Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Wisdom from Diversity: Bias Mitigation Through Hybrid Human-LLM Crowds

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.12349 v1 pith:6U74O6SB submitted 2025-05-18 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CYcs.HCcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CYcs.HCcs.LG
keywords biasesbiascrowdsdiversityllmswisdomaccuracyaggregation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite their performance, large language models (LLMs) can inadvertently perpetuate biases found in the data they are trained on. By analyzing LLM responses to bias-eliciting headlines, we find that these models often mirror human biases. To address this, we explore crowd-based strategies for mitigating bias through response aggregation. We first demonstrate that simply averaging responses from multiple LLMs, intended to leverage the "wisdom of the crowd", can exacerbate existing biases due to the limited diversity within LLM crowds. In contrast, we show that locally weighted aggregation methods more effectively leverage the wisdom of the LLM crowd, achieving both bias mitigation and improved accuracy. Finally, recognizing the complementary strengths of LLMs (accuracy) and humans (diversity), we demonstrate that hybrid crowds containing both significantly enhance performance and further reduce biases across ethnic and gender-related contexts.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Proof2Hybrid: Automatic Mathematical Benchmark Synthesis for Proof-Centric Problems

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A fully automated pipeline produces proof-centric math benchmarks, demonstrated on algebraic geometry with 456 items, where leading LLMs score near 60 percent.

  2. Floor, Ceiling, and the Fusion Gap: How Much of Crowd Reading Attention Can Machines Predict?

    cs.IR 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Machines recover up to 53% of the crowd-highlight prediction headroom, and fusing five frontier models reaches about 60%, confirmed in a pre-registered replication.

Pith tools