Linear Response and Optimal Fingerprinting for Nonautonomous Systems
Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 06:02 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Linear response formulas for time-dependent Markov chains and diffusions extend optimal fingerprinting to non-stationary backgrounds.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
We provide a link between response theory, pullback measures, and optimal fingerprinting that allows predicting the impact of acting forcings on time-dependent systems and attributing observed anomalies when the reference state is not time-independent. Formulas are derived for linear response theory for time-dependent Markov chains and diffusion processes. Existence, uniqueness, and differentiability of the equivariant measure are established under general perturbations of the transition kernels. These results extend optimal fingerprinting for detection and attribution to time-dependent backgrounds and to the simultaneous treatment of multiple time slices, with numerical verification on a Gh
What carries the argument
The equivariant measure for time-dependent transition kernels, whose differentiability supplies the linear response formulas and connects them to pullback measures.
If this is right
- Response predictions become available for any system whose background state evolves, not only stationary ones.
- Optimal fingerprinting can now be solved jointly across many time slices rather than slice by slice.
- Attribution of observed anomalies to multiple concurrent forcings becomes feasible in non-stationary regimes.
- Coarse-grained Markov or diffusion models can still deliver accurate response estimates for practical applications.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The same construction could be tested on real observational records to see whether attribution skill improves when non-stationarity is explicitly included.
- If the differentiability property holds more broadly, it would open a route to second-order response corrections for stronger forcings.
- The framework naturally suggests analogous extensions for other nonautonomous complex systems such as ecological networks or financial markets.
- Numerical experiments with finer spatial resolution or stochastic noise terms would clarify the robustness of the coarse-grained accuracy reported here.
Load-bearing premise
The equivariant measure must exist, remain unique, and stay differentiable under arbitrary perturbations of the transition kernels.
What would settle it
A side-by-side comparison in the energy-balance model where the predicted temperature response to time-varying CO2 differs measurably from direct simulation results would show the formulas do not hold.
Figures
read the original abstract
We provide a link between response theory, pullback measures, and optimal fingerprinting method that paves the way for a) predicting the impact of acting forcings on time-dependent systems and b) attributing observed anomalies to acting forcings when the reference state is not time-independent. We derive formulas for linear response theory for time-dependent Markov chains and diffusion processes. We discuss existence, uniqueness, and differentiability of the equivariant measure under general (not necessarily slow or periodic) perturbations of the transition kernels. Our results allow for extending the theory of optimal fingerprinting for detection and attribution of climate change (or change in any complex system) when the background state is time-dependent amd when the optimal solution is sought for multiple time slices at the same time. We provide numerical support for the findings by applying our theory to a modified version of the Ghil-Sellers energy balance model. We verify the precision of response theory - even in a coarse-grained setting - in predicting the impact of increasing CO$_2$ concentration on the temperature field. Additionally, we show that the optimal fingerprinting method developed here is capable to attribute the climate change signal to multiple acting forcings across a vast time horizon.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper derives linear response formulas for nonautonomous Markov chains and diffusion processes via pullback/equivariant measures, establishes existence/uniqueness/differentiability of these measures under general (not necessarily slow or periodic) perturbations of the transition kernels, and extends optimal fingerprinting to time-dependent background states for simultaneous multi-slice detection and attribution. Numerical tests on a modified Ghil-Sellers energy-balance model are used to verify predictive accuracy for CO2 forcing and attribution to multiple forcings over long time horizons.
Significance. If the central derivations are rigorous and the required hypotheses on the kernels are made explicit, the work would meaningfully extend linear response and optimal fingerprinting from autonomous to nonautonomous settings, directly addressing a practical limitation in climate detection/attribution when the reference climate is itself evolving. The numerical validation on a coarse-grained climate model is a positive indicator of practical utility.
major comments (2)
- [Abstract / theoretical section on pullback measures] Abstract and theoretical development of equivariant measures: the claim that differentiability of the equivariant measure μ_t holds for 'general' (arbitrary) perturbations of the transition kernels P_t is stated without the necessary hypotheses (uniform-in-time spectral gap, uniform ergodicity, or C^1 regularity in both space and time). These conditions are load-bearing; if they fail at even one instant the derivative dμ_t/dε ceases to exist in the required sense and the subsequent optimal-fingerprinting formulas collapse. Explicit statement of the minimal assumptions (or a counter-example showing when they can be relaxed) is required.
- [Optimal fingerprinting extension] Extension to optimal fingerprinting: the multi-time-slice formulation is presented as a direct consequence of the linear-response formulas, yet the paper does not demonstrate that the resulting optimization problem remains well-posed (unique solution, stable inversion) once the time-dependent background measure is substituted. A concrete derivation or numerical check of the Hessian or conditioning of the fingerprinting operator under time-dependent μ_t is needed.
minor comments (2)
- [Abstract] Abstract contains a typographical error: 'amd' should read 'and'.
- [Throughout theoretical sections] Notation for the time-dependent kernels and measures should be introduced once and used consistently; occasional switches between P_t, K_t, μ_t and pullback notation make the derivations harder to follow.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which highlight important points for improving the rigor and clarity of the presentation. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract / theoretical section on pullback measures] Abstract and theoretical development of equivariant measures: the claim that differentiability of the equivariant measure μ_t holds for 'general' (arbitrary) perturbations of the transition kernels P_t is stated without the necessary hypotheses (uniform-in-time spectral gap, uniform ergodicity, or C^1 regularity in both space and time). These conditions are load-bearing; if they fail at even one instant the derivative dμ_t/dε ceases to exist in the required sense and the subsequent optimal-fingerprinting formulas collapse. Explicit statement of the minimal assumptions (or a counter-example showing when they can be relaxed) is required.
Authors: We agree that the hypotheses underlying the differentiability of the equivariant measure must be stated explicitly. Our derivations rely on the existence of a uniform-in-time spectral gap for the family of transition kernels together with appropriate regularity (C^1 in space and time) to guarantee the required differentiability. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph (or subsection) that lists these minimal assumptions at the outset of the theoretical development, referencing standard results on nonautonomous Markov processes. We will also note that the results do not hold without such conditions and briefly indicate why they are necessary. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Optimal fingerprinting extension] Extension to optimal fingerprinting: the multi-time-slice formulation is presented as a direct consequence of the linear-response formulas, yet the paper does not demonstrate that the resulting optimization problem remains well-posed (unique solution, stable inversion) once the time-dependent background measure is substituted. A concrete derivation or numerical check of the Hessian or conditioning of the fingerprinting operator under time-dependent μ_t is needed.
Authors: We acknowledge the need to verify well-posedness of the multi-time-slice optimization under a time-dependent background. In the revision we will insert a short derivation showing that the Hessian of the fingerprinting objective remains positive definite when the background is replaced by the equivariant measure μ_t, using the linear-response representation of the response operator. We will also augment the numerical section with explicit condition-number diagnostics for the fingerprinting matrices computed on the Ghil-Sellers model across the multi-decadal time windows already considered, thereby confirming numerical stability of the inversion. revision: yes
Circularity Check
Derivations for linear response in nonautonomous systems are self-contained first-principles extensions
full rationale
The paper derives linear response formulas for time-dependent Markov chains and diffusions by extending standard response theory to pullback/equivariant measures, with explicit discussion of existence, uniqueness, and differentiability under general kernel perturbations. These steps are presented as mathematical constructions independent of the target fingerprinting application. Numerical verification on the modified Ghil-Sellers model provides an external check that does not reduce to any internal fit or self-citation chain. No load-bearing step equates a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter or prior self-citation by construction; the central claims remain independently verifiable.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Existence, uniqueness, and differentiability of the equivariant measure under general perturbations of the transition kernels
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.leanwashburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
ρ(1)(t) = ∫ ds Θ(t-s) g(s) Texp(∫_t^s dτ L_τ) L(1)_s ρ0(s)
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Mathematical Framework for Linear Response Theory for Nonautonomous Systems
Establishes rigorous linear response formulas for general deterministic and random nonautonomous systems with fast memory loss via a global transfer operator on sequence space of measures.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Kubo, Statistical-mechanical theory of irreversible processes
Kubo R. 1957 Statistical-mechanical theory of irreversible processes. I. General theory and simple applications to magnetic and conduction problems.J. Phys. Soc. Japan12, 570–586. (10.1143/JPSJ.12.570)
-
[2]
1966 The fluctuation-dissipation theorem.Rep
Kubo R. 1966 The fluctuation-dissipation theorem.Rep. Prog. Phys.29, 255–284
work page 1966
-
[3]
2010 A simple framework to justify linear response theory.Nonlinearity 23, 909–922
Hairer M, Majda AJ. 2010 A simple framework to justify linear response theory.Nonlinearity 23, 909–922. (10.1088/0951-7715/23/4/008)
-
[4]
Lippiello E, Corberi F, Zannetti M. 2005 Off-equilibrium generalization of the fluctuation dissipation theorem for Ising spins and measurement of the linear response function.Phys. Rev. E71, 036104. (10.1103/PhysRevE.71.036104)
-
[5]
2008 Fluctuation-Dissipation: Response Theory in Statistical Physics.Phys
Marconi UMB, Puglisi A, Rondoni L, Vulpiani A. 2008 Fluctuation-Dissipation: Response Theory in Statistical Physics.Phys. Rep.461, 111
work page 2008
-
[6]
2009 Fluctuations and Response of Nonequilibrium States.Phys
Baiesi M, Maes C, Wynants B. 2009 Fluctuations and Response of Nonequilibrium States.Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 010602. (10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.010602)
-
[7]
2013 An update on the nonequilibrium linear response.New Journal of Physics15, 013004
Baiesi M, Maes C. 2013 An update on the nonequilibrium linear response.New Journal of Physics15, 013004. (10.1088/1367-2630/15/1/013004) 23royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rspa Proc R Soc A 0000000
-
[8]
Colangeli M, Lucarini V . 2014 Elements of a unified framework for response formulae. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2014, P01002. (10.1088/1742- 5468/2014/01/p01002)
-
[9]
Sarracino A, Vulpiani A. 2019 On the fluctuation-dissipation relation in non-equilibrium and non-Hamiltonian systems.Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science29, 083132. (10.1063/1.5110262)
-
[10]
Wormell CL, Gottwald GA. 2019 Linear response for macroscopic observables in high- dimensional systems.Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science29, 113127. (10.1063/1.5122740)
-
[11]
Ruelle D. 1998 Nonequilibrium statistical mechanics near equilibrium: computing higher- order terms.Nonlinearity11, 5–18
work page 1998
-
[12]
Bouchaud JP , Biroli G. 2005 Nonlinear susceptibility in glassy systems: A probe for cooperative dynamical length scales.Phys. Rev. B72, 064204. (10.1103/PhysRevB.72.064204)
-
[13]
2008 Nonlinear susceptibilities and the measurement of a cooperative length.Phys
Lippiello E, Corberi F, Sarracino A, Zannetti M. 2008 Nonlinear susceptibilities and the measurement of a cooperative length.Phys. Rev. B77, 212201. (10.1103/PhysRevB.77.212201)
-
[14]
Lucarini V . 2008 Response Theory for Equilibrium and Non-Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics: Causality and Generalized Kramers-Kronig relations.Journal of Statistical Physics 131, 543–558. (10.1007/s10955-008-9498-y)
-
[15]
Lucarini V , Colangeli M. 2012 Beyond the linear fluctuation-dissipation theorem: the role of causality.Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2012, P05013
work page 2012
-
[16]
2015 Frenetic aspects of second order response.Phys
Basu U, Krüger M, Lazarescu A, Maes C. 2015 Frenetic aspects of second order response.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.17, 6653–6666. (10.1039/C4CP04977B)
-
[17]
Lucarini V , Wouters J. 2017 Response formulae for n-point correlations in statistical mechanical systems and application to a problem of coarse graining.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical50, 355003. (10.1088/1751-8121/aa812c)
-
[18]
Ruelle D. 1998 General linear response formula in statistical mechanics, and the fluctuation- dissipation theorem far from equilibrium.Phys. Lett. A245, 220–224. (10.1016/S0375- 9601(98)00419-8)
-
[19]
Ruelle D. 2009 A review of linear response theory for general differentiable dynamical systems.Nonlinearity22, 855–870. (10.1088/0951-7715/22/4/009)
-
[20]
Abramov R, Majda A. 2007 Blended response algorithms for linear fluctuation-dissipation for complex nonlinear dynamical systems.Nonlinearity20, 2793
work page 2007
-
[21]
Ni A. 2021 Approximating Linear Response by Nonintrusive Shadowing Algorithms.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis59, 2843–2865. (10.1137/20M1388255)
-
[22]
Chandramoorthy N, Wang Q. 2022 Efficient Computation of Linear Response of Chaotic Attractors with One-Dimensional Unstable Manifolds.SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems21, 735–781. (10.1137/21M1405599)
-
[23]
Ni A. 2023 Fast Adjoint Algorithm for Linear Responses of Hyperbolic Chaos.SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems22, 2792–2824. (10.1137/22M1522383)
-
[24]
Mezi´ c I. 2005 Spectral properties of dynamical systems, model reduction and decompositions. Nonlinear Dynam.41, 309–325. (10.1007/s11071-005-2824-x)
-
[25]
Budiši´ c M, Mohr R, Mezi´ c I. 2012 Applied Koopmanism.Chaos22, 047510, 33. (10.1063/1.4772195)
-
[26]
Modern koopman theory for dynamical systems,
Brunton SL, Budiši´ c M, Kaiser E, Kutz JN. 2022 Modern Koopman Theory for Dynamical Systems.SIAM Review64, 229–340. (10.1137/21M1401243)
-
[27]
Gutiérrez MS, Lucarini V . 2022 On some aspects of the response to stochastic and deterministic forcings.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical55, 425002. (10.1088/1751- 8121/ac90fd)
-
[28]
Lucarini V , Chekroun MD. 2023 Theoretical tools for understanding the climate crisis from Hasselmann’s programme and beyond.Nature Reviews Physics5, 744–765. (10.1038/s42254- 023-00650-8)
-
[29]
A general framework for linking free and forced fluctuations via Koopmanism , journal =
Lucarini V , Gutiérrez MS, Moroney J, Zagli N. 2026 A general framework for linking free and forced fluctuations via Koopmanism.Chaos, Solitons and Fractals202, 117540. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2025.117540)
-
[30]
Zagli N, Colbrook MJ, Lucarini V , Mezi´ c I, Moroney J. 2026 Bridging the gap between Koopmanism and response theory: Using natural variability to predict forced response.SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems25, 196–229
work page 2026
-
[31]
Chekroun MD, Zagli N, Lucarini V . 2025 Kolmogorov modes and linear response of jump- diffusion models.Reports on Progress in Physics88, 127601. (10.1088/1361-6633/ae2206) 24royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rspa Proc R Soc A 0000000
-
[32]
2020 Ruelle–Pollicott Resonances of Stochastic Systems in Reduced State Space
Chekroun MD, Tantet A, Dijkstra HA, Neelin JD. 2020 Ruelle–Pollicott Resonances of Stochastic Systems in Reduced State Space. Part I: Theory.Journal of Statistical Physics. (10.1007/s10955-020-02535-x)
-
[33]
Lucarini V , Chekroun MD. 2024 Detecting and Attributing Change in Climate and Complex Systems: Foundations, Green’s Functions, and Nonlinear Fingerprints.Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 244201. (10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.244201)
-
[34]
Theory of dynamic critical phenomena
Hohenberg PC, Halperin BI. 1977 Theory of dynamic critical phenomena.Rev. Mod. Phys.49, 435–479. (10.1103/RevModPhys.49.435)
-
[35]
2009 Early-warning signals for critical transitions.Nature461, 53–59
Scheffer M, Bascompte J, Brock WA, Brovkin V , Carpenter SR, Dakos V , Held H, Van Nes EH, Rietkerk M, Sugihara G. 2009 Early-warning signals for critical transitions.Nature461, 53–59
work page 2009
-
[36]
Lenton TM, Livina VN, Dakos V , van Nes EH, Scheffer M. 2012 Early warning of climate tipping points from critical slowing down: comparing methods to improve robustness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 370, 1185–1204. (10.1098/rsta.2011.0304)
-
[37]
Dakos V , Boulton CA, Buxton JE, Abrams JF, Arellano-Nava B, Armstrong McKay DI, Bathiany S, Blaschke L, Boers N, Dylewsky D et al.. 2024 Tipping point detection and early warnings in climate, ecological, and human systems.Earth System Dynamics15, 1117–1135
work page 2024
-
[38]
2024 Chapter 4 - The multiverse of dynamic mode decomposition algorithms
Colbrook MJ. 2024 Chapter 4 - The multiverse of dynamic mode decomposition algorithms. In Mishra S, Townsend A, editors,Numerical Analysis Meets Machine Learning, Handbook of Numerical Analysis, vol. 25, pp. 127–230. Elsevier. (https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hna.2024.05.004)
-
[39]
Colbrook MJ, Li Q, Raut RV , Townsend A. 2024 Beyond expectations: residual dynamic mode decomposition and variance for stochastic dynamical systems.Nonlinear Dynamics112, 2037–
work page 2024
-
[40]
(10.1007/s11071-023-09135-w)
-
[41]
Colbrook MJ, Townsend A. 2024 Rigorous data-driven computation of spectral properties of Koopman operators for dynamical systems.Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 77, 221–283. (https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.22125)
-
[42]
Williams MO, Rowley CW, Kevrekidis IG. 2015 A kernel-based method for data- driven koopman spectral analysis.Journal of Computational Dynamics2, 247–265. (10.3934/jcd.2015005)
-
[43]
2020 Kernel-Based Approximation of the Koopman Generator and Schrödinger Operator.Entropy22
Klus S, Nüske F, Hamzi B. 2020 Kernel-Based Approximation of the Koopman Generator and Schrödinger Operator.Entropy22. (10.3390/e22070722)
-
[44]
1991 Voronoi diagrams—a survey of a fundamental geometric data structure.ACM Comput
Aurenhammer F. 1991 Voronoi diagrams—a survey of a fundamental geometric data structure.ACM Comput. Surv.23, 345–405. (10.1145/116873.116880)
-
[45]
Norris J. 1998Markov chains. Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
-
[46]
Pande VS, Beauchamp K, Bowman GR. 2010 Everything you wanted to know about Markov State Models but were afraid to ask.Methods52, 99–105. (10.1016/j.ymeth.2010.06.002)
-
[47]
Schuette C, Winkelmann S, Hartmann C. 2012 Optimal control of molecular dynamics using Markov state models.Mathematical Programming134, 259–282. (10.1007/s10107-012-0547-6)
-
[48]
Husic BE, Pande VS. 2018 Markov State Models: From an Art to a Science.Journal of the American Chemical Society140, 2386–2396. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b12191 (10.1021/jacs.7b12191)
-
[49]
1967 Multivariate observations
MacQueen J. 1967 Multivariate observations. InProceedings ofthe 5th Berkeley symposium on mathematical statisticsand probabilityvol. 1 pp. 281–297. University of California press Oakland, CA, USA
work page 1967
-
[50]
Baiesi M, Maes C, Wynants B. 2009 Nonequilibrium Linear Response for Markov Dynamics, I: Jump Processes and Overdamped Diffusions.Journal of Statistical Physics137, 1094–1116. (10.1007/s10955-009-9852-8)
-
[51]
Lucarini V . 2016 Response Operators for Markov Processes in a Finite State Space: Radius of Convergence and Link to the Response Theory for Axiom A Systems.Journal of Statistical Physics162, 312–333. (10.1007/s10955-015-1409-4)
-
[52]
2020 Response and Sensitivity Using Markov Chains.Journal of Statistical Physics179, 1572–1593
Santos Gutiérrez M, Lucarini V . 2020 Response and Sensitivity Using Markov Chains.Journal of Statistical Physics179, 1572–1593. (10.1007/s10955-020-02504-4)
-
[53]
2024 Nonequilibrium Response for Markov Jump Processes: Exact Results and Tight Bounds.Phys
Aslyamov T, Esposito M. 2024 Nonequilibrium Response for Markov Jump Processes: Exact Results and Tight Bounds.Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 037101. (10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.037101)
-
[54]
2025 Interpretable and Equation-Free Response Theory for Complex Systems.Phil
Lucarini V . 2025 Interpretable and Equation-Free Response Theory for Complex Systems.Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A. (10.1098/rsta.2025.0081)
-
[55]
2025 Nonequilibrium Fluctuation-Response Relations: From Identities to Bounds.Phys
Aslyamov T, Ptaszy ´ nski K, Esposito M. 2025 Nonequilibrium Fluctuation-Response Relations: From Identities to Bounds.Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 157101. (10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.157101) 25royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rspa Proc R Soc A 0000000
-
[56]
2024MATLAB version 24.1.0.2537033 (R2024a)
The Mathworks, Inc.. 2024MATLAB version 24.1.0.2537033 (R2024a). Natick, Massachusetts
-
[57]
2023Python 3.12.1 Documentation
Python Software Foundation. 2023Python 3.12.1 Documentation
-
[58]
Bezanson J, Edelman A, Karpinski S, Shah VB. 2017 Julia: A Fresh Approach to Numerical Computing.SIAM Review59, 65–98. (10.1137/141000671)
-
[59]
2024 Response Theory via Generative Score Modeling.Physical Review Letters133, 267302
Giorgini LT, Deck K, Bischoff T, Souza AN. 2024 Response Theory via Generative Score Modeling.Physical Review Letters133, 267302. (10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.267302)
-
[60]
Giorgini LT, Falasca F, Souza AN. 2025a Predicting forced responses of probability distributions via the fluctuation–dissipation theorem and generative modeling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences122, e2509578122. (10.1073/pnas.2509578122)
-
[61]
Giorgini LT, Bischoff T, Souza AN. 2025b Statistical Parameter Calibration with the Generalized Fluctuation–Dissipation Theorem and Generative Modeling. arXiv:2509.19660
-
[62]
Hasselmann K. 1997 Multi-pattern fingerprint method for detection and attribution of climate change.Climate Dynamics13, 601–611. (10.1007/s003820050185)
-
[63]
1999 Checking for model consistency in optimal fingerprinting.Climate Dynamics15, 419–434
Allen M, Tett S. 1999 Checking for model consistency in optimal fingerprinting.Climate Dynamics15, 419–434. (10.1007/s003820050291)
-
[64]
2011 Use of models in detection and attribution of climate change.WIREs Climate Change2, 570–591
Hegerl G, Zwiers F. 2011 Use of models in detection and attribution of climate change.WIREs Climate Change2, 570–591. (https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.121)
-
[65]
Hannart A, Ribes A, Naveau P . 2014 Optimal fingerprinting under multiple sources of uncertainty.Geophysical Research Letters41, 1261–1268. (https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058653)
-
[66]
2009Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems : networks of plausible inference
Pearl J. 2009Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems : networks of plausible inference. San Francisco, Calif.: Morgan Kaufmann. Example for Explaning away
-
[67]
Crisanti A, Ritort F. 2003 Violation of the fluctuation–dissipation theorem in glassy systems: basic notions and the numerical evidence.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General36, R181. (10.1088/0305-4470/36/21/201)
-
[68]
Berthier L. 2007 Efficient Measurement of Linear Susceptibilities in Molecular Simulations: Application to Aging Supercooled Liquids.Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 220601. (10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.220601)
-
[69]
2012 Temporal networks.Physics Reports519, 97–125
Holme P , Saramäki J. 2012 Temporal networks.Physics Reports519, 97–125. Temporal Networks (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2012.03.001)
-
[70]
2012 Activity driven modeling of time varying networks.Scientific Reports2, 469
Perra N, Gonçalves B, Pastor-Satorras R, Vespignani A. 2012 Activity driven modeling of time varying networks.Scientific Reports2, 469. (10.1038/srep00469)
-
[71]
Sun H, Radicchi F, Kurths J, Bianconi G. 2023 The dynamic nature of percolation on networks with triadic interactions.Nature Communications14, 1308. (10.1038/s41467-023-37019-5)
-
[72]
2010 Dynamical and bursty interactions in social networks
Stehlé J, Barrat A, Bianconi G. 2010 Dynamical and bursty interactions in social networks. Phys. Rev. E81, 035101. (10.1103/PhysRevE.81.035101)
-
[73]
Millán AP , Sun H, Torres JJ, Bianconi G. 2024 Triadic percolation induces dynamical topological patterns in higher-order networks.PNAS Nexus3, pgae270. (10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae270)
-
[74]
2021 Consensus dynamics on temporal hypergraphs
Neuhäuser L, Lambiotte R, Schaub MT. 2021 Consensus dynamics on temporal hypergraphs. Phys. Rev. E104, 064305. (10.1103/PhysRevE.104.064305)
-
[75]
Chakrabarti G, Das R. 2021 Time-varying beta, market volatility and stress: A comparison between the United States and India.IIMB Management Review33, 50–63. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2021.03.003)
-
[76]
Summers D, Cranford JG, Healey BP . 2000 Chaos in periodically forced discrete-time ecosystem models.Chaos, Solitons & Fractals11, 2331–2342. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960- 0779(99)00154-X)
-
[77]
2000 Periodic Mortality Events in Predator-Prey Systems
Ives AR, Gross K, Vincent AAJ. 2000 Periodic Mortality Events in Predator-Prey Systems. Ecology81, 3330–3340. (10.2307/177497)
-
[78]
Basak A, Dana SK, Bairagi N. 2024 Partial tipping in bistable ecological systems under periodic environmental variability.Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science34, 083130. (10.1063/5.0215157)
-
[79]
Horrocks EAB, Rodrigues FR, Saleem AB. 2024 Flexible neural population dynamics govern the speed and stability of sensory encoding in mouse visual cortex.Nature Communications15,
work page 2024
-
[80]
(10.1038/s41467-024-50563-y)
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.