REVIEW 2 cited by
OneEdit: A Neural-Symbolic Collaboratively Knowledge Editing System
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Knowledge representation has been a central aim of AI since its inception. Symbolic Knowledge Graphs (KGs) and neural Large Language Models (LLMs) can both represent knowledge. KGs provide highly accurate and explicit knowledge representation, but face scalability issue; while LLMs offer expansive coverage of knowledge, but incur significant training costs and struggle with precise and reliable knowledge manipulation. To this end, we introduce OneEdit, a neural-symbolic prototype system for collaborative knowledge editing using natural language, which facilitates easy-to-use knowledge management with KG and LLM. OneEdit consists of three modules: 1) The Interpreter serves for user interaction with natural language; 2) The Controller manages editing requests from various users, leveraging the KG with rollbacks to handle knowledge conflicts and prevent toxic knowledge attacks; 3) The Editor utilizes the knowledge from the Controller to edit KG and LLM. We conduct experiments on two new datasets with KGs which demonstrate that OneEdit can achieve superior performance.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Reinforced Lifelong Editing for Language Models
RLEdit trains a hypernetwork to edit LLM parameters over long knowledge sequences by maximizing a trajectory-level reward, and reports strong accuracy and large speedups versus existing editing methods.
-
Political-LLM: Large Language Models in Political Science
A survey and taxonomy of LLM applications in political science, with a case study suggesting that larger LLMs reproduce ANES 2016 voting patterns more accurately than smaller ones.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.