REVIEW 5 cited by
Relative Langlands Duality
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We propose a duality in the relative Langlands program. This duality pairs a Hamiltonian space for a group $G$ with a Hamiltonian space under its dual group $\check{G}$, and recovers at a numerical level the relationship between a period on $G$ and an $L$-function attached to $\check{G}$; it is an arithmetic analog of the electric-magnetic duality of boundary conditions in four-dimensional supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
On the cubic Shimura lift to $PGL(3)$: Hecke correspondences
Matching of relative orbital integrals on PGL(3) and metaplectic orbital integrals on the triple cover of SL(3) is established for the full spherical Hecke algebras.
-
Diagonal cycles on Shtukas and the adjoint $L$-function
For split almost simple groups over function fields, self-intersections of diagonal cycles on shtuka moduli, with determinant line-bundle insertions, equal higher derivatives of adjoint L-functions.
-
Co-periods and central symmetric cube L-values
Co-period integrals of GL(2) forms with two cubic exceptional theta series are locally one-dimensional, and an explicit unramified identity matches them to the central symmetric cube L-factor ratio.
-
Functoriality of Coulomb branches
Gluable maps of reductive groups make Coulomb branches compose via Hamiltonian reduction, yielding a proof that T^*(G/U_P) for GL_n and SL_n is a Coulomb branch.
-
Bump-Friedberg type periods beyond the cuspidal spectrum
Bump–Friedberg-type periods extend continuously beyond the cuspidal spectrum under regularity, and on GL_{2n+1} Eisenstein series they equal a sum of L-values indexed by dual-variety fixed points.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.