Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 2 cited by

BraTS orchestrator : Democratizing and Disseminating state-of-the-art brain tumor image analysis

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read One Python package wraps the winning brain-tumor AI models.

desk verdict A useful, honestly described software infrastructure paper, but the 'seamless access' claim is unverified and several integrated algorithms are not yet publicly documented. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.13807 v1 pith:LKLVO6AL submitted 2025-06-13 eess.IV cs.AIcs.CV

Florian Kofler , Marcel Rosier , Mehdi Astaraki , Ujjwal Baid , Hendrik Möller , Josef A. Buchner , Felix Steinbauer , Eva Oswald
show 29 more authors
Ezequiel de la Rosa Ivan Ezhov Constantin von See Jan Kirschke Anton Schmick Sarthak Pati Akis Linardos Carla Pitarch Sanyukta Adap Jeffrey Rudie Maria Correia de Verdier Rachit Saluja Evan Calabrese Dominic LaBella Mariam Aboian Ahmed W. Moawad Nazanin Maleki Udunna Anazodo Maruf Adewole Marius George Linguraru Anahita Fathi Kazerooni Zhifan Jiang Gian Marco Conte Hongwei Li Juan Eugenio Iglesias Spyridon Bakas Benedikt Wiestler Marie Piraud Bjoern Menze
This is my paper
classification eess.IVcs.AIcs.CV
keywords BraTSchallengebraintumorsegmentationMRImedicalimageanalysisopen-sourcesoftwaredeeplearningsynthesisclinicaltranslation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces BraTS orchestrator, an open-source Python package that bundles the winning algorithms from recent Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenges into a single, easy-to-run tool. The goal is to remove the technical barriers—data preprocessing, environment setup, Docker configuration—that have kept these state-of-the-art models out of routine research and clinical use. If the package works as claimed, a radiologist or researcher with minimal programming experience can run BraTS-winning segmentation and synthesis models on their own MRI data, and fuse the outputs of several models into a consensus segmentation. This would speed the translation of challenge innovations into neuro-radiology and neuro-oncology practice.

What carries the argument

The central object is the BraTS orchestrator package itself: a modular, API-driven Python pipeline that chains preprocessing from the BrainLesion suite, Docker containerization for each winning algorithm, inference execution, and optional ensemble fusion via the BraTS Fusionator module (majority voting or SIMPLE fusion). The package's design makes each algorithm's exact preprocessing and environment reproducible while keeping the user-facing interface minimal. The work is carried by this containerized 'orchestration'—the ability to automatically transform raw MRI into the specific input format each model expects, run the model, and return a usable segmentation or synthetic image.

What would settle it

Install the released package on a clean Linux machine with Docker, follow the published tutorial to run the BraTS 2023 adult-glioma winning algorithm on a public test scan, and verify that the model weights are fetched automatically and inference completes. If the weights are missing, the container fails, or the tutorial requires undocumented programming steps, the central claim of seamless access is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that BraTS orchestrator provides seamless access to state-of-the-art segmentation and synthesis algorithms for diverse brain tumors from the BraTS challenge ecosystem, and thereby democratizes access to the specialized knowledge developed within the BraTS community. The package abstracts away the complexities of modern deep learning: it handles preprocessing (registration, skull stripping, atlas registration), fetches and runs containerized models for each task, and offers a fusion module to ensemble multiple candidate segmentations. It covers seven segmentation tasks (glioma pre- and post-treatment, sub-Saharan African glioma, meningioma before and after radiotherapy, metastasis, pediatric tumors, and generalizability across tumors) and two synthesis tasks (healthy-tissue inpainting and missing MRI modality synthesis). The authors present tutorials for users with minimal programming experience and plan future support for native-space segmentation and DICOM output to bridge clinical deployment.

Load-bearing premise

The winning algorithms from BraTS 2023 and 2024 are publicly available, redistributable, and can be containerized within the orchestrator; if the underlying models are not released, are restrictively licensed, or cannot run inside Docker, the package cannot deliver the promised seamless access.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A clinician with no deep-learning background can run BraTS-winning tumor segmentation on their own MRI scans by following the provided tutorials.
  • Researchers can ensemble multiple winning algorithms into a consensus segmentation, which typically improves robustness over any single model.
  • Synthesis tasks—inpainting tumors to healthy-appearing tissue and filling in missing MRI sequences—become accessible for data augmentation and sequence harmonization.
  • The same infrastructure can be extended to new BraTS tasks and new winning models as future challenges conclude, keeping the package current.
  • Native-space segmentation and DICOM support, once added, would allow the outputs to flow directly into radiation therapy planning and PACS workflows.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A versioned, permanent model registry would guard against the risk that winning teams later restrict or withdraw their weights; without that, the package's coverage is contingent on goodwill.
  • The same containerized orchestration pattern could be reused for challenge ecosystems outside brain imaging, lowering the barrier for adopting winning algorithms in other clinical specialties.
  • Because the package standardizes preprocessing, it could double as a reproducibility harness: papers citing BraTS results could point to the exact container and preprocessing version used, making leaderboard numbers more auditably comparable.
  • A quantitative user study—measuring how quickly and correctly a novice can produce a segmentation after following the tutorial—would be the natural next validation step the paper does not report.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. This paper introduces BraTS orchestrator, an open-source Python package intended to provide streamlined, containerized access to winning algorithms from the BraTS 2023 and 2024 segmentation and synthesis challenges. The manuscript describes the package's modular architecture, its preprocessing pipeline, the set of supported tasks (seven segmentation and two synthesis tasks), and its planned applications and limitations. It also summarizes top-performing algorithms in Tables 2 and 3 and situates the package as a successor to the earlier BraTS Toolkit.

Significance. If the package works as described, it addresses a real and important barrier: the gap between challenge-winning brain tumor segmentation/synthesis algorithms and their use by researchers and clinicians without deep technical expertise. The open-source, Apache-2.0-licensed, Docker-based design, the continuity with BraTS Toolkit, and the emphasis on tutorials for non-experts are credible strengths. However, the paper currently provides a design and intention description rather than evidence of a working, verified package. The central claim of 'seamless access' is therefore plausible but unsubstantiated, and its validity depends on algorithmic availability, redistribution rights, and actual integration, none of which is demonstrated in the manuscript.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Section 2] The central claim that BraTS orchestrator provides 'seamless access to state-of-the-art segmentation and synthesis algorithms' is not supported by any evaluation or verification in the manuscript. There is no user study, no benchmark, no installation test, no smoke test, and no code-level evidence that the package successfully runs the listed algorithms on representative data. For a software paper, the authors should provide a task-by-task integration manifest (which exact winner, model weight provenance, container image, verified output) and report the results of reproducible inference tests on at least one public dataset per task.
  2. [Tables 2/3, References [47], [1], [5], [46], [50], and Section 5] Several algorithms claimed to be accessible through the orchestrator are not publicly available or are described only as 'paper in press' or 'manuscript under preparation'. Reference [47] (Myronenko) is 'Manuscript under preparation', and references [1], [5], [46], and [50] are listed as 'paper in press'. Section 5 further states that the authorship list is incomplete and that the authors are 'in the process of contacting all winning teams', which suggests that integration agreements and possibly the algorithms themselves are not finalized. If any of these algorithms turn out to be unavailable, non-redistributable, or not actually wired into the package, the 'seamless access' claim is false for those tasks. The paper must state, per task, the actual integration status and the license/redistribution terms for each included model.
  3. [Section 2.1 and Table 1] The preprocessing section states that 'the precise MNI152 and SRI24 versions utilized in the BraTS challenges will be made available through the preprocessing modules of BraTS Orchestrator', but the paper does not specify these versions or otherwise pin down the exact preprocessing configuration. Since the winning models are trained on challenge-specific preprocessed data, ambiguous preprocessing is a reproducibility risk: a user or reviewer cannot verify that the package reproduces the intended input distribution without referring to code that is not described in the paper. Please specify the exact atlases, registration tools, and preprocessing parameters, or provide a configuration file and a reproducibility test in the repository.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Throughout] The name of the package is spelled inconsistently: 'BraTS orchestrator' in the title and abstract, but 'BraTs orchestrator' in several places (e.g., Sections 2 and 4). Please standardize the spelling.
  2. [Author affiliations] The author list has a formatting error at 'Felix Steinbauer11 Eva Oswald2,7'; a comma or line break is missing.
  3. [Tables 2 and 3] The entry for Myronenko [47] consists entirely of 'N/A' with no explanation. A footnote should explain that the method is not yet publicly described, so readers do not misinterpret this as a completed algorithmic entry.
  4. [Table 1] The table lists task-specific preprocessing steps but does not indicate which version of the preprocessing pipeline (or which exact commands) should be used for each task. A pointer to the repository's configuration files would resolve this ambiguity.
  5. [Section 3] The sentence 'The provided tutorials on the BraTS orchestrator GitHub repository Illustrate the application...' has an unnecessarily capitalized 'Illustrate'; it should be lowercase.
  6. [Section 2] The paper would benefit from specifying a versioned release (e.g., DOI or commit hash) of the GitHub repository, rather than only the repository URL, to support the reproducibility claims.
  7. [Section 4] The discussion of the potential bias in BraTS 2023 annotations is interesting but not connected to the orchestrator's design or evaluation; consider either removing it or explaining its relevance to the package's limitations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: BraTS orchestrator is a software integration report with no derivation or prediction to be circular about; availability caveats are correctness risks, not circularity.

full rationale

This paper makes no derivation or prediction of a scientific quantity; it describes an open-source Python package that wraps existing BraTS challenge algorithms. The central claim, that the package provides 'seamless access' to winning algorithms, is a functional engineering claim that stands or falls on the code, containers, model weights, and licenses, not on a derivation chain. The self-citations, such as 'It continues and simplifies the previously established BraTS Toolkit segmentation module [30]', are lineage statements about prior software and do not serve as evidence for a newly derived result. The paper's own caveats, including that several algorithms are 'paper in press' or 'Manuscript under preparation' and that 'We are in the process of contacting all winning teams', are availability and licensing risks for the package's coverage claim, not circular reasoning. No equation is defined in terms of a target output, no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from self-citation to force a conclusion. Accordingly, the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is an engineering claim about a software package; it relies on assumptions about the computing environment, algorithm availability, and user capability rather than on mathematical derivations.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Docker is available and permitted in the target clinical and research environments
    The paper states that the package relies on Docker containerization, which requires administrative permissions and may be restricted by security protocols (Limitations section).
  • domain assumption The BraTS 2023 and 2024 winning algorithms are publicly available and can be redistributed as part of the package
    The package integrates these algorithms, but several are cited as 'paper in press' or 'manuscript under preparation' (Tables 2 and 3, reference [47]), so their availability and licensing are not established in the paper.
  • domain assumption Users with minimal programming experience can deploy the algorithms via the provided tutorials
    The paper claims democratization, but no user study or usability evaluation is presented to support this assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of BraTS orchestrator : Democratizing and Disseminating state-of-the-art brain tumor image analysis." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LKLVO6AL

@misc{pith2026250613807,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: BraTS orchestrator : Democratizing and Disseminating state-of-the-art brain tumor image analysis},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LKLVO6AL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.13807}
}
read the original abstract

The Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) cluster of challenges has significantly advanced brain tumor image analysis by providing large, curated datasets and addressing clinically relevant tasks. However, despite its success and popularity, algorithms and models developed through BraTS have seen limited adoption in both scientific and clinical communities. To accelerate their dissemination, we introduce BraTS orchestrator, an open-source Python package that provides seamless access to state-of-the-art segmentation and synthesis algorithms for diverse brain tumors from the BraTS challenge ecosystem. Available on GitHub (https://github.com/BrainLesion/BraTS), the package features intuitive tutorials designed for users with minimal programming experience, enabling both researchers and clinicians to easily deploy winning BraTS algorithms for inference. By abstracting the complexities of modern deep learning, BraTS orchestrator democratizes access to the specialized knowledge developed within the BraTS community, making these advances readily available to broader neuro-radiology and neuro-oncology audiences.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.13807 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. BraTS orchestrator features algorithms for tumor segmentation, missing MRI modality synthesis and brain lesion inpainting. The figure illustrates the respective inputs to the algorithms on the left and the computed outputs on the right [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustration of the different segmentation tasks for diverse brain tumor types within the BraTS segmentation challenges. Each row represents a distinct segmentation task, with the first four columns indicating the required MRI data. The segmentation labels for various tumor subregions, including Enhancing tumor (ET), non-enhancing tumor core (NETC), peritumoral edema (ED), resection cavity (RC), and Gross Tumor Volu… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Improving Pre-trained Adult Glioma Segmentation Models Using only Post-processing Techniques

    cs.CV 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Radiomics-guided thresholds that delete small components and relabel swapped tissue classes improved the BraTS 2025 ranking metric by 14.9% (SSA) and 0.9% (GLI) with zero GPU hours.

  2. BrainLesion Suite: A Flexible and User-Friendly Framework for Modular Brain Lesion Image Analysis

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    BrainLesion Suite is a modular open-source toolkit for brain lesion image analysis that combines previously published preprocessing, segmentation, and evaluation components, though the paper reports no new quantitativ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [47]

    Integrated biophysical modeling and image analysis: Application to neuro-oncology.Annual Review of Biomedical En- gineering, 22(Volume 22, 2020):309–341, 2020

    Andreas Mang, Spyridon Bakas, Shashank Subramanian, Christos Da- vatzikos, and George Biros. Integrated biophysical modeling and image analysis: Application to neuro-oncology.Annual Review of Biomedical En- gineering, 22(Volume 22, 2020):309–341, 2020. ISSN 1545-4274.https:// doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-062117-121105

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-062117-121105 2020

  2. [1]

    nnunet for meningioma segmentation in radiotherapy planning mri; paper in press, 2024

    Valeriia Abramova, Uma Maria Lal-Trehan Estrada, Cansu Yal, Rachika El- hassna Hamadache, Clara Lisazo, Adri‘a Casamitjana, Joaquim Salvi, Ar- nau Oliver, , and Xavier Llad´. nnunet for meningioma segmentation in radiotherapy planning mri; paper in press, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [5]

    Brain tumor segmentation in pediatrics and adults: A contribution to brats 2024; paper in press, 2024

    Mehdi Astaraki. Brain tumor segmentation in pediatrics and adults: A contribution to brats 2024; paper in press, 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [46]

    Segmentationofpediatricbraintumorsusingaradiologicallyinformed,deep learning cascade; paper in press, 2024

    Timothy Mulvany, Daniel Griffiths-King, Jan Novak, and Heather Rose. Segmentationofpediatricbraintumorsusingaradiologicallyinformed,deep learning cascade; paper in press, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [50]

    Ahmed W. Moawad, Anastasia Janas, Ujjwal Baid, Divya Ramakrish- nan, Rachit Saluja, Nader Ashraf, Nazanin Maleki, Leon Jekel, Niko- lay Yordanov, Pascal Fehringer, Athanasios Gkampenis, Raisa Amiruddin, Amirreza Manteghinejad, Maruf Adewole, Jake Albrecht, Udunna Ana- zodo, Sanjay Aneja, Syed Muhammad Anwar, Timothy Bergquist, Veron- ica Chiang, Verena Ch...

    arXiv 2023

  6. [2]

    Maruf Adewole, Jeffrey D. Rudie, Anu Gbadamosi, Oluyemisi Toyobo, Con- fidence Raymond, Dong Zhang, Olubukola Omidiji, Rachel Akinola, Mo- hammadAbbaSuwaid,AdaobiEmegoakor,NancyOjo,KennethAguh,Chi- nasa Kalaiwo, Gabriel Babatunde, Afolabi Ogunleye, Yewande Gbadamosi, Kator Iorpagher, Evan Calabrese, Mariam Aboian, Marius Linguraru, Jake Albrecht, Benedikt...

    arXiv 2023

  7. [3]

    Machine 16 F

    Hamed Akbari, Spyridon Bakas, Chiharu Sako, Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Javier Villanueva-Meyer, Jose A Garcia, Elizabeth Mamourian, Fang Liu, Quy Cao, Russell T Shinohara, Ujjwal Baid, Alexander Getka, Sarthak Pati, Ashish Singh, Evan Calabrese, Susan Chang, Jeffrey Rudie, Aris- teidis Sotiras, Pamela LaMontagne, Daniel S Marcus, Mikhail Milchenko, Arash Na...

    work page 2024

  8. [4]

    Amod, Alexandra Smith, Pearly Joubert, Confidence Ray- mond, Dong Zhang, Udunna C

    Alyssa R. Amod, Alexandra Smith, Pearly Joubert, Confidence Ray- mond, Dong Zhang, Udunna C. Anazodo, Dodzi Motchon, Tinashe E. M. Mutsvangwa, and Sébastien Quetin. Bridging the gap: Generalising state- of-the-art u-net models to sub-saharan african populations. In Ujjwal Baid, Reuben Dorent, Sylwia Malec, Monika Pytlarz, Ruisheng Su, Navodini Wi- jethila...

    work page 2024

Show all 69 references
  1. [6]

    Kitamura, Sarthak Pati, Luciano M

    Ujjwal Baid, Satyam Ghodasara, Suyash Mohan, Michel Bilello, Evan Cal- abrese, Errol Colak, Keyvan Farahani, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, Fe- lipe C. Kitamura, Sarthak Pati, Luciano M. Prevedello, Jeffrey D. Rudie, Chiharu Sako, Russell T. Shinohara, Timothy Bergquist, Rong Chai...

    2021 arXiv

  2. [7]

    Advancing the cancer genome atlas glioma MRI collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features.Scientific Data, 4 (1):170117, September 2017

    Spyridon Bakas, Hamed Akbari, Aristeidis Sotiras, Michel Bilello, Martin Rozycki, Justin S Kirby, John B Freymann, Keyvan Farahani, and Christos Davatzikos. Advancing the cancer genome atlas glioma MRI collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features.Scientifi...

    2017

  3. [8]

    Spyridon Bakas, Mauricio Reyes, Andras Jakab, Stefan Bauer, Markus Rempfler, Alessandro Crimi, Russell Takeshi Shinohara, Christoph Berger, Sung Min Ha, Martin Rozycki, et al. Identifying the best machine learning algorithms for brain tumor segmentation, progression assessment...

    2018 arXiv

  4. [9]

    Thakur, Shahriar Faghani, Mana Moassefi, Ujjwal Baid, Verena Chung, Sarthak Pati, Shubham Innani, Bhakti Baheti, Jake Albrecht, Alexandros Karargyris, Hasan Kassem, MacLean P

    Spyridon Bakas, Siddhesh P. Thakur, Shahriar Faghani, Mana Moassefi, Ujjwal Baid, Verena Chung, Sarthak Pati, Shubham Innani, Bhakti Baheti, Jake Albrecht, Alexandros Karargyris, Hasan Kassem, MacLean P. Nasral- lah, Jared T. Ahrendsen, Valeria Barresi, Maria A. Gubbiotti, Gis...

    2024 arXiv

  5. [10]

    Spyridon Bakas, Philipp Vollmuth, Norbert Galldiks, Thomas C Booth, Hugo J W L Aerts, Wenya Linda Bi, Benedikt Wiestler, Pallavi Tiwari, Sarthak Pati, Ujjwal Baid, Evan Calabrese, Philipp Lohmann, Martha Nowosielski, Rajan Jain, Rivka Colen, Marwa Ismail, Ghulam Rasool, Ja- ni...

    2024

  6. [11]

    Ledesma-Carbayo, Syed Muhammad Anwar, and Marius George Lingu- raru

    Daniel Capell’an-Mart’in, Zhifan Jiang, Abhijeet Parida, Xinyang Liu, Van Lam, Hareem Nisar, Austin Tapp, Sarah Elsharkawi, María J. Ledesma-Carbayo, Syed Muhammad Anwar, and Marius George Lingu- raru. Model ensemble for brain tumor segmentation in magnetic reso- nance imaging...

    2024

  7. [12]

    Mist: A simple and scalable end-to-end 3d medical imag- ing segmentation framework, 2024

    Adrian Celaya, Evan Lim, Rachel Glenn, Brayden Mi, Alex Balsells, Dawid Schellingerhout, Tucker Netherton, Caroline Chung, Beatrice Riviere, and David Fuentes. Mist: A simple and scalable end-to-end 3d medical imag- ing segmentation framework, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/24...

    2024

  8. [13]

    Moawad, Yury Velichko, BenediktWiestler,TalissaAltes,PatilBasavasagar,MartinBendszus,Gian- lucaBrugnara,JaeyoungCho,YaseenDhemesh,BrandonK.K.Fields,Filip 18 F

    Maria Correia de Verdier, Rachit Saluja, Louis Gagnon, Dominic LaBella, Ujjwall Baid, Nourel Hoda Tahon, Martha Foltyn-Dumitru, Jikai Zhang, Maram Alafif, Saif Baig, Ken Chang, Gennaro D’Anna, Lisa Deptula, Di- viya Gupta, Muhammad Ammar Haider, Ali Hussain, Michael Iv, Mari- ...

    2024 arXiv

  9. [14]

    Paetzold, Luca Canalini, Diana Waldmannstetter, Martin J

    Ivan Ezhov, Kevin Scibilia, Katharina Franitza, Felix Steinbauer, Suprosanna Shit, Lucas Zimmer, Jana Lipkova, Florian Kofler, Johannes C. Paetzold, Luca Canalini, Diana Waldmannstetter, Martin J. Menten, Marie Metz, Benedikt Wiestler, and Bjoern Menze. Learn-morph-infer: A ne...

    2023

  10. [15]

    Clinical measures, radiomics, and genomics offer synergistic value in AI-based prediction of overall survival in patients with glioblastoma.Scientific Reports, 12(1):8784, May 2022

    Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Sanjay Saxena, Erik Toorens, Danni Tu, Vishnu Bashyam, Hamed Akbari, Elizabeth Mamourian, Chiharu Sako, Costas Koumenis, Ioannis Verginadis, Ragini Verma, Russell T Shinohara, Arati S Desai, Robert A Lustig, Steven Brem, Suyash Mohan, Stephen J Bagley,...

    2022

  11. [16]

    Multiparametric MRI along with machine learning predicts prognosis and treatment response in pediatric low-grade glioma.Nature Communications, 16(1):340, January 2025

    Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Adam Kraya, Komal S Rathi, Meen Chul Kim, Arastoo Vossough, Nastaran Khalili, Ariana M Familiar, Deep Gandhi, Neda Khalili, Varun Kesherwani, Debanjan Haldar, Hannah Anderson, Run Jin, Aria Mahtabfar, Sina Bagheri, Yiran Guo, Qi Li, Xiaoyan Huang, Yuan...

    2025

  12. [17]

    Improved multi-task brain tumour segmentation with synthetic data augmentation, 2024

    AndréFerreira,TiagoJesus,BehrusPuladi,JensKleesiek,VictorAlves,and Jan Egger. Improved multi-task brain tumour segmentation with synthetic data augmentation, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2411.04632

    2024 arXiv

  13. [18]

    How we won brats 2023 adult glioma chal- lenge? just faking it! enhanced synthetic data augmentation and model en- semble for brain tumour segmentation, 2024

    André Ferreira, Naida Solak, Jianning Li, Philipp Dammann, Jens Kleesiek, Victor Alves, and Jan Egger. How we won brats 2023 adult glioma chal- lenge? just faking it! enhanced synthetic data augmentation and model en- semble for brain tumour segmentation, 2024. URLhttps://arxi...

    2023 arXiv

  14. [19]

    Unbiased nonlinear average age-appropriate brain templates from birth to adulthood

    VS Fonov, AC Evans, RC McKinstry, CR Almli, and DL Collins. Unbiased nonlinear average age-appropriate brain templates from birth to adulthood. NeuroImage, 47:S102, 2009. ISSN 1053-8119.https://doi.org/https: //doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(09)70884-5. URLhttps://www. sciencedire...

    2009 doi

  15. [20]

    Optimizing brain tumor segmentation with mednext: Brats 2024 ssa and pediatrics, 2024

    Sarim Hashmi, Juan Lugo, Abdelrahman Elsayed, Dinesh Saggurthi, Mo- hammed Elseiagy, Alikhan Nurkamal, Jaskaran Walia, Fadillah Adamsyah Maani, and Mohammad Yaqub. Optimizing brain tumor segmentation with mednext: Brats 2024 ssa and pediatrics, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv.org/ abs/...

    2024 arXiv

  16. [21]

    Roth, and Daguang Xu

    Ali Hatamizadeh, Vishwesh Nath, Yucheng Tang, Dong Yang, Holger R. Roth, and Daguang Xu. Swin unetr: Swin transformers for semantic seg- mentation of brain tumors in mri images. In Alessandro Crimi and Spyridon Bakas, editors,Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and...

    2022

  17. [22]

    Stu-net: Scalable and transferable medical image segmentation models empowered by large-scale supervised pre-training, 2023

    Ziyan Huang, Haoyu Wang, Zhongying Deng, Jin Ye, Yanzhou Su, Hui Sun, Junjun He, Yun Gu, Lixu Gu, Shaoting Zhang, and Yu Qiao. Stu-net: Scalable and transferable medical image segmentation models empowered by large-scale supervised pre-training, 2023. URLhttps://arxiv.org/ abs...

    2023 arXiv

  18. [23]

    Evaluating stu-net for brain tumor segmentation

    Ziyan Huang, Jin Ye, Haoyu Wang, Zhongying Deng, Yanzhou Su, Tianbin Li, Junlong Cheng, Jianpin Chen, Sizheng Guo, Yiqing Shen, and Junjun He. Evaluating stu-net for brain tumor segmentation. In Ujjwal Baid, Reuben Dorent, Sylwia Malec, Monika Pytlarz, Ruisheng Su, Navodini Wi...

    2024

  19. [24]

    nnu-net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation.Nature methods, 18(2):203–211, 2021

    Fabian Isensee, Paul F Jaeger, Simon AA Kohl, Jens Petersen, and Klaus H Maier-Hein. nnu-net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation.Nature methods, 18(2):203–211, 2021

    2021

  20. [25]

    Fabian Isensee, Tassilo Wald, Constantin Ulrich, Michael Baumgartner, Saikat Roy, Klaus Maier-Hein, and Paul F. Jaeger. nnu-net revisited: A call for rigorous validation in 3d medical image segmentation, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.09556

    2024 arXiv

  21. [26]

    Two-stage cascaded u-net: 1st place solution tobrats challenge2019 segmentationtask

    Zeyu Jiang, Changxing Ding, Minfeng Liu, and Dacheng Tao. Two-stage cascaded u-net: 1st place solution tobrats challenge2019 segmentationtask. InAlessandroCrimiandSpyridonBakas,editors,Brainlesion: Glioma, Mul- tiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries, pages 231–241, Cham,

  22. [27]

    Borja, Evan Calabrese, Verena Chung, Gian-Marco Conte, Farouk Dako, James Eddy, Ivan Ezhov, Ariana Familiar, Keyvan Farahani, An- 20 F

    Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Nastaran Khalili, Xinyang Liu, Deep Gandhi, Zhifan Jiang, Syed Muhammed Anwar, Jake Albrecht, Maruf Adewole, Udunna Anazodo, Hannah Anderson, Ujjwal Baid, Timothy Bergquist, Austin J. Borja, Evan Calabrese, Verena Chung, Gian-Marco Conte, Farouk Dako, ...

    2024 arXiv

  23. [28]

    Philipp Kickingereder, Fabian Isensee, Irada Tursunova, Jens Petersen, Ulf Neuberger, David Bonekamp, Gianluca Brugnara, Marianne Schell, Tobias Kessler, Martha Foltyn, Inga Harting, Felix Sahm, Marcel Prager, Martha Nowosielski, Antje Wick, Marco Nolden, Alexander Radbruch, J...

    2019

  24. [29]

    Effective segmentation of post-treatment gliomas using simple approaches: Artificial sequence gen- eration and ensemble models, 2024

    Heejong Kim, Leo Milecki, Mina C Moghadam, Fengbei Liu, Minh Nguyen, Eric Qiu, Abhishek Thanki, and Mert R Sabuncu. Effective segmentation of post-treatment gliomas using simple approaches: Artificial sequence gen- eration and ensemble models, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/24...

    2024

  25. [30]

    Brats toolkit: translating brats brain tumor segmen- tation algorithms into clinical and scientific practice.Frontiers in neuro- science, 14:125, 2020

    Florian Kofler, Christoph Berger, Diana Waldmannstetter, Jana Lipkova, Ivan Ezhov, Giles Tetteh, Jan Kirschke, Claus Zimmer, Benedikt Wiestler, and Bjoern H Menze. Brats toolkit: translating brats brain tumor segmen- tation algorithms into clinical and scientific practice.Fron...

    2020

  26. [31]

    Paetzold, Ivan Ezhov, Suprosanna Shit, Daniel Krahulec, Jan S

    Florian Kofler, Johannes C. Paetzold, Ivan Ezhov, Suprosanna Shit, Daniel Krahulec, Jan S. Kirschke, Claus Zimmer, Benedikt Wiestler, and Bjoern H. Menze. A baseline for predicting glioblastoma patient survival time with classical statistical models and primitive features igno...

    2020

  27. [32]

    Florian Kofler, Hendrik Möller, Josef A. Buchner, Ezequiel de la Rosa, Ivan Ezhov, Marcel Rosier, Isra Mekki, Suprosanna Shit, Moritz Negwer, Rami Al-Maskari, Ali Ertürk, Shankeeth Vinayahalingam, Fabian Isensee, Sarthak Pati, Daniel Rueckert, Jan S. Kirschke, Stefan K. Ehrlic...

  28. [33]

    Ap- proaching peak ground truth, 2023

    Florian Kofler, Johannes Wahle, Ivan Ezhov, Sophia Wagner, Rami Al- Maskari, Emilia Gryska, Mihail Todorov, Christina Bukas, Felix Meissen, TingyingPeng,AliErtürk,DanielRueckert,RolfHeckemann,JanKirschke, Claus Zimmer, Benedikt Wiestler, Bjoern Menze, and Marie Piraud. Ap- pro...

    2023

  29. [34]

    Paetzold, Ezequiel de da Rosa, Isra Mekki,ShankeethVinayahalingam,HasanKassem,JuexinZhang,KeChen, Ying Weng, Alicia Durrer, Philippe C

    Florian Kofler, Felix Meissen, Felix Steinbauer, Robert Graf, Stefan K Ehrlich, Annika Reinke, Eva Oswald, Diana Waldmannstetter, Florian Hoelzl, Izabela Horvath, Oezguen Turgut, Suprosanna Shit, Christina Bukas, Kaiyuan Yang, Johannes C. Paetzold, Ezequiel de da Rosa, Isra Me...

    2024 arXiv

  30. [35]

    Kofler et al

    Dominic LaBella, Maruf Adewole, Michelle Alonso-Basanta, Talissa Altes, Syed Muhammad Anwar, Ujjwal Baid, Timothy Bergquist, Radhika Bhalerao, Sully Chen, Verena Chung, Gian-Marco Conte, Farouk Dako, James Eddy, Ivan Ezhov, Devon Godfrey, Fathi Hilal, Ariana Famil- iar, Keyvan...

    2023

  31. [36]

    Reitman, Trey Mullikin, Ulas Bagci, Sean Sachdev, Jona A

    Dominic LaBella, Katherine Schumacher, Michael Mix, Kevin Leu, Shan McBurney-Lin, Pierre Nedelec, Javier Villanueva-Meyer, Jonathan Shapey, Tom Vercauteren, Kazumi Chia, Omar Al-Salihi, Justin Leu, Lia Halasz, Yury Velichko, Chunhao Wang, John Kirkpatrick, Scott Floyd, Zachary...

    2024 arXiv

  32. [37]

    Hongwei Bran Li, Gian Marco Conte, Qingqiao Hu, Syed Muhammad Anwar, Florian Kofler, Ivan Ezhov, Koen van Leemput, Marie Piraud, Maria Diaz, Byrone Cole, Evan Calabrese, Jeff Rudie, Felix Meissen, Maruf Adewole, Anastasia Janas, Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Dominic LaBella, Ahmed ...

    2023

  33. [38]

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2305.07642

    arXiv

  34. [39]

    Roth, Austin Tapp, Maria J

    Xinyang Liu, Pengfei Guo, Daniel Capellán-Martin, Zhifan Jiang, Holger R. Roth, Austin Tapp, Maria J. Ledesma-Carbayo, Syed Muhammad Anwar, and Marius George Linguraru. Controllable latent diffusion-based 3d brain tumor segmentation: With synthetic label generation and detaile...

    2025

  35. [40]

    Haider, Harry Subramanian, Waverly Brim, Ichiro Ikuta, Antonio Omuro, Gian Marco Conte, Bernadette V

    Jan Lost, Tej Verma, Leon Jekel, Marc von Reppert, Niklas Tillmanns, Sara Merkaj, Gabriel Cassinelli Petersen, Ryan Bahar, Ayyüce Gordem, Muhammad A. Haider, Harry Subramanian, Waverly Brim, Ichiro Ikuta, Antonio Omuro, Gian Marco Conte, Bernadette V. Marquez-Nostra, Ar- man A...

  36. [41]

    Advanced tumor seg- mentation in medical imaging: An ensemble approach for brats 2023 adult glioma and pediatric tumor tasks

    Fadillah Maani, Anees Ur Rehman Hashmi, Mariam Aljuboory, Numan Saeed, Ikboljon Sobirov, and Mohammad Yaqub. Advanced tumor seg- mentation in medical imaging: An ensemble approach for brats 2023 adult glioma and pediatric tumor tasks. In Ujjwal Baid, Reuben Dorent, Syl- wia Ma...

    2023

  37. [42]

    Xinyang Liu, Zhifan Jiang, Holger R Roth, Syed Muhammad Anwar, Erin R Bonner, Aria Mahtabfar, Roger J Packer, Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Miriam Bornhorst, and Marius George Linguraru. Early prognostication of overall survival for pediatric diffuse midline gliomas using mri radio...

    2024 doi

  38. [43]

    The multimodal brain tumor image segmen- tation benchmark (brats).IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 34(10): 1993–2024, 2014

    Bjoern H Menze, Andras Jakab, Stefan Bauer, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, Keyvan Farahani, Justin Kirby, Yuliya Burren, Nicole Porz, Johannes Slot- boom, Roland Wiest, et al. The multimodal brain tumor image segmen- tation benchmark (brats).IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 3...

    1993

  39. [44]

    V-net: Fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation

    Fausto Milletari, Nassir Navab, and Seyed-Ahmad Ahmadi. V-net: Fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation. 24 F. Kofler et al. In2016 Fourth International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV), pages 565– 571, 2016.https://doi.org/10.1109/3DV.2016.79

    2016 doi

  40. [45]

    URL https://www.ajnr.org/content/44/10/1126

    ISSN 0195-6108.https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8000. URL https://www.ajnr.org/content/44/10/1126

    doi

  41. [48]

    3d mri brain tumor segmentation using autoencoder regularization

    Andriy Myronenko. 3d mri brain tumor segmentation using autoencoder regularization. In Alessandro Crimi, Spyridon Bakas, Hugo Kuijf, Fara- hani Keyvan, Mauricio Reyes, and Theo van Walsum, editors,Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries,pag...

    2019

  42. [49]

    Automated 3d segmentation of kidneys and tumors in miccai kits 2023 challenge, 2023

    Andriy Myronenko, Dong Yang, Yufan He, and Daguang Xu. Automated 3d segmentation of kidneys and tumors in miccai kits 2023 challenge, 2023. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2310.04110

    2023 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Epidemi- ology of brain and other CNS tumors.Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 21(12):68, November 2021

    Quinn T Ostrom, Stephen S Francis, and Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan. Epidemi- ology of brain and other CNS tumors.Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 21(12):68, November 2021

    2021

  44. [52]

    Manuscript under preparation

    Andriy Myronenko. Manuscript under preparation

  45. [53]

    The cancer imaging phenomics toolkit (captk): technical overview

    Sarthak Pati, Ashish Singh, Saima Rathore, Aimilia Gastounioti, Mark Bergman, Phuc Ngo, Sung Min Ha, Dimitrios Bounias, James Minock, Grayson Murphy, et al. The cancer imaging phenomics toolkit (captk): technical overview. InBrainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and ...

    2019

  46. [54]

    Thakur, Hamed Akbari, Andreas Mang, Shashank Subramanian, George Biros, Christos Da- vatzikos, and Spyridon Bakas

    Sarthak Pati, Vaibhav Sharma, Heena Aslam, Siddhesh P. Thakur, Hamed Akbari, Andreas Mang, Shashank Subramanian, George Biros, Christos Da- vatzikos, and Spyridon Bakas. Estimating glioblastoma biophysical growth parameters using deep learning regression. In Alessandro Crimi a...

    2021

  47. [55]

    Enhancing brain tumor segmentation generalizability using mean teacher and optimal trans- port; paper in press, 2024

    Shengjie Niu, Fangran Miao, Ting Li, and Jian Huang. Enhancing brain tumor segmentation generalizability using mean teacher and optimal trans- port; paper in press, 2024

    2024

  48. [56]

    Thesri24multichannelatlasofnormaladulthumanbrainstructure.Human brain mapping, 31(5):798–819, 2010

    Torsten Rohlfing, Natalie M Zahr, Edith V Sullivan, and Adolf Pfefferbaum. Thesri24multichannelatlasofnormaladulthumanbrainstructure.Human brain mapping, 31(5):798–819, 2010

    2010

  49. [57]

    Ledesma-Carbayo, and Marius George Linguraru

    Abhijeet Parida, Daniel Capellán-Martín, Zhifan Jiang, Austin Tapp, Xinyang Liu, Syed Muhammad Anwar, María J. Ledesma-Carbayo, and Marius George Linguraru. Adult glioma segmentation in sub-saharan africa using transfer learning on stratified finetuning data, 2024. URL https:/...

    2024 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Jäger,and KlausH

    Saikat Roy, Gregor Koehler, Constantin Ulrich, Michael Baumgartner, Jens Petersen, FabianIsensee,Paul F. Jäger,and KlausH. Maier-Hein. Mednext: Transformer-driven scaling of convnets for medical image segmentation. In Hayit Greenspan, Anant Madabhushi, Parvin Mousavi, Septimiu...

    2023

  51. [59]

    Artificial intelligence for response assessment in neuro oncology (ai-rano), part 1: review of current advancements.The Lancet Oncology, 25(11):e581–e588, 2024

    Javier E Villanueva-Meyer, Spyridon Bakas, Pallavi Tiwari, Janine M Lupo, Evan Calabrese, Christos Davatzikos, Wenya Linda Bi, Marwa Ismail, Hamed Akbari, Philipp Lohmann, Thomas C Booth, Benedikt Wiestler, Hugo J W L Aerts, Ghulam Rasool, Joerg C Tonn, Martha Nowosielski, Raj...

    2024

  52. [60]

    Brain cancer imag- ing phenomics toolkit (brain-captk): An interactive platform for quantita- tive analysis of glioblastoma

    Saima Rathore, Spyridon Bakas, Sarthak Pati, Hamed Akbari, Ratheesh Kalarot, Patmaa Sridharan, Martin Rozycki, Mark Bergman, Birkan Tunc, Ragini Verma, Michel Bilello, and Christos Davatzikos. Brain cancer imag- ing phenomics toolkit (brain-captk): An interactive platform for ...

    2018

  53. [61]

    Transferring knowledge from high-quality to low-quality mri for adult glioma diagnosis, 2024

    Yanguang Zhao, Long Bai, Zhaoxi Zhang, Yanan Wu, Mobarakol Islam, and Hongliang Ren. Transferring knowledge from high-quality to low-quality mri for adult glioma diagnosis, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2410. 18698

    2024

  54. [62]

    U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation

    Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In Nassir Navab, Joachim Hornegger, William M. Wells, and Alejandro F. Frangi, editors,Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2015,...

    2015

  55. [63]

    Brain tumor segmentation based on self-supervised pre-training and adaptive region-specific loss

    Yubo Zhou, Lanfeng Zhong, and Guotai Wang. Brain tumor segmentation based on self-supervised pre-training and adaptive region-specific loss. In Ujjwal Baid, Reuben Dorent, Sylwia Malec, Monika Pytlarz, Ruisheng Su, NavodiniWijethilake,SpyridonBakas,andAlessandroCrimi,editors,B...

    2024

  56. [64]

    Unet++: A nested u-net architecture for medical image segmentation

    Zongwei Zhou, Md Mahfuzur Rahman Siddiquee, Nima Tajbakhsh, and Jianming Liang. Unet++: A nested u-net architecture for medical image segmentation. In Danail Stoyanov, Zeike Taylor, Gustavo Carneiro, Tan- veer Syeda-Mahmood, Anne Martel, Lena Maier-Hein, João Manuel R.S. Tavar...

    2018

  57. [65]

    3d-transunet for brain metastases segmentation in the brats2023 challenge

    Siwei Yang, Xianhang Li, Jieru Mei, Jieneng Chen, Cihang Xie, and Yuyin Zhou. 3d-transunet for brain metastases segmentation in the brats2023 challenge. In Ujjwal Baid, Reuben Dorent, Sylwia Malec, Monika Pytlarz, Ruisheng Su, Navodini Wijethilake, Spyridon Bakas, and Alessand...

    2024

  58. [67]

    nnformer: Interleaved transformer for volumetric segmen- tation, 2022

    Hong-Yu Zhou, Jiansen Guo, Yinghao Zhang, Lequan Yu, Liansheng Wang, and Yizhou Yu. nnformer: Interleaved transformer for volumetric segmen- tation, 2022. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2109.03201

    2022 arXiv

  59. [2020]

    Springer International Publishing

  60. [2023]

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2312.02608

    arXiv

  61. [2024]

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2305.09011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.