arxiv: 2507.04471 · v2 · submitted 2025-07-06 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE· hep-th

A multi-parameter expansion for the evolution of asymmetric binaries in astrophysical environments

Sayak Datta , Andrea Maselli This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 05:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HEhep-th

keywords asymmetric binariesextreme mass ratio inspiralsgravitational wavesperturbation theoryastrophysical environmentsmulti-parameter expansionSchwarzschild metric

0 comments p. Extension

The pith

A multi-parameter expansion reduces metric and fluid perturbations around asymmetric binaries in matter to wave equations similar to the vacuum case.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a multi-parameter formalism for compact binaries with large mass asymmetries evolving in general matter distributions that have both radial and tangential pressures. Building on ideas from vacuum perturbation theory, it shows that for small deviations from the Schwarzschild metric, which covers most astrophysical cases, the perturbations of the metric and the fluid can be expressed as wave equations closely resembling those in empty space. This offers a practical method for calculating the orbital dynamics and gravitational wave output from such systems in realistic environments and allows modular combination with existing vacuum models.

Core claim

In the regime of small deviations from the Schwarzschild metric, the system admits a simplified description where both metric and fluid perturbations can be cast into wave equations closely related to those of the vacuum case. The multi-parameter expansion provides a framework for modeling the dynamics and gravitational wave emission from asymmetric binaries embedded in astrophysical matter distributions.

What carries the argument

The multi-parameter expansion, inspired by vacuum perturbation theory, which casts metric and fluid perturbations into wave equations when deviations from Schwarzschild are small.

If this is right

The orbital evolution of extreme mass ratio inspirals can be modeled accurately in the presence of matter.
Gravitational wave signals from binaries in astrophysical environments can be computed using simplified equations.
This approach integrates with existing vacuum perturbation results for hybrid modeling.
Precise inference of source properties becomes possible even when matter effects are present.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Extending this to larger deviations might require higher-order terms in the expansion.
The method could be applied to other compact object systems beyond binaries, such as in galactic centers.
Implementing numerical solutions based on these wave equations could test the framework against simulations.

Load-bearing premise

Deviations from the Schwarzschild metric must remain small for the multi-parameter expansion to simplify the perturbations to vacuum-like wave equations.

What would settle it

A detailed numerical simulation or observation of an asymmetric binary in a matter distribution with small metric deviations that shows perturbations not following the vacuum-like wave equations.

read the original abstract

Compact binaries with large mass asymmetries - such as Extreme and Intermediate Mass Ratio Inspirals - are unique probes of the astrophysical environments in which they evolve. Their long-lived and intricate dynamics allow for precise inference of source properties, provided waveform models are accurate enough to capture the full complexity of their orbital evolution. In this work, we develop a multi-parameter formalism, inspired by vacuum perturbation theory, to model asymmetric binaries embedded in general matter distributions with both radial and tangential pressures. In the regime of small deviations from the Schwarzschild metric, relevant to most astrophysical scenarios, the system admits a simplified description, where both metric and fluid perturbations can be cast into wave equations closely related to those of the vacuum case. This framework offers a practical approach to modeling the dynamics and the gravitational wave emission from binaries in realistic matter distributions, and can be modularly integrated with existing results for vacuum sources.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper offers a multi-parameter expansion around Schwarzschild for asymmetric binaries in matter with radial and tangential pressures, claiming both metric and fluid perturbations reduce to vacuum-style wave equations, but that reduction needs explicit checking for pressure terms.

read the letter

This paper develops a multi-parameter formalism to model the orbital evolution and gravitational wave emission from extreme and intermediate mass ratio binaries embedded in general matter distributions that carry both radial and tangential pressures. The central move is to expand around a Schwarzschild background under the assumption of small deviations, which the authors say lets the metric and fluid perturbations satisfy wave equations closely related to the vacuum Regge-Wheeler and Zerilli equations. The framework is presented as modular so that existing vacuum results can be reused directly. That is the main new element: a systematic way to include pressured matter without rebuilding the entire perturbation machinery from scratch each time. The approach is aimed squarely at making waveform models more realistic for LISA-relevant sources where environmental effects could be measurable. The setup for the small-deviation regime is laid out clearly and matches the astrophysical cases the authors target. The modular integration with vacuum perturbation theory is a practical strength if the math works. The soft spot is the claimed reduction for the fluid perturbations. Linearized stress-energy conservation for a background with anisotropic pressures generally produces additional terms involving pressure gradients and anisotropic stress. These do not automatically vanish or get absorbed into a source-free wave operator just because deviations from Schwarzschild are small. The multi-parameter expansion does not by itself guarantee the principal part stays hyperbolic and source-free for arbitrary pressure profiles. The paper would need to show the explicit cancellation or redefinition at the orders kept. If that step is carried through and holds, the framework is worth using. If not, the central simplification rests on an assumption rather than a derivation. This is for people building environmental waveform models for EMRIs and IMRIs. A reader already working with vacuum perturbation theory who wants to add matter effects would get the most out of it, assuming the fluid equations check out. It deserves a serious referee because the topic is timely for LISA science and the multi-parameter handling of pressures is a concrete step forward, even if the fluid reduction requires close scrutiny in review.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a multi-parameter formalism, inspired by vacuum perturbation theory, to model the orbital evolution and gravitational wave emission of asymmetric binaries (such as EMRIs and IMRIs) embedded in general astrophysical matter distributions that include both radial and tangential pressures. It claims that, for small deviations from the Schwarzschild metric, both metric and fluid perturbations admit a simplified description in which they satisfy wave equations closely related to the vacuum Regge-Wheeler and Zerilli equations, allowing modular integration with existing vacuum results.

Significance. If the claimed reduction to vacuum-like wave equations holds, the work would offer a practical and extensible framework for incorporating environmental effects into waveform models without sacrificing the analytic simplicity of vacuum perturbation theory. This could meaningfully improve the modeling of long-lived signals relevant to space-based detectors and enable systematic studies of matter distributions around compact binaries.

major comments (1)

[Abstract and main derivation] The central claim that fluid perturbations (with anisotropic pressures) reduce to source-free wave equations closely related to the vacuum case is load-bearing but not secured by the small-deviation assumption alone. Linearized conservation laws for the stress-energy tensor generally introduce additional terms involving pressure gradients and anisotropic stress perturbations; these must cancel or be absorbed into a redefinition of the wave operator. The multi-parameter expansion around Schwarzschild does not automatically guarantee this cancellation for arbitrary pressure profiles, and an explicit demonstration of the principal part remaining hyperbolic and source-free at the working order is required.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract refers to a 'multi-parameter formalism' without enumerating the expansion parameters; listing them explicitly in the introduction or §2 would aid clarity.
Notation for the fluid variables and the precise relation to the vacuum Regge-Wheeler/Zerilli operators should be defined before the reduction is stated.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. The major comment identifies a key point regarding the explicit demonstration of the reduction for fluid perturbations, which we address below with a commitment to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and main derivation] The central claim that fluid perturbations (with anisotropic pressures) reduce to source-free wave equations closely related to the vacuum case is load-bearing but not secured by the small-deviation assumption alone. Linearized conservation laws for the stress-energy tensor generally introduce additional terms involving pressure gradients and anisotropic stress perturbations; these must cancel or be absorbed into a redefinition of the wave operator. The multi-parameter expansion around Schwarzschild does not automatically guarantee this cancellation for arbitrary pressure profiles, and an explicit demonstration of the principal part remaining hyperbolic and source-free at the working order is required.

Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration strengthens the paper. In the multi-parameter expansion, the background is a small deviation from Schwarzschild determined by the matter distribution satisfying the Einstein equations. Linearizing the conservation laws around this background, the terms involving background pressure gradients and anisotropic stresses are canceled by corresponding contributions from the metric perturbations at the leading order in the small parameters. The wave operator's principal part remains unchanged from the vacuum Regge-Wheeler and Zerilli operators because higher-order curvature corrections from the background are neglected at our working order. To make this transparent, we will add an explicit step-by-step derivation of the fluid perturbation equations in the revised manuscript, showing the cancellation and confirming hyperbolicity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained via multi-parameter expansion

full rationale

The paper presents a multi-parameter formalism inspired by vacuum perturbation theory to model asymmetric binaries in matter distributions. The key claim—that small deviations from Schwarzschild allow both metric and fluid perturbations to be cast into wave equations closely related to the vacuum Regge-Wheeler/Zerilli case—is framed as a consequence of the expansion in the small-deviation regime, not as a redefinition of inputs or a fit. No quoted equations or self-citations reduce the central reduction to a tautology or prior result by construction; the framework is described as modularly integrable with existing vacuum results. The approach remains independent of any load-bearing self-citation chain or ansatz smuggling, making the derivation self-contained against standard GR perturbation benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, new axioms, or invented entities are stated. The work relies on standard general relativity and perturbation theory around Schwarzschild.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5682 in / 1101 out tokens · 57183 ms · 2026-05-19T05:49:15.448682+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

In the regime of small deviations from the Schwarzschild metric... both metric and fluid perturbations can be cast into wave equations closely related to those of the vacuum case... V^A = f(ℓ(ℓ+1)/r² − 6M/r³) and the Zerilli potential V^P.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/DimensionForcing.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We develop a multi-parameter formalism, inspired by vacuum perturbation theory... expanding... in powers of ε and q... retain terms up to O(εq).

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 99 canonical work pages · 21 internal anchors

[1]

Environmental effects in the presence of the secondary: (1,1) matter decompositions The last piece of the multi-parameter expansion is given by the (1 , 1) perturbations of matter energy- momentum tensor, T eµν (1,1). The covariant equa- tions (5) are determined, at this order, by three con- tributions: ∇µ[g(0,0) αβ ](T eµ ν (1,1) + T pµ ν (1,1)) + ∇µ[g(1...

work page
[2]

The frequency domain solution In the frequency domain, Eqs. (47)–(48) reduce to two ordinary differential equations in the radial coordinate: [∂2 r⋆ + ω2 − V A]ϕ(1,0) ℓm (ω, r) = SA(1,0) ℓm (ω, r) , (51) [∂2 r⋆ + ω2 − V A]ϕ(1,1) ℓm (ω, r) = SA(1,1) ℓm (ω, r) , (52) where, for a generic function X(t, r): X(ω, r) = 1 2π Z +∞ −∞ eiωtX(t, r) dt . (53) X(t, r)...

work page 2022
[3]

C. P. L. Berry, S. A. Hughes, C. F. Sopuerta, A. J. K. Chua, A. Heffernan, K. Holley-Bockelmann, D. P. Mihaylov, M. C. Miller, and A. Sesana, (2019), arXiv:1903.03686 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2019
[4]

Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

P. Amaro-Seoane, H. Audley, S. Babak, J. Baker, E. Ba- rausse, P. Bender, E. Berti, P. Binetruy, M. Born, D. Bor- toluzzi, J. Camp, C. Caprini, V. Cardoso, M. Colpi, J. Conklin, N. Cornish, C. Cutler, K. Danzmann, R. Dolesi, L. Ferraioli, V. Ferroni, E. Fitzsimons, J. Gair, L. Gesa Bote, D. Giardini, F. Gibert, C. Grimani, H. Hal- loin, G. Heinzel, T. Her...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[5]

TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector

J. Luo et al. (TianQin), Class. Quant. Grav. 33, 035010 (2016), arXiv:1512.02076 [astro-ph.IM]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[6]

Barsanti, V

S. Barsanti, V. De Luca, A. Maselli, and P. Pani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 111104 (2022), arXiv:2109.02170 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[7]

A. L. Miller, S. Clesse, F. De Lillo, G. Bruno, A. Depasse, and A. Tanasijczuk, Phys. Dark Univ.32, 100836 (2021), arXiv:2012.12983 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2021
[8]

Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. I: Supermassive black hole binaries

A. Klein et al. , Phys. Rev. D 93, 024003 (2016), arXiv:1511.05581 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[9]

Volonteri et al

M. Volonteri et al. , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 498, 2219 (2020), arXiv:2005.04902 [astro-ph.GA]

work page arXiv 2020
[10]

Arca-Sedda, P

M. Arca-Sedda, P. Amaro-Seoane, and X. Chen, Astron. Astrophys. 652, A54 (2021), arXiv:2007.13746 [astro- ph.GA]

work page arXiv 2021
[11]

LISA Definition Study Report

M. Colpi et al. (LISA), (2024), arXiv:2402.07571 [astro- ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[12]

J. Luo, H. An, L. Bian, R.-G. Cai, Z. Cao, W. Han, J. He, M. A. Hendry, B. Hu, Y.-M. Hu, F. P. Huang, S.- J. Huang, S. P. Kim, E.-K. Li, Y.-X. Liu, V. Milyukov, S. Pi, K. Postnov, M. Sasaki, C.-G. Shao, L. Shao, C. Shi, S. Sun, A. Wang, P.-P. Wang, S. Wang, S.-J. Wang, Z.-Z. Xianyu, H. Yang, T. Yang, J.-d. Zhang, X. Zhang, W. Zhao, L.-G. Zhu, and J. Mei, ...

work page arXiv 2025
[13]

Ajith et al

P. Ajith et al. , JCAP 01, 108 (2025), arXiv:2404.09181 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[14]

The Science of the Einstein Telescope

A. Abac et al., (2025), arXiv:2503.12263 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[15]

Evans, A

M. Evans, A. Corsi, C. Afle, A. Ananyeva, K. G. 16 Arun, S. Ballmer, A. Bandopadhyay, L. Barsotti, M. Baryakhtar, E. Berger, E. Berti, S. Biscov- eanu, S. Borhanian, F. Broekgaarden, D. A. Brown, C. Cahillane, L. Campbell, H.-Y. Chen, K. J. Daniel, A. Dhani, J. C. Driggers, A. Effler, R. Eisenstein, S. Fairhurst, J. Feicht, P. Fritschel, P. Fulda, I. Gupt...

work page arXiv 2023
[16]

Self-force and radiation reaction in general relativity

L. Barack and A. Pound, Rept. Prog. Phys. 82, 016904 (2019), arXiv:1805.10385 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[17]

Barausse et al

E. Barausse et al. , Gen. Rel. Grav. 52, 81 (2020), arXiv:2001.09793 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[18]

K. G. Arun et al. (LISA), Living Rev. Rel. 25, 4 (2022), arXiv:2205.01597 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[19]

M. A. Sedda et al. , Class. Quant. Grav. 37, 215011 (2020), arXiv:1908.11375 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[20]

C´ ardenas-Avenda˜ no and C

A. C´ ardenas-Avenda˜ no and C. F. Sopuerta, (2024), arXiv:2401.08085 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[21]

A New Era in the Quest for Dark Matter

G. Bertone and M. P. Tait, Tim, Nature 562, 51 (2018), arXiv:1810.01668 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[22]

Can environmental effects spoil precision gravitational-wave astrophysics?

E. Barausse, V. Cardoso, and P. Pani, Phys. Rev. D89, 104059 (2014), arXiv:1404.7149 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[23]

Cardoso and A

V. Cardoso and A. Maselli, Astron. Astrophys.644, A147 (2020), arXiv:1909.05870 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2020
[24]

K. Eda, Y. Itoh, S. Kuroyanagi, and J. Silk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 221101 (2013), arXiv:1301.5971 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[25]

K. Eda, Y. Itoh, S. Kuroyanagi, and J. Silk, Phys. Rev. D91, 044045 (2015), arXiv:1408.3534 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[26]

B. J. Kavanagh, D. A. Nichols, G. Bertone, and D. Gag- gero, Phys. Rev. D102, 083006 (2020), arXiv:2002.12811 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[27]

Cardoso, K

V. Cardoso, K. Destounis, F. Duque, R. P. Macedo, and A. Maselli, Phys. Rev. D 105, L061501 (2022), arXiv:2109.00005 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[28]

Speeney, A

N. Speeney, A. Antonelli, V. Baibhav, and E. Berti, Phys. Rev. D 106, 044027 (2022), arXiv:2204.12508 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[29]

Gliorio, E

S. Gliorio, E. Berti, A. Maselli, and N. Speeney, (2025), arXiv:2503.16649 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[30]

Kakehi, H

T. Kakehi, H. Omiya, T. Takahashi, and T. Tanaka, (2025), arXiv:2505.10036 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[31]

C. Feng, Y. Tang, and Y.-L. Wu, (2025), arXiv:2506.02937 [astro-ph.GA]

work page arXiv 2025
[32]

Mitra, N

S. Mitra, N. Speeney, S. Chakraborty, and E. Berti, (2025), arXiv:2505.04697 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[33]

Chandrasekhar, Astrophys

S. Chandrasekhar, Astrophys. J. 97, 255 (1943)

work page 1943
[34]

E. C. Ostriker, Astrophys. J. 513, 252 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9810324

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[35]

Bonga, H

B. Bonga, H. Yang, and S. A. Hughes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 101103 (2019), arXiv:1905.00030 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2019
[36]

M. Garg, A. Derdzinski, L. Zwick, P. R. Capelo, and L. Mayer, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.517, 1339 (2022), arXiv:2206.05292 [astro-ph.GA]

work page arXiv 2022
[37]

Speri, A

L. Speri, A. Antonelli, L. Sberna, S. Babak, E. Barausse, J. R. Gair, and M. L. Katz, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021035 (2023), arXiv:2207.10086 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[38]

"Kludge" gravitational waveforms for a test-body orbiting a Kerr black hole

S. Babak, H. Fang, J. R. Gair, K. Glampedakis, and S. A. Hughes, Phys. Rev. D75, 024005 (2007), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 77, 04990 (2008)], arXiv:gr-qc/0607007

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[39]

Two timescale analysis of extreme mass ratio inspirals in Kerr. I. Orbital Motion

T. Hinderer and E. E. Flanagan, Phys. Rev. D78, 064028 (2008), arXiv:0805.3337 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[40]

Pound, B

A. Pound, B. Wardell, N. Warburton, and J. Miller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 021101 (2020), arXiv:1908.07419 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[41]

Wardell, A

B. Wardell, A. Pound, N. Warburton, J. Miller, L. Durkan, and A. Le Tiec, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 241402 (2023), arXiv:2112.12265 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[42]

Warburton, A

N. Warburton, A. Pound, B. Wardell, J. Miller, and L. Durkan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 151102 (2021), arXiv:2107.01298 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[43]

Observable Signatures of EMRI Black Hole Binaries Embedded in Thin Accretion Disks

B. Kocsis, N. Yunes, and A. Loeb, Phys. Rev. D 84, 024032 (2011), arXiv:1104.2322 [astro-ph.GA]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[44]

Coogan, G

A. Coogan, G. Bertone, D. Gaggero, B. J. Kavanagh, and D. A. Nichols, Phys. Rev. D 105, 043009 (2022), arXiv:2108.04154 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[45]

P. S. Cole, G. Bertone, A. Coogan, D. Gaggero, T. Karydas, B. J. Kavanagh, T. F. M. Spieksma, and G. M. Tomaselli, Nature Astron. 7, 943 (2023), arXiv:2211.01362 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[46]

G. M. Tomaselli, T. F. M. Spieksma, and G. Bertone, JCAP 07, 070 (2023), arXiv:2305.15460 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[47]

Berezhiani, G

L. Berezhiani, G. Cintia, V. De Luca, and J. Khoury, JCAP 06, 024 (2024), arXiv:2311.07672 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2024
[48]

C. F. B. Macedo, P. Pani, V. Cardoso, and L. C. B. Crispino, Astrophys. J. 774, 48 (2013), arXiv:1302.2646 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[49]

Annulli, V

L. Annulli, V. Cardoso, and R. Vicente, Phys. Rev. D 102, 063022 (2020), arXiv:2009.00012 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[50]

Traykova, K

D. Traykova, K. Clough, T. Helfer, E. Berti, P. G. Fer- reira, and L. Hui, Phys. Rev. D 104, 103014 (2021), arXiv:2106.08280 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[51]

Destounis, A

K. Destounis, A. G. Suvorov, and K. D. Kokkotas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 141102 (2021), arXiv:2103.05643 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[52]

Vicente and V

R. Vicente and V. Cardoso, Phys. Rev. D 105, 083008 (2022), arXiv:2201.08854 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[53]

Destounis, A

K. Destounis, A. Kulathingal, K. D. Kokkotas, and G. O. Papadopoulos, Phys. Rev. D 107, 084027 (2023), arXiv:2210.09357 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[54]

Khalvati, A

H. Khalvati, A. Santini, F. Duque, L. Speri, J. Gair, H. Yang, and R. Brito, (2024), arXiv:2410.17310 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[55]

Vicente, T

R. Vicente, T. K. Karydas, and G. Bertone, (2025), arXiv:2505.09715 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[56]

C. Yuan, V. Cardoso, F. Duque, and Z. Younsi, Phys. Rev. D 111, 063048 (2025), arXiv:2502.07871 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[57]

J. S. Santos, V. Cardoso, J. Nat´ ario, and M. van de Meent, (2025), arXiv:2506.14868 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[58]

G. M. Tomaselli, Phys. Rev. D 111, 063075 (2025), arXiv:2501.00090 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[59]

Duque, C

F. Duque, C. F. B. Macedo, R. Vicente, and V. Cardoso, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 121404 (2024), arXiv:2312.06767 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[60]

Brito and S

R. Brito and S. Shah, Phys. Rev. D 108, 084019 (2023), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 110, 109902 (2024)], arXiv:2307.16093 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[61]

Dyson, T

C. Dyson, T. F. M. Spieksma, R. Brito, M. van de Meent, 17 and S. Dolan, (2025), arXiv:2501.09806 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[62]

D. Li, C. Weller, P. Bourg, M. LaHaye, N. Yunes, and H. Yang, (2025), arXiv:2507.02045 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[63]

Cardoso, K

V. Cardoso, K. Destounis, F. Duque, R. Panosso Macedo, and A. Maselli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 241103 (2022), arXiv:2210.01133 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[64]

Figueiredo, A

E. Figueiredo, A. Maselli, and V. Cardoso, Phys. Rev. D 107, 104033 (2023), arXiv:2303.08183 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[65]

Speeney, E

N. Speeney, E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. Maselli, Phys. Rev. D 109, 084068 (2024), arXiv:2401.00932 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[66]

Damour and G

T. Damour and G. Esposito-Farese, Class. Quant. Grav. 9, 2093 (1992)

work page 2093
[67]

Cadogan and E

T. Cadogan and E. Poisson, Gen. Rel. Grav. 56, 119 (2024), arXiv:2406.03191 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[68]

Cadogan and E

T. Cadogan and E. Poisson, Gen. Rel. Grav. 56, 118 (2024), arXiv:2406.03185 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[69]

Cadogan and E

T. Cadogan and E. Poisson, Gen. Rel. Grav. 56, 120 (2024), arXiv:2406.03196 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[70]

R. L. Bowers and E. P. T. Liang, Astrophys. J. 188, 657 (1974)

work page 1974
[71]

D. D. Doneva and S. S. Yazadjiev, Phys. Rev. D85, 124023 (2012), arXiv:1203.3963 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[72]

Anisotropic stars as ultracompact objects in General Relativity

G. Raposo, P. Pani, M. Bezares, C. Palenzuela, and V. Cardoso, (2018), arXiv:1811.07917 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[73]

Regge and J

T. Regge and J. A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev.108, 1063 (1957)

work page 1957
[74]

F. J. Zerilli, Phys. Rev. D 2, 2141 (1970)

work page 1970
[75]

F. J. Zerilli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 737 (1970)

work page 1970
[76]

N. Sago, H. Nakano, and M. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. D 67, 104017 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0208060

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[77]

Datta, Phys

S. Datta, Phys. Rev. D 109, 104042 (2024), arXiv:2312.01277 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[78]

Kojima, Phys

Y. Kojima, Phys. Rev. D 46, 4289 (1992)

work page 1992
[79]

sgrep repo,

“sgrep repo,” (github.com/masellia/SGREP/)

work page
[80]

S. L. Detweiler and E. Poisson, Phys. Rev. D 69, 084019 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0312010

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

Showing first 80 references.