Pith. sign in

REVIEW 34 cited by

VinePPO: Refining Credit Assignment in RL Training of LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.01679 v2 pith:ZEVSCJFX submitted 2024-10-02 cs.LG cs.CL

VinePPO: Refining Credit Assignment in RL Training of LLMs

classification cs.LG cs.CL
keywords creditassignmenttrainingllmsnetworksstepsvalueaccuracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to complex reasoning tasks that require executing several complex steps before receiving any reward. Properly assigning credit to these steps is essential for enhancing model performance. Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), a common reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm used for LLM finetuning, employs value networks to tackle credit assignment. However, recent approaches achieve strong results without it, raising questions about the efficacy of value networks in practice. In this work, we systematically evaluate the efficacy of value networks and reveal their significant shortcomings in reasoning-heavy LLM tasks, showing that they often produce poor estimate of expected return and barely outperform a random baseline when comparing alternative steps. This motivates our key question: Can improved credit assignment enhance RL training for LLMs? To address this, we propose VinePPO, a straightforward approach that leverages the flexibility of language environments to compute unbiased Monte Carlo-based estimates. Our method consistently outperforms PPO and other baselines across MATH and GSM8K datasets in less wall-clock time (up to 3.0x). Crucially, it achieves higher test accuracy for a given training accuracy, capturing more generalization signal per sample. These results emphasize the importance of accurate credit assignment in RL training of LLM.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 34 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Lightning OPD: Efficient Post-Training for Large Reasoning Models with Offline On-Policy Distillation

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Lightning OPD enforces teacher consistency by precomputing log-probabilities over SFT rollouts, matching standard OPD performance with bounded gradient discrepancy and achieving 4x speedup on math and code reasoning tasks.

  2. Weak-to-Strong Generalization via Direct On-Policy Distillation

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Transferring the log-ratio of a small model's pre-RL and post-RL checkpoints provides a dense implicit reward that improves stronger student models at a fraction of the cost of direct RL.

  3. ECHO: Learning Epistemically Adaptive Language Agents with Turn-Level Credit

    cs.MA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ECHO is a clipped policy-gradient method that uses posterior-sensitive rewards to give turn-level epistemic credit in multi-turn information-seeking tasks, outperforming trajectory-level GRPO on a new Clue Selector Ga...

  4. CRAFT: Counterfactual Credit Assignment from Free Sibling Rollouts for Self-Distilled Agentic Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    CRAFT is a three-pillar credit assignment scheme that uses counterfactual token importance from GRPO sibling rollouts to provide signed per-token distillation signals in self-distilled agentic RL.

  5. ARCA: Adapter-Residual Credit Assignment When Token Signals Degenerate

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ARCA assigns token credit in LoRA-based LLM RL from the norm of adapter-induced hidden state changes, yielding non-degenerate distributions and competitive performance on MATH tasks with Qwen3-1.7B under GRPO.

  6. Knowing When to Ask: Segment-Level Credit Assignment for LLM Tool Use

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    CARL trains a critic for segment-level credit assignment from binary outcomes in LLM tool-use trajectories, yielding 6.7-9.7 point accuracy gains and 53% fewer calls on solvable questions across five benchmarks.

  7. Learning from Language Feedback via Variational Policy Distillation

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    VPD frames language feedback learning as variational EM so the teacher policy refines itself via trust-region updates on outcomes while the student learns dense token distributions on its own rollouts, outperforming f...

  8. Beyond Variance: Prompt-Efficient RLVR via Rare-Event Amplification and Bidirectional Pairing

    cs.LG 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Positive-negative prompt pairing with weighted GRPO improves RLVR sample efficiency, raising AIME 2025 Pass@8 from 16.8 to 22.2 on Qwen2.5-Math-7B while matching large-scale training.

  9. Group-in-Group Policy Optimization for LLM Agent Training

    cs.LG 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    GiGPO adds a hierarchical grouping mechanism to group-based RL so that LLM agents receive both global trajectory and local step-level credit signals, yielding >12% gains on ALFWorld and >9% on WebShop over GRPO while ...

  10. Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Large Language Models with One Training Example

    cs.LG 2025-04 accept novelty 7.0

    One training example via RLVR boosts LLM math reasoning from 17.6% to 35.7% average across six benchmarks.

  11. RLVP: Penalize the Path, Reward the Outcome

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Pairing outcome rewards with verifiable per-action path penalties reduces constraint violations nearly sixfold at equal task success, while a progress potential accelerates learning only where partial progress is reachable.

  12. Weak-to-Strong Generalization via Direct On-Policy Distillation

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Transferring a weak model’s RL-induced log-ratio policy shift on a strong student’s own rollouts raises AIME accuracy more cheaply than imitating the weak teacher or running matched-step RL on the student.

  13. DelTA: Discriminative Token Credit Assignment for Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DelTA estimates token coefficients to amplify discriminative directions in token-gradient vectors, reweighting the RLVR surrogate to produce more contrastive side-wise centroids and yielding 3.26 and 2.62 point gains ...

  14. Resolving Action Bottleneck: Agentic Reinforcement Learning Informed by Token-Level Energy

    cs.LG 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    ActFocus resolves the action bottleneck in agentic RL by reweighting token gradients toward action tokens using observed reward variance and an energy-based uncertainty term, outperforming PPO and GRPO by up to 65 per...

  15. Experience Sharing in Mutual Reinforcement Learning for Heterogeneous Language Models

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Mutual Reinforcement Learning allows heterogeneous LLMs to exchange experience through mechanisms like Peer Rollout Pooling, Cross-Policy GRPO Advantage Sharing, and Success-Gated Transfer, with outcome-level sharing ...

  16. GRPO-VPS: Enhancing Group Relative Policy Optimization with Verifiable Process Supervision for Effective Reasoning

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GRPO-VPS improves GRPO by using segment-wise conditional probabilities of the correct answer to supply process-level feedback, yielding up to 2.6-point accuracy gains and 13.7% shorter reasoning on math tasks.

  17. Lightning OPD: Efficient Post-Training for Large Reasoning Models with Offline On-Policy Distillation

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Lightning OPD is an offline on-policy distillation method that matches standard OPD performance at 4x efficiency by enforcing teacher consistency between SFT and distillation phases.

  18. The Landscape of Agentic Reinforcement Learning for LLMs: A Survey

    cs.AI 2025-09 accept novelty 6.0

    Survey that defines agentic RL for LLMs via POMDPs, introduces a taxonomy of planning/tool-use/memory/reasoning capabilities and domains, and compiles open environments from over 500 papers.

  19. DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale

    cs.LG 2025-03 conditional novelty 6.0

    DAPO introduces decoupled clipping and dynamic sampling for LLM RL, achieving 50 on AIME 2024 with Qwen2.5-32B while fully open-sourcing code, data, and the verl-based training system.

  20. Process Reinforcement through Implicit Rewards

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    PRIME enables online process reward model updates in LLM RL using implicit rewards from rollouts and outcome labels, yielding 15.1% average gains on reasoning benchmarks and surpassing a stronger instruct model with 1...

  21. Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoning

    cs.LG 2024-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Process advantage verifiers trained to predict step-level progress under a distinct prover policy improve LLM reasoning accuracy by over 8% and sample efficiency by 5-6x over outcome reward models.

  22. Modularized Reinforcement Learning on LLMs: From MDP Creation to Exploration and Learning

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Survey mapping RL techniques onto LLM training and highlighting gaps in value-based, off-policy, and bootstrapping methods.

  23. RLVR without Ineffective Samples: Group Prioritized Off-Policy Optimization for LLM Reasoning

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    POPO uses recency-based prioritized group replay and decoupled off-policy optimization to avoid zero-variance ineffective samples in RLVR, accelerating LLM reasoning finetuning with fewer rollouts.

  24. LamPO: A Lambda Style Policy Optimization for Reasoning Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LamPO introduces a pairwise decomposed advantage with confidence-aware weighting to replace scalar group advantages in group-relative policy optimization for reasoning models.

  25. ProcessThinker: Enhancing Multi-modal Large Language Models Reasoning via Rollout-based Process Reward

    cs.CL 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0

    ProcessThinker assigns step-level rewards in GRPO by sampling continuations from each step prefix and using empirical success rates, improving video reasoning benchmarks without training a separate PRM.

  26. Polychromic Objectives for Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Introduces polychromic objectives adapted into PPO via vine sampling and modified advantages, showing higher success rates and better coverage under perturbations on BabyAI, Minigrid, and algorithmic tasks.

  27. Not All Rollouts are Useful: Down-Sampling Rollouts in LLM Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    PODS applies max-variance down-sampling to GRPO rollouts in LLM RLVR, delivering at least 1.7x faster training to peak test accuracy on reasoning benchmarks.

  28. Self-Distilled Policy Gradient

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    SDPG combines group-relative verifier advantages, normalized standard deviation, full-vocabulary on-policy self-distillation, and reference-policy KL regularization to improve stability and performance over RLVR and s...

  29. Learning to Reason at the Frontier of Learnability

    cs.LG 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A curriculum sampling questions with high variance in success rate improves reinforcement learning performance for LLM reasoning tasks.

  30. Rethinking Agentic Reinforcement Learning In Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    The paper reviews conceptual foundations, methodological innovations, effective designs, critical challenges, and future directions for LLM-based Agentic Reinforcement Learning.

  31. Towards Large Reasoning Models: A Survey of Reinforced Reasoning with Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2025-01 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    The paper surveys reinforced reasoning techniques for LLMs, covering automated data construction, learning-to-reason methods, and test-time scaling as steps toward Large Reasoning Models.

  32. Rethinking Agentic Reinforcement Learning In Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    The paper surveys the conceptual foundations, methodological innovations, challenges, and future directions of agentic reinforcement learning frameworks that embed cognitive capabilities like meta-reasoning and self-r...

  33. Rethinking Agentic Reinforcement Learning In Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    This review synthesizes conceptual foundations, methods, challenges, and future directions for agentic reinforcement learning in large language models.

  34. Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

    cs.LG 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    The book introduces the origins, mathematical setup, and optimization stages of RLHF including reward modeling, reinforcement learning, rejection sampling, and direct alignment algorithms.