Recognition: unknown
Grassroots Federation: Fair Democratic Governance at Scale
read the original abstract
We propose a framework for the fair democratic governance of federated digital communities that form and evolve dynamically, where small groups self-govern and larger groups are represented by assemblies selected via sortition. Prior work addressed static fairness conditions; here, we formalize a dynamic setting where federations evolve over time through communities forming, joining, and splitting, in all directions -- bottom-up, top-down, and middle-out -- and adapt the fairness guarantees. The main technical challenge is reconciling integral seat allocations with dynamic, overlapping federations, so that child communities always meet their persistent floors while long-run averages converge to proportional fairness. Overcoming these challenges, we introduce a protocol that ensures fair participation and representation both persistently (at all times) and eventually (in the limit after stabilization), extending the static fairness properties to handle structural changes. Prior work shows how grassroots federations can be specified via atomic transactions among assembly members, Constitutional Consensus can realize these transactions and the democratic processes leading to them, and Constitutional Governance in Metric Spaces lets a community govern itself and amend its own constitution. Together, these works form a comprehensive design for an egalitarian, fairly governed, large-scale decentralized sovereign digital community platform.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Constitutional Governance in Metric Spaces
A polynomial-time constitutional governance protocol in metric spaces unifies aggregation, supermajority amendment, deliberation, and consensus for digital communities and organizations.
-
Constitutional Governance in Metric Spaces
Constitutional governance in metric spaces integrates aggregation, deliberation, and supermajority amendment into a single polynomial-time process for egalitarian self-governance.
-
Volitional Multiagent Atomic Transactions: Describing People and their Machines
Volitional multiagent atomic transactions model systems of people and machines by requiring both machine preconditions and human willingness for atomic actions, enabling safety and liveness analysis for grassroots platforms.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.