Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

A Survey on (M)LLM-Based GUI Agents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.13865 v2 pith:VY54IEHH submitted 2025-03-27 cs.HC cs.AIcs.CLcs.CV

classification cs.HCcs.AIcs.CLcs.CV
keywords agentsinterfaceautomationcomponentssurveysystemsunderstandingcomprehensive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Graphical User Interface (GUI) Agents have emerged as a transformative paradigm in human-computer interaction, evolving from rule-based automation scripts to sophisticated AI-driven systems capable of understanding and executing complex interface operations. This survey provides a comprehensive examination of the rapidly advancing field of LLM-based GUI Agents, systematically analyzing their architectural foundations, technical components, and evaluation methodologies. We identify and analyze four fundamental components that constitute modern GUI Agents: (1) perception systems that integrate text-based parsing with multimodal understanding for comprehensive interface comprehension; (2) exploration mechanisms that construct and maintain knowledge bases through internal modeling, historical experience, and external information retrieval; (3) planning frameworks that leverage advanced reasoning methodologies for task decomposition and execution; and (4) interaction systems that manage action generation with robust safety controls. Through rigorous analysis of these components, we reveal how recent advances in large language models and multimodal learning have revolutionized GUI automation across desktop, mobile, and web platforms. We critically examine current evaluation frameworks, highlighting methodological limitations in existing benchmarks while proposing directions for standardization. This survey also identifies key technical challenges, including accurate element localization, effective knowledge retrieval, long-horizon planning, and safety-aware execution control, while outlining promising research directions for enhancing GUI Agents' capabilities. Our systematic review provides researchers and practitioners with a thorough understanding of the field's current state and offers insights into future developments in intelligent interface automation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Would You Walk to the Car Wash? Revealing the Salience Bias of Large Language Models in Commonsense Reasoning

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs' failures on physically impossible, number-laden tasks are mostly knowledge suppression by salient distractors, not missing commons sense, and light prompting largely fixes them.

  2. GUI-AC: Enhancing Continual Learning in GUI Agents

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    GUI-AC stabilizes RFT for non-stationary GUI data by down-weighting noisy advantages and relaxing clipping bounds via a grounding certainty term.

  3. Can Large Multimodal Models Actively Recognize Faulty Inputs? A Systematic Evaluation Framework of Their Input Scrutiny Ability

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Large multimodal models mostly fail to proactively detect flawed textual premises, and their performance depends on error type and on how they weight text versus images.

  4. Seeing is Fixing: Cross-Modal Reasoning with Multimodal LLMs for Visual Software Issue Fixing

    cs.SE 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GUIRepair, a cross-modal LLM pipeline that converts issue screenshots into reproduction code and rendered patch screenshots into validation feedback, resolves 157/517 SWE-bench M instances with GPT-4o and 175 with o4-mini.

  5. Plover: Steering GUI Agents through Plan-Centric Interaction

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An expert repairing visible plans rescued 23 of 26 failed GUI automation runs, turning 17 into full and 6 into partial successes.

  6. GUI-G$^2$: Gaussian Reward Modeling for GUI Grounding

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Modeling GUI elements as Gaussian distributions instead of binary targets yields 92.0% (ScreenSpot), 93.3% (ScreenSpot-v2), and 47.5% (ScreenSpot-Pro) for a 7B model, outperforming UI-TARS-72B by a relative 24.7% on t...

Pith tools