pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.02204 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-02 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Non-minimally coupled quintessence with sign-switching interaction

Jia-Qi Wang, Rong-Gen Cai, Shao-Jiang Wang, Xin Zhang, Yun-He Li, Zong-Kuan Guo

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 20:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords non-minimally coupled quintessencesign-switching interactiondark energy dynamicslate-time weakeningDESI measurementseffective phantom crossingcosmological data fit
0
0 comments X

The pith

A non-minimally coupled quintessence model accounts for the late-time weakening of dark energy seen in recent data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors introduce a quintessence scalar field non-minimally coupled to dark matter to model the late-time dynamics of dark energy suggested by DESI measurements. In this setup, the quintessence density only begins to decrease after it starts dominating the universe's energy content, which explains why the weakening of dark energy appears late in cosmic history. The coupling induces a change in the sign of the energy transfer rate between dark matter and dark energy as the universe evolves. Although the scalar field remains canonical and does not cross the phantom divide at w = -1, the altered dark matter density evolution leads to an apparent phantom crossing in the effective dark energy parameters inferred from observations. This model is shown to be statistically preferred by current cosmological datasets over both the standard Lambda CDM and the w0wa CDM parametrization.

Core claim

The central claim is that a non-minimally coupled quintessence scalar field, through its interaction with dark matter that switches sign during cosmic evolution, naturally produces the observed late-time weakening of dark energy. The field density stays roughly constant until domination, then decreases, while the effective dark energy equation of state appears to cross -1 due to the modified dark matter behavior, even though the field itself does not. This framework provides a better fit to current data than standard models.

What carries the argument

The non-minimal coupling between the quintessence field and dark matter that generates a sign-switching energy transfer interaction.

If this is right

  • The quintessence density remains constant until it dominates, then decreases to explain the late onset of weakening.
  • The coupling produces a sign change in the energy transfer between dark matter and dark energy.
  • An effective phantom crossing appears in the inferred dark energy equation of state without the field itself crossing w = -1.
  • Current cosmological data favor this model more strongly than both Lambda CDM and w0wa CDM.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future surveys could test the exact redshift of the interaction sign switch through combined expansion and growth measurements.
  • The effective crossing behavior may reduce the need to invoke phantom fields when interpreting observational hints of w < -1.
  • If the coupling form has a deeper origin in scalar-tensor gravity, similar interactions could appear in other late-universe observables.

Load-bearing premise

The specific functional forms of the non-minimal coupling and the scalar potential are assumed to produce the sign switch and the delayed onset of density decrease.

What would settle it

Future high-precision measurements of the dark energy equation of state evolution or the growth of cosmic structure at specific redshifts could confirm or rule out the predicted timing of the interaction sign change.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.02204 by Jia-Qi Wang, Rong-Gen Cai, Shao-Jiang Wang, Xin Zhang, Yun-He Li, Zong-Kuan Guo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose a new non-minimally coupled quintessence model to account for the late-time dark energy dynamics indicated by recent DESI measurements. Within this framework, the quintessence density begins to decrease only when it starts to dominate the universe, which naturally accounts for the late-time onset of dark energy weakening. The coupling also induces a sign change in the effective energy transfer between dark matter and dark energy during cosmic evolution. While the scalar field itself remains canonical and never crosses the phantom divide, the modified evolution of the dark matter density gives rise to an effective crossing behavior in the observationally inferred dark energy sector. Compared with both $\Lambda$CDM and $w_0w_a$CDM models, our model is favored more strongly by current cosmological data. This work may provide a promising avenue for understanding the observational late-time weakening of dark energy and the origin of its dynamics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a non-minimally coupled quintessence model with a sign-switching interaction term between dark energy and dark matter. The canonical scalar field never crosses the phantom divide, but the coupling modifies dark-matter evolution to produce an effective phantom-crossing signature in the inferred dark-energy sector. The model is constructed so that quintessence density begins to decrease only after it dominates, naturally producing late-time weakening. The central claim is that the model is statistically favored over both ΛCDM and w0waCDM by current cosmological data, including DESI measurements.

Significance. If the reported data preference survives proper Occam penalties for the two extra parameters and is shown to be robust, the construction supplies a concrete mechanism that links non-minimal coupling to both sign-switching energy transfer and late-time dark-energy weakening without invoking phantom fields. This would be a useful addition to the set of models addressing the DESI hints of evolving dark energy.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and results section: the claim that the model is 'favored more strongly' by current data is not supported by any reported likelihood ratios, Δχ² values, AIC/BIC differences, or Bayesian evidence that penalize the two additional parameters (coupling strength and sign-switch scale). Without these quantities the central statistical conclusion cannot be assessed.
  2. [Model definition] Model-construction section: the coupling function is explicitly engineered to produce the sign switch and the late-time weakening; the reported improvement in fit is therefore tied to this functional choice. A quantitative demonstration that the preference persists under reasonable variations of the functional form (or under a more general parametrization) is required to establish that the result is not an artifact of the construction.
  3. [Results] Results section: no robustness checks against data cuts, alternative datasets, or changes in the dark-matter equation-of-state prior are presented. Given that the effective phantom behavior arises from modified dark-matter evolution, such checks are load-bearing for the claim that the model is preferred by 'current cosmological data'.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Model definition] The exact functional forms of the non-minimal coupling and the quintessence potential should be written explicitly with all parameters labeled, together with the definition of the sign-switch scale.
  2. [Introduction] Add a brief discussion of the physical motivation (beyond data fitting) for the chosen coupling function.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested statistical quantifications, model robustness discussion, and checks.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and results section: the claim that the model is 'favored more strongly' by current data is not supported by any reported likelihood ratios, Δχ² values, AIC/BIC differences, or Bayesian evidence that penalize the two additional parameters (coupling strength and sign-switch scale). Without these quantities the central statistical conclusion cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We agree that the statistical preference must be quantified with proper penalties for the extra parameters. In the revised manuscript we will report Δχ², AIC, BIC, and Bayesian evidence comparisons between our model, ΛCDM, and w0waCDM that explicitly account for the two additional degrees of freedom. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Model definition] Model-construction section: the coupling function is explicitly engineered to produce the sign switch and the late-time weakening; the reported improvement in fit is therefore tied to this functional choice. A quantitative demonstration that the preference persists under reasonable variations of the functional form (or under a more general parametrization) is required to establish that the result is not an artifact of the construction.

    Authors: The functional form is physically motivated by the non-minimal coupling that generates the sign switch while preserving a canonical scalar field. We will add quantitative results in the revised version for reasonable variations of the coupling function and a generalized parametrization to show that the data preference is not an artifact of the specific choice. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Results] Results section: no robustness checks against data cuts, alternative datasets, or changes in the dark-matter equation-of-state prior are presented. Given that the effective phantom behavior arises from modified dark-matter evolution, such checks are load-bearing for the claim that the model is preferred by 'current cosmological data'.

    Authors: We will include the requested robustness tests in the revised manuscript: fits to data subsets, alternative datasets, and variations of the dark-matter equation-of-state prior, to confirm that the effective phantom signature and model preference remain stable. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper starts from a standard scalar-tensor action, introduces an explicit ansatz for the non-minimal coupling function chosen to produce the desired sign switch and late-time weakening, derives the background and perturbation equations in the usual way, and then performs a statistical comparison of the resulting model against data. The functional choice is stated upfront as a model-building step rather than derived from prior equations; the reported data preference is a post-fit statistical outcome (not a definitional identity). No equation reduces to its input by construction, no load-bearing premise rests solely on a self-citation chain, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as an independent prediction. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The model rests on standard FLRW cosmology plus a new non-minimal coupling function whose parameters are adjusted to match observations; no independent evidence is given for the coupling form beyond its ability to reproduce the desired phenomenology.

free parameters (2)
  • coupling strength parameter
    Determines the magnitude and timing of the sign switch in energy transfer; must be fitted to data to produce the reported late-time behavior.
  • quintessence potential parameters
    Shape of the scalar potential is chosen to ensure the field remains canonical and begins decreasing only after domination.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Background spacetime is described by the flat FLRW metric with standard Friedmann equations
    Invoked throughout the derivation of the modified continuity equations.
  • domain assumption The scalar field is minimally coupled to gravity but non-minimally coupled to dark matter only
    Core modeling choice that enables the sign-switching interaction.
invented entities (1)
  • sign-switching interaction term no independent evidence
    purpose: Induces reversal of effective energy transfer between dark matter and dark energy
    Postulated via the non-minimal coupling function to explain the observed weakening without phantom scalar field.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5462 in / 1508 out tokens · 42934 ms · 2026-05-13T20:40:38.445081+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Late-time reconstruction of non-minimally coupled gravity with a smoothness prior

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Non-parametric reconstruction of non-minimally coupled gravity with a smoothness prior on CMB, DESI BAO, supernovae, and DES data yields a 2.8σ hint for coupling and a preference for phantom divide crossing stabilized...

  2. Alleviating the Hubble Tension Using $\Lambda$sCDM Model: A Coupled Dark Energy - Dark Matter Interaction

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The ΛsCDM model with coupled dark sectors reduces the Hubble tension to 1.2σ via late-time expansion changes while keeping the early-universe sound horizon nearly unchanged.

  3. Cosmological intercept tension

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Tensions in the supernova intercept a_B at z~0.01 in PantheonPlus and z~0.1 in DES-Y5 point to data systematics or inter-survey inconsistencies rather than new physics, aligning H0 measurements and reducing support fo...

  4. Alleviating the Hubble Tension Using $\Lambda$sCDM Model: A Coupled Dark Energy - Dark Matter Interaction

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The ΛsCDM interacting dark sector model reduces the Hubble tension to 1.2σ via late-time energy transfer from dark matter to dark energy while leaving the sound horizon nearly unchanged.

  5. Constraints on Coupled Dark Energy in the DESI Era

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    New cosmological data mildly favor a small coupling between dark matter and a scalar dark energy field at |β| ≈ 0.03 while allowing an effective phantom-crossing equation of state.

  6. Coupled Dark Energy and Dark Matter for DESI: An Effective Guide to the Phantom Divide

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Coupled quintessence-dark matter models can produce an apparent phantom-crossing effective equation of state matching DESI preferences if the scalar field begins frozen in the radiation era.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 97 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers · 21 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,” Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    Alam and others (eBOSS), Phys

    Shadab Alam et al. (eBOSS), “Completed SDSS-IV ex- tended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cos- mological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the Apache Point Observatory,” Phys. Rev. D 103, 083533 (2021) , arXiv:2007.08991 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations

    A. G. Adame et al. (DESI), “DESI 2024 VI: cosmologi- cal constraints from the measurements of baryon acous- tic oscillations,” JCAP 02, 021 (2025) , arXiv:2404.03002 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints

    Dillon Brout et al., “The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cos- mological Constraints,” Astrophys. J. 938, 110 (2022) , arXiv:2202.04077 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    The Dark Energy Sur- vey: Cosmology Results with ∼1500 New High-redshift Type Ia Supernovae Using the Full 5 yr Data Set,

    T. M. C. Abbott et al. (DES), “The Dark Energy Sur- vey: Cosmology Results with ∼1500 New High-redshift Type Ia Supernovae Using the Full 5 yr Data Set,” Astro- phys. J. Lett. 973, L14 (2024) , arXiv:2401.02929 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    The Cosmological Constant Prob- lem,

    Steven Weinberg, “The Cosmological Constant Prob- lem,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 1–23 (1989)

    work page 1989

  7. [7]

    Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe

    Joshua Frieman, Michael Turner, and Dragan Huterer, “Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe,” Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 46, 385–432 (2008) , arXiv:0803.0982 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  8. [8]

    The Cosmological Constant and Dark Energy

    P. J. E. Peebles and Bharat Ratra, “The Cosmological Constant and Dark Energy,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 559– 606 (2003) , arXiv:astro-ph/0207347

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  9. [9]

    Dynamics of dark energy

    Edmund J. Copeland, M. Sami, and Shinji Tsujikawa, “Dynamics of dark energy,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15, 1753–1936 (2006) , arXiv:hep-th/0603057

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1936

  10. [10]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 Maps and Cosmological Parameters,

    Simone Aiola et al. (ACT), “The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 Maps and Cosmological Parameters,” JCAP 12, 047 (2020) , arXiv:2007.07288 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  11. [11]

    Constraints on ΛCDM ex- tensions from the SPT-3G 2018 EE and TE power spec- tra,

    L. Balkenhol et al. (SPT-3G), “Constraints on ΛCDM ex- tensions from the SPT-3G 2018 EE and TE power spec- tra,” Phys. Rev. D 104, 083509 (2021) , arXiv:2103.13618 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    A 2.4% Determination of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant,

    Adam G. Riess et al., “A 2.4% Determination of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant,” Astrophys. J. 826, 56 (2016), arXiv:1604.01424 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2016

  13. [13]

    New Parallaxes of Galactic Cepheids from Spatially Scanning the Hubble Space Tele- scope: Implications for the Hubble Constant,

    Adam G. Riess et al., “New Parallaxes of Galactic Cepheids from Spatially Scanning the Hubble Space Tele- scope: Implications for the Hubble Constant,” Astro- phys. J. 855, 136 (2018), arXiv:1801.01120 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2018

  14. [14]

    Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1% Foundation for the De- termination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evi- dence for Physics beyond ΛCDM,

    Adam G. Riess, Stefano Casertano, Wenlong Yuan, Lu- cas M. Macri, and Dan Scolnic, “Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1% Foundation for the De- termination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evi- dence for Physics beyond ΛCDM,” Astrophys. J. 876, 85 (2019), arXiv:1903.07603 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km/s/Mpc Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team

    Adam G. Riess et al., “A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km s 1 Mpc1 Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 934, L7 (2022) , arXiv:2112.04510 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions,

    Eleonora Di Valentino, Olga Mena, Supriya Pan, Luca Visinelli, Weiqiang Yang, Alessandro Melchiorri, David F. Mota, Adam G. Riess, and Joseph Silk, “In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions,” Class. Quant. Grav. 38, 153001 (2021) , arXiv:2103.01183 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Estimating Hubble Constant with Grav- itational Observations: A Concise Review,

    Rosa Poggiani, “Estimating Hubble Constant with Grav- itational Observations: A Concise Review,” Galaxies 13, 8 65 (2025) , arXiv:2506.15410 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Perivolaropoulos and F

    Leandros Perivolaropoulos and Foteini Skara, “Chal- lenges for ΛCDM: An update,” New Astron. Rev. 95, 101659 (2022) , arXiv:2105.05208 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    Hubble Tension: The Evidence of New Physics,

    Jian-Ping Hu and Fa-Yin Wang, “Hubble Tension: The Evidence of New Physics,” Universe 9, 94 (2023) , arXiv:2302.05709 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    The Hubble Tension and Early Dark Energy,

    Marc Kamionkowski and Adam G. Riess, “The Hubble Tension and Early Dark Energy,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 73, 153–180 (2023) , arXiv:2211.04492 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Accelerating Universes with Scaling Dark Matter

    Michel Chevallier and David Polarski, “Accelerating uni- verses with scaling dark matter,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 10, 213–224 (2001) , arXiv:gr-qc/0009008

    work page Pith review arXiv 2001

  22. [22]

    Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe

    Eric V. Linder, “Exploring the expansion history of the universe,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 091301 (2003) , arXiv:astro-ph/0208512

    work page Pith review arXiv 2003

  23. [23]

    Extended Dark Energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements

    K. Lodha et al. (DESI), “Extended dark energy analy- sis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements,” Phys. Rev. D 112, 083511 (2025) , arXiv:2503.14743 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints

    M. Abdul Karim et al. (DESI), “DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cos- mological Constraints,” (2025), arXiv:2503.14738 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Evolving dark energy or supernovae systematics?

    George Efstathiou, “Evolving dark energy or supernovae systematics?” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 538, 875–882 (2025), arXiv:2408.07175 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Comparing the DES-SN5YR and Pantheon+ SN cosmology analyses: investigation based on ‘evolving dark energy or supernovae system- atics’?

    M. Vincenzi et al. (DES), “Comparing the DES-SN5YR and Pantheon+ SN cosmology analyses: investigation based on ‘evolving dark energy or supernovae system- atics’?” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 541, 2585–2593 (2025), arXiv:2501.06664 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    The DESI DR1/DR2 evidence for dynamical dark en- ergy is biased by low-redshift supernovae,

    Lu Huang, Rong-Gen Cai, and Shao-Jiang Wang, “The DESI DR1/DR2 evidence for dynamical dark en- ergy is biased by low-redshift supernovae,” Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 68, 100413 (2025), arXiv:2502.04212 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    The Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program: A Reanalysis Of Cosmology Results And Evidence For Evolving Dark Energy With An Updated Type Ia Supernova Calibration

    B. Popovic et al. (DES), “The Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program: A Reanalysis Of Cosmology Re- sults And Evidence For Evolving Dark Energy With An Updated Type Ia Supernova Calibration,” (2025), arXiv:2511.07517 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    How much has DESI dark en- ergy evolved since DR1?

    Eoin Ó. Colgáin, Saeed Pourojaghi, M. M. Sheikh- Jabbari, and Lu Yin, “How much has DESI dark en- ergy evolved since DR1?” Phys. Dark Univ. 52, 102268 (2026), arXiv:2504.04417 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2026

  30. [30]

    Model-independent cosmological inference after the DESI DR2 data with improved inverse distance ladder,

    Jia-Le Ling, Guo-Hong Du, Tian-Nuo Li, Jing-Fei Zhang, Shao-Jiang Wang, and Xin Zhang, “Model-independent cosmological inference after the DESI DR2 data with improved inverse distance ladder,” Phys. Rev. D 112, 083528 (2025) , arXiv:2505.22369 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Can dark energy evolve to the phan- tom?

    Alexander Vikman, “Can dark energy evolve to the phan- tom?” Phys. Rev. D 71, 023515 (2005) , arXiv:astro- ph/0407107

    work page arXiv 2005

  32. [32]

    Interacting Phantom Energy

    Zong-Kuan Guo and Yuan-Zhong Zhang, “Interacting phantom energy,” Phys. Rev. D 71, 023501 (2005) , arXiv:astro-ph/0411524

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  33. [33]

    Cosmological Evolution of Interacting Phantom Energy with Dark Matter

    Zong-Kuan Guo, Rong-Gen Cai, and Yuan-Zhong Zhang, “Cosmological evolution of interacting phan- tom energy with dark matter,” JCAP 05, 002 (2005) , arXiv:astro-ph/0412624

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  34. [34]

    Probing the Coupling between Dark Components of the Universe,

    Zong-Kuan Guo, Nobuyoshi Ohta, and Shinji Tsujikawa, “Probing the Coupling between Dark Components of the Universe,” Phys. Rev. D 76, 023508 (2007) , arXiv:astro- ph/0702015

    work page arXiv 2007

  35. [35]

    Re- constructing the interaction between dark energy and dark matter using Gaussian Processes,

    Tao Yang, Zong-Kuan Guo, and Rong-Gen Cai, “Re- constructing the interaction between dark energy and dark matter using Gaussian Processes,” Phys. Rev. D 91, 123533 (2015) , arXiv:1505.04443 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2015

  36. [36]

    The Cosmon model for an asymp- totically vanishing time dependent cosmological ’con- stant’,

    Christof Wetterich, “The Cosmon model for an asymp- totically vanishing time dependent cosmological ’con- stant’,” Astron. Astrophys. 301, 321–328 (1995), arXiv:hep-th/9408025

    work page arXiv 1995

  37. [37]

    Coupled Quintessence

    Luca Amendola, “Coupled quintessence,” Phys. Rev. D 62, 043511 (2000) , arXiv:astro-ph/9908023

    work page Pith review arXiv 2000

  38. [38]

    Cosmological Evolution With Interaction Be- tween Dark Energy And Dark Matter,

    Yu. L. Bolotin, A. Kostenko, O. A. Lemets, and D. A. Yerokhin, “Cosmological Evolution With Interaction Be- tween Dark Energy And Dark Matter,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24, 1530007 (2014) , arXiv:1310.0085 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2014

  39. [39]

    Hints of Nonminimally Coupled Gravity in DESI 2024 Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurements,

    Gen Ye, Matteo Martinelli, Bin Hu, and Alessandra Sil- vestri, “Hints of Nonminimally Coupled Gravity in DESI 2024 Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurements,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 181002 (2025) , arXiv:2407.15832 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Exploring Coupled Quintessence in light of CMB and DESI DR2 measurements,

    Atul Ashutosh Samanta, Abhijith Ajith, and Sukanta Panda, “Exploring Coupled Quintessence in light of CMB and DESI DR2 measurements,” (2025), arXiv:2509.09624 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Comparing Minimal and Non-Minimal Quintessence Models to 2025 DESI Data

    Husam Adam, Mark P. Hertzberg, Daniel Jiménez- Aguilar, and Iman Khan, “Comparing Minimal and Non-Minimal Quintessence Models to 2025 DESI Data,” (2025), arXiv:2509.13302 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Assessing Cosmological Evidence for Nonminimal Coupling,

    William J. Wolf, Carlos García-García, Theodore Anton, and Pedro G. Ferreira, “Assessing Cosmological Evidence for Nonminimal Coupling,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 081001 (2025), arXiv:2504.07679 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Resolving the Planck-DESI tension by nonminimally coupled quintessence

    Jia-Qi Wang, Rong-Gen Cai, Zong-Kuan Guo, and Shao-Jiang Wang, “Resolving the Planck-DESI ten- sion by non-minimally coupled quintessence,” (2025), arXiv:2508.01759 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Non-Minimally Coupled Quintessence in Light of DESI,

    Samuel Sánchez López, Alexandros Karam, and Dhi- raj Kumar Hazra, “Non-Minimally Coupled Quintessence in Light of DESI,” (2025), arXiv:2510.14941 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Strong Evidence for Dark Sector Interactions,

    Tian-Nuo Li, William Giarè, Guo-Hong Du, Yun-He Li, Eleonora Di Valentino, Jing-Fei Zhang, and Xin Zhang, “Strong Evidence for Dark Sector Interactions,” (2026), arXiv:2601.07361 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2026

  46. [46]

    Con- straints on Interacting Dark Energy Models from the DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillation and DES Supernovae Data,

    Tian-Nuo Li, Peng-Ju Wu, Guo-Hong Du, Shang-Jie Jin, Hai-Li Li, Jing-Fei Zhang, and Xin Zhang, “Con- straints on Interacting Dark Energy Models from the DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillation and DES Supernovae Data,” Astrophys. J. 976, 1 (2024) , arXiv:2407.14934 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    On the Dark Sec- tor Interactions,

    Rong-Gen Cai and Qiping Su, “On the Dark Sec- tor Interactions,” Phys. Rev. D 81, 103514 (2010) , arXiv:0912.1943 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2010

  48. [48]

    Cosmic sign-reversal: non-parametric reconstruction of interacting dark en- ergy with DESI DR2,

    Yun-He Li and Xin Zhang, “Cosmic sign-reversal: non-parametric reconstruction of interacting dark en- ergy with DESI DR2,” JCAP 12, 018 (2025) , arXiv:2506.18477 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Probing the sign-changeable interaction between dark energy and dark matter with DESI baryon acoustic oscillations and DES supernovae data,

    Tian-Nuo Li, Guo-Hong Du, Yun-He Li, Peng-Ju Wu, Shang-Jie Jin, Jing-Fei Zhang, and Xin Zhang, “Probing the sign-changeable interaction between dark energy and dark matter with DESI baryon acoustic oscillations and DES supernovae data,” Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 69, 210413 (2026) , arXiv:2501.07361 [astro-ph.CO] . 9

    work page arXiv 2026

  50. [50]

    Dark Energy Is Not That Into You: Variable Couplings after DESI DR2 BAO,

    Weiqiang Yang, Sibo Zhang, Olga Mena, Supriya Pan, and Eleonora Di Valentino, “Dark Energy Is Not That Into You: Variable Couplings after DESI DR2 BAO,” (2025), arXiv:2508.19109 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    How Dark Sector Equations of State Govern Interaction Sig- natures,

    Peng-Ju Wu, Ming Zhang, and Shang-Jie Jin, “How Dark Sector Equations of State Govern Interaction Sig- natures,” (2025), arXiv:2512.05548 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Sign switch- ing in dark sector coupling interactions as a candidate for resolving cosmological tensions,

    Miguel A. Sabogal, Emanuelly Silva, Rafael C. Nunes, Suresh Kumar, and Eleonora Di Valentino, “Sign switch- ing in dark sector coupling interactions as a candidate for resolving cosmological tensions,” Phys. Rev. D 111, 043531 (2025) , arXiv:2501.10323 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Scaling solutions in general non-minimal coupling theories

    Luca Amendola, “Scaling solutions in general nonmini- mal coupling theories,” Phys. Rev. D 60, 043501 (1999) , arXiv:astro-ph/9904120

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  54. [54]

    Dark Energy, the Swampland and the Equivalence Principle,

    Carsten van de Bruck and Cameron C. Thomas, “Dark Energy, the Swampland and the Equivalence Principle,” Phys. Rev. D 100, 023515 (2019) , arXiv:1904.07082 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  55. [55]

    Scalar-Field Dark Energy Nonminimally and Kinetically Coupled to Dark Matter,

    Ryotaro Kase and Shinji Tsujikawa, “Scalar-Field Dark Energy Nonminimally and Kinetically Coupled to Dark Matter,” Phys. Rev. D 101, 063511 (2020) , arXiv:1910.02699 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  56. [56]

    Coupled quintessence in a power-law case and the cosmic coincidence problem,

    Xin Zhang, “Coupled quintessence in a power-law case and the cosmic coincidence problem,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 20, 2575 (2005) , arXiv:astro-ph/0503072

    work page arXiv 2005

  57. [57]

    Constraining interacting dark energy models with black hole superradiance

    Zhen-Hong Lyu, Rong-Gen Cai, Shao-Jiang Wang, and Xiang-Xi Zeng, “Constraining interacting dark en- ergy models with black hole superradiance,” (2025), 10.1103/rmgx-rp87, arXiv:2511.16244 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/rmgx-rp87 2025

  58. [58]

    Phantom Mirage from Axion Dark Energy,

    Rayne Liu, Yijie Zhu, Wayne Hu, and Vivian Miranda, “Phantom Mirage from Axion Dark Energy,” (2025), arXiv:2510.14957 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    Rec- onciling S8: insights from interacting dark sectors,

    Rahul Shah, Purba Mukherjee, and Supratik Pal, “Rec- onciling S8: insights from interacting dark sectors,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 536, 2404–2420 (2024) , arXiv:2404.06396 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    Velocities as a probe of dark sector interactions,

    Kazuya Koyama, Roy Maartens, and Yong-Seon Song, “Velocities as a probe of dark sector interactions,” JCAP 10, 017 (2009) , arXiv:0907.2126 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2009

  61. [61]

    Chameleon cos- mology,

    Justin Khoury and Amanda Weltman, “Chameleon cos- mology,” Phys. Rev. D 69, 044026 (2004) , arXiv:astro- ph/0309411

    work page arXiv 2004

  62. [62]

    Quan- tum Stability of Chameleon Field Theories,

    Amol Upadhye, Wayne Hu, and Justin Khoury, “Quan- tum Stability of Chameleon Field Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 041301 (2012) , arXiv:1204.3906 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2012

  63. [63]

    Hubble Tension as a Window on the Gravitation of the Dark Matter Sector,

    Cyril Pitrou and Jean-Philippe Uzan, “Hubble Tension as a Window on the Gravitation of the Dark Matter Sector,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 191001 (2024) , arXiv:2312.12493 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    Hubble tension as a window on the gravitation of the dark matter sector: Exploration of a family of models,

    Jean-Philippe Uzan and Cyril Pitrou, “Hubble tension as a window on the gravitation of the dark matter sector: Exploration of a family of models,” Phys. Rev. D 109, 103505 (2024) , arXiv:2312.12408 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  65. [65]

    Efficient Computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models

    Antony Lewis, Anthony Challinor, and Anthony Lasenby, “Efficient computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FR W models,” Astrophys. J. 538, 473–476 (2000) , arXiv:astro-ph/9911177

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  66. [66]

    IDECAMB: an implemen- tation of interacting dark energy cosmology in CAMB,

    Yun-He Li and Xin Zhang, “IDECAMB: an implemen- tation of interacting dark energy cosmology in CAMB,” JCAP 09, 046 (2023) , arXiv:2306.01593 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  67. [67]

    Parametrized Post-Friedmann Framework for Interact- ing Dark Energy,

    Yun-He Li, Jing-Fei Zhang, and Xin Zhang, “Parametrized Post-Friedmann Framework for Interact- ing Dark Energy,” Phys. Rev. D 90, 063005 (2014) , arXiv:1404.5220 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2014

  68. [68]

    Effective Field Theory of Cosmic Acceler- ation: an implementation in CAMB,

    Bin Hu, Marco Raveri, Noemi Frusciante, and Alessan- dra Silvestri, “Effective Field Theory of Cosmic Acceler- ation: an implementation in CAMB,” Phys. Rev. D 89, 103530 (2014) , arXiv:1312.5742 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2014

  69. [69]

    A class of methods for solving nonlin- ear simultaneous equations,

    C. G. Broyden, “A class of methods for solving nonlin- ear simultaneous equations,” Math. Comput. 19, 577– 593 (1965)

    work page 1965

  70. [70]

    Some convergence properties of broyden’s method,

    David M Gay, “Some convergence properties of broyden’s method,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 16, 623– 630 (1979)

    work page 1979

  71. [71]

    Torrado and A

    Jesus Torrado and Antony Lewis, “Cobaya: Code for Bayesian Analysis of hierarchical physical models,” JCAP 05, 057 (2021) , arXiv:2005.05290 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2021

  72. [72]

    Cobaya: Bayesian analysis in cosmology,

    Jesús Torrado and Antony Lewis, “Cobaya: Bayesian analysis in cosmology,” Astrophysics Source Code Li- brary, record ascl:1910.019 (2019)

    work page 1910

  73. [73]

    PolyChord: nested sampling for cosmology

    W. J. Handley, M. P. Hobson, and A. N. Lasenby, “Poly- Chord: nested sampling for cosmology,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 450, L61–L65 (2015) , arXiv:1502.01856 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  74. [74]

    polychord: next-generation nested sampling,

    W. J. Handley, M. P. Hobson, and A. N. Lasenby, “polychord: next-generation nested sampling,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 453, 4385–4399 (2015) , arXiv:1506.00171 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2015

  75. [75]

    Nested sampling for physical sci- entists,

    Greg Ashton et al., “Nested sampling for physical sci- entists,” Nature 2 (2022), 10.1038/s43586-022-00121-x , arXiv:2205.15570 [stat.CO]

    work page doi:10.1038/s43586-022-00121-x 2022

  76. [76]

    GetDist: a Python package for analysing Monte Carlo samples,

    Antony Lewis, “GetDist: a Python package for analysing Monte Carlo samples,” (2019), arXiv:1910.13970 [astro- ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2019

  77. [77]

    Rosenberg, S

    Erik Rosenberg, Steven Gratton, and George Efstathiou, “CMB power spectra and cosmological parameters from Planck PR4 with CamSpec,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 517, 4620–4636 (2022) , arXiv:2205.10869 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  78. [78]

    Aghanim and others (Planck), Astron

    N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), “Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods,” Astron. Astrophys. 641, A5 (2020) , arXiv:1907.12875 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2018

  79. [79]

    Carron, M

    Julien Carron, Mark Mirmelstein, and Antony Lewis, “CMB lensing from Planck PR4 maps,” JCAP 09, 039 (2022), arXiv:2206.07773 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  80. [80]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods and $\Lambda$CDM Parameters

    Thibaut Louis et al. (Atacama Cosmology Telescope), “The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 power spec- tra, likelihoods and ΛCDM parameters,” JCAP 11, 062 (2025), arXiv:2503.14452 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.