Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

See it, Think it, Sorted: Large Multimodal Models are Few-shot Time Series Anomaly Analyzers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.02465 v1 pith:GPKKVQDI submitted 2024-11-04 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
keywords anomalyseriestimedetectiontamaanomaliesdatatsad
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Time series anomaly detection (TSAD) is becoming increasingly vital due to the rapid growth of time series data across various sectors. Anomalies in web service data, for example, can signal critical incidents such as system failures or server malfunctions, necessitating timely detection and response. However, most existing TSAD methodologies rely heavily on manual feature engineering or require extensive labeled training data, while also offering limited interpretability. To address these challenges, we introduce a pioneering framework called the Time Series Anomaly Multimodal Analyzer (TAMA), which leverages the power of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) to enhance both the detection and interpretation of anomalies in time series data. By converting time series into visual formats that LMMs can efficiently process, TAMA leverages few-shot in-context learning capabilities to reduce dependence on extensive labeled datasets. Our methodology is validated through rigorous experimentation on multiple real-world datasets, where TAMA consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods in TSAD tasks. Additionally, TAMA provides rich, natural language-based semantic analysis, offering deeper insights into the nature of detected anomalies. Furthermore, we contribute one of the first open-source datasets that includes anomaly detection labels, anomaly type labels, and contextual description, facilitating broader exploration and advancement within this critical field. Ultimately, TAMA not only excels in anomaly detection but also provides a comprehensive approach for understanding the underlying causes of anomalies, pushing TSAD forward through innovative methodologies and insights.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AnomSeer: Reinforcing Multimodal LLMs to Reason for Time-Series Anomaly Detection

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    New RL approach (TimerPO) with ground-truth-generated expert reasoning traces lets 3B-7B multimodal LLMs outperform GPT-4o on time-series anomaly detection and explanation.

  2. RATFM: Retrieval-augmented Time Series Foundation Model for Anomaly Detection

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RATFM fine-tunes time series foundation models to use retrieved similar examples as context, improving anomaly detection on unseen domains without domain-specific fine-tuning.

  3. From Images to Signals: Are Large Vision Models Useful for Time Series Analysis?

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Large vision models slightly beat strong baselines on imaged time series classification, but their forecasting advantage is narrow, tied to periodic patterns, and shrinks with long histories.

  4. Harnessing Vision Models for Time Series Analysis: A Survey

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A survey organizing existing methods that encode time series as images and apply vision models, with a dual-view taxonomy of imaging and modeling approaches.

  5. A Survey of Reasoning and Agentic Systems in Time Series with Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The authors organize LLM-based time series reasoning into three exclusive topologies (direct, chain, branch) crossed with four objectives, and use them to label 125 papers, benchmarks, and resources.

  6. Signal, Image, or Symbolic: Exploring the Best Input Representation for Electrocardiogram-Language Models Through a Unified Framework

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A unified benchmark across six ECG datasets and five text-generation metrics finds tokenized symbolic ECG inputs outperform raw signal and image inputs for ECG-language models.

Pith tools