Pith. sign in

REVIEW 11 cited by

Embodied LLM Agents Learn to Cooperate in Organized Teams

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.12482 v2 pith:T7X4TXY3 submitted 2024-03-19 cs.AI cs.CLcs.CYcs.MA

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.CYcs.MA
keywords agentsllmscooperationefficiencyembodiedlanguageleadershipmulti-agent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as integral tools for reasoning, planning, and decision-making, drawing upon their extensive world knowledge and proficiency in language-related tasks. LLMs thus hold tremendous potential for natural language interaction within multi-agent systems to foster cooperation. However, LLM agents tend to over-report and comply with any instruction, which may result in information redundancy and confusion in multi-agent cooperation. Inspired by human organizations, this paper introduces a framework that imposes prompt-based organization structures on LLM agents to mitigate these problems. Through a series of experiments with embodied LLM agents and human-agent collaboration, our results highlight the impact of designated leadership on team efficiency, shedding light on the leadership qualities displayed by LLM agents and their spontaneous cooperative behaviors. Further, we harness the potential of LLMs to propose enhanced organizational prompts, via a Criticize-Reflect process, resulting in novel organization structures that reduce communication costs and enhance team efficiency.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 11 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Who&When Pro: Can LLMs Really Attribute Failures in AI Agents?

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    A warm-start error-injection pipeline yields 12,326 golden-labeled multimodal agent failures, and current LLMs remain weak at step-and-mode failure attribution.

  2. Wrong Code, Right Structure: Learning Netlist Representations from Imperfect LLM-Generated RTL

    cs.LG 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Training on filtered, functionally imperfect LLM-generated RTL netlists lets GNNs match or beat models trained on scarce clean netlist data for sub-circuit identification.

  3. Tacit Coordination of Large Language Models

    cs.GT 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across 20+ open-source LLMs, tacit coordination in focal-point games is often at or above human levels, with systematic failures on cultural and numerical salience that culture prompts partially fix.

  4. The Decrypto Benchmark for Multi-Agent Reasoning and Theory of Mind

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new interactive language-game benchmark shows LLMs lag behind simple word-embedding baselines and that newer reasoning models regress on theory-of-mind tasks.

  5. Modeling Earth-Scale Human-Like Societies with One Billion Agents

    cs.MA 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Light Society scales LLM-agent social simulations to one billion agents by substituting most LLM interactions with a distilled surrogate model.

  6. Collision- and Reachability-Aware Multi-Robot Control with Grounded LLM Planners

    cs.RO 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RLVR fine-tuning teaches small LLMs to reason about reachability and collisions, letting them beat far larger ungrounded LLMs on multi-robot box-moving tasks.

  7. Toward Scientific Reasoning in LLMs: Training from Expert Discussions via Reinforcement Learning

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Reinforcement learning on questions extracted from CRISPR expert forums improves LLM accuracy on a new benchmark (Genome-Bench) by over 15 percentage points.

  8. Is Inter-Seed Cross-Play Enough? Evaluating the Robustness of Zero-Shot Coordination Algorithms to Implementation Details

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    For Other-Play in Yokai, agents trained with different implementation details coordinate across implementations about as well as across seeds, supporting inter-seed cross-play as a proxy for cross-implementation evaluation.

  9. Scaling LLM-Driven Multi-Agent Systems: Design Principles and Architectural Scalability Analysis

    cs.MA 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Architecturally scaling LLM multi-agent systems raises accuracy at near-linear cost only above a model-capability threshold, peaks at intermediate complexity, and never fixes poor run-to-run consistency.

  10. Transition from Statistical to Hardware-Limited Scaling in Photonic Quantum State Reconstruction

    quant-ph 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Classical shadow tomography on integrated photonics shows a sharp transition from statistical O(M^{-1/2}) error scaling to a hardware-limited floor set by unitary spectral distortions.

  11. Cross-Task Experiential Learning on LLM-based Multi-Agent Collaboration

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MAEL gives each agent in a multi-agent LLM system an experience pool and retrieves high-reward past steps to guide new task solving.

Pith tools