Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Topological Twisting of 4d $\mathcal{N}=2$ Supersymmetric Field Theories

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that the topologically twisted partition function of any 4d N=2 theory depends only on the orientation and diffeomorphism type of spacetime, the ’t Hooft fluxes of background gerbe connections, and a generalized spin-c…

desk verdict A serious, useful framework for topological twisting of 4d N=2 theories; the Lagrangian part is solid, and the universal claim for class S theories is explicitly conditional on a postulate the authors themselves flag as unreliable. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14396 v1 pith:Q3Q6VKCT submitted 2024-11-21 hep-th math-phmath.ATmath.DGmath.GTmath.MP

Gregory W. Moore , Vivek Saxena , Ranveer Kumar Singh This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath-phmath.ATmath.DGmath.GTmath.MP MSC 81T6081T1357R56 PACS 11.30.Pb11.15.-q02.40.-k
keywords topologicaltwistingN=2supersymmetrygeneralizedspin-cstructure’tHooftfluxclassStheoriesfour-manifoldinvariantsS-dualitygerbes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks what extra data are needed to define the topologically twisted partition function of an arbitrary four-dimensional N=2 supersymmetric field theory on a smooth four-manifold. Its answer: only the orientation and diffeomorphism type of the manifold, the ’t Hooft fluxes (characteristic classes of background gerbe connections, i.e. one-form symmetry backgrounds), and a newly introduced “generalized spin-c structure.” The claim matters because it turns twisted partition functions into well-defined invariants of smooth four-manifolds equipped with that data, and because it specifies what must be fixed before a twisting of a non-Lagrangian theory is defined. The paper checks the claim for renormalizable Lagrangian theories and for class S theories of A-type, showing in particular that different S-duality orbits of the same UV curve can require different topological data.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the generalized spin-c group $\mathrm{Spin}^d_C(4)=(\mathrm{Spin}(4)\times U(1)^d)/C$ with $p_1(C)=\langle(-1,-1)\rangle$, together with the twisting homomorphism $\varphi_{\mathrm{tw},\mathrm{bck}}:(\mathrm{Spin}(4)\times T_f)/C_{\mathrm{tw},\mathrm{bck}}\to(\mathrm{Spin}(4)\times SU(2)_R\times G_f)/C$ built from the Witten homomorphism $[(u_1,u_2)]\mapsto[(u_1,u_2),u_2]$. Transfer of structure group along this homomorphism forces the R-symmetry background to be the self-dual part of the Levi-Civita connection, making the stress tensor a $Q$-commutator. The finite quotient $C$ encodes the consistency conditions, summarized in equation (4.18), which simultaneously imply $w_2(P^R)=w_2(X)$, the $\mathcal{N}=2^*$ spin-c condition, and the massive-SQCD condition of [AFM22].

What would settle it

Compute the twisted partition function of the $E_6$ trinion theory on a closed four-manifold with $b_2^+>1$ under its $\mathbb{Z}_3$ center symmetry: if the partition function is not invariant although the Schur index (a protected-state count) is invariant, the factorization postulate fails and the three-item list is incomplete for non-Lagrangian theories.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper’s own terms, the central claim is that the topological partition function $Z_{\mathrm{tw}}$ of any 4d $\mathcal{N}=2$ field theory is a function of only three pieces of topological data: the orientation and diffeomorphism type of the closed oriented four-manifold $X$; the characteristic classes $\mu(b)\in H^2(X,C_{\mathrm{grb}})$ of background gerbe connections, i.e. the ’t Hooft fluxes of the one-form symmetry background; and a generalized spin-c structure, defined as a principal $(\mathrm{Spin}(4)\times U(1)^d)/C$ bundle over $X$ whose projection to the first factor is the oriented frame bundle. The paper contends that no other topological choices enter: continuous deformations of background connections do not change correlators because the energy-momentum and flavor currents become $Q$-exact, while the quotient by the finite central subgroup $C$ encodes the cohomological constraints that couple the gauge, flavor, R-symmetry, and gravitational backgrounds. The argument is made for all 4d $\mathcal{N}=2$ theories and is worked out in detail for renormalizable Lagrangian theories and for class $\mathcal{S}$ theories of $A_1$ type.

Load-bearing premise

For the non-Lagrangian class $\mathcal{S}$ part, the argument assumes that if a central symmetry subgroup leaves all protected-state counts of a trinion building block unchanged, then it also leaves the full twisted partition function unchanged; the paper itself cites a known example where such a subgroup acts nontrivially on BPS state spaces even though the protected count does not see it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every topologically twisted 4d $\mathcal{N}=2$ partition function defines an invariant of smooth four-manifolds labelled only by orientation, diffeomorphism type, ’t Hooft fluxes, and generalized spin-c structure, with no further hidden topological choices.
  • For $\mathcal{N}=2^*$ theories the generalized spin-c structure reduces to a UV spin-c structure with $c_1\equiv w_2(X) \bmod 2$, reproducing a condition previously known only as an isolated example.
  • For renormalizable Lagrangian theories the twisted path integral localizes on non-Abelian monopole equations, and the resulting invariants depend on background Chern classes only through the cohomological constraint (4.18).
  • For $A_1$ class $\mathcal{S}$ theories, theories in the same S-duality orbit share the same cohomological conditions, while distinct S-duality orbits of the same UV curve $C_{g,n}$ generally give distinct topological theories.
  • The paper proposes that the topological data are RG invariants, so IR Coulomb-branch and u-plane computations must reproduce the same generalized spin-c and flux data as the UV theory.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the three-item classification holds, the known four-manifold invariants coming from $\mathcal{N}=2$ twists should be specializations of one construction indexed by the generalized spin-c group; checking this would unify their transformation laws under metric and connection deformations.
  • The functorial formulation suggests a bordism-theoretic enumeration of all twistings of a given 4d $\mathcal{N}=2$ theory: inequivalent twistings should correspond to homomorphisms from generalized spin-c groups into the symmetry quotient, a finite computation once the central subgroup $C$ is fixed.
  • A direct test beyond the paper would be to compute u-plane integrals on manifolds with $b_2^+>1$ for theories with multiple flavor $U(1)$s and check that single-valuedness of the measure forces exactly the constraints (4.18).
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a general framework for topological twisting of four-dimensional N=2 field theories using transfer of structure group and a central quotient of Spin(4) x SU(2)_R x G_f (and, for Lagrangian theories, the gauge group). It argues that twisted partition functions depend only on (a) the orientation and diffeomorphism type of the spacetime, (b) characteristic classes of background gerbe connections ('t Hooft fluxes), and (c) a newly introduced generalized spin-c structure. The Lagrangian part of the paper derives cohomological conditions for the existence of the physical bundle, constructs explicit twisting homomorphisms, writes a Q-exact action, and checks topological invariance of the partition function. The class S part applies the same strategy to trinion theories and gluing, using the superconformal index to determine the central subgroups that can act trivially. The paper also analyzes A1 class S theories and shows that different S-duality orbits can require different cohomological conditions.

Significance. If the central claim is established, the paper provides a unifying understanding of topological twisting for 4d N=2 theories, recovering known examples (Donaldson-Witten theory, N=2* spin-c condition, massive SQCD flux conditions) and clarifying the topological data needed in each case. The manuscript contains a careful derivation of the cohomological conditions in Section 4, a concrete Q-exact Lagrangian construction in Section 7, and a precise definition of generalized spin-c structures in Appendix C. The observation that different S-duality orbits of the same A1 class S curve have different cohomological conditions is a concrete, falsifiable prediction. However, the universal claim is not fully established for non-Lagrangian class S theories, and the paper itself flags the main gap in footnote 41.

major comments (3)
  1. [§8.2, Eq. (8.7), footnote 41] The factorization of the trinion functor eZ_T through eG_T/C_T is the load-bearing step for the class S extension. The paper postulates that if a central subgroup acts trivially on the superconformal index, then it acts trivially on the full functor. Footnote 41 explicitly concedes that this postulate has a fundamental flaw and cites Hollands-Neitzke, where a Z3 central subgroup of E6 acts nontrivially on the BPS Hilbert space of the Minahan-Nemenschansky E6 theory even though the index may not detect it. Since C^{max}_T in Eq. (8.30) is determined from the Schur index, the conclusion that eZ_T factors through eG_T/C_T is not established for interacting trinions. This gap directly undermines the universal claim stated in the Abstract and in the Introduction's items 1-3 for non-Lagrangian class S theories, and it must be addressed by either weakening the claim or supplying an independent test of factorization.
  2. [Abstract and Introduction, items 1-3; footnote 6] The claim that the twisted partition function depends 'only' on the three listed topological data is qualified in footnote 6 by the absence of BRST anomalies. The footnote states that for b_2^+ = 1 there is such an anomaly and the partition function depends on the period point J, and for b_2^+ = 0 continuous metric dependence is expected. As written, the Abstract and the numbered list in the Introduction overstate the claim for these manifolds. The main statement should be restated with the b_2^+ > 1 assumption or with an explicit caveat, since the literal reading is false for the exceptional cases.
  3. [§4, footnote 21, and §6, Eq. (6.13)] The sufficiency of the cohomological condition (4.18) for the existence of P^{phys} is proved only for the maximal admissible subgroup C^{phys}_{max} and for G_f = U(1). Footnote 21 gives a counterexample showing that (4.14) is not equivalent to (4.7) when C^{phys} is not maximal. Yet Section 6 constructs the twisted bundle P^{tw} for general admissible C^{phys} using condition (4.18). The paper should either extend the sufficiency proof to non-maximal admissible subgroups or explain why the twisting construction still works in those cases. Without this, the Lagrangian derivation does not cover all admissible choices of C^{phys} that the paper claims to treat.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4, Eq. (4.14)] The symbol '⇐ ⇒' in Eq. (4.14) should be written as the logical equivalence symbol '⇔'.
  2. [Appendix C, Eq. (C.24)] The homotopy group formula should read π_3((Spin^c(4))^d) ≅ (Z ⊕ Z)^d, not (Z ⊕ Z)⊗d; the tensor product notation gives the wrong abelian group and should be corrected.
  3. [§9.2, text after Eq. (9.23)] The notation for the mapping class group changes from MCG(C_{g,n}) to MCG(Σ_{g,n}) in the sentence following Eq. (9.23); the notation should be unified.
  4. [§7, Eqs. (7.14)-(7.18)] The covariant derivatives in Eqs. (7.14)-(7.18) mix dynamical gauge fields, background U(1) fields, and gravitational spin connections with different sign conventions; a summary table or a more explicit statement of the sign of the U(1) charge q_u/n_u would improve readability.
  5. [§8.3, Remark 8.1] The open question about how the absolute-theory data composes under Gaiotto gluing is relevant to the conclusion in §8.5; a forward reference from §8.5 to this remark would make the conditional nature of the gluing step clearer.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central derivation is self-contained; the class-S extension rests on an explicitly acknowledged index-invariance postulate, which is a limitation rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that topologically twisted partition functions of 4d N=2 theories depend only on (a) orientation and diffeomorphism type, (b) gerbe characteristic classes ('t Hooft fluxes), and (c) a generalized spin-c structure. The derivation chain is not circular. Section 4 derives the cohomological conditions (4.18) from the existence of the G_phys-bundle P_phys via Cech cocycles, and the generalized spin-c structure is defined independently in Appendix C as a principal Spin_C(4) bundle satisfying (3.11). Section 7 establishes Q-exactness of the twisted action, S_twisted = {Q,V} + S_top (eq. 7.20), giving formal local constancy under continuous deformation of background connections; no fitted parameters are introduced and no prediction is a renamed input. Lagrangian checks in Sections 6 and Appendix F rederive known conditions, e.g., the N=2* spin-c condition (4.37), rather than relying on prior work as the load-bearing step. Minor self-citations appear, such as [MM21] for the N=2* condition, but the condition is rederived in the paper's own framework, so the citation is corroborative, not load-bearing. The only significant weakness is in the class-S extension: Section 8.2 postulates that if C_T acts trivially on the Schur index then it acts trivially on the full functor eZ_T (eq. 8.7 and footnote 41). The paper itself flags this postulate as flawed, citing Hollands-Neitzke, where the Z_3 center of E_6 acts nontrivially on BPS Hilbert spaces even though the index may not detect it. This is a genuine limitation of the universality claim, but it is not circular: the conclusion does not reduce by construction to the index input; rather, the index is used as a proxy for a stronger invariance property that is not proven. Thus the universal claim for non-Lagrangian class-S theories is not fully established, but that is a rigor/correctness concern, not a circularity concern. Accordingly, the circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central argument depends on the functorial formulation of QFT, the no-BRST-anomaly assumption, and standard Q-exactness arguments. For class S theories it additionally relies on the Gaiotto gluing conjecture and on a postulate connecting the superconformal index to full factorization, which the paper itself flags as fragile in footnote 41. No numerical free parameters are fitted to data.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The functorial (Segal-Atiyah) formulation of QFT: a theory is a monoidal functor Z: Bord_F <=4 -> VECT.
    Section 2, equation (2.1). The central argument that the twisted partition function depends only on topological data is framed entirely within this axiomatic setting.
  • standard math The Q-exactness argument: in a twisted theory, T_mu_nu = {Q, Lambda_mu_nu} and the derivative of Z with respect to the metric is Q-exact and hence vanishes in the absence of BRST anomaly.
    Section 2, equation (2.19). This is a standard argument from Witten 1988.
  • domain assumption The no-BRST-anomaly condition (or b+2 > 1) is assumed for the only-depends claim; the paper states this is violated for b+2 = 1 and expects issues for b+2 = 0.
    Section 2, footnote 6: 'We are assuming there is no BRST anomaly... For manifolds with b+2 = 1, there is such an anomaly.'
  • ad hoc to paper The postulate that trivial action of C_T on the superconformal index implies trivial action on the full partition function and hence factorization of the functor.
    Section 8.2: 'we will simply postulate that if C_T acts trivially on the superconformal index it acts trivially on eZ and therefore eZ factorizes.' The paper flags a known exception in footnote 41.
  • domain assumption The Gaiotto gluing conjecture, which expresses class S theories as gauged products of trinion theories.
    Section 8.3, equation (8.38). Used to derive the cohomological conditions for general class S theories.
  • domain assumption The assumption that trinion theories can be made absolute with extra data L.
    Section 8.2: 'It is thought that the trinion theory can be defined as an absolute 4d theory once some extra data is specified [Tac13a].'
invented entities (1)
  • Generalized spin-c structure (Spin_C^d(4) = (Spin(4) x U(1)^d)/C)
    purpose: To encode the topological data, beyond diffeomorphism type and 't Hooft fluxes, on which twisted partition functions depend.
    Defined in Appendix C. It is a new mathematical object; the paper gives no external falsifiable handle such as a predicted measurable consequence independent of the framework.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Topological Twisting of 4d $\mathcal{N}=2$ Supersymmetric Field Theories." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Q3Q6VKCT

@misc{pith2026241114396,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Topological Twisting of 4d $\mathcalN=2$ Supersymmetric Field Theories},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Q3Q6VKCT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14396}
}
abstract

We discuss what topological data must be provided to define topologically twisted partition functions of four-dimensional $\mathcal{N}=2$ supersymmetric field theories. The original example of Donaldson-Witten theory depends only on the diffeomorphism type of the spacetime and 't Hooft fluxes (characteristic classes of background gerbe connections, a.k.a. "one-form symmetry connections.") The example of $\mathcal{N}=2^*$ theories shows that, in general, the twisted partition functions depend on further topological data. We describe topological twisting for general four-dimensional $\mathcal{N}=2$ theories and argue that the topological partition functions depend on (a): the diffeomorphism type of the spacetime, (b): the characteristic classes of background gerbe connections and (c): a "generalized spin-c structure," a concept we introduce and define. The main ideas are illustrated with both Lagrangian theories and class $\mathcal{S}$ theories. In the case of class $\mathcal{S}$ theories of $A_1$ type, we note that the different $S$-duality orbits of a theory associated with a fixed UV curve $C_{g,n}$ can have different topological data.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Generalized Families of QFTs

    hep-th 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Generalized family anomalies for broken higher-group and non-invertible symmetries constrain RG flows and IR phases of QFT families, with explicit application to deformed 4d QCD.

  2. SymTFTs and Non-Invertible Symmetries of 6d (2,0) SCFTs of Type $D$ from M-theory

    hep-th 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The 7d SymTFT for 6d (2,0) D_N SCFTs is derived from M-theory on AdS7 × RP4, including the outer-automorphism Z2 sector, and is used to derive non-invertible symmetries and anomaly polynomials.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

124 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Assel, D

    B. Assel, D. Cassani, L. Di Pietro, Z. Komargodski, J. Lorenzen, and D. Martelli, The Casimir Energy in Curved Space and its Supersymmetric Counterpart , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2015)043 JHEP 07 (2015) 043 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.05537 arXiv:1503.05537 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    Assel, D

    B. Assel, D. Cassani, and D. Martelli, Localization on Hopf surfaces , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2014)123 JHEP 08 (2014) 123 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.5144 arXiv:1405.5144 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2014

  3. [3]

    Albertini, M

    F. Albertini, M. Del Zotto, I. Garc \'i a Etxebarria, and S. S. Hosseini, Higher Form Symmetries and M-theory , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2020)203 JHEP 12 (2020) 203 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.12831 arXiv:2005.12831 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  4. [4]

    Aspman, E

    J. Aspman, E. Furrer, and J. Manschot, Topological twists of massive SQCD, Part I , http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.08943 arXiv:2206.08943 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  5. [5]

    S. J. Avis and C. J. Isham, GENERALIZED SPIN STRUCTURES ON FOUR-DIMENSIONAL SPACE-TIMES , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01197630 Commun. Math. Phys. 72 (1980) 103

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01197630 1980

  6. [6]

    Albanese and A

    M. Albanese and A. Milivojevic, Spin ^h and further generalisations of spin , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomphys.2021.104174 J. Geom. Phys. 164 (2021) 104174 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.04934 arXiv:2008.04934 [math.AT]

    arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Atiyah, Topological quantum field theories , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02698547 Inst

    M. Atiyah, Topological quantum field theories , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02698547 Inst. Hautes Etudes Sci. Publ. Math. 68 (1989) 175--186

    doi:10.1007/bf02698547 1989

  8. [8]

    Bashmakov, M

    V. Bashmakov, M. Del Zotto, and A. Hasan, On the 6d origin of non-invertible symmetries in 4d , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2023)161 JHEP 09 (2023) 161 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.07073 arXiv:2206.07073 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

Show all 124 references
  1. [9]

    Bashmakov, M

    V. Bashmakov, M. Del Zotto, A. Hasan, and J. Kaidi, Non-invertible symmetries of class S theories , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2023)225 JHEP 05 (2023) 225 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.05138 arXiv:2211.05138 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  2. [10]

    u bner, and S. Sch \

    L. Bhardwaj, S. Giacomelli, M. H \"u bner, and S. Sch \"a fer-Nameki, Relative defects in relative theories: Trapped higher-form symmetries and irregular punctures in class S , http://dx.doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.13.4.101 SciPost Phys. 13 (2022) 101 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2...

    2022 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Bhardwaj, Global form of flavor symmetry groups in 4d N=2 theories of class S , http://dx.doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.12.6.183 SciPost Phys

    L. Bhardwaj, Global form of flavor symmetry groups in 4d N=2 theories of class S , http://dx.doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.12.6.183 SciPost Phys. 12 (2022) 183 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.08730 arXiv:2105.08730 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Bhardwaj, M

    L. Bhardwaj, M. Hubner, and S. Sch \"a fer-Nameki, 1-form Symmetries of 4d N=2 Class S Theories , http://dx.doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.11.5.096 SciPost Phys. 11 (2021) 096 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.01693 arXiv:2102.01693 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  5. [13]

    T. D. Brennan and K. Intriligator, Anomalies of 4d Spin _ G theories , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2024)157 JHEP 07 (2024) 157 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.04756 arXiv:2312.04756 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    C. Beem, M. Lemos, P. Liendo, W. Peelaers, L. Rastelli, and B. C. van Rees, Infinite Chiral Symmetry in Four Dimensions , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-014-2272-x Commun. Math. Phys. 336 (2015) 1359--1433 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.5344 arXiv:1312.5344 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  7. [15]

    C. Beem, W. Peelaers, L. Rastelli, and B. C. van Rees, Chiral algebras of class S , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2015)020 JHEP 05 (2015) 020 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1408.6522 arXiv:1408.6522 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Chacaltana and J

    O. Chacaltana and J. Distler, Tinkertoys for Gaiotto Duality , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2010)099 JHEP 11 (2010) 099 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.5203 arXiv:1008.5203 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  9. [17]

    C\'ordova and T

    C. C\'ordova and T. T. Dumitrescu, Candidate phases for SU(2) adjoint QCD _4 with two flavors from N =2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory , http://dx.doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.16.5.139 SciPost Phys. 16 (2024) 139 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09592 arXiv:1806.09592 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Closset, T

    C. Closset, T. T. Dumitrescu, G. Festuccia, and Z. Komargodski, The Geometry of Supersymmetric Partition Functions , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2014)124 JHEP 01 (2014) 124 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1309.5876 arXiv:1309.5876 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  11. [19]

    , From Rigid Supersymmetry to Twisted Holomorphic Theories , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.085006 Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 085006 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.2598 arXiv:1407.2598 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  12. [20]

    C \'o rdova, T

    C. C \'o rdova, T. T. Dumitrescu, and K. Intriligator, Deformations of Superconformal Theories , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2016)135 JHEP 11 (2016) 135 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.01217 arXiv:1602.01217 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  13. [21]

    , Multiplets of Superconformal Symmetry in Diverse Dimensions , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2019)163 JHEP 03 (2019) 163 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1612.00809 arXiv:1612.00809 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  14. [22]

    , Exploring 2-Group Global Symmetries , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2019)184 JHEP 02 (2019) 184 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.04790 arXiv:1802.04790 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Chacaltana, J

    O. Chacaltana, J. Distler, and Y. Tachikawa, Nilpotent orbits and codimension-two defects of 6d N=(2,0) theories , http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X1340006X Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28 (2013) 1340006 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.2930 arXiv:1203.2930 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  16. [24]

    S. S. Chern, The geometry of G -structures , Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 72 (1966) 167 -- 219

    1966

  17. [25]

    Cassani, C

    D. Cassani, C. Klare, D. Martelli, A. Tomasiello, and A. Zaffaroni, Supersymmetry in Lorentzian Curved Spaces and Holography , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-014-1983-3 Commun. Math. Phys. 327 (2014) 577--602 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.2181 arXiv:1207.2181 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Cushing, G

    J. Cushing, G. W. Moore, M. Ro c ek, and V. Saxena, Superconformal Gravity And The Topology Of Diffeomorphism Groups , http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.08394 arXiv:2311.08394 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    C \'o rdova and S.-H

    C. C \'o rdova and S.-H. Shao, Schur Indices, BPS Particles, and Argyres-Douglas Theories , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2016)040 JHEP 01 (2016) 040 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.00265 arXiv:1506.00265 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Deligne and D

    P. Deligne and D. S. Freed, Supersolutions , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9901094 arXiv:hep-th/9901094

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    Drukker, D

    N. Drukker, D. R. Morrison, and T. Okuda, Loop operators and S-duality from curves on Riemann surfaces , http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2009/09/031 JHEP 09 (2009) 031 , http://arxiv.org/abs/0907.2593 arXiv:0907.2593 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  22. [30]

    F. A. Dolan and H. Osborn, On short and semi-short representations for four-dimensional superconformal symmetry , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4916(03)00074-5 Annals Phys. 307 (2003) 41--89 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0209056 arXiv:hep-th/0209056

    2003 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Dabholkar, P

    A. Dabholkar, P. Putrov, and E. Witten, Duality and Mock Modularity , http://dx.doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.9.5.072 SciPost Phys. 9 (2020) 072 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.14387 arXiv:2004.14387 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Dumitrescu, Some Tools for Exploring Supersymmetric RG Flows , 2016

    T. Dumitrescu, Some Tools for Exploring Supersymmetric RG Flows , 2016. https://www.ias.edu/sites/default/files/video/dumitrescu_nf.pdf. Presented at NatiFest, Institute for Advanced Study

    2016

  25. [33]

    de Wit, P

    B. de Wit, P. G. Lauwers, and A. Van Proeyen, Lagrangians of N=2 Supergravity - Matter Systems , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(85)90154-3 Nucl. Phys. B 255 (1985) 569--608

    1985 doi

  26. [34]

    Del Zotto and I

    M. Del Zotto and I. Garc \'i a Etxebarria, Global structures from the infrared , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2023)058 JHEP 11 (2023) 058 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.06495 arXiv:2204.06495 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Eberhardt, Superconformal symmetry and representations , http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/abd7b3 J

    L. Eberhardt, Superconformal symmetry and representations , http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/abd7b3 J. Phys. A 54 (2021) 063002 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.13280 arXiv:2006.13280 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Elliott, O

    C. Elliott, O. Gwilliam, and M. Lotito, Twists of superconformal algebras , http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.19753 arXiv:2403.19753 [math-ph]

  29. [37]

    Elliott and P

    C. Elliott and P. Safronov, Topological twists of supersymmetric algebras of observables , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-019-03393-9 Commun. Math. Phys. 371 (2019) 727--786 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1805.10806 arXiv:1805.10806 [math-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Elliott, P

    C. Elliott, P. Safronov, and B. R. Williams, A taxonomy of twists of supersymmetric Yang Mills theory , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00029-022-00786-y Selecta Math. 28 (2022) 73 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.10517 arXiv:2002.10517 [math-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [39]

    D. S. Freed and M. J. Hopkins, Chern-Weil forms and abstract homotopy theory , http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.5959 arXiv:1301.5959 [math.DG]

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    D. S. Freed and G. W. Moore, Setting the quantum integrand of M-theory , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-005-1482-7 Commun. Math. Phys. 263 (2006) 89--132 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0409135 arXiv:hep-th/0409135

    2006 arXiv

  33. [41]

    D. S. Freed, G. W. Moore, and C. Teleman, Topological symmetry in quantum field theory , http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.07471 arXiv:2209.07471 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    D. S. Freed, Special K \"a hler manifolds , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002200050604 Commun. Math. Phys. 203 (1999) 31--52 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9712042 arXiv:hep-th/9712042

    1999 arXiv

  35. [43]

    , The cobordism hypothesis, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 50 (2013) 57--92 https://doi.org/10.1090/S0273-0979-2012-01393-9

    2013 doi

  36. [44]

    133, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2019

    , http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/cbms/133 Lectures on field theory and topology , CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, vol. 133, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1090/cbms/133. Published for the Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences

    2019 doi

  37. [45]

    , Introduction to topological symmetry in QFT , Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 107 (2024) 93--106, http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.00195 arXiv:2212.00195 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    , Topological Twisting And Symmetry Types , Unpublished, 2023

    2023

  39. [47]

    Festuccia and N

    G. Festuccia and N. Seiberg, Rigid Supersymmetric Theories in Curved Superspace , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2011)114 JHEP 06 (2011) 114 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.0689 arXiv:1105.0689 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  40. [48]

    D. S. Freed and C. Teleman, Relative quantum field theory , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-013-1880-1 Commun. Math. Phys. 326 (2014) 459--476 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1212.1692 arXiv:1212.1692 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  41. [49]

    D. Z. Freedman and A. Van Proeyen, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139026833 Supergravity , Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 5 2012

    2012 doi

  42. [50]

    Gadde, Lectures on the Superconformal Index , http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ac42ac J

    A. Gadde, Lectures on the Superconformal Index , http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ac42ac J. Phys. A 55 (2022) 063001 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.13630 arXiv:2006.13630 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Gaiotto, N=2 dualities , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2012)034 JHEP 08 (2012) 034 , http://arxiv.org/abs/0904.2715 arXiv:0904.2715 [hep-th]

    D. Gaiotto, N=2 dualities , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2012)034 JHEP 08 (2012) 034 , http://arxiv.org/abs/0904.2715 arXiv:0904.2715 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Garc \'i a Etxebarria, B

    I. Garc \'i a Etxebarria, B. Heidenreich, M. Lotito, and A. K. Sorout, Deconfining N = 2 SCFTs or the art of brane bending , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2022)140 JHEP 03 (2022) 140 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.08022 arXiv:2111.08022 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  45. [53]

    S. J. Gates, M. T. Grisaru, M. Ro c ek, and W. Siegel, Superspace Or One Thousand and One Lessons in Supersymmetry , Frontiers in Physics, vol. 58, 1983. http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0108200 arXiv:hep-th/0108200

    1983 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Gaiotto, G

    D. Gaiotto, G. W. Moore, and A. Neitzke, Wall-crossing, Hitchin systems, and the WKB approximation , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2012.09.027 Adv. Math. 234 (2013) 239--403 , http://arxiv.org/abs/0907.3987 arXiv:0907.3987 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  47. [55]

    , Framed BPS States , http://dx.doi.org/10.4310/ATMP.2013.v17.n2.a1 Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 17 (2013) 241--397 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.0146 arXiv:1006.0146 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Gadde, E

    A. Gadde, E. Pomoni, and L. Rastelli, The Veneziano Limit of N = 2 Superconformal QCD: Towards the String Dual of N = 2 SU(N _c ) SYM with N_f=2 N_c , http://arxiv.org/abs/0912.4918 arXiv:0912.4918 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  49. [57]

    Gadde, E

    A. Gadde, E. Pomoni, L. Rastelli, and S. S. Razamat, S-duality and 2d Topological QFT , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2010)032 JHEP 03 (2010) 032 , http://arxiv.org/abs/0910.2225 arXiv:0910.2225 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  50. [58]

    E. R. G a rding, Defect groups of class S theories from the Coulomb branch , http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.16224 arXiv:2311.16224 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  51. [59]

    Gaiotto, L

    D. Gaiotto, L. Rastelli, and S. S. Razamat, Bootstrapping the superconformal index with surface defects , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2013)022 JHEP 01 (2013) 022 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3577 arXiv:1207.3577 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Gadde, L

    A. Gadde, L. Rastelli, S. S. Razamat, and W. Yan, The 4d Superconformal Index from q-deformed 2d Yang-Mills , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.241602 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 241602 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.3850 arXiv:1104.3850 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  53. [61]

    , Gauge Theories and Macdonald Polynomials , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-012-1607-8 Commun. Math. Phys. 319 (2013) 147--193 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.3740 arXiv:1110.3740 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  54. [62]

    R. E. Gompf and A. I. Stipsicz, 4-Manifolds and Kirby Calculus , Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 20, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999. https://bookstore.ams.org/gsm-20

    1999

  55. [63]

    Gaiotto and H

    D. Gaiotto and H. Verlinde, SYK-Schur duality: Double scaled SYK correlators from N=2 supersymmetric gauge theory , http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.11551 arXiv:2409.11551 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  56. [64]

    Harary, Graph Theory , Addison-Wesley series in mathematics, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1969

    F. Harary, Graph Theory , Addison-Wesley series in mathematics, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1969. https://books.google.com/books?id=QNxgQZQH868C

    1969

  57. [65]

    Hatcher, Pants decompositions of surfaces

    A. Hatcher, Pants decompositions of surfaces. https://pi.math.cornell.edu/ hatcher/Papers/pantsdecomp.pdf

  58. [66]

    Hama and K

    N. Hama and K. Hosomichi, Seiberg-Witten Theories on Ellipsoids , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2012)033 JHEP 09 (2012) 033 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.6359 arXiv:1206.6359 [hep-th] . [Addendum: JHEP 10, 051 (2012)]

    2012 arXiv

  59. [67]

    N. J. Hitchin, Lectures on special Lagrangian submanifolds , AMS/IP Stud. Adv. Math. 23 (2001) 151--182, http://arxiv.org/abs/math/9907034 arXiv:math/9907034

    2001 arXiv

  60. [68]

    J. J. Heckman, C. Lawrie, L. Lin, H. Y. Zhang, and G. Zoccarato, 6D SCFTs, center-flavor symmetries, and Stiefel-Whitney compactifications , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.066003 Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 066003 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.03411 arXiv:2205.03411 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Hatcher, P

    A. Hatcher, P. Lochak, and L. Schneps, On the Teichmüller Tower of Mapping Class Groups , Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 521 (2000) 1--24

    2000

  62. [70]

    Hollands and A

    L. Hollands and A. Neitzke, BPS states in the Minahan-Nemeschansky E_6 theory , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-016-2798-1 Commun. Math. Phys. 353 (2017) 317--351 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.01743 arXiv:1607.01743 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  63. [71]

    S. Hyun, J. Park, and J.-S. Park, Spin-c Topological QCD , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(95)00404-G Nucl. Phys. B 453 (1995) 199--224 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9503201 arXiv:hep-th/9503201

    1995 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Hatcher and W

    A. Hatcher and W. Thurston, A presentation for the mapping class group of a closed orientable surface, Topology 19 (1980) 221--237

    1980

  65. [73]

    Kinney, J

    J. Kinney, J. M. Maldacena, S. Minwalla, and S. Raju, An Index for 4 dimensional super conformal theories , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-007-0258-7 Commun. Math. Phys. 275 (2007) 209--254 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0510251 arXiv:hep-th/0510251

    2007 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Karlhede and M

    A. Karlhede and M. Ro c ek, Topological Quantum Field Theory and N=2 Conformal Supergravity , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(88)91234-8 Phys. Lett. B 212 (1988) 51--55

    1988 doi

  67. [75]

    Kontsevich and G

    M. Kontsevich and G. Segal, Wick Rotation and the Positivity of Energy in Quantum Field Theory , http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/qmath/haab027 Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. 72 (2021) 673--699 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.10161 arXiv:2105.10161 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Klare, A

    C. Klare, A. Tomasiello, and A. Zaffaroni, Supersymmetry on Curved Spaces and Holography , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2012)061 JHEP 08 (2012) 061 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.1062 arXiv:1205.1062 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Kapustin and E

    A. Kapustin and E. Witten, Electric-Magnetic Duality And The Geometric Langlands Program , http://dx.doi.org/10.4310/CNTP.2007.v1.n1.a1 Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 1 (2007) 1--236 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0604151 arXiv:hep-th/0604151

    2007 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Klare and A

    C. Klare and A. Zaffaroni, Extended Supersymmetry on Curved Spaces , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2013)218 JHEP 10 (2013) 218 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1308.1102 arXiv:1308.1102 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Lichnerowicz, Spineurs harmoniques, C

    A. Lichnerowicz, Spineurs harmoniques, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 257 (1963) 7--9

    1963

  72. [80]

    Lorenzen and D

    J. Lorenzen and D. Martelli, Comments on the Casimir energy in supersymmetric field theories , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2015)001 JHEP 07 (2015) 001 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.7463 arXiv:1412.7463 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  73. [81]

    J. M. F. Labastida and M. Mari\ n o, NonAbelian monopoles on four manifolds , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(95)00300-H Nucl. Phys. B 448 (1995) 373--398 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9504010 arXiv:hep-th/9504010

    1995 arXiv

  74. [82]

    , Twisted baryon number in N=2 supersymmetric QCD , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(97)00376-6 Phys. Lett. B 400 (1997) 323--330 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9702054 arXiv:hep-th/9702054

    1997 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Labastida and M

    J. Labastida and M. Mari\ n o, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3177-7 Topological quantum field theory and four manifolds , Springer, Dordrecht, 2005

    2005 doi

  76. [84]

    Losev, N

    A. Losev, N. Nekrasov, and S. L. Shatashvili, Issues in topological gauge theory , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(98)00628-2 Nucl. Phys. B 534 (1998) 549--611 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9711108 arXiv:hep-th/9711108

    1998 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Lemos and W

    M. Lemos and W. Peelaers, Chiral Algebras for Trinion Theories , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2015)113 JHEP 02 (2015) 113 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.3252 arXiv:1411.3252 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Lindstr \"o m and M

    U. Lindstr \"o m and M. Ro c ek, N=2 super Yang-Mills Theory in Projective Superspace , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02097052 Commun. Math. Phys. 128 (1990) 191

    1990 doi

  79. [87]

    , Properties of hyperk \"a hler manifolds and their twistor spaces , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-009-0923-0 Commun. Math. Phys. 293 (2010) 257--278 , http://arxiv.org/abs/0807.1366 arXiv:0807.1366 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Marcus, The Other topological twisting of N=4 Yang-Mills , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(95)00389-A Nucl

    N. Marcus, The Other topological twisting of N=4 Yang-Mills , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(95)00389-A Nucl. Phys. B 452 (1995) 331--345 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9506002 arXiv:hep-th/9506002

    1995 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Margalit, Automorphisms of the pants complex , Duke Mathematical Journal 121 (2004) 457 -- 479 https://doi.org/10.1215/S0012-7094-04-12133-5

    D. Margalit, Automorphisms of the pants complex , Duke Mathematical Journal 121 (2004) 457 -- 479 https://doi.org/10.1215/S0012-7094-04-12133-5

    2004 doi

  82. [90]

    Minwalla, Restrictions imposed by superconformal invariance on quantum field theories , http://dx.doi.org/10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n4.a4 Adv

    S. Minwalla, Restrictions imposed by superconformal invariance on quantum field theories , http://dx.doi.org/10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n4.a4 Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 783--851 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9712074 arXiv:hep-th/9712074

    1998 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Mari \ n o and G

    M. Mari \ n o and G. W. Moore, The Donaldson-Witten function for gauge groups of rank larger than one , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002200050494 Commun. Math. Phys. 199 (1998) 25--69 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9802185 arXiv:hep-th/9802185

    1998 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Manschot and G

    J. Manschot and G. W. Moore, Topological correlators of SU(2) , N =2^* SYM on four-manifolds , http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.06492 arXiv:2104.06492 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  85. [93]

    Manschot, G

    J. Manschot, G. W. Moore, and X. Zhang, Effective gravitational couplings of four-dimensional N = 2 supersymmetric gauge theories , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2020)150 JHEP 06 (2020) 150 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1912.04091 arXiv:1912.04091 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  86. [94]

    G. W. Moore and V. Saxena, TASI Lectures on Differential Cohomology and Topological Field Theories (to appear)

  87. [95]

    G. W. Moore and E. Witten, Integration over the u plane in Donaldson theory , http://dx.doi.org/10.4310/ATMP.1997.v1.n2.a7 Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 1 (1997) 298--387 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9709193 arXiv:hep-th/9709193

    1997 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Pestun et al., Localization techniques in quantum field theories , http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/aa63c1 J

    V. Pestun et al., Localization techniques in quantum field theories , http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/aa63c1 J. Phys. A 50 (2017) 440301 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.02952 arXiv:1608.02952 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Pestun, Localization for N=2 supersymmetric gauge theories in four dimensions

    V. Pestun, Localization for N=2 supersymmetric gauge theories in four dimensions. , pp. 159--194, 2016. http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.7134 arXiv:1412.7134 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Pan and W

    Y. Pan and W. Peelaers, Schur correlation functions on S^3 S^1 , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2019)013 JHEP 07 (2019) 013 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1903.03623 arXiv:1903.03623 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  91. [99]

    , Exact Schur index in closed form , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.045017 Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 045017 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.09705 arXiv:2112.09705 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Pidstrigach and A

    V. Pidstrigach and A. Tyurin, Localisation of the Donaldson's invariants along Seiberg-Witten classes , arXiv preprint dg-ga/9507004 (1995)

    1995 arXiv

  93. [101]

    S. S. Razamat, On a modular property of N=2 superconformal theories in four dimensions , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2012)191 JHEP 10 (2012) 191 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.5056 arXiv:1208.5056 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  94. [102]

    , On the N = 2 superconformal index and eigenfunctions of the elliptic RS model , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11005-014-0682-5 Lett. Math. Phys. 104 (2014) 673--690 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1309.0278 arXiv:1309.0278 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Romelsberger, Counting chiral primaries in N = 1, d=4 superconformal field theories , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.03.037 Nucl

    C. Romelsberger, Counting chiral primaries in N = 1, d=4 superconformal field theories , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.03.037 Nucl. Phys. B 747 (2006) 329--353 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0510060 arXiv:hep-th/0510060

    2006 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Rastelli and S

    L. Rastelli and S. S. Razamat, The superconformal index of theories of class S. , pp. 261--305, 2016. http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.7131 arXiv:1412.7131 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  97. [105]

    , The supersymmetric index in four dimensions , http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/aa76a6 J. Phys. A 50 (2017) 443013 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.02965 arXiv:1608.02965 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Schwinger, Quantum Electrodynamics

    J. Schwinger, Quantum Electrodynamics. I. A Covariant Formulation , Phys. Rev. 74 (1948) 1439--1461 https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.74.1439

    1948 doi

  99. [107]

    Scorpan, The Wild World of 4-Manifolds , Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol

    A. Scorpan, The Wild World of 4-Manifolds , Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 84, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2005. https://bookstore.ams.org/fourman

    2005

  100. [108]

    Segal, TWO-DIMENSIONAL CONFORMAL FIELD THEORIES AND MODULAR FUNCTIONS , IX International Conference on Mathematical Physics (IAMP) , 1988

    G. Segal, TWO-DIMENSIONAL CONFORMAL FIELD THEORIES AND MODULAR FUNCTIONS , IX International Conference on Mathematical Physics (IAMP) , 1988

    1988

  101. [109]

    G. B. Segal, The definition of conformal field theory, pp. 165--171, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7809-7_9

    1988 doi

  102. [110]

    Segal, The definition of conformal field theory , Symposium on Topology, Geometry and Quantum Field Theory (Segalfest) , 6 2002, pp

    G. Segal, The definition of conformal field theory , Symposium on Topology, Geometry and Quantum Field Theory (Segalfest) , 6 2002, pp. 421--575

    2002

  103. [111]

    Y. Tachikawa, On the 6d origin of discrete additional data of 4d gauge theories , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2014)020 JHEP 05 (2014) 020 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1309.0697 arXiv:1309.0697 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  104. [112]

    http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.2684 arXiv:1312.2684 [hep-th]

    , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08822-8 N=2 supersymmetric dynamics for pedestrians , 12 2013. http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.2684 arXiv:1312.2684 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  105. [113]

    , A review of the T_N theory and its cousins , http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptv098 PTEP 2015 (2015) 11B102 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.01481 arXiv:1504.01481 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Tomonaga, On a relativistically invariant formulation of the quantum theory of wave fields , http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/PTP.1.27 Prog

    S. Tomonaga, On a relativistically invariant formulation of the quantum theory of wave fields , http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/PTP.1.27 Prog. Theor. Phys. 1 (1946) 27--42

    1946 doi

  107. [115]

    Teichner and E

    P. Teichner and E. Vogt, All 4-manifolds have spin c structures , Preprint, available at https://math.berkeley.edu/ teichner/Papers/spin.pdf, 1994

    1994

  108. [116]

    Vafa and E

    C. Vafa and E. Witten, A Strong coupling test of S duality , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(94)90097-3 Nucl. Phys. B 431 (1994) 3--77 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9408074 arXiv:hep-th/9408074

    1994 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Witten, Constraints on Supersymmetry Breaking , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(82)90071-2 Nucl

    E. Witten, Constraints on Supersymmetry Breaking , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(82)90071-2 Nucl. Phys. B 202 (1982) 253

    1982 doi

  110. [118]

    , Topological Quantum Field Theory , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01223371 Commun. Math. Phys. 117 (1988) 353

    1988 doi

  111. [119]

    , Monopoles and four manifolds , http://dx.doi.org/10.4310/MRL.1994.v1.n6.a13 Math. Res. Lett. 1 (1994) 769--796 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9411102 arXiv:hep-th/9411102

    1994 arXiv

  112. [120]

    , Solutions of four-dimensional field theories via M theory , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00416-1 Nucl. Phys. B 500 (1997) 3--42 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9703166 arXiv:hep-th/9703166

    1997 arXiv

  113. [121]

    , Lectures on quantum field theory, Quantum Fields and Strings: A Course for Mathematicians, Vol. 2 (P. Deligne, P. Etingof, D. S. Freed, L. C. Jeffrey, D. Kazhdan, J. W. Morgan, D. R. Morrison, and E. Witten, eds.), American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999, pp. 1119--1424

    1999

  114. [122]

    Wolf, The action of the mapping class group on the pants complex

    U. Wolf, The action of the mapping class group on the pants complex . https://www.math.kit.edu/iag3/ wolf/media/wolf-the-action-of-the-mapping-class-group-on-the-pants-complex.pdf

  115. [123]

    Yamron, Topological Actions From Twisted Supersymmetric Theories , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(88)91769-8 Phys

    J. Yamron, Topological Actions From Twisted Supersymmetric Theories , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(88)91769-8 Phys. Lett. B 213 (1988) 325--330

    1988 doi

  116. [124]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION output.nonempty.mrnumber duplicate missing pop "" 'skip if duplicate empty 'pop " " swap * " " * write if FUNCTION blank.sep after.quote 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry add.period write newline FUNCTION new.block outp...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.