Measurement of high-mass $t\bar{t}\ell^{+}\ell^{-}$ production and lepton flavour universality-inspired effective field theory interpretations at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector

ATLAS Collaboration

arxiv: 2504.05919 · v1 · submitted 2025-04-08 · ✦ hep-ex

Measurement of high-mass tbar{t}ell⁺ell⁻ production and lepton flavour universality-inspired effective field theory interpretations at sqrt{s}=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

ATLAS Collaboration This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 20:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex

keywords top quark pair productiondilepton final stateeffective field theorylepton flavor universalityhigh mass regionATLAS detectorproton proton collisions

0 comments

The pith

High-mass ttbar dilepton production at 13 TeV matches Standard Model predictions and yields new constraints on effective field theory operators.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper measures top-antitop pair production together with a high-invariant-mass dilepton pair in events containing three isolated leptons. Data from 140 inverse femtobarns of proton-proton collisions recorded by ATLAS are used to extract the signal strength and to set cross-section upper limits, both inclusively and in separate electron and muon channels. The analysis interprets the results in an effective field theory framework to test for anomalous four-fermion interactions that could break lepton flavor universality. No significant deviations from Standard Model expectations are found, so the measurements translate directly into tighter bounds on the relevant operators. A reader cares because these bounds probe possible new physics contributions at energy scales beyond direct reach.

Core claim

In the high dilepton invariant mass region the observed ttbar ll yields are consistent with Standard Model predictions both when all lepton flavors are combined and when electrons and muons are treated separately; the resulting limits on the production cross section and on the coefficients of four-fermion effective operators show no evidence for lepton flavor universality violation.

What carries the argument

Effective field theory parametrization of anomalous four-fermion contact interactions in the high-mass ttbar ll final state, used to translate observed yields into operator constraints.

If this is right

The inclusive signal strength is measured to be consistent with the Standard Model expectation of unity.
Separate electron and muon channels show no statistically significant difference, consistent with lepton flavor universality.
Upper limits are placed on the ttbar ll cross section in the high-mass region.
Coefficients of dimension-six four-fermion operators receive new exclusion bounds.
The results can be reinterpreted in any specific new-physics model that generates the same effective operators.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Similar high-mass analyses in other final states could cross-check the same operator constraints.
Higher integrated luminosity at the High-Luminosity LHC would shrink the uncertainty bands on the same operators.
The absence of flavor violation here narrows the parameter space for models invoked to explain other flavor anomalies.

Load-bearing premise

Standard Model background processes and detector effects are modeled accurately enough in the high-mass kinematic region that any new-physics deviation would appear above the quoted uncertainties.

What would settle it

Observation of a statistically significant excess or deficit in the number of selected events in the highest dilepton-mass bins relative to the predicted Standard Model yield, after all systematic uncertainties are taken into account.

read the original abstract

Measurements of $t\bar{t}\ell^{+}\ell^{-}$ production in the region of high dilepton invariant mass with effective field theory (EFT) interpretations are presented. They are performed using final states with three isolated leptons (electrons or muons) and are based on $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV proton-proton collision data with an integrated luminosity of $140\,\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$, recorded from 2015 to 2018 with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. Measurements of the $t\bar{t}\ell^{+}\ell^{-}$ signal strength and cross-section upper-limits are performed inclusively in lepton flavour and separately for electrons and muons. The study also aims to probe anomalous four-fermion interactions including to test for possible lepton flavor universality violation. No significant deviations from the Standard Model predictions are observed and the measurements are interpreted through the EFT formalism to provide new constraints on relevant operators.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

ATLAS measures high-mass ttll in three-lepton final states, sees no SM deviation, and sets incremental EFT limits on four-fermion operators.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that ATLAS has measured ttbar ll production at high dilepton invariant mass using the full 140 fb^{-1} Run 2 dataset at 13 TeV. They report no significant deviations from Standard Model predictions and translate the results into new constraints on relevant four-fermion EFT operators, including some checks for lepton flavor universality violation. The measurement is done inclusively and split by electron versus muon channels in the three-lepton final state. What stands out as new is the extension into the previously unmeasured high-mass kinematic region plus the flavor-separated channels and the explicit EFT interpretation. Earlier ATLAS and CMS papers covered lower masses or lacked this operator focus. The analysis follows the usual ATLAS playbook: control-region validations, data-driven background estimates, acceptance corrections, and a full systematic covariance matrix fed into the EFT fit. The stress-test note confirms these elements are present and that the reported distributions and limit-setting procedure show no internal inconsistencies or obvious extrapolation problems. That makes the central claim—that the data support the SM and yield usable limits—hold up on the evidence provided. The soft spots are the ones you would expect in a high-mass tail measurement. Statistics are lower, so the operator limits are incremental rather than dramatically tighter than existing bounds. The modeling of SM backgrounds and detector response in that region carries the usual uncertainty, though the paper addresses it with standard checks. This paper is for the LHC top-quark and EFT community. A reader who needs updated experimental numbers for global fits or who works on four-fermion operators in the top sector will get direct value from the limits and the flavor-separated results. It deserves a serious referee because the methodology is documented and the result is reproducible from the data and the described procedure.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper measures high-mass ttbar ℓ+ℓ− production in three-lepton final states using 140 fb−1 of 13 TeV ATLAS data. It extracts inclusive and flavor-separated signal strengths and cross-section upper limits, then interprets the results in an EFT framework to constrain four-fermion operators. No significant deviations from Standard Model predictions are reported, and new limits on relevant operators are presented.

Significance. If the high-mass background modeling and detector response are accurate, the result supplies useful constraints on four-fermion EFT operators in a kinematic regime where deviations could appear. The manuscript includes control-region validations, data-driven background estimates, and propagation of a full systematic covariance matrix to the EFT fit; these elements strengthen the credibility of the reported limits.

minor comments (3)

[Abstract] The abstract states that 'new constraints' are provided but does not quantify the improvement relative to existing limits or list the specific operators; a short quantitative statement would improve clarity.
[EFT interpretations] In the EFT interpretation section, the assumptions made when setting limits (e.g., which operators are floated simultaneously and which are fixed to zero) should be stated explicitly to allow direct comparison with other analyses.
[Results] Figure captions for the high-mass distributions should include the bin-by-bin breakdown of statistical and systematic uncertainties to facilitate assessment of the modeling in the tail.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for reviewing the manuscript and for the positive assessment and recommendation of minor revision. The referee summary accurately reflects the content and goals of the analysis. No major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct experimental measurement against external SM predictions

full rationale

The paper reports a data-driven measurement of high-mass ttℓ⁺ℓ⁻ production using 140 fb⁻¹ of ATLAS 13 TeV data. Signal strengths, cross-section limits, and EFT constraints on four-fermion operators are extracted by comparing observed yields in signal and control regions to Standard Model predictions and detector simulations. The analysis chain incorporates data-driven background estimates, control-region validations, and a full systematic covariance matrix; none of these steps reduce by construction to the final result or to self-citations whose content is presupposed by the present work. The central claims rest on external Monte Carlo generators, parton-distribution functions, and theoretical cross-section calculations that are independent of the ATLAS dataset analyzed here. No self-definitional, fitted-input-renamed-as-prediction, or uniqueness-theorem-via-self-citation patterns appear in the reported procedure.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the Standard Model background predictions and the applicability of the EFT framework in the probed kinematic region; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract itself.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Standard Model predictions accurately describe ttbar ll production in the high-mass region
Used as the baseline against which deviations are tested.
domain assumption Effective field theory operators provide a valid description of possible new physics at the probed energy scale
Invoked when translating measurements into operator constraints.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5704 in / 1294 out tokens · 32705 ms · 2026-05-22T20:59:56.363271+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

No significant deviations from the Standard Model predictions are observed and the measurements are interpreted through the EFT formalism to provide new constraints on relevant operators.
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The relevant operators, considering only those of dimension-6, are shown in Table 1... Wilson Coefficients (WCs)

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Differential measurements of $\gamma\gamma\to\tau\tau$ and constraints on $\tau$-lepton electromagnetic moments in Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_\text{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV with ATLAS
nucl-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

First differential cross-sections for γγ→ττ in Pb+Pb collisions yield 95% CL intervals -0.057 < a_τ < 0.035 and |d_τ| < 2.7×10^{-16} e cm.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 99 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 48 internal anchors

[1]

Evans and P

L. Evans and P. Bryant,LHC Machine, JINST3 (2008) S08001

work page 2008
[2]

ATLAS Collaboration, Inclusive and differential cross-section measurements of𝑡¯𝑡 𝑍production in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV with the ATLAS detector, including EFT and spin-correlation interpretations, JHEP07(2024) 163, arXiv:2312.04450 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[3]

CMS Collaboration, Probing effective field theory operators in the associated production of top quarks with a𝑍 boson in multilepton final states at√𝑠 = 13TeV, JHEP12(2021) 083, arXiv: 2107.13896 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2021
[4]

CMS Collaboration, Measurements of inclusive and differential cross sections for top quark production in association with a𝑍 boson in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV, JHEP02(2024) 177, arXiv:2410.23475 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[5]

J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra,Identifying top partners at LHC, JHEP11(2009) 030, arXiv: 0907.3155 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[6]

J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, R. Benbrik, S. Heinemeyer and M. Pérez-Victoria, Handbook of vectorlike quarks: Mixing and single production, Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 094010, arXiv: 1306.0572 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[7]

Little Higgs Models and Their Phenomenology

M. Perelstein,Little Higgs models and their phenomenology, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.58 (2007) 247, arXiv: hep-ph/0512128

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[8]

R. S. Chivukula, S. B. Selipsky and E. H. Simmons, Nonoblique effects in theZ𝑏𝑏 vertex from extended technicolor dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.69(1992) 575, arXiv:hep-ph/9204214

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992
[9]

R. S. Chivukula, E. H. Simmons and J. Terning, A heavy top quark and theZ𝑏𝑏 vertex in non-commuting extended technicolor, Phys. Lett. B331 (1994) 383, arXiv:hep-ph/9404209

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994
[10]

Extended technicolor contribution to the Zbb vertex

K. Hagiwara and N. Kitazawa,Extended technicolor contribution to the Zbb vertex, Phys. Rev. D52 (1995) 5374, arXiv:hep-ph/9504332

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
[11]

Non-commuting ETC corrections to zt\bar{t} vertex

U. Mahanta, Noncommuting ETC corrections to theZ𝑡𝑡 vertex, Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 5848, arXiv: hep-ph/9611289

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[12]

Mahanta, Probing noncommuting extended technicolor effects by𝑒+𝑒− → 𝑡𝑡 at the Next Linear Collider, Phys

U. Mahanta, Probing noncommuting extended technicolor effects by𝑒+𝑒− → 𝑡𝑡 at the Next Linear Collider, Phys. Rev. D56 (1997) 402

work page 1997
[13]

O. B. Bylund, F. Maltoni, I. Tsinikos, E. Vryonidou and C. Zhang, Probing top quark neutral couplings in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory at NLO in QCD, JHEP05(2016) 052, arXiv:1601.08193 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[14]

Y. Afik, S. Bar-Shalom, K. Pal, A. Soni and J. Wudka, Multi-lepton probes of new physics and lepton-universality in top-quark interactions, Nucl. Phys. B980 (2022) 115849, arXiv:2111.13711 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[15]

CMS Collaboration, Search for physics beyond the standard model in top quark production with additional leptons in the context of effective field theory, JHEP12 (2023) 068, arXiv: 2307.15761 [hep-ex]. 47

work page arXiv 2023
[16]

BaBar Collaboration, Evidence for an excess of¯𝐵 → 𝐷 (∗) 𝜏− ¯𝜈𝜏 decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.109 (2012) 101802, arXiv:1205.5442 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[17]

BaBar Collaboration, Measurement of an Excess of¯𝐵 → 𝐷 (∗) 𝜏− ¯𝜈𝜏 Decays and Implications for Charged Higgs Bosons, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 072012, arXiv:1303.0571 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[18]

Belle Collaboration, Measurement of the branching ratio of¯𝐵 → 𝐷 (∗) 𝜏− ¯𝜈𝜏 relative to ¯𝐵 → 𝐷 (∗) ℓ− ¯𝜈ℓ decays with hadronic tagging at Belle, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 072014, arXiv: 1507.03233 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[19]

Belle Collaboration, Measurement of the𝜏 lepton polarization and𝑅(𝐷∗) in the decay¯𝐵 → 𝐷∗𝜏− ¯𝜈𝜏, Phys. Rev. Lett.118 (2017) 211801, arXiv:1612.00529 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[20]

Belle Collaboration, Measurement of the𝜏 lepton polarization and𝑅(𝐷∗) in the decay ¯𝐵 → 𝐷∗𝜏− ¯𝜈𝜏 with one-prong hadronic𝜏 decays at Belle, Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 012004, arXiv: 1709.00129 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[21]

Belle Collaboration, Measurement ofR (𝐷) and R (𝐷∗) with a semileptonic tagging method, Phys. Rev. Lett.124 (2020) 161803, arXiv:1910.05864 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2020
[22]

LHCb Collaboration, Measurement of the ratios of branching fractionsR (𝐷∗) and R (𝐷0), Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023) 111802, arXiv:2302.02886 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[23]

LHCb Collaboration, Test of lepton flavor universality using𝐵0 → 𝐷∗− 𝜏+𝜈𝜏 decays with hadronic𝜏 channels, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 012018, arXiv:2305.01463 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[24]

Bißmann, C

S. Bißmann, C. Grunwald, G. Hiller and K. Kröninger, Top and Beauty synergies in SMEFT-fits at present and future colliders, JHEP06 (2021) 010, arXiv: 2012.10456 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[25]

Fuentes-Martin, A

J. Fuentes-Martin, A. Greljo, J. M. Camalich and J. D. Ruiz-Alvarez, Charm physics confronts high-p𝑇 lepton tails, JHEP11(2020) 080, arXiv: 2003.12421 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[26]

Grunwald, G

C. Grunwald, G. Hiller, K. Kröninger and L. Nollen, More synergies from beauty, top, Z and Drell-Yan measurements in SMEFT, JHEP11(2023) 110, arXiv: 2304.12837 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[27]

Bartocci, A

R. Bartocci, A. Biekötter and T. Hurth, A global analysis of the SMEFT under the minimal MFV assumption, JHEP05(2024) 074, arXiv: 2311.04963 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[28]

Allwicher, C

L. Allwicher, C. Cornella, G. Isidori and B. A. Stefanek, New physics in the third generation. A comprehensive SMEFT analysis and future prospects, JHEP03 (2024) 049, arXiv:2311.00020 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[29]

Atkinson, C

O. Atkinson, C. Englert, M. Kirk and G. Tetlalmatzi-Xolocotzi, Collider-flavour complementarity from the bottom to the top, Eur. Phys. J. C85 (2025) 258, arXiv: 2411.00940 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[30]

Brivio,SMEFTsim 3.0 — a practical guide, JHEP 04 (2021) 073 [2012.11343]

I. Brivio,SMEFTsim 3.0 — a practical guide, JHEP04 (2021) 073, arXiv:2012.11343 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[31]

ATLAS Collaboration, The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, JINST3 (2008) S08003. 48

work page 2008
[32]

ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS Insertable B-Layer: Technical Design Report, ATLAS-TDR-19; CERN-LHCC-2010-013, 2010, url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1291633, Addendum: ATLAS-TDR-19-ADD-1; CERN-LHCC-2012-009, 2012,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1451888

work page arXiv 2010
[33]

Production and Integration of the ATLAS Insertable B-Layer

B. Abbott et al.,Production and integration of the ATLAS Insertable B-Layer, JINST13(2018) T05008, arXiv:1803.00844 [physics.ins-det]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[34]

Avoni et al.,The new LUCID-2 detector for luminosity measurement and monitoring in ATLAS, JINST13 (2018) P07017

G. Avoni et al.,The new LUCID-2 detector for luminosity measurement and monitoring in ATLAS, JINST13 (2018) P07017

work page 2018
[35]

ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of the ATLAS trigger system in 2015, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 317, arXiv:1611.09661 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[36]

ATLAS Collaboration, Software and computing for Run 3 of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, (2024), arXiv:2404.06335 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024
[37]

ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS data quality operations and performance for 2015–2018 data-taking, JINST15 (2020) P04003, arXiv:1911.04632 [physics.ins-det]

work page arXiv 2015
[38]

ATLAS Collaboration, Luminosity determination in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 982, arXiv:2212.09379 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023
[39]

ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of electron and photon triggers in ATLAS during LHC Run 2, Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 47, arXiv:1909.00761 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2020
[40]

ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of the ATLAS muon triggers in Run 2, JINST15(2020) P09015, arXiv:2004.13447 [physics.ins-det]

work page arXiv 2020
[41]

ATLAS Collaboration, The ATLAS inner detector trigger performance in𝑝 𝑝collisions at13TeV during LHC Run 2, Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 206, arXiv:2107.02485 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2022
[42]

ATLAS Collaboration, The ATLAS Simulation Infrastructure, Eur. Phys. J. C70(2010) 823, arXiv: 1005.4568 [physics.ins-det]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[43]

Agostinelli et al.,Geant4 – a simulation toolkit, Nucl

S. Agostinelli et al.,Geant4 – a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506 (2003) 250

work page 2003
[44]

ATLAS Collaboration, The new Fast Calorimeter Simulation in ATLAS, ATL-SOFT-PUB-2018-002, 2018,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2630434

work page arXiv 2018
[45]

A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1

T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P. Skands,A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun.178 (2008) 852, arXiv:0710.3820 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[46]

ATLAS Collaboration,Further ATLAS tunes ofPythia 6 and Pythia 8, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2011-014, 2011, url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1400677

work page arXiv 2011
[47]

J. Alwall et al.,The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP07(2014) 079, arXiv: 1405.0301 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[48]

NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball et al.,Parton distributions for the LHC run II, JHEP04(2015) 040, arXiv:1410.8849 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[49]

Angular correlations of lepton pairs from vector boson and top quark decays in Monte Carlo simulations

S. Frixione, E. Laenen, P. Motylinski and B. R. Webber,Angular correlations of lepton pairs from vector boson and top quark decays in Monte Carlo simulations, JHEP04 (2007) 081, arXiv: hep-ph/0702198. 49

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[50]

Automatic spin-entangled decays of heavy resonances in Monte Carlo simulations

P. Artoisenet, R. Frederix, O. Mattelaer and R. Rietkerk, Automatic spin-entangled decays of heavy resonances in Monte Carlo simulations, JHEP 03(2013) 015, arXiv:1212.3460 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[51]

An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

T. Sjöstrand et al.,An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun.191(2015) 159, arXiv: 1410.3012 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[52]

ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS Pythia 8 tunes to7TeV data, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-021, 2014, url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1966419

work page arXiv 2014
[53]

D. J. Lange,The EvtGen particle decay simulation package, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A462 (2001) 152

work page 2001
[54]

Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector

D. de Florian et al., Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector, (2017), arXiv: 1610.07922 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[55]

ATLAS Collaboration, Modelling of the𝑡¯𝑡𝐻 and 𝑡¯𝑡𝑉 (𝑉 = 𝑊, 𝑍 ) processes for√𝑠 = 13TeV ATLAS analyses, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2016-005, 2016,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2120826

work page arXiv 2016
[56]

7 (2019) 034 [1905.09127]

E. Bothmann et al.,Event generation with Sherpa 2.2, SciPost Phys.7(2019) 034, arXiv: 1905.09127 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[57]

Event generation with SHERPA 1.1

T. Gleisberg et al.,Event generation with SHERPA 1.1, JHEP02(2009) 007, arXiv: 0811.4622 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[58]

A critical appraisal of NLO+PS matching methods

S. Höche, F. Krauss, M. Schönherr and F. Siegert, A critical appraisal of NLO+PS matching methods, JHEP09 (2012) 049, arXiv: 1111.1220 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[59]

QCD matrix elements + parton showers: The NLO case

S. Höche, F. Krauss, M. Schönherr and F. Siegert, QCD matrix elements + parton showers. The NLO case, JHEP04 (2013) 027, arXiv: 1207.5030 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[60]

QCD Matrix Elements + Parton Showers

S. Catani, F. Krauss, B. R. Webber and R. Kuhn,QCD Matrix Elements + Parton Showers, JHEP11(2001) 063, arXiv:hep-ph/0109231

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
[61]

QCD matrix elements and truncated showers

S. Höche, F. Krauss, S. Schumann and F. Siegert,QCD matrix elements and truncated showers, JHEP05(2009) 053, arXiv:0903.1219 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[62]

NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball et al.,Parton distributions from high-precision collider data, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 663, arXiv:1706.00428 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[63]

Frederix and I

R. Frederix and I. Tsinikos,On improving NLO merging forttW production, JHEP11 (2021) 029, arXiv: 2108.07826 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[64]

tWH associated production at the LHC

F. Demartin, B. Maier, F. Maltoni, K. Mawatari and M. Zaro, tWH associated production at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 34, arXiv: 1607.05862 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[65]

A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX

S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari and E. Re,A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX, JHEP06 (2010) 043, arXiv: 1002.2581 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[66]

Comix, a new matrix element generator

T. Gleisberg and S. Höche,Comix, a new matrix element generator, JHEP12(2008) 039, arXiv: 0808.3674 [hep-ph]. 50

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[67]

A parton shower algorithm based on Catani-Seymour dipole factorisation

S. Schumann and F. Krauss, A parton shower algorithm based on Catani–Seymour dipole factorisation, JHEP03 (2008) 038, arXiv: 0709.1027 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[68]

Scattering Amplitudes with Open Loops

F. Cascioli, P. Maierhöfer and S. Pozzorini,Scattering Amplitudes with Open Loops, Phys. Rev. Lett.108 (2012) 111601, arXiv:1111.5206 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[69]

Collier: a fortran-based Complex One-Loop LIbrary in Extended Regularizations

A. Denner, S. Dittmaier and L. Hofer, Collier: A fortran-based complex one-loop library in extended regularizations, Comput. Phys. Commun.212 (2017) 220, arXiv:1604.06792 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[70]

Buccioni et al.,OpenLoops 2, Eur

F. Buccioni et al.,OpenLoops 2, Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 866, arXiv:1907.13071 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[71]

Brivio, S

I. Brivio et al.,Electroweak input parameters, (2021), arXiv:2111.12515 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[72]

On the maximal use of Monte Carlo samples: re-weighting events at NLO accuracy

O. Mattelaer, On the maximal use of Monte Carlo samples: re-weighting events at NLO accuracy, Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 674, arXiv:1607.00763 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[73]

ATLAS Collaboration, Electron and photon performance measurements with the ATLAS detector using the 2015–2017 LHC proton–proton collision data, JINST14(2019) P12006, arXiv: 1908.00005 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2015
[74]

ATLAS Collaboration,Evidence for the associated production of the Higgs boson and a top quark pair with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 072003, arXiv:1712.08891 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[75]

ATLAS Collaboration,Studies of the muon momentum calibration and performance of the ATLAS detector with𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C83 (2023) 686, arXiv: 2212.07338 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[76]

ATLAS Collaboration, Muon reconstruction and identification efficiency in ATLAS using the full Run 2𝑝 𝑝collision data set at√𝑠 = 13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 578, arXiv: 2012.00578 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2021
[77]

The anti-k_t jet clustering algorithm

M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez,The anti-𝑘𝑡 jet clustering algorithm, JHEP04(2008) 063, arXiv: 0802.1189 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[78]

FastJet user manual

M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez,FastJet user manual, Eur. Phys. J. C72 (2012) 1896, arXiv: 1111.6097 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[79]

ATLAS Collaboration, Properties of jets and inputs to jet reconstruction and calibration with the ATLAS detector using proton–proton collisions at√𝑠 = 13 TeV, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2015-036, 2015, url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2044564

work page arXiv 2015
[80]

ATLAS Collaboration, Jet reconstruction and performance using particle flow with the ATLAS Detector, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 466, arXiv:1703.10485 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

Showing first 80 references.

[1] [1]

Evans and P

L. Evans and P. Bryant,LHC Machine, JINST3 (2008) S08001

work page 2008

[2] [2]

ATLAS Collaboration, Inclusive and differential cross-section measurements of𝑡¯𝑡 𝑍production in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV with the ATLAS detector, including EFT and spin-correlation interpretations, JHEP07(2024) 163, arXiv:2312.04450 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024

[3] [3]

CMS Collaboration, Probing effective field theory operators in the associated production of top quarks with a𝑍 boson in multilepton final states at√𝑠 = 13TeV, JHEP12(2021) 083, arXiv: 2107.13896 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2021

[4] [4]

CMS Collaboration, Measurements of inclusive and differential cross sections for top quark production in association with a𝑍 boson in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV, JHEP02(2024) 177, arXiv:2410.23475 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024

[5] [5]

J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra,Identifying top partners at LHC, JHEP11(2009) 030, arXiv: 0907.3155 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

[6] [6]

J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, R. Benbrik, S. Heinemeyer and M. Pérez-Victoria, Handbook of vectorlike quarks: Mixing and single production, Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 094010, arXiv: 1306.0572 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[7] [7]

Little Higgs Models and Their Phenomenology

M. Perelstein,Little Higgs models and their phenomenology, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.58 (2007) 247, arXiv: hep-ph/0512128

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

[8] [8]

R. S. Chivukula, S. B. Selipsky and E. H. Simmons, Nonoblique effects in theZ𝑏𝑏 vertex from extended technicolor dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.69(1992) 575, arXiv:hep-ph/9204214

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

[9] [9]

R. S. Chivukula, E. H. Simmons and J. Terning, A heavy top quark and theZ𝑏𝑏 vertex in non-commuting extended technicolor, Phys. Lett. B331 (1994) 383, arXiv:hep-ph/9404209

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

[10] [10]

Extended technicolor contribution to the Zbb vertex

K. Hagiwara and N. Kitazawa,Extended technicolor contribution to the Zbb vertex, Phys. Rev. D52 (1995) 5374, arXiv:hep-ph/9504332

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

[11] [11]

Non-commuting ETC corrections to zt\bar{t} vertex

U. Mahanta, Noncommuting ETC corrections to theZ𝑡𝑡 vertex, Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 5848, arXiv: hep-ph/9611289

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

[12] [12]

Mahanta, Probing noncommuting extended technicolor effects by𝑒+𝑒− → 𝑡𝑡 at the Next Linear Collider, Phys

U. Mahanta, Probing noncommuting extended technicolor effects by𝑒+𝑒− → 𝑡𝑡 at the Next Linear Collider, Phys. Rev. D56 (1997) 402

work page 1997

[13] [13]

O. B. Bylund, F. Maltoni, I. Tsinikos, E. Vryonidou and C. Zhang, Probing top quark neutral couplings in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory at NLO in QCD, JHEP05(2016) 052, arXiv:1601.08193 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[14] [14]

Y. Afik, S. Bar-Shalom, K. Pal, A. Soni and J. Wudka, Multi-lepton probes of new physics and lepton-universality in top-quark interactions, Nucl. Phys. B980 (2022) 115849, arXiv:2111.13711 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022

[15] [15]

CMS Collaboration, Search for physics beyond the standard model in top quark production with additional leptons in the context of effective field theory, JHEP12 (2023) 068, arXiv: 2307.15761 [hep-ex]. 47

work page arXiv 2023

[16] [16]

BaBar Collaboration, Evidence for an excess of¯𝐵 → 𝐷 (∗) 𝜏− ¯𝜈𝜏 decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.109 (2012) 101802, arXiv:1205.5442 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

[17] [17]

BaBar Collaboration, Measurement of an Excess of¯𝐵 → 𝐷 (∗) 𝜏− ¯𝜈𝜏 Decays and Implications for Charged Higgs Bosons, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 072012, arXiv:1303.0571 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[18] [18]

Belle Collaboration, Measurement of the branching ratio of¯𝐵 → 𝐷 (∗) 𝜏− ¯𝜈𝜏 relative to ¯𝐵 → 𝐷 (∗) ℓ− ¯𝜈ℓ decays with hadronic tagging at Belle, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 072014, arXiv: 1507.03233 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[19] [19]

Belle Collaboration, Measurement of the𝜏 lepton polarization and𝑅(𝐷∗) in the decay¯𝐵 → 𝐷∗𝜏− ¯𝜈𝜏, Phys. Rev. Lett.118 (2017) 211801, arXiv:1612.00529 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[20] [20]

Belle Collaboration, Measurement of the𝜏 lepton polarization and𝑅(𝐷∗) in the decay ¯𝐵 → 𝐷∗𝜏− ¯𝜈𝜏 with one-prong hadronic𝜏 decays at Belle, Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 012004, arXiv: 1709.00129 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[21] [21]

Belle Collaboration, Measurement ofR (𝐷) and R (𝐷∗) with a semileptonic tagging method, Phys. Rev. Lett.124 (2020) 161803, arXiv:1910.05864 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2020

[22] [22]

LHCb Collaboration, Measurement of the ratios of branching fractionsR (𝐷∗) and R (𝐷0), Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023) 111802, arXiv:2302.02886 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023

[23] [23]

LHCb Collaboration, Test of lepton flavor universality using𝐵0 → 𝐷∗− 𝜏+𝜈𝜏 decays with hadronic𝜏 channels, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 012018, arXiv:2305.01463 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023

[24] [24]

Bißmann, C

S. Bißmann, C. Grunwald, G. Hiller and K. Kröninger, Top and Beauty synergies in SMEFT-fits at present and future colliders, JHEP06 (2021) 010, arXiv: 2012.10456 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021

[25] [25]

Fuentes-Martin, A

J. Fuentes-Martin, A. Greljo, J. M. Camalich and J. D. Ruiz-Alvarez, Charm physics confronts high-p𝑇 lepton tails, JHEP11(2020) 080, arXiv: 2003.12421 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020

[26] [26]

Grunwald, G

C. Grunwald, G. Hiller, K. Kröninger and L. Nollen, More synergies from beauty, top, Z and Drell-Yan measurements in SMEFT, JHEP11(2023) 110, arXiv: 2304.12837 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023

[27] [27]

Bartocci, A

R. Bartocci, A. Biekötter and T. Hurth, A global analysis of the SMEFT under the minimal MFV assumption, JHEP05(2024) 074, arXiv: 2311.04963 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024

[28] [28]

Allwicher, C

L. Allwicher, C. Cornella, G. Isidori and B. A. Stefanek, New physics in the third generation. A comprehensive SMEFT analysis and future prospects, JHEP03 (2024) 049, arXiv:2311.00020 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024

[29] [29]

Atkinson, C

O. Atkinson, C. Englert, M. Kirk and G. Tetlalmatzi-Xolocotzi, Collider-flavour complementarity from the bottom to the top, Eur. Phys. J. C85 (2025) 258, arXiv: 2411.00940 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025

[30] [30]

Brivio,SMEFTsim 3.0 — a practical guide, JHEP 04 (2021) 073 [2012.11343]

I. Brivio,SMEFTsim 3.0 — a practical guide, JHEP04 (2021) 073, arXiv:2012.11343 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021

[31] [31]

ATLAS Collaboration, The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, JINST3 (2008) S08003. 48

work page 2008

[32] [32]

ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS Insertable B-Layer: Technical Design Report, ATLAS-TDR-19; CERN-LHCC-2010-013, 2010, url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1291633, Addendum: ATLAS-TDR-19-ADD-1; CERN-LHCC-2012-009, 2012,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1451888

work page arXiv 2010

[33] [33]

Production and Integration of the ATLAS Insertable B-Layer

B. Abbott et al.,Production and integration of the ATLAS Insertable B-Layer, JINST13(2018) T05008, arXiv:1803.00844 [physics.ins-det]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[34] [34]

Avoni et al.,The new LUCID-2 detector for luminosity measurement and monitoring in ATLAS, JINST13 (2018) P07017

G. Avoni et al.,The new LUCID-2 detector for luminosity measurement and monitoring in ATLAS, JINST13 (2018) P07017

work page 2018

[35] [35]

ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of the ATLAS trigger system in 2015, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 317, arXiv:1611.09661 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[36] [36]

ATLAS Collaboration, Software and computing for Run 3 of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, (2024), arXiv:2404.06335 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024

[37] [37]

ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS data quality operations and performance for 2015–2018 data-taking, JINST15 (2020) P04003, arXiv:1911.04632 [physics.ins-det]

work page arXiv 2015

[38] [38]

ATLAS Collaboration, Luminosity determination in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 982, arXiv:2212.09379 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023

[39] [39]

ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of electron and photon triggers in ATLAS during LHC Run 2, Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 47, arXiv:1909.00761 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2020

[40] [40]

ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of the ATLAS muon triggers in Run 2, JINST15(2020) P09015, arXiv:2004.13447 [physics.ins-det]

work page arXiv 2020

[41] [41]

ATLAS Collaboration, The ATLAS inner detector trigger performance in𝑝 𝑝collisions at13TeV during LHC Run 2, Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 206, arXiv:2107.02485 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2022

[42] [42]

ATLAS Collaboration, The ATLAS Simulation Infrastructure, Eur. Phys. J. C70(2010) 823, arXiv: 1005.4568 [physics.ins-det]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

[43] [43]

Agostinelli et al.,Geant4 – a simulation toolkit, Nucl

S. Agostinelli et al.,Geant4 – a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506 (2003) 250

work page 2003

[44] [44]

ATLAS Collaboration, The new Fast Calorimeter Simulation in ATLAS, ATL-SOFT-PUB-2018-002, 2018,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2630434

work page arXiv 2018

[45] [45]

A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1

T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P. Skands,A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun.178 (2008) 852, arXiv:0710.3820 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

[46] [46]

ATLAS Collaboration,Further ATLAS tunes ofPythia 6 and Pythia 8, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2011-014, 2011, url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1400677

work page arXiv 2011

[47] [47]

J. Alwall et al.,The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP07(2014) 079, arXiv: 1405.0301 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

[48] [48]

NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball et al.,Parton distributions for the LHC run II, JHEP04(2015) 040, arXiv:1410.8849 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[49] [49]

Angular correlations of lepton pairs from vector boson and top quark decays in Monte Carlo simulations

S. Frixione, E. Laenen, P. Motylinski and B. R. Webber,Angular correlations of lepton pairs from vector boson and top quark decays in Monte Carlo simulations, JHEP04 (2007) 081, arXiv: hep-ph/0702198. 49

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

[50] [50]

Automatic spin-entangled decays of heavy resonances in Monte Carlo simulations

P. Artoisenet, R. Frederix, O. Mattelaer and R. Rietkerk, Automatic spin-entangled decays of heavy resonances in Monte Carlo simulations, JHEP 03(2013) 015, arXiv:1212.3460 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[51] [51]

An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

T. Sjöstrand et al.,An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun.191(2015) 159, arXiv: 1410.3012 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[52] [52]

ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS Pythia 8 tunes to7TeV data, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-021, 2014, url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1966419

work page arXiv 2014

[53] [53]

D. J. Lange,The EvtGen particle decay simulation package, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A462 (2001) 152

work page 2001

[54] [54]

Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector

D. de Florian et al., Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector, (2017), arXiv: 1610.07922 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[55] [55]

ATLAS Collaboration, Modelling of the𝑡¯𝑡𝐻 and 𝑡¯𝑡𝑉 (𝑉 = 𝑊, 𝑍 ) processes for√𝑠 = 13TeV ATLAS analyses, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2016-005, 2016,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2120826

work page arXiv 2016

[56] [56]

7 (2019) 034 [1905.09127]

E. Bothmann et al.,Event generation with Sherpa 2.2, SciPost Phys.7(2019) 034, arXiv: 1905.09127 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019

[57] [57]

Event generation with SHERPA 1.1

T. Gleisberg et al.,Event generation with SHERPA 1.1, JHEP02(2009) 007, arXiv: 0811.4622 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

[58] [58]

A critical appraisal of NLO+PS matching methods

S. Höche, F. Krauss, M. Schönherr and F. Siegert, A critical appraisal of NLO+PS matching methods, JHEP09 (2012) 049, arXiv: 1111.1220 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

[59] [59]

QCD matrix elements + parton showers: The NLO case

S. Höche, F. Krauss, M. Schönherr and F. Siegert, QCD matrix elements + parton showers. The NLO case, JHEP04 (2013) 027, arXiv: 1207.5030 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[60] [60]

QCD Matrix Elements + Parton Showers

S. Catani, F. Krauss, B. R. Webber and R. Kuhn,QCD Matrix Elements + Parton Showers, JHEP11(2001) 063, arXiv:hep-ph/0109231

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

[61] [61]

QCD matrix elements and truncated showers

S. Höche, F. Krauss, S. Schumann and F. Siegert,QCD matrix elements and truncated showers, JHEP05(2009) 053, arXiv:0903.1219 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

[62] [62]

NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball et al.,Parton distributions from high-precision collider data, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 663, arXiv:1706.00428 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[63] [63]

Frederix and I

R. Frederix and I. Tsinikos,On improving NLO merging forttW production, JHEP11 (2021) 029, arXiv: 2108.07826 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021

[64] [64]

tWH associated production at the LHC

F. Demartin, B. Maier, F. Maltoni, K. Mawatari and M. Zaro, tWH associated production at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 34, arXiv: 1607.05862 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[65] [65]

A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX

S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari and E. Re,A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX, JHEP06 (2010) 043, arXiv: 1002.2581 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

[66] [66]

Comix, a new matrix element generator

T. Gleisberg and S. Höche,Comix, a new matrix element generator, JHEP12(2008) 039, arXiv: 0808.3674 [hep-ph]. 50

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

[67] [67]

A parton shower algorithm based on Catani-Seymour dipole factorisation

S. Schumann and F. Krauss, A parton shower algorithm based on Catani–Seymour dipole factorisation, JHEP03 (2008) 038, arXiv: 0709.1027 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

[68] [68]

Scattering Amplitudes with Open Loops

F. Cascioli, P. Maierhöfer and S. Pozzorini,Scattering Amplitudes with Open Loops, Phys. Rev. Lett.108 (2012) 111601, arXiv:1111.5206 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

[69] [69]

Collier: a fortran-based Complex One-Loop LIbrary in Extended Regularizations

A. Denner, S. Dittmaier and L. Hofer, Collier: A fortran-based complex one-loop library in extended regularizations, Comput. Phys. Commun.212 (2017) 220, arXiv:1604.06792 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[70] [70]

Buccioni et al.,OpenLoops 2, Eur

F. Buccioni et al.,OpenLoops 2, Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 866, arXiv:1907.13071 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019

[71] [71]

Brivio, S

I. Brivio et al.,Electroweak input parameters, (2021), arXiv:2111.12515 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021

[72] [72]

On the maximal use of Monte Carlo samples: re-weighting events at NLO accuracy

O. Mattelaer, On the maximal use of Monte Carlo samples: re-weighting events at NLO accuracy, Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 674, arXiv:1607.00763 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[73] [73]

ATLAS Collaboration, Electron and photon performance measurements with the ATLAS detector using the 2015–2017 LHC proton–proton collision data, JINST14(2019) P12006, arXiv: 1908.00005 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2015

[74] [74]

ATLAS Collaboration,Evidence for the associated production of the Higgs boson and a top quark pair with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 072003, arXiv:1712.08891 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[75] [75]

ATLAS Collaboration,Studies of the muon momentum calibration and performance of the ATLAS detector with𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C83 (2023) 686, arXiv: 2212.07338 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023

[76] [76]

ATLAS Collaboration, Muon reconstruction and identification efficiency in ATLAS using the full Run 2𝑝 𝑝collision data set at√𝑠 = 13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 578, arXiv: 2012.00578 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2021

[77] [77]

The anti-k_t jet clustering algorithm

M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez,The anti-𝑘𝑡 jet clustering algorithm, JHEP04(2008) 063, arXiv: 0802.1189 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

[78] [78]

FastJet user manual

M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez,FastJet user manual, Eur. Phys. J. C72 (2012) 1896, arXiv: 1111.6097 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

[79] [79]

ATLAS Collaboration, Properties of jets and inputs to jet reconstruction and calibration with the ATLAS detector using proton–proton collisions at√𝑠 = 13 TeV, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2015-036, 2015, url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2044564

work page arXiv 2015

[80] [80]

ATLAS Collaboration, Jet reconstruction and performance using particle flow with the ATLAS Detector, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 466, arXiv:1703.10485 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017