pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.04370 · v2 · submitted 2025-06-04 · ✦ hep-ph · gr-qc· hep-ex

Dark Matter Induced Proton Decays

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 10:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph gr-qchep-ex
keywords proton decaydark matterZ4 symmetryB+L symmetryleptoquarksone-loop processesdark sector mediators
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Proton decay occurs at one loop mediated by dark matter particles through a residual Z4 symmetry

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes that proton decay and dark matter stability arise from the same spontaneous breaking of a global U(1)B+L symmetry. This breaking leaves behind a Z4 symmetry that keeps dark matter stable while blocking proton decay at tree level. Proton decay therefore appears only at one loop, with dark sector particles as mediators. The proton lifetime scales directly with the dark matter mass, so that heavier dark matter makes the proton more stable. Mediator masses around the TeV scale remain allowed by present lifetime limits and could appear in collider searches as leptoquarks carrying exotic B+L charges.

Core claim

Spontaneous breaking of the global U(1)B+L symmetry yields a residual Z4 symmetry. This Z4 symmetry guarantees dark matter stability and forbids proton decay at tree level, so decay occurs only at one loop through dark-sector particles. The proton lifetime is thereby linked to the dark matter mass, with larger dark matter masses corresponding to longer proton lifetimes. Mediator masses of order TeV remain consistent with current experimental bounds on proton decay.

What carries the argument

Residual Z4 symmetry produced by spontaneous breaking of global U(1)B+L, which stabilizes dark matter while restricting proton decay to one-loop mediation by dark sector particles

Load-bearing premise

The spontaneous breaking of the global U(1)B+L symmetry produces a residual Z4 symmetry that simultaneously ensures dark matter stability and forbids proton decay at tree level.

What would settle it

A measured proton lifetime that fails to increase with increasing dark matter mass, or the absence of the predicted exotic-B+L leptoquark signals at TeV energies in collider data

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04370 by Rahul Srivastava, Ranjeet Kumar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The diagrams depict the stability of the DM candidate under residual [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Proton decay at one-loop level mediated by new dark sector particles, where [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Correlation between the proton lifetime [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Representative Feynman diagrams illustrating loop-level (a, conserved [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The relic density as a function of DM mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: The variation of the spin-independent WIMP–nucleon cross section with respect to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Feynman diagrams depicting the pair production of leptoquark [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Production cross section of leptoquark [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Three-body and two-body decay modes of the leptoquark [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Three-body decay width of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Two-body decay width of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Branching ratios of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Leading-order Feynman diagrams for the pair production of the heavy charged [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: Production cross section of the heavy charged lepton [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: Four-body and two-body decay modes of the heavy charged lepton [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: Decay width of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17: One-loop Feynman diagram for proton decay via new dark sector particles in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18: One-loop calculation of proton decay, where [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_18.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose a novel theoretical framework in which proton decay is induced by the dark matter. While proton decay requires violation of the $B+L$ symmetry, dark matter stability often relies on the presence of an unbroken symmetry. These seemingly distinct phenomena are unified through the global $U(1)_{B+L}$ symmetry inherent in the Standard Model. Its spontaneous breaking leads to a residual $Z_4$ symmetry, which ensures dark matter stability and forbids proton decay at tree level. Consequently, proton decay occurs at the one-loop level, mediated by dark sector particles. The proton lifetime is linked with the dark matter, the heavier dark matter mass enhancing proton stability, and vice versa. The $\mathcal{O}$(TeV) masses of the mediators remain consistent with current proton lifetime limits, making them accessible to experimental searches. In particular, the leptoquark mediating proton decay, carrying exotic $B+L$ charges, leads to a distinctive signature in collider searches. By intertwining proton decay, dark matter stability, and collider phenomenology, this framework offers distinctive signatures that can be probed in current and future experiments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a novel theoretical framework in which proton decay is induced by dark matter. Spontaneous breaking of the global U(1)_{B+L} symmetry leaves a residual Z_4 symmetry that stabilizes the dark matter candidate while forbidding proton decay at tree level, allowing it only at one-loop level mediated by dark-sector particles. The proton lifetime is linked to the dark matter mass such that heavier dark matter enhances stability, with O(TeV) mediator masses remaining consistent with current limits; the exotic-B+L leptoquark yields distinctive collider signatures.

Significance. If the symmetry mechanism and loop-level suppression hold, the work provides a concrete link between dark matter stability and baryon-number violation, yielding falsifiable predictions that tie the proton lifetime directly to the dark matter mass and point to TeV-scale mediators accessible at current colliders. This unified approach offers new search strategies and could guide model building in beyond-Standard-Model physics.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (Symmetry Breaking and Residual Z_4): The central claim that the unbroken Z_4 forbids all tree-level B+L-violating operators (e.g., dimension-6 four-fermion terms) while permitting the claimed one-loop diagrams requires explicit verification. The manuscript must list the Z_4 charges of the dark-sector mediators, the exotic-B+L leptoquark, and the DM candidate, then enumerate all relevant operators to confirm none are Z_4-neutral at tree level. Without this, the prohibition of tree-level decay and the resulting lifetime-DM-mass correlation remain unestablished.
  2. [§4] §4 (One-Loop Proton Decay): The statement that the proton lifetime is linked to the dark matter mass, with heavier DM enhancing stability, is presented qualitatively. No explicit one-loop diagrams, Feynman rules, or decay-width formula (e.g., relating Γ_p to mediator masses and DM mass) are shown, nor are numerical lifetime predictions provided to demonstrate consistency with current bounds for O(TeV) mediators. This quantitative link is load-bearing for the main phenomenological claim.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states 'the heavier dark matter mass enhancing proton stability, and vice versa' without specifying the functional dependence; a brief qualifier on the scaling would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and valuable comments on our manuscript. The suggestions help to clarify the key aspects of our proposed framework. We address each major comment below and have made revisions to the manuscript to incorporate the requested details.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Symmetry Breaking and Residual Z_4): The central claim that the unbroken Z_4 forbids all tree-level B+L-violating operators (e.g., dimension-6 four-fermion terms) while permitting the claimed one-loop diagrams requires explicit verification. The manuscript must list the Z_4 charges of the dark-sector mediators, the exotic-B+L leptoquark, and the DM candidate, then enumerate all relevant operators to confirm none are Z_4-neutral at tree level. Without this, the prohibition of tree-level decay and the resulting lifetime-DM-mass correlation remain unestablished.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that an explicit listing of the Z_4 charges and enumeration of operators is necessary to substantiate the claims. In the revised version, we have expanded §3 to include a dedicated table presenting the Z_4 charges assigned to the dark matter candidate, the dark-sector mediators, and the exotic-B+L leptoquark. Following this, we enumerate all dimension-6 B+L violating four-fermion operators and show that none are neutral under the residual Z_4 symmetry, thereby forbidding tree-level proton decay. The one-loop diagrams are permitted because they involve fields whose charge combinations allow effective Z_4 invariance after integrating out the mediators. This addition establishes the symmetry protection rigorously and reinforces the link between the proton lifetime and the dark matter mass. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (One-Loop Proton Decay): The statement that the proton lifetime is linked to the dark matter mass, with heavier DM enhancing stability, is presented qualitatively. No explicit one-loop diagrams, Feynman rules, or decay-width formula (e.g., relating Γ_p to mediator masses and DM mass) are shown, nor are numerical lifetime predictions provided to demonstrate consistency with current bounds for O(TeV) mediators. This quantitative link is load-bearing for the main phenomenological claim.

    Authors: We recognize that the original manuscript presented the connection between proton lifetime and dark matter mass in a primarily qualitative manner. To provide the necessary quantitative support, the revised manuscript now includes the explicit one-loop Feynman diagrams in §4, along with the derivation of the effective Feynman rules from the model Lagrangian. We derive and present the decay width formula Γ_p, which depends on the masses of the mediators and the dark matter particle through the loop suppression factors. Numerical evaluations are added, demonstrating that for mediator masses around 1-2 TeV, the predicted proton lifetime exceeds the current experimental lower bounds (e.g., >10^34 years) and increases with larger dark matter masses due to the kinematic and coupling structure. These results are summarized in a new figure and table, confirming consistency with observations while highlighting the model's testability. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; model construction is self-contained

full rationale

The paper proposes a new particle content and symmetry-breaking pattern (global U(1)_{B+L} broken to residual Z_4) chosen so that DM is stable while proton decay is forbidden at tree level but allowed at one loop. This is a standard model-building construction whose central claims follow directly from the assigned charges and the resulting operator selection rules. No parameter is fitted to data and then relabeled as a prediction, no load-bearing result reduces to a self-citation, and the lifetime–DM-mass relation is an output of the loop calculation rather than an input by definition. The framework is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The framework rests on the assumption that U(1)B+L is a global symmetry whose breaking pattern yields exactly Z4, plus the existence of new dark-sector fields with appropriate charges; no independent evidence for these fields is supplied beyond consistency with lifetime bounds.

free parameters (1)
  • mediator masses
    TeV-scale masses for dark sector particles and leptoquark are chosen to satisfy current proton lifetime limits while remaining experimentally accessible.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Global U(1)B+L symmetry exists in the Standard Model and breaks spontaneously to a residual Z4.
    Invoked to unify dark matter stability and tree-level proton decay suppression.
invented entities (1)
  • dark sector mediators with exotic B+L charges no independent evidence
    purpose: Mediate one-loop proton decay while preserving Z4 stability for dark matter.
    New particles introduced to realize the loop-level process; no independent falsifiable prediction beyond mass range is given.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5714 in / 1416 out tokens · 28742 ms · 2026-05-19T10:36:58.830853+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages · 26 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Dark Matter Induced Proton Decays

    INTRODUCTION Within the Standard Model (SM), baryon number (B) and lepton number (L) are pertur- batively conserved accidental global symmetries, which prevent processes like proton decay. However, this need not be true for higher dimensional operators. Indeed, the well-known dim-5 Weinberg operator [1] violates lepton number by two units and generates th...

  2. [2]

    The stability of the DM candidate is ensured by the residual Z4 arising from U(1)B+L symmetry

    MODEL FRAMEWORK We present a loop-induced proton decay framework in a scotogenic-like setup [23], where the dark sector particles run in the loop and mediate proton decay. The stability of the DM candidate is ensured by the residual Z4 arising from U(1)B+L symmetry. We address proton decay in our model via the dim-6 effective operator [ du][ue]. To realiz...

  3. [5]

    0 → 1 BSM (EL, ER) (1, 1, −1) ( 5 6 , − 1

  4. [6]

    → (ω, ω3) (UL, UR) (3, 1, 2

  5. [7]

    → (ω3, ω) ˜S1 (¯3, 1, 4

  6. [8]

    An alternative UV-completion, featuring a fermionic DM candidate, is discussed in App

    1 6 → ω σ (1, 1, 0) 4 3 → 1 χ (1, 1, 0) 2 3 → 1 ζ (1, 1, 0) 1 6 → ω TABLE I: The particle content and their transformations under various symmetries are presented for the case where the DM candidate is a scalar. An alternative UV-completion, featuring a fermionic DM candidate, is discussed in App. A. Notably, the scalar ζ is both color and electromagnetic...

  7. [9]

    The UV-complete Feynman diagram corresponding to this process is shown in Fig

    PROTON DECA Y We now discuss the phenomenology of proton decay, which occurs at the one-loop level through the two-body process p → e+π0. The UV-complete Feynman diagram corresponding to this process is shown in Fig. 2. Due to the specific charge assignments of both SM and p e+ π0 u u d ELER u uUR UL ˜S1 ζ σ χ FIG. 2: Proton decay at one-loop level mediat...

  8. [10]

    In the present scenario, scalar ζ is also electromagnetically neutral, making it a viable DM candi- date

    DARK MA TTER In the dark sector, we have two color neutral particles, scalar ζ and fermion E. In the present scenario, scalar ζ is also electromagnetically neutral, making it a viable DM candi- date. However, it is possible to construct a scenario where the DM candidate is a fermion, as we discuss in App A. We now present the numerical results for DM phen...

  9. [11]

    The searches for these particles are ongoing in the collider experiments

    COLLIDER SIGNA TURE Apart from the DM candidate ζ, our model features a rich BSM sector that includes the leptoquark ˜S1, a heavy charged lepton E, and a vector-like quark U. The searches for these particles are ongoing in the collider experiments. The conventional collider searches for these BSM particles do not directly apply to our model, as they carry...

  10. [12]

    This scenario arose naturally from the U(1)B+L symmetry, which is already present in the SM

    CONCLUSIONS In this work, we presented a theoretical framework for DM induced proton decay. This scenario arose naturally from the U(1)B+L symmetry, which is already present in the SM. Its spontaneous breaking through the vev of the scalar fields χ and σ results in a residual Z4 symmetry. This residual symmetry serves a dual purpose: it ensures the stabil...

  11. [13]

    Also, we acknowledge Salvador Centelles Chuli´ a for his contributions during the preliminary stage of this work

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to thank Martin Hirsch, Oleg Popov, and Duttatreya Malayaja for useful discussions. Also, we acknowledge Salvador Centelles Chuli´ a for his contributions during the preliminary stage of this work. Authors would like to acknowledge the SARAH [53], SPheno [54], micrOMEGAs [55], and MadGraph5 [56] packages, which have been used...

  12. [14]

    1 3 → ω2 Li (1, 2, − 1

  13. [15]

    1 3 → ω2 ei (1, 1, −1) 1 → ω2 di (3, 1, − 1

  14. [16]

    0 → 1 BSM (N1, N2) (1, 1, 0) (− 1 2 , 5

  15. [17]

    → (ω3, ω) (D1, D2) (3, 1, − 1

  16. [18]

    → (ω, ω3) S1 (¯3, 1, 1

  17. [19]

    However, the DM and collider phenomenology exhibit significant differences

    1 6 → ω σ (1, 1, 0) 4 3 → 1 χ (1, 1, 0) 2 3 → 1 ϕ− (1, 1, −1) 1 6 → ω TABLE II: Particle content and their transformation under different symmetries in the case of fermionic DM. However, the DM and collider phenomenology exhibit significant differences. Unlike scalar DM, fermionic DM has distinct relic density production channels and DD prospects, leading...

  18. [20]

    Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes,

    S. Weinberg, “Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 1566–1570

  19. [21]

    Operator Analysis of Nucleon Decay,

    F. Wilczek and A. Zee, “Operator Analysis of Nucleon Decay,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 1571–1573

  20. [22]

    The Effective Hamiltonian for Nucleon Decay,

    L. F. Abbott and M. B. Wise, “The Effective Hamiltonian for Nucleon Decay,” Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2208

  21. [23]

    Unified Lepton-Hadron Symmetry and a Gauge Theory of the Basic Interactions,

    J. C. Pati and A. Salam, “Unified Lepton-Hadron Symmetry and a Gauge Theory of the Basic Interactions,” Phys. Rev. D 8 (1973) 1240–1251

  22. [24]

    Unity of All Elementary Particle Forces,

    H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, “Unity of All Elementary Particle Forces,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 32 (1974) 438–441

  23. [25]

    Unified Interactions of Leptons and Hadrons,

    H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski, “Unified Interactions of Leptons and Hadrons,” Annals Phys. 93 (1975) 193–266

  24. [26]

    Search for proton decay via p → e+π0 and p → µ+π0 with an enlarged fiducial volume in Super-Kamiokande I-IV,

    Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, A. Takenaka et al. , “Search for proton decay via p → e+π0 and p → µ+π0 with an enlarged fiducial volume in Super-Kamiokande I-IV,” Phys. Rev. D 102 no. 11, (2020) 112011, arXiv:2010.16098 [hep-ex]

  25. [27]

    Search for proton decay via p → µ+K0 in 0.37 megaton-years exposure of Super-Kamiokande,

    Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, R. Matsumoto et al. , “Search for proton decay via p → µ+K0 in 0.37 megaton-years exposure of Super-Kamiokande,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 7, (2022) 072003, arXiv:2208.13188 [hep-ex]

  26. [28]

    Abiet al.(DUNE), Deep Underground Neutrino Ex- periment (DUNE), Far Detector Technical Design Re- port, Volume II: DUNE Physics (2020), arXiv:2002.03005 [hep-ex]

    DUNE Collaboration, B. Abi et al. , “Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE), Far Detector Technical Design Report, Volume II: DUNE Physics,” arXiv:2002.03005 [hep-ex]

  27. [29]

    Hyper-Kamiokande Design Report

    Hyper-Kamiokande Collaboration, K. Abe et al. , “Hyper-Kamiokande Design Report,” arXiv:1805.04163 [physics.ins-det]

  28. [30]

    Abuslemeet al.(JUNO), Prog

    JUNO Collaboration, A. Abusleme et al. , “JUNO physics and detector,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 123 (2022) 103927, arXiv:2104.02565 [hep-ex]

  29. [31]

    Proton decay at 1-loop

    J. C. Helo, M. Hirsch, and T. Ota, “Proton decay at one loop,” Phys. Rev. D 99 no. 9, (2019) 095021, arXiv:1904.00036 [hep-ph]

  30. [32]

    Triple-leptoquark interactions for tree- and loop-level proton decays,

    I. Dorˇ sner, S. Fajfer, and O. Sumensari, “Triple-leptoquark interactions for tree- and loop-level proton decays,” JHEP 05 (2022) 183, arXiv:2202.08287 [hep-ph]

  31. [33]

    Extended scotogenic model of neutrino mass and proton decay,

    T. Nomura and O. Popov, “Extended scotogenic model of neutrino mass and proton decay,” Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 7, (2024) 075035, arXiv:2406.00651 [hep-ph]

  32. [34]

    Pathways to proton’s stability via naturally small neutrino masses,

    S. K. Kang and O. Popov, “Pathways to proton’s stability via naturally small neutrino masses,” arXiv:2412.20723 [hep-ph]

  33. [35]

    Three lepton decay modes of the proton

    P. J. O’Donnell and U. Sarkar, “Three lepton decay mode of the proton,” Phys. Lett. B 316 (1993) 121–126, arXiv:hep-ph/9307254. 22

  34. [36]

    B-L Violating Proton Decay Modes and New Baryogenesis Scenario in SO(10)

    K. S. Babu and R. N. Mohapatra, “B-L Violating Proton Decay Modes and New Baryogenesis Scenario in SO(10),” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 091803, arXiv:1207.5771 [hep-ph]

  35. [37]

    Extending the Standard Model Effective Field Theory with the Complete Set of Dimension-7 Operators

    L. Lehman, “Extending the Standard Model Effective Field Theory with the Complete Set of Dimension-7 Operators,” Phys. Rev. D 90 no. 12, (2014) 125023, arXiv:1410.4193 [hep-ph]

  36. [38]

    Dimension Seven Operators in Standard Model with Right handed Neutrinos

    S. Bhattacharya and J. Wudka, “Dimension-seven operators in the standard model with right handed neutrinos,” Phys. Rev. D 94 no. 5, (2016) 055022, arXiv:1505.05264 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 95, 039904 (2017)]

  37. [39]

    Proton decay into charged leptons

    T. Hambye and J. Heeck, “Proton decay into charged leptons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 no. 17, (2018) 171801, arXiv:1712.04871 [hep-ph]

  38. [40]

    $\Delta L = 3$ processes: Proton decay and LHC

    R. M. Fonseca, M. Hirsch, and R. Srivastava, “∆ L = 3 processes: Proton decay and the LHC,” Phys. Rev. D 97 no. 7, (2018) 075026, arXiv:1802.04814 [hep-ph]

  39. [41]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim et al. , “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,” Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6, arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO] . [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

  40. [42]

    Verifiable Radiative Seesaw Mechanism of Neutrino Mass and Dark Matter

    E. Ma, “Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 077301, arXiv:hep-ph/0601225

  41. [43]

    Scotogenic dark matter stability from gauged matter parity,

    S. K. Kang, O. Popov, R. Srivastava, J. W. F. Valle, and C. A. Vaquera-Araujo, “Scotogenic dark matter stability from gauged matter parity,” Phys. Lett. B 798 (2019) 135013, arXiv:1902.05966 [hep-ph]

  42. [44]

    Scotogenic dark matter and Dirac neutrinos from unbroken gauged B-L symmetry,

    J. Leite, A. Morales, J. W. F. Valle, and C. A. Vaquera-Araujo, “Scotogenic dark matter and Dirac neutrinos from unbroken gauged B-L symmetry,” Phys. Lett. B 807 (2020) 135537, arXiv:2003.02950 [hep-ph]

  43. [45]

    CDF-II W boson mass in the Dirac Scotogenic model,

    S. Centelles Chuli´ a, R. Srivastava, and S. Yadav, “CDF-II W boson mass in the Dirac Scotogenic model,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 38 no. 7, (2023) , arXiv:2206.11903 [hep-ph]

  44. [46]

    CDF-II W-boson mass anomaly in the canonical Scotogenic neutrino–dark matter model,

    A. Batra, S. K. A, S. Mandal, H. Prajapati, and R. Srivastava, “CDF-II W-boson mass anomaly in the canonical Scotogenic neutrino–dark matter model,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 38 no. 18n19, (2023) 2350090, arXiv:2204.11945 [hep-ph]

  45. [47]

    Predictions from scoto-seesaw with A4 modular symmetry,

    R. Kumar, P. Mishra, M. K. Behera, R. Mohanta, and R. Srivastava, “Predictions from scoto-seesaw with A4 modular symmetry,” Phys. Lett. B 853 (2024) 138635, arXiv:2310.02363 [hep-ph]

  46. [48]

    Cutting the Scotogenic Loop: A4 Flavor Symmetry to Z2 Dark Symmetry,

    R. Kumar, N. Nath, and R. Srivastava, “Cutting the Scotogenic Loop: A4 Flavor Symmetry to Z2 Dark Symmetry,” Springer Proc. Phys. 304 (2024) 1183–1185

  47. [49]

    Cutting the scotogenic loop: adding flavor to dark matter,

    R. Kumar, N. Nath, and R. Srivastava, “Cutting the scotogenic loop: adding flavor to dark matter,” JHEP 12 (2024) 036, arXiv:2406.00188 [hep-ph]

  48. [50]

    Comprehensive Phenomenology of the Dirac Scotogenic Model: Novel Low Mass Dark Matter,

    S. Centelles Chuli´ a, R. Srivastava, and S. Yadav, “Comprehensive Phenomenology of the Dirac Scotogenic Model: Novel Low Mass Dark Matter,” arXiv:2409.18513 [hep-ph] . 23

  49. [51]

    Scotogenic dark matter from gauged B − L,

    Y. Garnica, A. Morales, and C. A. Vaquera-Araujo, “Scotogenic dark matter from gauged B − L,” arXiv:2411.13756 [hep-ph]

  50. [52]

    Type-III Scotogenic Model: Inflation, Dark Matter and Collider Phenomenology,

    L. Singh, R. Srivastava, S. Verma, and S. Yadav, “Type-III Scotogenic Model: Inflation, Dark Matter and Collider Phenomenology,” arXiv:2501.13171 [hep-ph]

  51. [53]

    Collider signatures of fermionic scotogenic dark matter,

    V. M. Lozano, G. Sanchez Garcia, and J. W. F. Valle, “Collider signatures of fermionic scotogenic dark matter,” arXiv:2502.05270 [hep-ph]

  52. [54]

    Dirac Scoto Inverse-Seesaw from A4 Flavor Symmetry,

    R. Kumar, N. Nath, R. Srivastava, and S. Yadav, “Dirac Scoto Inverse-Seesaw from A4 Flavor Symmetry,” arXiv:2505.01407 [hep-ph]

  53. [55]

    Spontaneous proton decay and the origin of Peccei-Quinn symmetry

    M. Reig and R. Srivastava, “Spontaneous proton decay and the origin of Peccei–Quinn symmetry,” Phys. Lett. B 790 (2019) 134–139, arXiv:1809.02093 [hep-ph]

  54. [56]

    Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC

    CMS Collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al. , “Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC,” Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30–61, arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex]

  55. [57]

    Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC

    A TLASCollaboration, G. Aad et al. , “Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,” Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1–29, arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex]

  56. [58]

    Review of particle physics,

    Particle Data Group Collaboration, S. Navas et al. , “Review of particle physics,” Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 3, (2024) 030001

  57. [59]

    Update on scalar singlet dark matter

    J. M. Cline, K. Kainulainen, P. Scott, and C. Weniger, “Update on scalar singlet dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 055025, arXiv:1306.4710 [hep-ph] . [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 92, 039906 (2015)]

  58. [60]

    Improved lattice computation of proton decay matrix elements

    Y. Aoki, T. Izubuchi, E. Shintani, and A. Soni, “Improved lattice computation of proton decay matrix elements,” Phys. Rev. D 96 no. 1, (2017) 014506, arXiv:1705.01338 [hep-lat]

  59. [61]

    Dark Matter Escaping Direct Detection Runs into Higgs Mass Hierarchy Problem,

    P. Bharadwaj, R. Kumar, H. K. Prajapati, R. Srivastava, and S. Yadav, “Dark Matter Escaping Direct Detection Runs into Higgs Mass Hierarchy Problem,” arXiv:2412.13301 [hep-ph]

  60. [62]

    First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment

    LZ Collaboration, J. Aalbers et al. , “First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 no. 4, (2023) 041002, arXiv:2207.03764 [hep-ex]

  61. [63]

    Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment

    LZ Collaboration Collaboration, J. Aalbers et al. , “Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,” arXiv:2410.17036 [hep-ex]

  62. [64]

    First Dark Matter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the XENONnT Experiment,

    XENON Collaboration, E. Aprile et al. , “First Dark Matter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the XENONnT Experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 no. 4, (2023) 041003, arXiv:2303.14729 [hep-ex]

  63. [65]

    Dark Matter Search Results from 1.54 Tonne ·Year Exposure of PandaX-4T,

    PandaX Collaboration, Z. Bo et al. , “Dark Matter Search Results from 1.54 Tonne ·Year Exposure of PandaX-4T,” arXiv:2408.00664 [hep-ex] . 24

  64. [66]

    Search for scalar leptoquarks in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV with the ATLAS experiment

    A TLASCollaboration, M. Aaboud et al. , “Search for scalar leptoquarks in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS experiment,” New J. Phys. 18 no. 9, (2016) 093016, arXiv:1605.06035 [hep-ex]

  65. [67]

    Search for supersymmetry in multijet events with missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al. , “Search for supersymmetry in multijet events with missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV,” Phys. Rev. D 96 no. 3, (2017) 032003, arXiv:1704.07781 [hep-ex]

  66. [68]

    Search for squarks and gluinos in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum using 36 fb$^{-1}$ of $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV $pp$ collision data with the ATLAS detector

    A TLASCollaboration, M. Aaboud et al. , “Search for squarks and gluinos in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum using 36 fb −1 of √s = 13 TeV pp collision data with the ATLAS detector,” Phys. Rev. D 97 no. 11, (2018) 112001, arXiv:1712.02332 [hep-ex]

  67. [69]

    Search for supersymmetry in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum,

    CMS Collaboration, T. C. Collaboration et al. , “Search for supersymmetry in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum,” JHEP 10 (2019) 244, arXiv:1908.04722 [hep-ex]

  68. [70]

    Physics of leptoquarks in precision experiments and at particle colliders

    I. Dorˇ sner, S. Fajfer, A. Greljo, J. F. Kamenik, and N. Koˇ snik, “Physics of leptoquarks in precision experiments and at particle colliders,” Phys. Rept. 641 (2016) 1–68, arXiv:1603.04993 [hep-ph]

  69. [71]

    FCC-hh: The Hadron Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 3,

    FCC Collaboration, A. Abada et al. , “FCC-hh: The Hadron Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 3,” Eur. Phys. J. ST 228 no. 4, (2019) 755–1107

  70. [72]

    Exploring new models in all detail with SARAH

    F. Staub, “Exploring new models in all detail with SARAH,” Adv. High Energy Phys. 2015 (2015) 840780, arXiv:1503.04200 [hep-ph]

  71. [73]

    SPheno 3.1: extensions including flavour, CP-phases and models beyond the MSSM

    W. Porod and F. Staub, “SPheno 3.1: Extensions including flavour, CP-phases and models beyond the MSSM,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012) 2458–2469, arXiv:1104.1573 [hep-ph]

  72. [74]

    micrOMEGAs4.1: two dark matter candidates

    G. B´ elanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, and A. Semenov, “micrOMEGAs4.1: two dark matter candidates,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 192 (2015) 322–329, arXiv:1407.6129 [hep-ph]

  73. [75]

    The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations

    J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, “The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations,” JHEP 07 (2014) 079, arXiv:1405.0301 [hep-ph]