Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Can LLMs "Reason" in Music? An Evaluation of LLMs' Capability of Music Understanding and Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.21531 v1 pith:4A6CFU4W submitted 2024-07-31 cs.SD cs.CLcs.MMeess.AS

classification cs.SDcs.CLcs.MMeess.AS
keywords musicllmscapabilitygenerationreasoningresearchsymbolicunderstanding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Symbolic Music, akin to language, can be encoded in discrete symbols. Recent research has extended the application of large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-4 and Llama2 to the symbolic music domain including understanding and generation. Yet scant research explores the details of how these LLMs perform on advanced music understanding and conditioned generation, especially from the multi-step reasoning perspective, which is a critical aspect in the conditioned, editable, and interactive human-computer co-creation process. This study conducts a thorough investigation of LLMs' capability and limitations in symbolic music processing. We identify that current LLMs exhibit poor performance in song-level multi-step music reasoning, and typically fail to leverage learned music knowledge when addressing complex musical tasks. An analysis of LLMs' responses highlights distinctly their pros and cons. Our findings suggest achieving advanced musical capability is not intrinsically obtained by LLMs, and future research should focus more on bridging the gap between music knowledge and reasoning, to improve the co-creation experience for musicians.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Audio Large Language Models Can Be Descriptive Speech Quality Evaluators

    cs.SD 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Audio LLMs fine-tuned with token-level distillation against an LLM teacher can predict speech quality scores and generate natural-language descriptions, including A/B comparisons.

Pith tools