REVIEW 4 cited by
The CLRS-Text Algorithmic Reasoning Language Benchmark
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Eliciting reasoning capabilities from language models (LMs) is a critical direction on the path towards building intelligent systems. Most recent studies dedicated to reasoning focus on out-of-distribution performance on procedurally-generated synthetic benchmarks, bespoke-built to evaluate specific skills only. This trend makes results hard to transfer across publications, slowing down progress. Three years ago, a similar issue was identified and rectified in the field of neural algorithmic reasoning, with the advent of the CLRS benchmark. CLRS is a dataset generator comprising graph execution traces of classical algorithms from the Introduction to Algorithms textbook. Inspired by this, we propose CLRS-Text -- a textual version of these algorithmic traces. Out of the box, CLRS-Text is capable of procedurally generating trace data for thirty diverse, challenging algorithmic tasks across any desirable input distribution, while offering a standard pipeline in which any additional algorithmic tasks may be created in the benchmark. We fine-tune and evaluate various LMs as generalist executors on this benchmark, validating prior work and revealing a novel, interesting challenge for the LM reasoning community. Our code is available at https://github.com/google-deepmind/clrs/tree/master/clrs/_src/clrs_text.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
SPARK: Susceptibility-Guided Profiling and Steering of Latent Reasoning States in Large Language Models
Length-controlled hidden-state susceptibility diagnoses under-activated reasoning in LLMs and guides selective test-time steering that lifts MATH-500 accuracy by roughly 2–3 points.
-
Learning to Execute Graph Algorithms Exactly with Graph Neural Networks
A GNN with an ensemble of MLPs can exactly execute any LOCAL-model graph algorithm after learning a polynomial-size set of local template instructions.
-
Efficiently Learning Branching Networks for Multitask Algorithmic Reasoning
AutoBRANE learns tree-structured branching networks for multitask algorithmic reasoning via gradient-based task affinities and convex relaxation.
-
Cross-Model Cross-Language AI Coding Agent Performance: Accuracy and Speed of Parallel CLRS Algorithms
Coding agents write correct parallel CLRS code with little prompting, but meaningful speedups are model-, language-, and algorithm-dependent, with Sonnet strongest and GPT producing none.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.