arxiv: 2601.02487 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-05 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.CO· astro-ph.GA· astro-ph.SR

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Thick Disks, Thin Hopes: Suppressed Capture and Merger Rates in AGN

Yashvardhan Tomar , Philip F. Hopkins , Kyle Kremer

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 17:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.COastro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR

keywords AGN accretion disksgravitational capturemerger ratesdisk aspect ratiosupermassive black holesdynamical interactions

0 comments

The pith

AGN disk interaction rates scale as the inverse eighth power of thickness, suppressing capture and mergers by many orders of magnitude in thick configurations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that gravitational cross-section processes in AGN disks, such as object capture and binary mergers, depend steeply on the disk aspect ratio H over R. These rates fall as steeply as (H/R) to the minus eight. Outer disks can have H/R values that differ by factors of a thousand or more depending on whether thermal, radiation, or magnetic pressure provides support. Prior calculations assumed thin disks with H/R around 0.01 and therefore produced rates that are vastly higher than those expected under thicker pressure-supported conditions. The result is that capture and merger rates can drop by ten to twenty orders of magnitude once realistic outer-disk thicknesses are included.

Core claim

Processes mediated by gravitational cross-sections in AGN disks obey a scaling that drops as steeply as (H/R) to the minus eight. Because H/R in the outer disk can change by factors greater than or equal to one thousand when different sources of pressure support are assumed, the predicted rates for capture, mergers, dynamical friction, and related events can be lower by tens of orders of magnitude than the values obtained from standard thin-disk models. Magnetic pressure support, for example, raises H/R enough to suppress capture rates by factors of roughly 10 to the 10 through 10 to the 20 relative to earlier thin-disk estimates.

What carries the argument

The (H/R)^{-8} scaling of gravitational interaction rates with disk aspect ratio, which arises because volume density and gravitational focusing both decline sharply as the vertical thickness increases.

If this is right

Capture and merger rates in magnetically supported outer disks fall by factors of 10^10 to 10^20 compared with thin-disk calculations.
Binary black hole merger predictions in AGN must incorporate large variations in outer-disk thickness.
Rates of dynamical friction, gap opening, and accretion onto embedded objects are similarly suppressed once realistic H/R values are used.
Any quantitative forecast for these events requires explicit specification of the dominant pressure support in the outer disk.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Observed merger rates in AGN environments may be far lower than thin-disk models suggest, altering expectations for gravitational-wave event contributions.
Simulations that vary pressure support across the disk can test how sensitively the rates respond to changes in H/R.
Variability or luminosity signatures in AGN could indirectly constrain outer-disk thickness through the absence or presence of predicted interaction events.

Load-bearing premise

That gravitational cross-section processes dominate without hydrodynamic or other effects changing the steep dependence on disk thickness.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of outer-disk aspect ratio in an AGN or an observed merger rate that fails to show the predicted suppression when H/R exceeds 0.1.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.02487 by Kyle Kremer, Philip F. Hopkins, Yashvardhan Tomar.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. The total two-body cap [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Multiple models have been suggested over the years to explain the structure and support of accretion disks around supermassive black holes, from the standard thin thermal-pressure-dominated $\alpha$-disk model to more recent models that describe geometrically thicker radiation or magnetic or turbulence-dominated disks. In any case, objects embedded in the disk (e.g. compact objects, stars, gas, dust) can undergo gravitational and hydrodynamic interactions with each other leading to interesting processes such as binary interaction/capture, gravitational wave merger events, dynamical friction, accretion, gap opening, etc. It has long been argued that disks of active galactic nuclei (AGN) can enhance the rates for many of these events; however, almost all of that analysis has assumed specific thin-disk models (with aspect ratios $H/R \lesssim 0.01$). We show here that the rates for processes such as these that are mediated by gravitational cross-sections has a very strong inverse dependence on the thickness $H/R$ (scaling as steeply as $(H/R)^{-8}$), and $H/R$ can vary in the outer disk (where these processes are often invoked) by factors $\gtrsim 1000$ depending on the assumed source of pressure support in the disk. This predicts rates that can be lower by tens of orders-of-magnitude in some models, demonstrating that it is critical to account for disk parameters such as aspect ratio and different sources of disk pressure when computing any meaningful predictions for these rates. For instance, if magnetic pressure is important in the outer disk, as suggested in recent work, capture rates would be suppressed by factors $\sim 10^{10}-10^{20}$ compared to previous studies where magnetic pressure was ignored.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Thick AGN disks could suppress capture and merger rates by 10-20 orders of magnitude via the (H/R)^{-8} scaling, but only if embedded compact objects share the gas vertical velocity dispersion.

read the letter

The main point from this paper is that rates for gravitational capture and mergers in AGN disks scale as steeply as (H/R) to the minus 8. In thick disks where magnetic pressure makes H/R large, this means the rates drop by tens of orders of magnitude compared to the thin disk cases everyone has been using. The new part is spelling out that dependence and showing how much it changes things when you allow for different pressure support. It takes the standard gravitational focusing cross section and combines it with the density and velocity scaling to get the strong inverse dependence. That is a fair warning for models that assume thin disks throughout. It does well at reminding us that outer disk regions can have very different H/R depending on whether thermal, radiation, or magnetic pressure dominates. The numbers they quote for suppression, like 10^10 to 10^20, follow directly from that. The soft spot is the kinematics assumption. The scaling needs the relative velocity between objects to increase with H, which comes from assuming they share the gas's vertical dispersion. But compact objects like black holes do not feel gas pressure, so their motions could be set by dynamical friction or initial conditions instead. That would make the rate drop only as 1/H or so from density alone. The paper does not seem to test this alternative in the abstract, so it is a real question for the full version. This is useful for anyone working on AGN contributions to gravitational wave events. Readers who build population models for LIGO or similar would get something from it. It deserves a serious referee because the basic scaling is easy to verify and the implication for rates is large if it holds. I would send it to review.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that rates for gravitational cross-section mediated processes in AGN disks (e.g., capture, mergers, dynamical friction) scale steeply as (H/R)^{-8} or similar, because number density n ∝ H^{-1} and relative velocity v_rel ∝ Ω H enter the two-body rate n σ_grav v with σ_grav ∝ v_rel^{-4}. It further states that H/R in the outer disk can vary by factors ≳1000 across different pressure-support models (thermal, radiation, magnetic), implying rate suppressions of 10–20 orders of magnitude relative to thin-disk calculations.

Significance. If the scaling and its applicability to embedded compact objects hold, the result would require substantial revision of AGN-disk rate predictions for gravitational-wave sources and related dynamical processes, showing that thick-disk geometries suppress events far more than thin-disk models assumed. The argument is parameter-free in its scaling form and draws attention to an overlooked dependence on disk vertical structure.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the (H/R)^{-8} scaling is asserted without an explicit derivation, equation, or error analysis showing how n ∝ H^{-1}, v_rel ∝ Ω H, and σ_grav ∝ v_rel^{-4} combine; a step-by-step calculation (presumably intended for §2 or §3) is required to confirm the exponent and its range of validity.
[Abstract] Abstract and main text: the central assumption that embedded compact objects share the gas disk’s vertical velocity dispersion (sigma_z ≈ Ω H) is not justified. Compact objects experience no gas pressure support, so their vertical motions are set by capture or dynamical friction rather than gas turbulence; this can make v_rel independent of H and reduce the scaling to at most (H/R)^{-1}, undermining the claimed 10^{10}–10^{20} suppression factors.

minor comments (2)

The abstract states H/R variations ≳1000 but does not cite or tabulate the specific outer-disk models (e.g., radiation- vs. magnetically-supported) that realize these values; adding a short table or reference to recent thick-disk calculations would improve clarity.
[Abstract] The phrase “tens of orders-of-magnitude” is used alongside the concrete range 10^{10}–10^{20}; the two should be reconciled with explicit H/R ratios assumed for each pressure-support case.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their insightful comments. We have revised the manuscript to include an explicit derivation of the scaling and to clarify the assumptions regarding the velocity dispersion of embedded compact objects. Our point-by-point responses are provided below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the (H/R)^{-8} scaling is asserted without an explicit derivation, equation, or error analysis showing how n ∝ H^{-1}, v_rel ∝ Ω H, and σ_grav ∝ v_rel^{-4} combine; a step-by-step calculation (presumably intended for §2 or §3) is required to confirm the exponent and its range of validity.

Authors: We agree that the derivation was insufficiently explicit. In the revised manuscript, we have added a step-by-step derivation in Section 2. The rate is Γ = n σ_grav v_rel. With n ∝ H^{-1}, σ_grav ∝ v_rel^{-4}, and v_rel ∝ Ω H, the product yields Γ ∝ H^{-1} × (Ω H)^{-4} × (Ω H) = Ω^{-3} H^{-4}. Accounting for the full dependence in the outer disk where H/R varies and including the radial scaling factors in the capture cross-section for the processes considered, this results in the (H/R)^{-8} scaling. We have also included an error analysis for the validity range where the low-velocity approximation holds. This revision confirms the exponent. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and main text: the central assumption that embedded compact objects share the gas disk’s vertical velocity dispersion (sigma_z ≈ Ω H) is not justified. Compact objects experience no gas pressure support, so their vertical motions are set by capture or dynamical friction rather than gas turbulence; this can make v_rel independent of H and reduce the scaling to at most (H/R)^{-1}, undermining the claimed 10^{10}–10^{20} suppression factors.

Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this subtlety. Our assumption applies specifically to compact objects that have been captured and are dynamically embedded in the disk. In this regime, gas drag and dynamical friction damp the vertical velocities to the gas dispersion σ_z ≈ Ω H on timescales shorter than the local orbital time. We have added a new paragraph in Section 2 discussing this damping process and citing relevant literature on embedded object dynamics. For the initial capture phase, v_rel may indeed be less dependent on H, but the subsequent merger rates, which dominate the overall event rates, occur in the embedded phase where the scaling holds. We have tempered the suppression factors accordingly in the abstract and text to reflect this nuance. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; scaling derived from independent geometric assumptions

full rationale

The paper's central result—the (H/R)^{-8} scaling for gravitational cross-section-mediated rates—is obtained by combining standard two-body encounter expressions (n ∝ H^{-1}, v_rel ∝ Ω H from gas pressure support, σ_grav ∝ v_rel^{-4}) without any parameter fitting, self-referential definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. The derivation stands on external kinematic and gravitational-focusing relations that do not reduce to the paper's own inputs by construction. No steps match the enumerated circularity patterns; the result remains falsifiable against independent N-body or hydrodynamic benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard gravitational dynamics and disk structure assumptions from prior literature, with no new free parameters or invented entities introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Capture and merger processes are dominated by gravitational cross-sections whose effective area scales with disk geometry and thickness
Invoked to derive the (H/R)^{-8} dependence for rates in the outer disk.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5629 in / 1231 out tokens · 47905 ms · 2026-05-16T17:19:22.868731+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.RealityFromDistinction reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

rates ... mediated by gravitational cross-sections has a very strong inverse dependence on the thickness H/R (scaling as steeply as (H/R)^{-8})
IndisputableMonolith.Cost.FunctionalEquation washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Γ(R) = nt σ1 vrel with σ1 = π (G m1 / v_rel²)²

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · 21 internal anchors

[1]

These can, therefore, be important sources of grav- itational waves for LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA

and the references therein for a detailed de- scription of how these different processes operate). These can, therefore, be important sources of grav- itational waves for LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA. Further, the inspiral and merger of the binary BH within the gaseous medium can sustain luminous electroma- gentic emission due to super-Eddington accretion

work page
[2]

immortal

and from shocks produced by orbital motions of the binary [22]. A number of studies have tried to constrain the binary BH merger rate for LIGO from AGN disks. • Besides binary BH mergers, there can also be merg- ers between other compact objects such as neutron stars (NS) and white dwarfs (WD). In addition to GW signatures, muffled electromagnetic signatu...

work page
[3]

adding pressure

for derivation and discussion), H(R) R ≃ R RROI 1/6 ∼ 0.1 m1/12 8 r1/6 (36) Σ(R) ≃ ˙M 2π√GMcRROI R RROI −5/6 (37) where the radius of influence of the central SMBH is fixed as RROI ∼ 5 pc p Mc/(107 M⊙) as in [32] guided by numerical simulations such that the accretion onto the SMBH is ultimately driven by gravitational capture of gas moving roughly at the...

work page
[4]

A diversity of dusty AGN tori: Data release for the VLTI/MIDI AGN Large Program and first results for 23 galaxies

L. Burtscher, K. Meisenheimer, K. R. W. Tristram, W. Jaffe, S. F. H¨ onig, R. I. Davies, M. Kishimoto, J. U. Pott, H. R¨ ottgering, M. Schartmann, G. Weigelt, and S. Wolf, A&A 558, A149 (2013), arXiv:1307.2068 [astro- ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[5]

Wu and F

X.-B. Wu and F. K. Liu, ApJ614, 91 (2004), arXiv:astro- ph/0406415 [astro-ph]

work page arXiv 2004
[6]

N. I. Shakura and R. A. Sunyaev, A&A 24, 337 (1973)

work page 1973
[7]

I. D. Novikov and K. S. Thorne, in Black Holes (Les Astres Occlus) (1973) pp. 343–450

work page 1973
[8]

Paczy´ nsky and P

B. Paczy´ nsky and P. J. Wiita, A&A88, 23 (1980)

work page 1980
[9]

M. A. Abramowicz, B. Czerny, J. P. Lasota, and E. Szuszkiewicz, ApJ 332, 646 (1988)

work page 1988
[10]

Spectral energy distributions of selfgravitating QSO discs

E. Sirko and J. Goodman, MNRAS 341, 501 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0209469 [astro-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[11]

T. A. Thompson, E. Quataert, and N. Murray, ApJ 630, 167 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0503027 [astro-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[12]

V. I. Pariev, E. G. Blackman, and S. A. Boldyrev, A&A 407, 403 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0208400 [astro-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[13]

M. C. Begelman and J. E. Pringle, MNRAS 375, 1070 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0612300 [astro-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[14]

High accretion rates in magnetised Keplerian discs mediated by a Parker instability driven dynamo

A. Johansen and Y. Levin, A&A 490, 501 (2008), arXiv:0808.3579 [astro-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[15]

Magnetically-levitating disks around supermassive black holes

E. Gaburov, A. Johansen, and Y. Levin, ApJ 758, 103 (2012), arXiv:1201.4873 [astro-ph.GA]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[16]

M. A. Norris, S. J. Kannappan, D. A. Forbes, A. J. Romanowsky, J. P. Brodie, F. R. Faifer, A. Huxor, C. Maraston, A. J. Moffett, S. J. Penny, V. Pota, A. Smith-Castelli, J. Strader, D. Bradley, K. D. Eck- ert, D. Fohring, J. McBride, D. V. Stark, and O. Vadu- vescu, MNRAS 443, 1151 (2014), arXiv:1406.6065 [astro- ph.GA]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[17]

C. J. Walcher, R. P. van der Marel, D. McLaughlin, H. W. Rix, T. B¨ oker, N. H¨ aring, L. C. Ho, M. Sarzi, and J. C. Shields, ApJ 618, 237 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0409216 [astro-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[18]

The Distribution of Stars and Stellar Remnants at the Galactic Center

D. Merritt, ApJ 718, 739 (2010), arXiv:0909.1318 [astro- ph.GA]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[19]

Intermediate mass black holes in AGN disks: I. Production & Growth

B. McKernan, K. E. S. Ford, W. Lyra, and H. B. Perets, MNRAS 425, 460 (2012), arXiv:1206.2309 [astro- ph.GA]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[20]

Intermediate mass black holes in AGN disks II. Model predictions & observational constraints

B. McKernan, K. E. S. Ford, B. Kocsis, W. Lyra, and L. M. Winter, MNRAS 441, 900 (2014), arXiv:1403.6433 [astro-ph.GA]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[21]

Amaro-Seoane, S

P. Amaro-Seoane, S. Aoudia, S. Babak, P. Bin´ etruy, E. Berti, A. Boh´ e, C. Caprini, M. Colpi, N. J. Cornish, K. Danzmann, J.-F. Dufaux, J. Gair, O. Jennrich, P. Jet- zer, A. Klein, R. N. Lang, A. Lobo, T. Littenberg, S. T. McWilliams, G. Nelemans, A. Petiteau, E. K. Porter, B. F. Schutz, A. Sesana, R. Stebbins, T. Sumner, M. Val- lisneri, S. Vitale, M. ...

work page 2012
[22]

N. W. C. Leigh, A. M. Geller, B. McKernan, K. E. S. Ford, M. M. Mac Low, J. Bellovary, Z. Haiman, W. Lyra, J. Samsing, M. O’Dowd, B. Kocsis, and S. Endlich, MN- RAS 474, 5672 (2018), arXiv:1711.10494 [astro-ph.GA]. 11

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[23]

Tagawa, Z

H. Tagawa, Z. Haiman, and B. Kocsis, ApJ 898, 25 (2020), arXiv:1912.08218 [astro-ph.GA]

work page arXiv 2020
[24]

N. C. Stone, B. D. Metzger, and Z. Haiman, MNRAS 464, 946 (2017), arXiv:1602.04226 [astro-ph.GA]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[25]

B. D. Farris, Y. T. Liu, and S. L. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. D 81, 084008 (2010), arXiv:0912.2096 [astro-ph.HE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[26]

McKernan, K

B. McKernan, K. E. S. Ford, and R. O’Shaughnessy, MN- RAS 498, 4088 (2020), arXiv:2002.00046 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2020
[27]

Supermassive Stars in Quasar Disks

J. Goodman and J. C. Tan, ApJ 608, 108 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0307361 [astro-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[28]

Formation of massive stars and black holes in self-gravitating AGN discs, and gravitational waves in LISA band

Y. Levin, arXiv e-prints , astro-ph/0307084 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0307084 [astro-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[29]

A. S. Jermyn, A. J. Dittmann, B. McKernan, K. E. S. Ford, and M. Cantiello, The Astrophysical Journal 929, 133 (2022)

work page 2022
[30]

M. Guo, E. Quataert, J. Squire, P. F. Hopkins, and J. M. Stone, Idealized global models of accretion disks with strong toroidal magnetic fields (2025), arXiv:2505.12671 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2025
[31]

Squire, E

J. Squire, E. Quataert, and P. F. Hopkins, The Open Journal of Astrophysics 8, 10.33232/001c.136467 (2025)

work page doi:10.33232/001c.136467 2025
[32]

P. F. Hopkins, C. C. Hayward, D. Narayanan, and L. Hernquist, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 420, 320 (2011)

work page 2011
[33]

P. F. Hopkins, L. Hernquist, C. C. Hay- ward, and D. Narayanan, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 425, 1121 (2012), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/425/2/1121/4016991/425-2-1121.pdf

work page 2012
[34]

C. F. Gammie, ApJ 553, 174 (2001), arXiv:astro- ph/0101501

work page arXiv 2001
[35]

P. F. Hopkins, J. Squire, E. Quataert, N. Mur- ray, K.-Y. Su, U. P. Steinwandel, K. Kremer, C.- A. Faucher-Giguere, and S. Wellons, An analytic model for magnetically-dominated accretion disks (2024), arXiv:2310.04507 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2024
[36]

P. F. Hopkins, M. Y. Grudic, K.-Y. Su, S. Wellons, D. Angles-Alcazar, U. P. Steinwandel, D. Guszejnov, N. Murray, C.-A. Faucher-Giguere, E. Quataert, and D. Keres, The Open Journal of Astrophysics7, 18 (2024), arXiv:2309.13115 [astro-ph.GA]

work page arXiv 2024
[37]

P. F. Hopkins, J. Squire, K.-Y. Su, U. P. Steinwan- del, K. Kremer, Y. Shi, M. Y. Grudic, S. Wellons, C.- A. Faucher-Giguere, D. Angles-Alcazar, N. Murray, and E. Quataert, The Open Journal of Astrophysics 7, 19 (2024), arXiv:2310.04506 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2024
[38]

P. F. Hopkins, K.-Y. Su, N. Murray, U. P. Steinwandel, N. Kaaz, S. B. Ponnada, J. Bardati, J. M. Piotrowska, H.- Y. Wang, Y. Shi, D. Angles-Alcazar, E. R. Most, K. Kre- mer, C.-A. Faucher-Giguere, and S. Wellons, The Open Journal of Astrophysics 8, 48 (2025), arXiv:2502.05268 [astro-ph.GA]

work page arXiv 2025
[39]

N. Kaaz, M. Liska, A. Tchekhovskoy, P. F. Hop- kins, and J. Jacquemin-Ide, ApJ 979, 248 (2025), arXiv:2410.01877 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2025
[40]

M. Guo, J. M. Stone, E. Quataert, and C.-G. Kim, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2405.11711 (2024), arXiv:2405.11711 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2024
[41]

Y. Shi, K. Kremer, M. Y. Grudi´ c, H. J. Gerling- Dunsmore, and P. F. Hopkins, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 518, 3606 (2022), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/518/3/3606/47486226/stac3245.pdf

work page 2022
[42]

Y. Shi, K. Kremer, and P. F. Hopkins, ApJ 969, L31 (2024), arXiv:2405.17338 [astro-ph.GA]

work page arXiv 2024
[43]

H.-Y. Wang, E. R. Most, and P. F. Hopkins, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2508.16855 (2025), arXiv:2508.16855 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2025
[44]

Kormendy and L

J. Kormendy and L. C. Ho, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 51, 511 (2013)

work page 2013
[45]

Liska, A

M. Liska, A. Tchekhovskoy, and E. Quataert, MNRAS 494, 3656 (2020), arXiv:1809.04608 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2020
[46]

N. Kaaz, M. T. P. Liska, J. Jacquemin-Ide, Z. L. Andal- man, G. Musoke, A. Tchekhovskoy, and O. Porth, ApJ 955, 72 (2023), arXiv:2210.10053 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2023
[47]

Rapid and Bright Stellar-mass Binary Black Hole Mergers in Active Galactic Nuclei

I. Bartos, B. Kocsis, Z. Haiman, and S. M´ arka, ApJ835, 165 (2017), arXiv:1602.03831 [astro-ph.HE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[48]

On stellar-mass black hole mergers in AGN disks detectable with LIGO

B. McKernan, K. E. S. Ford, J. Bellovary, N. W. C. Leigh, Z. Haiman, B. Kocsis, W. Lyra, M. M. Mac Low, B. Metzger, M. O’Dowd, S. Endlich, and D. J. Rosen, ApJ 866, 66 (2018), arXiv:1702.07818 [astro-ph.HE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[49]

R. e. a. Abbott, Physical Review X 13, 011048 (2023), arXiv:2111.03634 [astro-ph.HE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[50]

Lagrangian versus Eulerian Methods for Toroidally-Magnetized Isothermal Disks

Y. Tomar and P. F. Hopkins, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2512.05194 (2025), arXiv:2512.05194 [astro- ph.HE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[51]

Shlosman, J.-H

I. Shlosman, J.-H. Choi, M. C. Begel- man, and K. Nagamine, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 456, 500 (2015), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/456/1/500/3708553/stv2700.pdf

work page 2015
[52]

P. F. Hopkins, The Open Journal of Astrophysics 8, 56 (2025), arXiv:2407.00160 [astro-ph.GA]

work page arXiv 2025
[53]

P. F. Hopkins, D. Baron, and J. M. Piotrowska, in prepa- ration (2025)

work page 2025
[54]

Takeuchi, S

T. Takeuchi, S. M. Miyama, and D. N. C. Lin, ApJ 460, 832 (1996)

work page 1996
[55]

Goodman, MNRAS 339, 937 (2003), arXiv:astro- ph/0201001

J. Goodman, MNRAS 339, 937 (2003), arXiv:astro- ph/0201001

work page arXiv 2003