Pith. sign in

REVIEW 10 cited by

MMSearch: Benchmarking the Potential of Large Models as Multi-modal Search Engines

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.12959 v2 pith:ODBVZKQF submitted 2024-09-19 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CLcs.IR

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CLcs.IR
keywords searchlmmsmultimodalenginesmmsearchmodelscurrentlarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has paved the way for AI search engines, e.g., SearchGPT, showcasing a new paradigm in human-internet interaction. However, most current AI search engines are limited to text-only settings, neglecting the multimodal user queries and the text-image interleaved nature of website information. Recently, Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have made impressive strides. Yet, whether they can function as AI search engines remains under-explored, leaving the potential of LMMs in multimodal search an open question. To this end, we first design a delicate pipeline, MMSearch-Engine, to empower any LMMs with multimodal search capabilities. On top of this, we introduce MMSearch, a comprehensive evaluation benchmark to assess the multimodal search performance of LMMs. The curated dataset contains 300 manually collected instances spanning 14 subfields, which involves no overlap with the current LMMs' training data, ensuring the correct answer can only be obtained within searching. By using MMSearch-Engine, the LMMs are evaluated by performing three individual tasks (requery, rerank, and summarization), and one challenging end-to-end task with a complete searching process. We conduct extensive experiments on closed-source and open-source LMMs. Among all tested models, GPT-4o with MMSearch-Engine achieves the best results, which surpasses the commercial product, Perplexity Pro, in the end-to-end task, demonstrating the effectiveness of our proposed pipeline. We further present error analysis to unveil current LMMs still struggle to fully grasp the multimodal search tasks, and conduct ablation study to indicate the potential of scaling test-time computation for AI search engine. We hope MMSearch may provide unique insights to guide the future development of multimodal AI search engine. Project Page: https://mmsearch.github.io

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 10 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. VideoSearcher: Empowering Video Deep Research with Multi-Tool Agentic Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    A multi-tool video agent trained with dual-branch RL (BiSPO) and a new VideoSearch-QA benchmark substantially beats open-source agentic baselines on video deep research and multimodal search tasks.

  2. UNIBROWSE: A Data-to-Agent Framework for Multimodal BrowseComp

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A unified KG-plus-live-web data pipeline covering all three multimodal BrowseComp information-flow patterns, plus an exploration-degree filter, yields a 35B agent at 54.4 avg accuracy.

  3. MM-BrowseComp: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multimodal Browsing Agents

    cs.CL 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    MM-BrowseComp is a multimodal browsing benchmark on which the best evaluated model, OpenAI o3 with tools, achieves 29.02% accuracy.

  4. Echo-4o: Harnessing the Power of GPT-4o Synthetic Images for Improved Image Generation

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A curated GPT-4o synthetic image dataset improves open-source generation models on instruction-following, surreal scenes, and multi-reference synthesis, plus two new benchmarks to measure those skills.

  5. Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Reasoning towards Multi-Step Multi-Source Search in Large Language Models

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    R-Search trains one LLM to reason, plan a multi-source search graph, and synthesize answers in a single pass, beating several search-augmented baselines.

  6. Enhancing LLMs' Reasoning-Intensive Multimedia Search Capabilities through Fine-Tuning and Reinforcement Learning

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A two-stage fine-tuning and reinforcement-learning method makes LLMs generate token-efficient natural-language search plans, reporting strong accuracy gains on financial and news search benchmarks.

  7. IA-T2I: Internet-Augmented Text-to-Image Generation

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    IA-T2I uses active retrieval, hierarchical image selection, and self-reflection to supply internet reference images to T2I models, improving generation accuracy on uncertain-knowledge prompts.

  8. AutoTool: Dynamic Tool Selection and Integration for Agentic Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-12 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    AutoTool's two-phase SFT/RL plus ranking training lets 8B LLM agents beat larger fixed-tool agents across math, search, code, and vision benchmarks, though unseen-tool gains are asserted, not isolated.

  9. MINT-CoT: Enabling Interleaved Visual Tokens in Mathematical Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MINT-CoT-7B interleaves fine-grained visual tokens into each math reasoning step and reports 73.70 on MathVista-Math, 64.72 on GeoQA, and 69.6 on MMStar-Math.

  10. VRAG-RL: Empower Vision-Perception-Based RAG for Visually Rich Information Understanding via Iterative Reasoning with Reinforcement Learning

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    VRAG-RL uses GRPO reinforcement learning with visual cropping actions and a retrieval-aware reward to improve vision-language RAG agents on document benchmarks.

Pith tools