Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.17631 v3 pith:CHKUGYZQ submitted 2024-05-27 cs.AI cs.CEcs.MA

classification cs.AIcs.CEcs.MA
keywords biodiscoveryagentagentexperimentsdesignbiologicalgeneticperturbationtask
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Agents based on large language models have shown great potential in accelerating scientific discovery by leveraging their rich background knowledge and reasoning capabilities. In this paper, we introduce BioDiscoveryAgent, an agent that designs new experiments, reasons about their outcomes, and efficiently navigates the hypothesis space to reach desired solutions. We demonstrate our agent on the problem of designing genetic perturbation experiments, where the aim is to find a small subset out of many possible genes that, when perturbed, result in a specific phenotype (e.g., cell growth). Utilizing its biological knowledge, BioDiscoveryAgent can uniquely design new experiments without the need to train a machine learning model or explicitly design an acquisition function as in Bayesian optimization. Moreover, BioDiscoveryAgent, using Claude 3.5 Sonnet, achieves an average of 21% improvement in predicting relevant genetic perturbations across six datasets, and a 46% improvement in the harder task of non-essential gene perturbation, compared to existing Bayesian optimization baselines specifically trained for this task. Our evaluation includes one dataset that is unpublished, ensuring it is not part of the language model's training data. Additionally, BioDiscoveryAgent predicts gene combinations to perturb more than twice as accurately as a random baseline, a task so far not explored in the context of closed-loop experiment design. The agent also has access to tools for searching the biomedical literature, executing code to analyze biological datasets, and prompting another agent to critically evaluate its predictions. Overall, BioDiscoveryAgent is interpretable at every stage, representing an accessible new paradigm in the computational design of biological experiments with the potential to augment scientists' efficacy.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 16 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Agentic Exploration of Physics Models

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A general-purpose LLM agent can discover physics models, including ODEs and spin Hamiltonians, by autonomously choosing experiments and fitting hypotheses to numeric data.

  2. Measuring Scientific Capabilities of Language Models with a Systems Biology Dry Lab

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    SciGym tests LLM agents on recovering hidden reaction networks from real curated SBML biology models through self-designed perturbations, and all six frontier models evaluated lose accuracy as complexity increases.

  3. The Curious Language Model: Strategic Test-Time Information Acquisition

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CuriosiTree is a greedy tree-search policy that lets LLMs select cost-effective information-gathering actions at test time, outperforming baselines in a simulated clinical diagnosis environment.

  4. Artificial Intelligence and the Generative Science of Food Formulation

    cs.CE 2026-07 accept novelty 5.5 of 10

    Digital food representations plus predictive, generative, foundation, world, and agentic AI turn food formulation into a generative science that optimizes taste, nutrition, and sustainability as explicit design objectives.

  5. How Far Are AI Scientists from Changing the World?

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    This survey proposes a four-level capability framework for AI Scientist systems and, using an AI reviewer, finds that current systems produce papers rated well below normal scientific standards.

  6. Multi-level Value Alignment in Agentic AI Systems: Survey and Perspectives

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey proposes a macro-meso-micro value framework for agentic AI alignment and maps applications, methods, and benchmarks onto it.

Pith tools