continuallearningevaluationgeneralizabilitymodelplasticitystabilityacross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Continual learning has emerged as an increasingly important challenge across various tasks, including Spoken Language Understanding (SLU). In SLU, its objective is to effectively handle the emergence of new concepts and evolving environments. The evaluation of continual learning algorithms typically involves assessing the model's stability, plasticity, and generalizability as fundamental aspects of standards. However, existing continual learning metrics primarily focus on only one or two of the properties. They neglect the overall performance across all tasks, and do not adequately disentangle the plasticity versus stability/generalizability trade-offs within the model. In this work, we propose an evaluation methodology that provides a unified evaluation on stability, plasticity, and generalizability in continual learning. By employing the proposed metric, we demonstrate how introducing various knowledge distillations can improve different aspects of these three properties of the SLU model. We further show that our proposed metric is more sensitive in capturing the impact of task ordering in continual learning, making it better suited for practical use-case scenarios.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools