REVIEW 3 cited by
PrE-Text: Training Language Models on Private Federated Data in the Age of LLMs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
On-device training is currently the most common approach for training machine learning (ML) models on private, distributed user data. Despite this, on-device training has several drawbacks: (1) most user devices are too small to train large models on-device, (2) on-device training is communication- and computation-intensive, and (3) on-device training can be difficult to debug and deploy. To address these problems, we propose Private Evolution-Text (PrE-Text), a method for generating differentially private (DP) synthetic textual data. First, we show that across multiple datasets, training small models (models that fit on user devices) with PrE-Text synthetic data outperforms small models trained on-device under practical privacy regimes ($\epsilon=1.29$, $\epsilon=7.58$). We achieve these results while using 9$\times$ fewer rounds, 6$\times$ less client computation per round, and 100$\times$ less communication per round. Second, finetuning large models on PrE-Text's DP synthetic data improves large language model (LLM) performance on private data across the same range of privacy budgets. Altogether, these results suggest that training on DP synthetic data can be a better option than training a model on-device on private distributed data. Code is available at https://github.com/houcharlie/PrE-Text.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Initialization Matters: Unraveling the Impact of Pre-Training on Federated Learning
For a two-layer CNN with a signal-noise data model, FedAvg test error depends on the number of filters misaligned at initialization, and pre-training helps mainly by reducing that number.
-
Is API Access to LLMs Useful for Generating Private Synthetic Tabular Data?
API access to Gemini 1.0 Pro does not improve differentially private synthetic tabular data beyond established non-LLM baselines on the tested datasets and workloads.
-
Differentially Private Synthetic Data via APIs 3: Using Simulators Instead of Foundation Model
Sim-PE plugs non-neural simulators into Private Evolution to create differentially private images, improving downstream accuracy over foundation-model PE by up to 3x on MNIST.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.