Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 48 references

Local and non-local $p$-energies on metric measure spaces

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that, on metric measure spaces with volume doubling and a chain condition, a local p-energy's regularity subordinates to every strictly slower stable-like non-local p-energy, and that one non-local p-energy subordinates to

desk verdict Real p>1 analogue of subordination with a useful CE/CS equivalence machine, but the headline theorems are proved under VD+CC, not VD alone, and the abstract has a sign error. read the letter →

arxiv 2602.10990 v2 pith:T6B5YZ3X submitted 2026-02-11 math.AP math.FAmath.MGmath.PR

Meng Yang This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath.FAmath.MGmath.PR MSC 31E0528A80
keywords subordinationprinciplep-energymetricmeasurespacescutoffSobolevinequalitiesPoincaréinequalitynon-localp-formsHöldercontinuitychaincondition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether the classical heat-kernel subordination principle—from a local Dirichlet form to stable-like jump forms with smaller walk dimension—survives for nonlinear p-energies. It answers both of its motivating questions affirmatively. Under volume doubling and a chain condition, a local regular p-energy that satisfies a Poincaré inequality and a cutoff Sobolev inequality forces every strictly slower stable-like non-local p-form to be a regular p-energy satisfying the corresponding non-local Poincaré and cutoff Sobolev inequalities. Similarly, a non-local regular p-energy satisfying these conditions subordinates to any non-local p-form with no faster scaling. The engine is a new equivalence showing that weak versions of these cutoff inequalities automatically produce Hölder-continuous cutoff functions.

What carries the argument

The central object is the cutoff energy inequality $\operatorname{CE}(\Psi)$: for every ball of radius $r$ there is a cutoff function $\varphi$ that is Hölder continuous of some exponent $\delta$ and whose energy on any ball $B(x,s)$ is bounded by $C \left(\frac{s}{r} \wedge 1\right)^\delta \frac{V(x,s)}{\Psi(s \wedge r)}$. The paper's machinery has three parts: a self-improvement argument converting the weak cutoff Sobolev inequality into energy estimates for cutoff functions; an interior and boundary regularity theory for the p-Laplace equation on metric measure spaces, using Moser iteration and weak Harnack inequalities, which yields the Hölder continuity of cutoffs; and a subordination argument comparing the two scaling functions $\Psi$ and $\Upsilon$ through summation of annulus energy

What would settle it

On a concrete self-similar fractal with a known local p-energy, compute the non-local capacity $\operatorname{cap}(B(x,r), X \setminus B(x,Ar))$ for a stable-like kernel with scaling $r^\beta$, $\beta$ below the p-walk dimension. The theorem predicts this capacity is comparable to $\frac{V(x,r)}{r^\beta}$ and that the associated p-form is regular; a single $\beta$ where the capacity has a different order, or where the domain contains only constants, would falsify the subordination claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 2.8. If a strongly local regular p-energy satisfies a local Poincaré inequality and a strong cutoff energy inequality with scaling function $\Psi$, and $\Upsilon$ is a doubling scaling function growing strictly slower than $\Psi$ at small scales, then the non-local p-form with kernel comparable to $\frac{1}{V(x,d(x,y)) \Upsilon(d(x,y))}$ is a regular p-energy satisfying the strong non-local cutoff energy inequality with scaling $\Upsilon$. If instead a non-local regular p-energy satisfies the strong cutoff energy inequality with scaling $\Psi$, the same conclusion holds for every $\Upsilon$ growing no faster than $\Psi$. Along the way, Theorems 2.1 and 2.2 show that weak, continuous, and strong versions of the cutoff Sobole

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the chain condition—the requirement that any two points be joinable by a chain with roughly equal small steps—because the proof uses it to create small balls in the complement near every boundary point, and without it the Hölder-continuous cutoff functions driving the subordination are not guaranteed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every strictly slower scaling function Υ, the associated stable-like non-local p-energy is a regular p-energy, so it has enough continuous compactly supported functions to support potential theory and calculus of variations.
  • Regularity transfers from local to non-local in a one-parameter family: in the case of power-law kernels with exponents β below the p-walk dimension, the whole family becomes regular and satisfies non-local cutoff Sobolev inequalities.
  • The equivalence theorems reduce verification to a weak condition: checking only the weak cutoff Sobolev inequality on a space is enough to obtain Hölder-continuous cutoffs and regularity, without a separate heat-kernel argument.
  • In part (b), a single non-local regular p-energy satisfying the cutoff condition propagates regularity to every non-local p-form with a no-faster scaling, unifying families of stable-like p-energies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the weak-to-strong equivalence holds broadly, then on fractals where only the weak cutoff Sobolev inequality is verified, the entire ladder of non-local p-energies becomes immediately available for study.
  • Editorial inference: the explicit scaling function produced by the subordination argument suggests a route toward defining and estimating p-walk dimensions for nonlinear stable-like processes, although no heat kernel exists for p>1.
  • Editorial inference: a natural testable extension is to compute the capacity upper bound for power-law jump kernels on a concrete self-similar fractal and compare it with the paper's predictions; this would independently confirm or challenge the regularity conclusion on a case where the chain condition is known to hold.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a subordination theory for local and non-local p-energies on metric measure spaces. It introduces several variants of cutoff-energy (CE) and cutoff-Sobolev (CS) conditions, proves equivalence theorems among them (Theorems 2.1 and 2.2), establishes that a continuous/strong non-local form is regular (Proposition 2.6), and then proves the central Theorem 2.8: under volume doubling, a local regular p-energy satisfying PI and CE_strong induces, for any jumping kernel whose scaling function satisfies a strict upper growth condition, a regular non-local p-energy satisfying CE_strong; an analogous non-local-to-non-local subordination holds under a weaker upper growth condition. The proofs use energy estimates, PDE regularity theory, and boundary-oscillation arguments to construct Hölder cutoff functions.

Significance. If the proof is completed as written, this is a substantial contribution. It extends the classical Dirichlet-form subordination principle to non-linear p-energies, gives explicit scaling functions, and connects recently studied cutoff Sobolev inequalities with regularity of non-local forms. The paper contains many non-trivial estimates: a self-improvement argument for CS, a partition-of-unity proof of regularity, and careful energy comparisons between local and non-local forms. The overall architecture is coherent, and the central construction in Section 6 is plausible and well motivated. The main concerns are about completeness of hypotheses and omitted proofs of several load-bearing auxiliary results.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2, Theorems 2.1/2.2; Lemma 3.1; §§8, 10] The displayed statements of Theorems 2.1 and 2.2 say only 'Assume VD', but the hard direction CS_weak ⇒ CE_strong is proved using Lemma 3.1, whose hypothesis is CC. Since 'Throughout this paper, we always assume CC' appears earlier in §2, there is no formal contradiction, but the theorem statements as printed are misleading: a reader who wishes to apply Theorem 2.1 or 2.2 to a doubling space that is not chain-connected (e.g., Cantor set times an interval) cannot tell that the equivalence depends on the additional geometric assumption CC. More importantly, the advertised affirmative answer to Questions 1 and 2 via Remark 2.9 inherits this unlisted CC dependence. The use of CC is essential in the proof, not cosmetic: it enters through Lemma 3.1 to produce corkscrew domains at every boundary point, which feed into Propositions 8.2 and 9.2 and ultimately into the Hölder continuity estimates
  2. [§3 Propositions 3.6 and 3.9; §10 Propositions 10.1 and 10.3] Several load-bearing results are stated without proof or with only a reference sketch. Proposition 3.6 (existence of solutions to the nonlinear boundary value problem) and Proposition 3.9 (non-local comparison principle) are explicitly declared 'proof is omitted'; Proposition 10.3 is asserted to follow the local argument and is also omitted; Proposition 10.1 is proved only by a sketch invoking [15], [26], and [29]. These are not routine remarks: they provide the PDE solutions and comparison/monotonicity tools used to construct the Hölder cutoff functions in Sections 8 and 10, and therefore underlie Theorems 2.1, 2.2, and 2.8. Since some of the cited results are in different settings or with different hypotheses (e.g., Euclidean, fractional, or purely local p-energy), please supply complete proofs in an appendix or give precise statements and verifications that the cited results apply to
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2] The standing assumption CC is introduced only after several definitions and notation paragraphs. Since it is used essentially in Theorems 2.1 and 2.2, consider moving it to the first sentence of Section 2 and adding it to the displayed hypotheses of those theorems.
  2. [Eq. (6.6)–(6.8)] In the estimate of I1 in the proof of Theorem 2.8(a), the CE_strong bound is applied at radii of the form 16 A_PI s, which introduces constants depending on A_PI. These are absorbable, but the resulting power δ in CE(J)_strong(Υ) may have to be reduced by a factor depending on A_PI and CV D. Please spell this out or adjust the notation so that the final δ is unambiguously the same as in (6.6)–(6.8).
  3. [§5, Lemma 5.3] The partition-of-unity construction is clever but dense. In particular, the step where the family {B(v,12ε)} is partitioned into N subfamilies with pairwise disjoint members should cite the standard coloring bound explicitly; currently it is only sketched via VD.
  4. [References] Several key references are very recent arXiv preprints [4, 21, 38, 45, 48]; for the final version, please verify that the cited results have appeared or give stable versions with all hypotheses precisely matching the uses here.
  5. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract says 'Under suitable geometric assumptions' without specifying CC. Since CC is a nonstandard and non-redundant assumption, please list the main geometric assumptions explicitly in the abstract or at the end of the introduction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Theorem 2.8 is a genuine transfer theorem, and the CE/CS equivalences are proved from explicit assumptions rather than by definitional collapse.

full rationale

I traced the main derivation chain: Theorem 2.8 assumes explicit scaling and cutoff hypotheses (PI, CE_strong, SUG or UG, kernel bounds) and derives the non-local CE_strong for the associated non-local p-form. The target non-local form is not defined in terms of the local energy's conclusion, and the growth conditions SUG/UG are independent scaling hypotheses; there is no fitted parameter being renamed as a prediction. The proof transfers the local CE bound through Lemma 6.1 and Lemma 6.2, and regularity is obtained from Proposition 2.6, which is proved separately via density arguments (Stone–Weierstrass, partition of unity) rather than by assuming the conclusion. The CE/CS equivalences in Theorems 2.1–2.2 are proved by explicit implications, including a genuinely nontrivial CS_weak ⇒ CE_strong direction via PDE regularity, weak Harnack inequalities, and oscillation estimates. No load-bearing 'uniqueness theorem' is imported from the author's prior work to force a choice, and no known result is merely renamed. The paper does cite the author's earlier papers [45,46,48] for quasi-continuity, capacity, and cutoff-Sobolev machinery, but those are stated as independent theorems with their own assumptions and do not include the target result; self-citation of this kind is not circularity. The one notable issue is an assumption gap: the hard direction uses the standing chain condition CC through Lemma 3.1 even though Theorems 2.1–2.2 state only VD. That is a hypothesis/statement mismatch and a correctness risk, not a circular derivation. Accordingly, no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's contribution is a transfer theorem: no new empirical constants or physical entities are introduced. The cost is paid in the hypotheses: a rich input p-energy, strong geometric conditions (VD+CC), and explicit growth comparisons between scaling functions. The auxiliary function Θ in SUG is a structural device rather than a fitted parameter.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Volume doubling VD and chain condition CC hold on the complete unbounded metric measure space (Section 2).
    Both are assumed throughout. VD is used for covering arguments, John-Nirenberg, and dyadic estimates; CC is used in Lemma 3.1 to construct corkscrew domains needed for boundary regularity.
  • domain assumption The scaling functions Ψ and Υ are doubling homeomorphisms satisfying the two-sided growth condition (2.1), and in Theorem 2.8 they satisfy SUG or UG.
    These growth conditions are not derived; they are hypotheses that make the dyadic sums in Lemma 6.3 and Sections 6-10 converge. The exact form of SUG with a summable Θ is proof-enabling.
  • domain assumption The input p-energies exist and satisfy the defining axioms: closed, Markovian, p-Clarkson, strongly local/regular, with PI and CE or CS as stated.
    Theorem 2.8 is conditional: it assumes the existence of a local regular p-energy satisfying PI and CE_strong, or a non-local regular p-energy satisfying CE_strong. The paper does not construct such energies.
  • domain assumption The non-local kernel K(J,Υ) satisfies the two-sided bound K(J)(Υ), and the p-energy measure Γ(L) exists for strongly local regular p-energies.
    The kernel bound is the bridge between the abstract p-form and the scaling function Υ. The existence and properties of Γ(L) are imported from [41] and [43].
  • standard math The nonlinear PDE machinery is available: comparison principles for local and non-local p-Laplacians, Sobolev inequalities, John-Nirenberg, and quasi-continuity.
    These results are cited from [11,15,22,33,35,45,48] and standard references. They are used to prove the weak Harnack and oscillation estimates in Sections 8-10.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Local and non-local $p$-energies on metric measure spaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/T6B5YZ3X

@misc{pith2026260210990,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Local and non-local $p$-energies on metric measure spaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/T6B5YZ3X}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.10990}
}
abstract

For $p>1$, we study subordination phenomena for local and non-local regular $p$-energies on metric measure spaces. Under suitable geometric assumptions, we show that if a local regular $p$-energy satisfies a Poincar\'e inequality and a cutoff Sobolev inequality with scaling function $\Psi$, then any non-local $p$-form induced by a jumping kernel with scaling function $\Upsilon$, where $\Upsilon$ lies strictly above $\Psi$ at small scales, defines a regular $p$-energy satisfying a non-local Poincar\'e inequality and a non-local cutoff Sobolev inequality. The corresponding scaling function $\Xi$ is explicitly determined by $\Psi$ and $\Upsilon$. Our results also cover examples whose jumping kernels have light polynomial tails at infinity. These results provide a nonlinear extension of the classical subordination principle beyond the Dirichlet form framework.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.10990 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Strategy of the proof of “CE(•) □ ⇔ CS(•) □ ” Remark 2.4. We will prove the diagrams of implications as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 5 linked inside Pith

  1. [45]

    Energy inequalities for cutoff functions of p-energies on metric measures spaces.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2507.08577v4, July 2025

    Meng Yang. Energy inequalities for cutoff functions of p-energies on metric measures spaces.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2507.08577v4, July 2025

    arXiv 2025

  2. [46]

    On singularity of p-energy measures on metric measure spaces.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2505.12468v1, May 2025

    Meng Yang. On singularity of p-energy measures on metric measure spaces.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2505.12468v1, May 2025

    arXiv 2025

  3. [48]

    p-Poincar´ e inequalities and cutoff Sobolev inequalities on metric measure spaces.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2504.09503v2, April 2025

    Meng Yang. p-Poincar´ e inequalities and cutoff Sobolev inequalities on metric measure spaces.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2504.09503v2, April 2025. Department of Mathematics, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark E-mail address:yangmengqh@gmail.com E-mail address:yang@math.au.dk 68

    arXiv 2025

  4. [35]

    Fractional eigenvalues.Calc

    Erik Lindgren and Peter Lindqvist. Fractional eigenvalues.Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 49(1-2):795–826, 2014

    2014

  5. [15]

    Elliptic Harnack inequalities for mixed local and nonlocal p-energy form on metric measure spaces.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2510.12404v2, October 2025

    Aobo Chen and Zhenyu Yu. Elliptic Harnack inequalities for mixed local and nonlocal p-energy form on metric measure spaces.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2510.12404v2, October 2025

    arXiv 2025

  6. [26]

    Mean value inequality and generalized capacity on doubling spaces.Pure Appl

    Alexander Grigor’yan, Eryan Hu, and Jiaxin Hu. Mean value inequality and generalized capacity on doubling spaces.Pure Appl. Funct. Anal., 9(1):111–168, 2024

    2024

  7. [29]

    Generalized capacity, Harnack inequality and heat kernels of Dirichlet forms on metric measure spaces.J

    Alexander Grigor’yan, Jiaxin Hu, and Ka-Sing Lau. Generalized capacity, Harnack inequality and heat kernels of Dirichlet forms on metric measure spaces.J. Math. Soc. Japan, 67(4):1485–1549, 2015

    2015

  8. [1]

    John-Nirenberg lemmas for a doubling measure.Studia Math., 204(1):21–37, 2011

    Daniel Aalto, Lauri Berkovits, Outi Elina Kansanen, and Hong Yue. John-Nirenberg lemmas for a doubling measure.Studia Math., 204(1):21–37, 2011

    2011

Show all 48 references
  1. [2]

    Korevaar-Schoenp-energies and their Γ-limits on Cheeger spaces.Nonlinear Anal., 256:Paper No

    Patricia Alonso-Ruiz and Fabrice Baudoin. Korevaar-Schoenp-energies and their Γ-limits on Cheeger spaces.Nonlinear Anal., 256:Paper No. 113779, 22, 2025

    2025

  2. [3]

    Sebastian Andres and Martin T. Barlow. Energy inequalities for cutoff functions and some applications.J. Reine Angew. Math., 699:183–215, 2015

    2015

  3. [4]

    An approach to sub-Gaussian heat kernel estimates via analysis on metric spaces.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2509.04155v2, September 2025

    Riku Anttila. An approach to sub-Gaussian heat kernel estimates via analysis on metric spaces.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2509.04155v2, September 2025

    2025

  4. [5]

    Construction of self- similar energy forms and singularity of Sobolev spaces on Laakso-type fractal spaces

    Riku Anttila, Sylvester Eriksson-Bique, and Ryosuke Shimizu. Construction of self- similar energy forms and singularity of Sobolev spaces on Laakso-type fractal spaces. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2503.13258, March 2025

    2025 arXiv

  5. [6]

    Barlow and Richard F

    Martin T. Barlow and Richard F. Bass. Stability of parabolic Harnack inequalities. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 356(4):1501–1533, 2004

    2004

  6. [7]

    Barlow, Alexander Grigor’yan, and Takashi Kumagai

    Martin T. Barlow, Alexander Grigor’yan, and Takashi Kumagai. On the equivalence of parabolic Harnack inequalities and heat kernel estimates.J. Math. Soc. Japan, 64(4):1091–1146, 2012

    2012

  7. [8]

    Korevaar-Schoen-Sobolev spaces and critical exponents in metric measure spaces.Ann

    Fabrice Baudoin. Korevaar-Schoen-Sobolev spaces and critical exponents in metric measure spaces.Ann. Fenn. Math., 49(2):487–527, 2024

    2024

  8. [9]

    Sobolev spaces and Poincar´ e inequalities on the Vicsek fractal.Ann

    Fabrice Baudoin and Li Chen. Sobolev spaces and Poincar´ e inequalities on the Vicsek fractal.Ann. Fenn. Math., 48(1):3–26, 2023

    2023

  9. [10]

    A Saint-Venant type principle for Dirichlet forms on discontinuous media.Ann

    Marco Biroli and Umberto Mosco. A Saint-Venant type principle for Dirichlet forms on discontinuous media.Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4), 169:125–181, 1995

    1995

  10. [11]

    European Mathematical Society (EMS), Z¨ urich, 2011

    Anders Bj¨ orn and Jana Bj¨ orn.Nonlinear potential theory on metric spaces, volume 17 ofEMS Tracts in Mathematics. European Mathematical Society (EMS), Z¨ urich, 2011

    2011

  11. [12]

    Regularity of jump-type Dirichlet forms on metric measure spaces.preprint, 2025

    Jun Cao, Alexander Grigor’yan, Eryan Hu, and Liguang Liu. Regularity of jump-type Dirichlet forms on metric measure spaces.preprint, 2025

    2025

  12. [13]

    p-energies on p.c.f

    Shiping Cao, Qingsong Gu, and Hua Qiu. p-energies on p.c.f. self-similar sets.Adv. Math., 405:Paper No. 108517, 58, 2022

    2022

  13. [14]

    Besov-Lipschitz norm and p-en-ergy measure on scale-irregular Vicsek sets.J

    Aobo Chen, Jin Gao, Zhenyu Yu, and Junda Zhang. Besov-Lipschitz norm and p-en-ergy measure on scale-irregular Vicsek sets.J. Fractal Geom., 2025. published online first

    2025

  14. [16]

    Elliptic Harnack inequalities for symmetric non-local Dirichlet forms.J

    Zhen-Qing Chen, Takashi Kumagai, and Jian Wang. Elliptic Harnack inequalities for symmetric non-local Dirichlet forms.J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 125:1–42, 2019

    2019

  15. [17]

    Stability of parabolic Harnack inequalities for symmetric non-local Dirichlet forms.J

    Zhen-Qing Chen, Takashi Kumagai, and Jian Wang. Stability of parabolic Harnack inequalities for symmetric non-local Dirichlet forms.J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 22(11):3747–3803, 2020

    2020

  16. [18]

    Stability of heat kernel estimates for symmetric non-local Dirichlet forms.Mem

    Zhen-Qing Chen, Takashi Kumagai, and Jian Wang. Stability of heat kernel estimates for symmetric non-local Dirichlet forms.Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 271(1330):v+89, 2021

    2021

  17. [19]

    Nonlocal Harnack inequali- ties.J

    Agnese Di Castro, Tuomo Kuusi, and Giampiero Palatucci. Nonlocal Harnack inequali- ties.J. Funct. Anal., 267(6):1807–1836, 2014

    2014

  18. [20]

    Local behavior of fractional p-minimizers.Ann

    Agnese Di Castro, Tuomo Kuusi, and Giampiero Palatucci. Local behavior of fractional p-minimizers.Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire, 33(5):1279–1299, 2016

    2016

  19. [21]

    On the Resistance Conjecture.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2602.05477, February 2026

    Sylvester Eriksson-Bique. On the Resistance Conjecture.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2602.05477, February 2026

    2026

  20. [22]

    Trudinger.Elliptic partial differential equations of second order

    David Gilbarg and Neil S. Trudinger.Elliptic partial differential equations of second order. Classics in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001. Reprint of the 1998 edition. 66

    2001

  21. [23]

    Interpolation properties of Besov spaces defined on metric spaces.Math

    Amiran Gogatishvili, Pekka Koskela, and Nageswari Shanmugalingam. Interpolation properties of Besov spaces defined on metric spaces.Math. Nachr., 283(2):215–231, 2010

    2010

  22. [24]

    Springer, New York, third edition, 2014

    Loukas Grafakos.Classical Fourier analysis, volume 249 ofGraduate Texts in Mathe- matics. Springer, New York, third edition, 2014

    2014

  23. [25]

    Two-sided estimates of heat kernels of jump type Dirichlet forms.Adv

    Alexander Grigor’yan, Eryan Hu, and Jiaxin Hu. Two-sided estimates of heat kernels of jump type Dirichlet forms.Adv. Math., 330:433–515, 2018

    2018

  24. [27]

    Estimates of heat kernels for non-local regular Dirichlet forms.Trans

    Alexander Grigor’yan, Jiaxin Hu, and Ka-Sing Lau. Estimates of heat kernels for non-local regular Dirichlet forms.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 366(12):6397–6441, 2014

    2014

  25. [28]

    Heat kernels on metric measure spaces

    Alexander Grigor’yan, Jiaxin Hu, and Ka-Sing Lau. Heat kernels on metric measure spaces. InGeometry and analysis of fractals, volume 88 ofSpringer Proc. Math. Stat., pages 147–207. Springer, Heidelberg, 2014

    2014

  26. [30]

    Strichartz

    Paul Edward Herman, Roberto Peirone, and Robert S. Strichartz. p-energy and p- harmonic functions on Sierpinski gasket type fractals.Potential Anal., 20(2):125–148, 2004

    2004

  27. [31]

    Naotaka Kajino and Ryosuke Shimizu. Contraction properties and differentiability of p-energy forms with applications to nonlinear potential theory on self-similar sets.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2404.13668v2, April 2024

    2024 arXiv

  28. [32]

    European Mathematical Society (EMS), Berlin, [2023]©2023

    Jun Kigami.Conductive homogeneity of compact metric spaces and construction of p-energy, volume 5 ofMemoirs of the European Mathematical Society. European Mathematical Society (EMS), Berlin, [2023]©2023

    2023

  29. [33]

    The Wiener criterion for nonlocal Dirichlet problems.Comm

    Minhyun Kim, Ki-Ahm Lee, and Se-Chan Lee. The Wiener criterion for nonlocal Dirichlet problems.Comm. Math. Phys., 400(3):1961–2003, 2023

    1961

  30. [34]

    Some remarks for stable-like jump processes on fractals

    Takashi Kumagai. Some remarks for stable-like jump processes on fractals. InFractals in Graz 2001, Trends Math., pages 185–196. Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 2003

    2001

  31. [36]

    Perron’s method and Wiener’s theorem for a nonlocal equation.Potential Anal., 46(4):705–737, 2017

    Erik Lindgren and Peter Lindqvist. Perron’s method and Wiener’s theorem for a nonlocal equation.Potential Anal., 46(4):705–737, 2017

    2017

  32. [37]

    Heat kernel for reflected diffusion and extension property on uniform domains.Probab

    Mathav Murugan. Heat kernel for reflected diffusion and extension property on uniform domains.Probab. Theory Related Fields, 190(1-2):543–599, 2024

    2024

  33. [38]

    A simplified characterization of stable-like heat kernel estimates

    Mathav Murugan. A simplified characterization of stable-like heat kernel estimates. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2602.06388, February 2026

    2026

  34. [39]

    First-order Sobolev spaces, self-similar energies and energy measures on the Sierpi´ nski carpet.Comm

    Mathav Murugan and Ryosuke Shimizu. First-order Sobolev spaces, self-similar energies and energy measures on the Sierpi´ nski carpet.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 78(9):1523–1608, 2025

    2025

  35. [40]

    Limiting behaviour of Dirichlet forms for stable processes on metric spaces.Bull

    Katarzyna Pietruska-Pa luba. Limiting behaviour of Dirichlet forms for stable processes on metric spaces.Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Math., 56(3-4):257–266, 2008

    2008

  36. [41]

    Construction ofp-energy measures associated with strongly local p-energy forms.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2502.10369v3, February 2025

    Kˆ ohei Sasaya. Construction ofp-energy measures associated with strongly local p-energy forms.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2502.10369v3, February 2025

    2025 arXiv

  37. [42]

    Construction of p-energy and associated energy measures on Sierpi´ nski carpets.Trans

    Ryosuke Shimizu. Construction of p-energy and associated energy measures on Sierpi´ nski carpets.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 377(2):951–1032, 2024

    2024

  38. [43]

    Characterizations of Sobolev functions via Besov-type energy func- tionals in fractals.Potential Anal., 63(4):2121–2156, 2025

    Ryosuke Shimizu. Characterizations of Sobolev functions via Besov-type energy func- tionals in fractals.Potential Anal., 63(4):2121–2156, 2025

    2025

  39. [44]

    A direct proof of the cutoff Sobolev inequality on the Sierpi´ nski gasket

    Meng Yang. A direct proof of the cutoff Sobolev inequality on the Sierpi´ nski gasket. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2505.04186v3, May 2025. 67

    2025

  40. [47]

    On the dichotomy of p-walk dimensions on metric measure spaces.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2509.08641v2, September 2025

    Meng Yang. On the dichotomy of p-walk dimensions on metric measure spaces.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2509.08641v2, September 2025

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.