REVIEW 14 cited by
A Technical Survey of Reinforcement Learning Techniques for Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
A Technical Survey of Reinforcement Learning Techniques for Large Language Models
read the original abstract
This survey offers a comprehensive foundation on the integration of RL with language models, highlighting prominent algorithms such as Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), Q-Learning, and Actor-Critic methods. Additionally, it provides an extensive technical overview of RL techniques specifically tailored for LLMs, including foundational methods like Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) and AI Feedback (RLAIF), as well as advanced strategies such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). We systematically analyze their applications across domains, i.e., from code generation to tool-augmented reasoning. Crucially, we move beyond descriptive categorization to provide a rigorous algorithmic analysis of failure modes, mathematically framing the structural bottlenecks and stability trade-offs inherent in policy optimization. We also present a comparative taxonomy based on reward modeling, feedback mechanisms, and optimization strategies. Our evaluation highlights key trends. RLHF remains dominant for alignment, and outcome-based RL such as Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) significantly improves stepwise reasoning. However, persistent challenges such as reward hacking, computational costs, and scalable feedback collection underscore the need for continued innovation. We also explicate the causal factors behind recent benchmark performances, distinguishing between gains derived from architectural scaling versus those stemming from specific optimization objectives. We further discuss emerging directions, including hybrid RL algorithms, verifier-guided training, and multi-objective alignment frameworks. This survey serves as a roadmap for researchers advancing RL-driven LLM development, balancing capability enhancement with safety and scalability.
Forward citations
Cited by 14 Pith papers
-
Generate, Filter, Control, Replay: A Comprehensive Survey of Rollout Strategies for LLM Reinforcement Learning
This survey introduces the Generate-Filter-Control-Replay (GFCR) taxonomy to structure rollout pipelines for RL-based post-training of reasoning LLMs.
-
PS-PPO: Prefix-Sampling PPO for Critic-Free RLHF
PS-PPO samples prefixes of trajectories in critic-free RLHF and uses importance-weighted updates to reduce compute and memory while claiming to preserve the full-trajectory objective.
-
Rubrics to Tokens: Bridging Response-level Rubrics and Token-level Rewards in Instruction Following Tasks
RTT bridges response-level rubrics to token-level rewards via a relevance discriminator and intra-sample group normalization, yielding higher instruction and rubric accuracy than baselines.
-
Understanding and Exploiting Weight Update Sparsity for Communication-Efficient Distributed RL
PULSE exploits BF16-invisible sparsity in weight updates to enable over 100x lower communication in distributed RL post-training via compute-visible sparsification.
-
The Geometric Reasoner: Manifold-Informed Latent Foresight Search for Long-Context Reasoning
TGR performs manifold-informed latent foresight search to boost trajectory coverage in long-context reasoning tasks by up to 13 AUC points with minimal overhead.
-
Auditing Data Membership in Reinforcement Learning With Verifiable Rewards
DIBA detects membership of prompts in RLVR training by measuring reward success changes and policy behavioral drift between pre- and post-RLVR model checkpoints.
-
The Landscape of Agentic Reinforcement Learning for LLMs: A Survey
Survey that defines agentic RL for LLMs via POMDPs, introduces a taxonomy of planning/tool-use/memory/reasoning capabilities and domains, and compiles open environments from over 500 papers.
-
PEER: Unified Process-Outcome Reinforcement Learning for Structured Empathetic Reasoning
PEER applies GRPO reinforcement learning with a unified process-outcome reward model to structured empathetic reasoning steps on the SER dataset, yielding gains in empathy, strategy alignment, and human-likeness.
-
Why Multi-Step Tool-Use Reinforcement Learning Collapses and How Supervisory Signals Fix It
RL for LLM multi-step tool use collapses from control token probability spikes but interleaving SFT improves stability at the cost of OOD generalization.
-
Trust Region On-Policy Distillation
TrOPD stabilizes on-policy distillation for LLMs with trust-region learning, outlier estimation, and off-policy guidance, outperforming prior OPD methods on reasoning and code benchmarks.
-
Self-Distilled Policy Gradient
SDPG combines group-relative verifier advantages, normalized standard deviation, full-vocabulary on-policy self-distillation, and reference-policy KL regularization to improve stability and performance over RLVR and s...
-
Rethinking Agentic Reinforcement Learning In Large Language Models
The paper reviews conceptual foundations, methodological innovations, effective designs, critical challenges, and future directions for LLM-based Agentic Reinforcement Learning.
-
Rethinking Agentic Reinforcement Learning In Large Language Models
The paper surveys the conceptual foundations, methodological innovations, challenges, and future directions of agentic reinforcement learning frameworks that embed cognitive capabilities like meta-reasoning and self-r...
-
Rethinking Agentic Reinforcement Learning In Large Language Models
This review synthesizes conceptual foundations, methods, challenges, and future directions for agentic reinforcement learning in large language models.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.