REVIEW 6 cited by
Reasoning-Augmented Conversation for Multi-Turn Jailbreak Attacks on Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Reasoning-Augmented Conversation for Multi-Turn Jailbreak Attacks on Large Language Models
read the original abstract
Multi-turn jailbreak attacks simulate real-world human interactions by engaging large language models (LLMs) in iterative dialogues, exposing critical safety vulnerabilities. However, existing methods often struggle to balance semantic coherence with attack effectiveness, resulting in either benign semantic drift or ineffective detection evasion. To address this challenge, we propose Reasoning-Augmented Conversation, a novel multi-turn jailbreak framework that reformulates harmful queries into benign reasoning tasks and leverages LLMs' strong reasoning capabilities to compromise safety alignment. Specifically, we introduce an attack state machine framework to systematically model problem translation and iterative reasoning, ensuring coherent query generation across multiple turns. Building on this framework, we design gain-guided exploration, self-play, and rejection feedback modules to preserve attack semantics, enhance effectiveness, and sustain reasoning-driven attack progression. Extensive experiments on multiple LLMs demonstrate that RACE achieves state-of-the-art attack effectiveness in complex conversational scenarios, with attack success rates (ASRs) increasing by up to 96%. Notably, our approach achieves ASRs of 82% and 92% against leading commercial models, OpenAI o1 and DeepSeek R1, underscoring its potency. We release our code at https://github.com/NY1024/RACE to facilitate further research in this critical domain.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
SecureWebArena: A Holistic Security Evaluation Benchmark for LVLM-based Web Agents
SecureWebArena is a new benchmark suite for holistic security evaluation of LVLM-based web agents using diverse simulated environments, attack taxonomies, and multi-layered failure analysis across reasoning, behavior,...
-
MT-JailBench: A Modular Benchmark for Understanding Multi-Turn Jailbreak Attacks
MT-JailBench is a modular benchmark that standardizes evaluation of multi-turn jailbreaks to identify key success drivers and enable stronger combined attacks.
-
The Salami Slicing Threat: Exploiting Cumulative Risks in LLM Systems
Salami Attack chains low-risk inputs to cumulatively trigger high-risk LLM behaviors, achieving over 90% success on GPT-4o and Gemini while resisting some defenses.
-
Evolve the Method, Not the Prompts: Evolutionary Synthesis of Jailbreak Attacks on LLMs
EvoSynth evolves code-based jailbreak algorithms via multi-agent self-correction, reaching 85.5% ASR on Claude-Sonnet-4.5 and 95.9% average across targets with greater diversity.
-
PRISM: Programmatic Reasoning with Image Sequence Manipulation for LVLM Jailbreaking
PRISM decomposes harmful instructions into benign visual gadgets and directs LVLMs via prompts to compose them through reasoning into harmful outputs, achieving ASR over 0.90 on SafeBench.
-
A Patch-based Cross-view Regularized Framework for Backdoor Defense in Multimodal Large Language Models
A patch-augmented cross-view regularization method reduces backdoor attack success rates in multimodal LLMs by enforcing output differences between original and perturbed views while using entropy constraints to prese...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.