pith. sign in

arxiv: 2404.06689 · v3 · submitted 2024-04-10 · 🧮 math.AT · math.CO· math.CT· math.KT

Bigraded path homology and the magnitude-path spectral sequence

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 02:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AT math.COmath.CTmath.KT
keywords magnitude homologypath homologyspectral sequencedirected graphsexcisionKunneth theoremMayer-Vietoriscofibration category
0
0 comments X

The pith

The magnitude-path spectral sequence turns each of its pages into a homology theory for directed graphs with excision and Kunneth properties.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that all pages of the magnitude-path spectral sequence can be viewed as homology theories in their own right. These theories satisfy excision and Kunneth theorems, and magnitude homology together with bigraded path homology satisfy Mayer-Vietoris theorems as well. A cofibration category is built on directed graphs whose weak equivalences are the maps inducing isomorphisms on bigraded path homology. This structure strictly refines an earlier one based on ordinary path homology. Complete computations of the spectral sequence are given for directed and bi-directed cycles, showing that bigraded path homology distinguishes graphs that ordinary path homology cannot.

Core claim

Magnitude homology appears as the E1 page of the magnitude-path spectral sequence, and path homology appears as an axis of the E2 page. The full E2 page is called bigraded path homology. Every page satisfies excision and the Kunneth theorem. Magnitude homology and bigraded path homology satisfy Mayer-Vietoris theorems. There is a cofibration category structure on directed graphs in which weak equivalences are maps inducing isomorphisms on bigraded path homology.

What carries the argument

The magnitude-path spectral sequence, with magnitude homology as the E1 page and bigraded path homology as the full E2 page, which carries excision, Kunneth, and Mayer-Vietoris properties while defining weak equivalences.

If this is right

  • The cofibration category on directed graphs refines the existing structure based on ordinary path homology.
  • Magnitude homology satisfies a Mayer-Vietoris theorem.
  • Bigraded path homology satisfies a Mayer-Vietoris theorem.
  • The MPSS admits complete computations for the families of directed cycles and bi-directed cycles.
  • Each page of the MPSS is homotopy invariant.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Excision permits computation of these homologies by decomposing graphs into simpler pieces.
  • Bigraded path homology supplies a finer invariant than ordinary path homology for distinguishing directed graphs.
  • The cofibration category may support the construction of higher homotopy invariants for graphs.
  • The spectral sequence could be applied to compute path homology in cases where direct methods are intractable.

Load-bearing premise

The magnitude-path spectral sequence exists with magnitude homology on the E1 page and path homology on an axis of the E2 page, as established in prior work.

What would settle it

A pair of directed graphs whose tensor product violates the claimed Kunneth theorem for bigraded path homology.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2404.06689 by Emily Roff, Richard Hepworth.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The directed cycle Zm and the bi-directed cycle Cm,n (B) to bigraded path homology, we can prove that their structure admits a natural refinement: (C) The category of directed graphs carries a cofibration category structure in which the cofibrations are those of [9] and the weak equivalences are maps inducing isomorphisms on bigraded path homology (Lemma 7.2). That this structure is indeed strictly finer t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Page E0 of the MPSS is the magnitude chain complex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Page E1 of the MPSS is magnitude homology. The differential d 1 in the E1 term of the spectral sequence associated to a filtered chain complex C∗ is given by applying the differential of C∗ to appropriate representatives [42, 5.4.6]. In the case of the MPSS, this amounts to the following. • Take an element x ∈ MHi+j,i(G). • Represent x by a cycle in MCi+j,i(G) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Page E2 of the MPSS is bigraded path homology. We will see later in the paper that the bigraded path homology groups satisfy many of the same formal properties as path homology, but that they contain strictly more information. Definition 3.2. Let X be a directed graph and let A be a subgraph of X. Then RC(A) is a subcomplex of RC(X), and we define the relative reachability chains of the pair (X, A) to be t… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The magnitude homology of the directed m-cycle. R R R R R R dm−1 dm−1 0 1 m m+1 2m 2m+1 0 −(m−2) −2(m−2) E2 ∗,∗ (Zm) = Em−1 ∗,∗ (Zm) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The bigraded path homology of the directed m-cycle. the spectral sequence. Since we know that the homology of the reachability complex is trivial, the same must be true of the term Em = E∞, so that each d m−1 depicted must be an isomorphism. 8.1. The complex of ordered partitions with upper bound. Definition 8.4. Let ℓ ∈ Z. An ordered partition of ℓ is an ordered tuple (a1, . . . , ak) of k ≥ 0 positive in… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Two important invariants of directed graphs, namely magnitude homology and path homology, have recently been shown to be intimately connected: there is a 'magnitude-path spectral sequence' or 'MPSS' in which magnitude homology appears as the first page, and in which path homology appears as an axis of the second page. In this paper we study the homological and computational properties of the spectral sequence, and in particular of the full second page, which we now call 'bigraded path homology'. We demonstrate that every page of the MPSS deserves to be regarded as a homology theory in its own right, satisfying excision and Kunneth theorems (along with a homotopy invariance property already established by Asao), and that magnitude homology and bigraded path homology also satisfy Mayer-Vietoris theorems. We construct a homotopy theory of graphs (in the form of a cofibration category structure) in which weak equivalences are the maps inducing isomorphisms on bigraded path homology, strictly refining an existing structure based on ordinary path homology. And we provide complete computations of the MPSS for two important families of graphs - the directed and bi-directed cycles - which demonstrate the power of both the MPSS, and bigraded path homology in particular, to distinguish graphs that ordinary path homology cannot.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper examines the magnitude-path spectral sequence (MPSS) connecting magnitude homology and path homology of directed graphs. It defines bigraded path homology as the full second page of the MPSS and shows that every page satisfies excision and Künneth theorems (with homotopy invariance already known), that magnitude homology and bigraded path homology satisfy Mayer-Vietoris, constructs a cofibration category on graphs whose weak equivalences are maps inducing isomorphisms on bigraded path homology (refining the ordinary path-homology version), and computes the MPSS explicitly for directed and bi-directed cycles.

Significance. If the claims hold, the work supplies a family of homology theories refining path homology, equips the category of graphs with a finer homotopy theory, and demonstrates via concrete computations that bigraded path homology distinguishes graphs invisible to ordinary path homology. The explicit cycle computations and the cofibration-category construction are concrete strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4, Theorem 4.3] §4, Theorem 4.3 (excision for each page): the proof sketch invokes the standard five-lemma argument on the long exact sequence of a pair, but the identification of the relative groups with the quotient chain complexes is not written out; this step is load-bearing for the claim that every page is an excision theory.
  2. [§6, Definition 6.1 and Theorem 6.4] §6, Definition 6.1 and Theorem 6.4 (cofibration category): the weak equivalences are defined via isomorphisms on bigraded path homology, yet the verification that the class satisfies the two-out-of-three property and the factorization axioms is only indicated by reference to the ordinary path-homology case; an explicit check that the new weak equivalences are strictly finer is needed to confirm the refinement claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Notation] Notation for the bigraded groups on page 3 is introduced as H_{p,q} but later appears as PH_{p,q}; a single consistent symbol should be fixed.
  2. [§7] The computations in §7 for the directed cycle C_n are presented in tables without an accompanying statement of the differential on the E2 page; adding the explicit differential would make the vanishing results easier to verify.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading, positive assessment, and constructive suggestions. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the requested clarifications in a revised version.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§4, Theorem 4.3] §4, Theorem 4.3 (excision for each page): the proof sketch invokes the standard five-lemma argument on the long exact sequence of a pair, but the identification of the relative groups with the quotient chain complexes is not written out; this step is load-bearing for the claim that every page is an excision theory.

    Authors: We agree that the identification step should be made fully explicit rather than left as a sketch. The relative chain groups for each page of the MPSS are defined via the quotient of the bigraded chain complex by the subcomplex generated by the subspace, and the boundary maps descend accordingly. We will expand the argument in the revised §4 to include this identification explicitly before invoking the five-lemma, confirming that excision holds pagewise. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§6, Definition 6.1 and Theorem 6.4] §6, Definition 6.1 and Theorem 6.4 (cofibration category): the weak equivalences are defined via isomorphisms on bigraded path homology, yet the verification that the class satisfies the two-out-of-three property and the factorization axioms is only indicated by reference to the ordinary path-homology case; an explicit check that the new weak equivalences are strictly finer is needed to confirm the refinement claim.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the verification of the cofibration-category axioms is referenced rather than written out in full for the refined class. Because an isomorphism on bigraded path homology (the full E² page) induces an isomorphism on ordinary path homology, the two-out-of-three and factorization properties carry over directly from the path-homology case; we will add a short explicit paragraph confirming this inheritance. Strict refinement follows from the cycle computations in §7, which exhibit graphs with identical path homology but distinct bigraded path homology; we will include a brief pointer to those examples in the revised statement of Theorem 6.4. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The derivation relies on the pre-existing magnitude-path spectral sequence (taken as given from prior independent work) together with the standard axioms of homological algebra and the definition of a cofibration category. New claims about excision, Künneth, Mayer-Vietoris, and the refined weak equivalences are obtained by applying these external axioms to the spectral sequence pages; no step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The central results remain independent of the paper's own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claims rest on the prior existence of the magnitude-path spectral sequence and on the standard axioms of abelian categories, chain complexes, and model categories; no free parameters or new postulated entities with independent evidence are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard axioms of homological algebra and category theory (abelian categories, spectral sequences, cofibration categories)
    Invoked throughout for defining the pages of the spectral sequence, proving excision/Kunneth/Mayer-Vietoris, and constructing the cofibration category.
invented entities (1)
  • Bigraded path homology no independent evidence
    purpose: To name and study the full second page of the MPSS as an independent homology theory
    Newly defined object whose properties are proved in the paper; no independent falsifiable evidence outside the definitions is supplied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5755 in / 1524 out tokens · 24459 ms · 2026-05-24T02:18:41.922848+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The discrete homotopy hypothesis for directed graphs

    math.AT 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Localizing the category of directed graphs at cubical homotopy equivalences produces an ∞-category equivalent to the ∞-category of spaces.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Magnitude homology of geodesic metric spaces with an upper curvature bound

    Yasuhiko Asao. Magnitude homology of geodesic metric spaces with an upper curvature bound. Algebr. Geom. Topol., 21(2):647–664, 2021

  2. [2]

    Magnitude and magnitude homology of filtered set enriched categories

    Yasuhiko Asao. Magnitude and magnitude homology of filtered set enriched categories. arXiv:2303.05677, 2023

  3. [3]

    Magnitude homology and path homology.Bull

    Yasuhiko Asao. Magnitude homology and path homology.Bull. Lond. Math. Soc., 55(1):375–398, 2023

  4. [4]

    Girth, magnitude homology and phase tran- sition of diagonality.Proc

    Yasuhiko Asao, Yasuaki Hiraoka, and Shu Kanazawa. Girth, magnitude homology and phase tran- sition of diagonality.Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. A: Math., page 1–27, 2023

  5. [5]

    H´ el` ene Barcelo, Valerio Capraro, and Jacob A. White. Discrete homology theory for metric spaces. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc., 46(5):889–905, 2014

  6. [6]

    Baues.Algebraic homotopy, volume 15 ofCambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics

    H.J. Baues.Algebraic homotopy, volume 15 ofCambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989

  7. [7]

    Magnitude homology, diagonality, and median spaces.Homol

    R´ emi Bottinelli and Tom Kaiser. Magnitude homology, diagonality, and median spaces.Homol. Ho- motopy Appl., 23(2):121–140, 2021

  8. [8]

    Kenneth S. Brown. Abstract homotopy theory and generalized sheaf cohomology.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 186:419–458, 1973

  9. [9]

    Cofibration category of digraphs for path homology.Algebr

    Daniel Carranza, Brandon Doherty, Krzyzstof Kapulkin, Morgan Opie, Maru Sarazola, and Liang Ze Wong. Cofibration category of digraphs for path homology.Algebr. Comb., 7(2):475–514, 2024

  10. [10]

    Nonexistence of colimits in naive discrete homotopy theory.Appl

    Daniel Carranza, Krzysztof Kapulkin, and Jinho Kim. Nonexistence of colimits in naive discrete homotopy theory.Appl. Categ. Struct., 31(5), 2023. Article number 41

  11. [11]

    Princeton Landmarks in Mathematics

    Henri Cartan and Samuel Eilenberg.Homological algebra. Princeton Landmarks in Mathematics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1999. With an appendix by David A. Buchsbaum, Reprint of the 1956 original

  12. [12]

    La classe des morphismes de Dwyer n’est pas stable par retractes

    Denis-Charles Cisinski. La classe des morphismes de Dwyer n’est pas stable par retractes. Cah. Topol. G´ eom. Diff´ er. Cat´ eg., 40(3):227–231, 1999

  13. [13]

    Th´ eorie de Hodge

    Pierre Deligne. Th´ eorie de Hodge. II.Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci. Publ. Math., (40):5–57, 1971

  14. [14]

    Zero divisor graphs of semigroups.J

    Frank DeMeyer and Lisa DeMeyer. Zero divisor graphs of semigroups.J. Algebra, 283(1):190–198, 2005

  15. [15]

    Ivanov, Lev Mukoseev, and Mengmeng Zhang

    Shaobo Di, Sergei O. Ivanov, Lev Mukoseev, and Mengmeng Zhang. On the path homology of Cayley digraphs and covering digraphs.J. Algebra, 653:156–199, 2024

  16. [16]

    On the groups ofH(Π, n)

    Samuel Eilenberg and Saunders Mac Lane. On the groups ofH(Π, n). I.Ann. of Math. (2), 58:55– 106, 1953

  17. [17]

    A combinatorial method for computing Steenrod squares

    Roc´ ıo Gonz´ alez-D´ ıaz and Pedro Real. A combinatorial method for computing Steenrod squares. J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 139:89–108, 1999

  18. [18]

    Goyal and R

    S. Goyal and R. Santhanam. Cofibration category structures on the category of graphs. arXiv:2301.13587, 2020

  19. [19]

    Goyal and R

    S. Goyal and R. Santhanam. (Lack of) model structures on the category of graphs. Appl. Categ. Struct., 29(4):671–683, 2021

  20. [20]

    A. A. Grigor’yan, Yong Lin, Yu. V. Muranov, and Shintan Yau. Path complexes and their homolo- gies.Fundam. Prikl. Mat., 21(5):79–128, 2016

  21. [21]

    Homotopy theory for di- graphs.Pure Appl

    Alexander Grigor’yan, Yong Lin, Yuri Muranov, and Shing-Tung Yau. Homotopy theory for di- graphs.Pure Appl. Math. Q., 10(4):619–674, 2014

  22. [22]

    Homologies of digraphs and K¨ unneth formulas.Comm

    Alexander Grigor’yan, Yuri Muranov, and Shing-Tung Yau. Homologies of digraphs and K¨ unneth formulas.Comm. Anal. Geom., 25(5):969–1018, 2017

  23. [23]

    Homologies of path complexes and digraphs

    Alexander Grigor’yan, Yong Lin, Yuri Muranov, and Shing-Tung Yau. Homologies of path complexes and digraphs.arXiv:1207.2834, 2013

  24. [24]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002

    Allen Hatcher.Algebraic topology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002

  25. [25]

    Pairings and convergence of spectral sequences

    Gard Olav Helle. Pairings and convergence of spectral sequences. Master’s thesis, University of Oslo,

  26. [26]

    Available athttps://www.mn.uio.no/math/personer/vit/rognes/theses/HelleGardOlav. pdf

  27. [27]

    The reachability homology of a directed graph.Int

    Richard Hepworth and Emily Roff. The reachability homology of a directed graph.Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, (3):Paper No. rnae280, 18, 2025. BIGRADED PATH HOMOLOGY AND THE MPSS 49

  28. [28]

    Categorifying the magnitude of a graph.Homol

    Richard Hepworth and Simon Willerton. Categorifying the magnitude of a graph.Homol. Homotopy Appl., 19:31–60, 2017

  29. [29]

    Sergei O. Ivanov. Nested homotopy models of finite metric spaces and their spectral homology. arXiv:2312.11878, 2023

  30. [30]

    Ivanov and Fedor Pavutnitskiy

    Sergei O. Ivanov and Fedor Pavutnitskiy. Simplicial approach to path homology of quivers, marked categories, groups and algebras.J. Lond. Math. Soc., 109(1), 2024. e12812

  31. [31]

    Magnitude homology of metric spaces and order complexes

    Ryuki Kaneta and Masahiko Yoshinaga. Magnitude homology of metric spaces and order complexes. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc., 53(3):893–905, 2021

  32. [32]

    A homology vanishing theorem for graphs with positive curvature.Comm

    Mark Kempton, Florentin M¨ unch, and Shing-Tung Yau. A homology vanishing theorem for graphs with positive curvature.Comm. Anal. Geom., 29(6):1449–1473, 2021

  33. [33]

    The magnitude of metric spaces.Doc

    Tom Leinster. The magnitude of metric spaces.Doc. Math., 18:857–905, 2013

  34. [34]

    The magnitude of a graph.Math

    Tom Leinster. The magnitude of a graph.Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 166(2):247–264, 2019

  35. [35]

    Magnitude homology of enriched categories and metric spaces

    Tom Leinster and Michael Shulman. Magnitude homology of enriched categories and metric spaces. Algebr. Geom. Topol., 21(5):2175–2221, 2021

  36. [36]

    Discrete Morse theory on digraphs.Pure Appl

    Yong Lin, Chong Wang, and Shing-Tung Yau. Discrete Morse theory on digraphs.Pure Appl. Math. Q., 17(5):1711–1737, 2021

  37. [37]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, second edition, 2001

    John McCleary.A User’s Guide to Spectral Sequences, volume 58 ofCambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, second edition, 2001

  38. [38]

    Topological strata of weighted complex networks.PLoS One, 8(6):1–8, 06 2013

    Giovanni Petri, Martina Scolamiero, Irene Donato, and Francesco Vaccarino. Topological strata of weighted complex networks.PLoS One, 8(6):1–8, 06 2013

  39. [39]

    Iterated magnitude homology.Adv

    Emily Roff. Iterated magnitude homology.Adv. Math., 468:Paper No. 110210, 42, 2025

  40. [40]

    The stacks project.https://stacks.math.columbia.edu, 2024

    The Stacks project authors. The stacks project.https://stacks.math.columbia.edu, 2024

  41. [41]

    Causal order complex and magnitude homotopy type of metric spaces.Int

    Yu Tajima and Masahiko Yoshinaga. Causal order complex and magnitude homotopy type of metric spaces.Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, (4):3176–3222, 2024

  42. [42]

    R. W. Thomason. Cat as a closed model category.Cah. Topol. G´ eom. Diff´ er. Cat´ eg., 21, 1980

  43. [43]

    Weibel.An Introduction to Homological Algebra, volume 38 ofCambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics

    Charles A. Weibel.An Introduction to Homological Algebra, volume 38 ofCambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994. Institute of Mathematics, University of Aberdeen, Scotland Email address:r.hepworth@abdn.ac.uk School of Mathematics, University of Edinburgh, Scotland Email address:emily.roff@ed.ac.uk