REVIEW 8 cited by
Benchmarking Agentic Workflow Generation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs), with their exceptional ability to handle a wide range of tasks, have driven significant advancements in tackling reasoning and planning tasks, wherein decomposing complex problems into executable workflows is a crucial step in this process. Existing workflow evaluation frameworks either focus solely on holistic performance or suffer from limitations such as restricted scenario coverage, simplistic workflow structures, and lax evaluation standards. To this end, we introduce WorfBench, a unified workflow generation benchmark with multi-faceted scenarios and intricate graph workflow structures. Additionally, we present WorfEval, a systemic evaluation protocol utilizing subsequence and subgraph matching algorithms to accurately quantify the LLM agent's workflow generation capabilities. Through comprehensive evaluations across different types of LLMs, we discover distinct gaps between the sequence planning capabilities and graph planning capabilities of LLM agents, with even GPT-4 exhibiting a gap of around 15%. We also train two open-source models and evaluate their generalization abilities on held-out tasks. Furthermore, we observe that the generated workflows can enhance downstream tasks, enabling them to achieve superior performance with less time during inference. Code and dataset are available at https://github.com/zjunlp/WorfBench.
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
Coupled Hierarchical Search over Topology and Execution for Agentic Workflow Synthesis
HierFlow couples search over task topologies and executable sub-workflows at test time, with an adaptive gate, and reports state-of-the-art results on QA, math, and code benchmarks without training.
-
WGSR-Bench: Wargame-based Game-theoretic Strategic Reasoning Benchmark for Large Language Models
A new wargame-based benchmark finds large language models score far below human experts on strategic reasoning across situation awareness, opponent modeling, and policy generation.
-
A Practical Approach for Building Production-Grade Conversational Agents with Workflow Graphs
A production e-commerce chatbot using a workflow graph with node-specific prompts and response-masked fine-tuning reports large gains in accuracy and format compliance, beating a GPT-4o-based agent in human preference tests.
-
Agent Identity Evals: Measuring Agentic Identity
Introduces Agent Identity Evals (AIE), five similarity-based metrics for LMA identity stability, with pilot experiments showing identifiability always at zero and no statistical support.
-
A Comprehensive Survey of Deep Research: Systems, Methodologies, and Applications
A survey of 80+ Deep Research systems that proposes a four-layer taxonomy (foundation models, tool use, planning, synthesis) and compares commercial and open-source implementations.
-
Evolutionary Perspectives on the Evaluation of LLM-Based AI Agents: A Comprehensive Survey
A survey that classifies AI agent evaluation benchmarks along environment and capability axes, and proposes five traits that distinguish agents from chatbots.
-
Can Compressed LLMs Truly Act? An Empirical Evaluation of Agentic Capabilities in LLM Compression
ACBench tests compressed LLMs on agentic tasks and finds 4-bit quantization keeps tool use and workflow generation strong while hurting real-world application performance.
-
Large Language Models for Planning: A Comprehensive and Systematic Survey
A structured survey of LLM planning methods, benchmarks, and interpretability work, organized around a three-way taxonomy.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.