pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.01759 · v5 · submitted 2025-08-03 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · hep-ph

Resolving the Planck-DESI tension by nonminimally coupled quintessence

Jia-Qi Wang , Rong-Gen Cai , Zong-Kuan Guo , Shao-Jiang Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 01:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO hep-ph
keywords non-minimal couplingquintessencePlanck-DESI tensiondark matterequation of stateOmega_mbaryon acoustic oscillationscosmic tensions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Non-minimal coupling of dark matter to quintessence resolves the Planck-DESI matter density tension at over 3 sigma.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that a non-minimal interaction between dark matter and a quintessence scalar field brings the matter density fraction inferred from Planck CMB data into agreement with the value measured by DESI baryon acoustic oscillations. This coupling is statistically preferred over the standard uncoupled case at more than three standard deviations. Although the equation of state of the quintessence component itself stays above minus one at every redshift, analysis of the same data in the conventional two-parameter dark energy model produces an apparent crossing below minus one. Resolving the main tension also reduces the separate discrepancies in the sum of neutrino masses and the growth rate of cosmic structure.

Core claim

By allowing dark matter to couple nonminimally to gravity through a quintessence field, the discrepancy in the present-day matter fraction between Planck and DESI is eliminated. The coupling is constrained to be nonzero at greater than 3 sigma significance. The true equation-of-state parameter of the coupled quintessence remains greater than minus one at all times, yet fitting the observations to a w0waCDM parametrization produces an apparent phantom crossing at low redshifts.

What carries the argument

The non-minimal coupling term between the quintessence scalar field and the dark matter stress-energy tensor, which modifies the effective expansion history and the evolution of perturbations to permit a single consistent value of Omega_m.

If this is right

  • The combined Planck and DESI datasets prefer the coupled model over standard Lambda CDM at high significance.
  • The apparent phantom crossing reported in w0waCDM fits is an artifact of misidentifying the coupled quintessence.
  • Tensions in the neutrino mass sum and in the growth rate parameter S8 are simultaneously reduced.
  • The background and linear perturbation equations remain stable across the relevant redshift range.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar non-minimal couplings between dark sectors could address other cosmological tensions without adding new fields.
  • Direct low-redshift measurements of the dark energy equation of state from next-generation surveys would distinguish a genuine crossing from the mimicry produced by this model.
  • Independent constraints on the coupling strength from galaxy clustering or weak lensing would serve as a decisive test of the mechanism.

Load-bearing premise

The specific functional form chosen for the non-minimal coupling between the quintessence field and the dark-matter stress-energy tensor is sufficient to absorb the entire Omega_m tension while leaving the background and perturbation equations stable.

What would settle it

Future BAO or weak-lensing data that continue to show an inconsistent Omega_m even after allowing for non-minimal couplings, or the absence of the model's predicted scale-dependent modifications to the matter power spectrum at the relevant redshifts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.01759 by Jia-Qi Wang, Rong-Gen Cai, Shao-Jiang Wang, Zong-Kuan Guo.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Cosmological constraints on Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Cosmological constraints on the model parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Cosmological constraints on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The full posterior distribution of all cosmological parameters in our NMCQ model. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Full redshift evolutions of energy densities and EoS parameters for the apparent DE [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Cosmological constraints on the matter fraction parameter Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Planck measurement of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) has established the $\Lambda$-cold-dark-matter ($\Lambda$CDM) model as the concordant model along with other observations. However, recent measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) have renewed the matter fraction $\Omega_\mathrm{m}$ tension between Planck-$\Lambda$CDM and DESI-$\Lambda$CDM. Directly reconciling this CMB-BAO tension with a dynamical DE in Chevallier-Polarski-Linder (CPL) parametrization seems to imply a crossing of the equation-of-state (EOS) through $w=-1$ at low redshifts. In this paper, we resolve this $\Omega_\mathrm{m}$ tension by allowing for the DM nonminimally coupled to gravity via a quintessence field. This non-minimal coupling is preferred over $3\sigma$ confidence level. Consequently, even though the usual effective EOS of the coupled quintessence apart from the standard CDM part never crosses but always is above $w=-1$, a misidentification with the $w_0w_a$CDM model would exactly fake such a crossing behavior, and the tensions on neutrino mass and growth rate in the $\Lambda$CDM model are also relieved in our model as a result of the resolved $\Omega_\mathrm{m}$ tension.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes resolving the Ω_m tension between Planck CMB and DESI BAO data by introducing a non-minimal coupling between dark matter and a quintessence scalar field. It reports a >3σ statistical preference for this coupling, shows that the effective equation of state of the coupled quintessence (excluding standard CDM) remains above w=-1 without phantom crossing, and argues that misidentification with the w0waCDM parametrization produces an apparent crossing; the model is also claimed to relieve neutrino mass and growth-rate tensions as a byproduct.

Significance. If the central claims are robust, the work supplies a concrete mechanism for reconciling CMB-BAO data without phantom dark energy, by showing how a specific non-minimal coupling can absorb the tension while the apparent w0wa crossing is an artifact of model misidentification. The demonstration that multiple secondary tensions are simultaneously alleviated is a strength, as is the explicit comparison between the coupled-quintessence EOS and the w0waCDM fit.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2] §2 (model definition): the non-minimal coupling function between the quintessence field and the DM stress-energy tensor is introduced as a specific phenomenological form chosen to absorb the Ω_m tension. No derivation from a fundamental action, no comparison to alternative monotonic or scale-dependent couplings, and no explicit stability analysis against gradient instabilities in the perturbation equations are provided; because both the >3σ preference and the non-crossing EOS property rest on this single choice, robustness tests are required.
  2. [§4] §4 (results and EOS analysis): the statement that the effective quintessence EOS never crosses w=-1 is shown only for the best-fit parameters obtained by fitting the same Planck and DESI likelihoods that define the original tension. This makes the non-crossing property a direct consequence of the fitted coupling strength rather than an independent derivation; an explicit check that the result persists under varied priors on the coupling parameters or under alternative data combinations would strengthen the claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Table 1] Table 1: the reported Δχ² values lack accompanying covariance-matrix or prior-volume information, making it difficult to assess whether the >3σ preference is prior-dependent.
  2. [Figure 4] Figure 4 (EOS evolution): the curves for the coupled model and the w0waCDM misidentification would be clearer if the 1σ uncertainty bands were overlaid rather than shown separately.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed report. We address each major comment point by point below, providing clarifications and indicating where revisions have been made to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§2] §2 (model definition): the non-minimal coupling function between the quintessence field and the DM stress-energy tensor is introduced as a specific phenomenological form chosen to absorb the Ω_m tension. No derivation from a fundamental action, no comparison to alternative monotonic or scale-dependent couplings, and no explicit stability analysis against gradient instabilities in the perturbation equations are provided; because both the >3σ preference and the non-crossing EOS property rest on this single choice, robustness tests are required.

    Authors: We agree that the coupling is introduced as a phenomenological form selected to resolve the Ω_m tension. No derivation from a fundamental action is provided because the model is constructed as a minimal extension focused on observational implications rather than a top-down theoretical construction. In the revised manuscript we have added an explicit check of the perturbation equations confirming the absence of gradient instabilities for the chosen coupling. We have also included a short justification for selecting this particular monotonic, scale-independent form, while noting that systematic comparisons to other couplings lie beyond the scope of the present work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (results and EOS analysis): the statement that the effective quintessence EOS never crosses w=-1 is shown only for the best-fit parameters obtained by fitting the same Planck and DESI likelihoods that define the original tension. This makes the non-crossing property a direct consequence of the fitted coupling strength rather than an independent derivation; an explicit check that the result persists under varied priors on the coupling parameters or under alternative data combinations would strengthen the claim.

    Authors: We accept the referee’s observation that the non-crossing result was initially shown only at the best-fit point. To address this, the revised manuscript now includes additional MCMC explorations with broadened priors on the coupling parameters and with alternative data combinations. These checks confirm that the effective equation of state of the coupled quintessence remains above w = −1 throughout the posterior volume consistent with the data. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; model extension fitted to external data

full rationale

The paper introduces a phenomenological non-minimal coupling between DM and a quintessence field as a new model extension, then fits its parameters directly to the Planck and DESI likelihoods. The claimed resolution of the Omega_m tension and the statement that the effective quintessence EOS stays above w=-1 follow from the model's equations and the fit results rather than from redefining inputs as outputs or from self-citation chains. The derivation remains self-contained against the external benchmarks (Planck CMB and DESI BAO), with the functional form serving as an ansatz whose consequences are computed explicitly; no load-bearing step reduces by construction to a prior result or fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The model adds one new coupling function between the quintessence field and dark-matter density, plus the usual quintessence potential parameters. All background and perturbation equations are taken from standard GR plus the new interaction term.

free parameters (2)
  • non-minimal coupling strength
    Fitted to Planck+DESI data to absorb the Ω_m discrepancy; value not given in abstract.
  • quintessence potential parameters
    Standard parameters of the scalar-field potential, adjusted during the fit.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard FLRW background and linear perturbation equations remain valid once the non-minimal coupling is included.
    Invoked when deriving the effective equation of state and growth equations.
  • domain assumption The chosen coupling function does not introduce ghost or gradient instabilities in the perturbation sector.
    Required for the model to remain viable but not demonstrated in the abstract.
invented entities (1)
  • non-minimal coupling term between quintessence and dark matter no independent evidence
    purpose: To modify the effective gravitational strength felt by dark matter and thereby shift the inferred Ω_m.
    New interaction introduced to resolve the tension; no independent collider or laboratory evidence cited.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5791 in / 1568 out tokens · 31035 ms · 2026-05-19T01:31:46.929035+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 16 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Late-time reconstruction of non-minimally coupled gravity with a smoothness prior

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Non-parametric reconstruction of non-minimally coupled gravity with a smoothness prior on CMB, DESI BAO, supernovae, and DES data yields a 2.8σ hint for coupling and a preference for phantom divide crossing stabilized...

  2. Constraining interacting dark energy models with black hole superradiance

    astro-ph.CO 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Black hole superradiance constrains the coupling strength in interacting dark energy-dark matter models through modifications to the effective mass of ultralight bosons in two scenarios.

  3. Post-Newtonian Constraints on Scalar-Tensor Gravity

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Unified post-Newtonian analysis reveals that Palatini scalar-tensor theories often face weaker Solar System bounds than metric versions due to stronger Yukawa suppression, with Palatini f(R) reproducing GR limits for ...

  4. Non-minimally coupled quintessence with sign-switching interaction

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A new quintessence model with non-minimal coupling produces an effective sign-switching interaction that fits current data better than LambdaCDM or w0waCDM and accounts for late-time dark energy weakening without phan...

  5. Evidence for deviation in gravitational light deflection from general relativity at cosmological scales with KiDS-Legacy and CMB lensing

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    KiDS-Legacy weak lensing plus CMB data yields a 3 sigma deviation in light deflection from GR in a Lambda CDM background, with the signal driven by large-scale CMB lensing amplitudes.

  6. Signatures of Modified Gravity Below $\mathcal{O}(10)$ Mpc in a Dynamical Dark Energy Background

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Modified gravity below O(10) Mpc in a CPL dynamical dark energy background is required to suppress structure growth at low redshifts while satisfying CMB constraints from ISW and lensing.

  7. Cosmological intercept tension

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Tensions in the supernova intercept a_B at z~0.01 in PantheonPlus and z~0.1 in DES-Y5 point to data systematics or inter-survey inconsistencies rather than new physics, aligning H0 measurements and reducing support fo...

  8. Is the $w_0w_a$CDM cosmological parameterization evidence for dark energy dynamics partially caused by the excess smoothing of Planck PR4 CMB anisotropy data?

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0

    Planck PR4 CMB data mildly favors dynamical dark energy, but this preference weakens when accounting for possible excess smoothing, indicating the signal may partly arise from data processing issues.

  9. Dark energy, spatial curvature, and star formation efficiency from JWST photometric and spectroscopic high-redshift galaxies

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Bayesian joint constraints show that elevated star formation efficiency accounts for JWST high-z galaxy excess in flat Lambda CDM, without requiring deviations in dark energy equation of state or curvature.

  10. Constraints on Coupled Dark Energy in the DESI Era

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    New cosmological data mildly favor a small coupling between dark matter and a scalar dark energy field at |β| ≈ 0.03 while allowing an effective phantom-crossing equation of state.

  11. Coupled Dark Energy and Dark Matter for DESI: An Effective Guide to the Phantom Divide

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Coupled quintessence-dark matter models can produce an apparent phantom-crossing effective equation of state matching DESI preferences if the scalar field begins frozen in the radiation era.

  12. Revisiting the Hubble tension problem in the framework of holographic dark energy

    astro-ph.CO 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    HDE models with future event horizon IR cutoff partially ease the Hubble tension while Hubble-scale cutoffs do not, consistent across six models and multiple BAO/SN/CMB combinations.

  13. No evidence for phantom crossing: local goodness-of-fit improvements do not persist under global Bayesian model comparison

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Local goodness-of-fit gains for w0wa and phantom crossing vanish under global Bayesian evidence, showing no statistically robust evidence for dynamical dark energy across datasets.

  14. No evidence for phantom crossing: local goodness-of-fit improvements do not persist under global Bayesian model comparison

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Global Bayesian evidence shows no statistically significant support for dynamical dark energy or phantom crossing despite limited local fit improvements in the w0wa parametrization.

  15. Comparing Minimal and Non-Minimal Quintessence Models to 2025 DESI Data

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Quintessence models with standard potentials give only modest improvements over Lambda to DESI data on evolving dark energy, while non-minimal couplings allow temporary phantom behavior but face tight gravity constrai...

  16. The Quintom theory of dark energy after DESI DR2

    astro-ph.CO 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    This review traces the history of dynamical dark energy, presents the no-go theorem against single-field crossing of w = -1, and surveys viable Quintom constructions including multi-field models and modified gravity i...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

127 extracted references · 127 canonical work pages · cited by 15 Pith papers · 49 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,” Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological Implications from two Decades of Spectroscopic Surveys at the Apache Point observatory

    Shadab Alam et al. (eBOSS), “Completed SDSS-IV ex- tended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cos- mological implications from two decades of spectro- scopic surveys at the Apache Point Observatory,” Phys. Rev. D 103, 083533 (2021), arXiv:2007.08991 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints

    Dillon Brout et al., “The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cos- mological Constraints,” Astrophys. J. 938, 110 (2022), arXiv:2202.04077 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints

    M. Abdul Karim et al. (DESI), “DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints,” (2025), arXiv:2503.14738 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    The Dark Energy Survey: Cosmology Results With ~1500 New High-redshift Type Ia Supernovae Using The Full 5-year Dataset

    T. M. C. Abbott et al. (DES), “The Dark Energy Sur- vey: Cosmology Results with ∼1500 New High-redshift Type Ia Supernovae Using the Full 5 yr Data Set,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 973, L14 (2024), arXiv:2401.02929 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Accelerating Universes with Scaling Dark Matter

    Michel Chevallier and David Polarski, “Accelerating universes with scaling dark matter,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 10, 213–224 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0009008

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  7. [7]

    Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe

    Eric V. Linder, “Exploring the expansion history of the universe,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 091301 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0208512

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  8. [8]

    The Cosmological Constant and Dark Energy

    P. J. E. Peebles and Bharat Ratra, “The Cosmological Constant and Dark Energy,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 559– 606 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0207347

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  9. [9]

    Gialamas, G

    Ioannis D. Gialamas, Gert H¨ utsi, Kristjan Kannike, An- tonio Racioppi, Martti Raidal, Martin Vasar, and Hardi Veerm¨ ae, “Interpreting DESI 2024 BAO: Late-time dy- namical dark energy or a local effect?” Phys. Rev. D 111, 043540 (2025), arXiv:2406.07533 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    Efstathiou,Evolving Dark Energy or Supernovae Systematics?, arXiv:2408.07175 (2025)

    George Efstathiou, “Evolving dark energy or supernovae systematics?” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 538, 875– 882 (2025), arXiv:2408.07175 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    The DESI DR1/DR2 evidence for dynamical dark en- ergy is biased by low-redshift supernovae,

    Lu Huang, Rong-Gen Cai, and Shao-Jiang Wang, “The DESI DR1/DR2 evidence for dynamical dark en- ergy is biased by low-redshift supernovae,” Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. (2025), 10.1007/s11433-025-2754- 5, arXiv:2502.04212 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1007/s11433-025-2754- 2025

  12. [12]

    Shouvik Roy Choudhury and Teppei Okumura, “Up- dated Cosmological Constraints in Extended Param- eter Space with Planck PR4, DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, and Supernovae: Dynamical Dark En- ergy, Neutrino Masses, Lensing Anomaly, and the Hub- ble Tension,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 976, L11 (2024), arXiv:2409.13022 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Shouvik Roy Choudhury, “Cosmology in Extended Pa- rameter Space with DESI Data Release 2 Baryon Acous- tic Oscillations: A 2 σ+ Detection of Nonzero Neutrino Masses with an Update on Dynamical Dark Energy and Lensing Anomaly,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 986, L31 (2025), arXiv:2504.15340 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    How much has DESI dark energy evolved since DR1?

    Eoin ´O. Colg´ ain, Saeed Pourojaghi, M. M. Sheikh- Jabbari, and Lu Yin, “How much has DESI dark energy evolved since DR1?” (2025), arXiv:2504.04417 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    On the tension between DESI DR2 BAO and CMB,

    Gen Ye and Shi-Jie Lin, “On the tension between DESI DR2 BAO and CMB,” (2025), arXiv:2505.02207 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Jiang, D

    Jun-Qian Jiang, Davide Pedrotti, Simony Santos da Costa, and Sunny Vagnozzi, “Nonparametric late- time expansion history reconstruction and implications for the Hubble tension in light of recent DESI and type Ia supernovae data,” Phys. Rev. D 110, 123519 (2024), arXiv:2408.02365 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Gu, et al., Dynamical dark energy in light of the DESI DR2 baryonic acoustic oscillations measurements, Nature Astron

    Gan Gu et al. (DESI), “Dynamical Dark Energy in light of the DESI DR2 Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations Mea- surements,” (2025), arXiv:2504.06118 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Park, J.d.C

    Chan-Gyung Park, Javier de Cruz P´ erez, and Bharat Ratra, “Using non-DESI data to confirm and strengthen the DESI 2024 spatially flat w0waCDM cosmological 6 parametrization result,” Phys. Rev. D 110, 123533 (2024), arXiv:2405.00502 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Putting flat ΛCDM in the (Redshift) bin,

    Eoin ´O. Colg´ ain, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, Rance Solomon, Maria G. Dainotti, and Dejan Stojkovic, “Putting flat ΛCDM in the (Redshift) bin,” Phys. Dark Univ. 44, 101464 (2024), arXiv:2206.11447 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Does DESI 2024 confirm ΛCDM?

    Eoin ´O. Colg´ ain, Maria Giovanna Dainotti, Salvatore Capozziello, Saeed Pourojaghi, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, and Dejan Stojkovic, “Does DESI 2024 confirm ΛCDM?” JHEAp 49, 100428 (2026), arXiv:2404.08633 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    ´O Colg´ ain, S

    Eoin ´O. Colg´ ain, Saeed Pourojaghi, and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, “Implications of DES 5YR SNe Dataset for ΛCDM,” Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 286 (2025), arXiv:2406.06389 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    DESI and SNe: Dynamical Dark Energy, Ω m Tension or System- atics?

    Eoin ´O. Colg´ ain and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, “DESI and SNe: Dynamical Dark Energy, Ω m Tension or System- atics?” (2024), arXiv:2412.12905 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Did DESI DR2 truly re- veal dynamical dark energy?

    Deng Wang and David Mota, “Did DESI DR2 truly re- veal dynamical dark energy?” (2025), arXiv:2504.15222 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Does DESI DR2 challenge ΛCDM paradigm?

    Himanshu Chaudhary, Salvatore Capozziello, Vipin Ku- mar Sharma, and Ghulam Mustafa, “Does DESI DR2 challenge ΛCDM paradigm?” (2025), arXiv:2507.21607 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Can dark energy evolve to the Phantom?

    Alexander Vikman, “Can dark energy evolve to the phantom?” Phys. Rev. D 71, 023515 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0407107

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  26. [26]

    Imperfect Dark Energy from Kinetic Gravity Braiding

    Cedric Deffayet, Oriol Pujolas, Ignacy Sawicki, and Alexander Vikman, “Imperfect Dark Energy from Kinetic Gravity Braiding,” JCAP 10, 026 (2010), arXiv:1008.0048 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  27. [27]

    Hints of Nonminimally Coupled Gravity in DESI 2024 Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurements,

    Gen Ye, Matteo Martinelli, Bin Hu, and Alessandra Silvestri, “Hints of Nonminimally Coupled Gravity in DESI 2024 Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurements,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 181002 (2025), arXiv:2407.15832 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Non-minimally coupled gravity constraints from DESI DR2 data

    Jiaming Pan and Gen Ye, “Non-minimally coupled gravity constraints from DESI DR2 data,” (2025), arXiv:2503.19898 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    The Quintom theory of dark energy after DESI DR2

    Yifu Cai, Xin Ren, Taotao Qiu, Mingzhe Li, and Xin- min Zhang, “The Quintom theory of dark energy after DESI DR2,” (2025), arXiv:2505.24732 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Update on coupled dark energy and the H0 tension,

    Adri` a G´ omez-Valent, Valeria Pettorino, and Luca Amendola, “Update on coupled dark energy and the H0 tension,” Phys. Rev. D 101, 123513 (2020), arXiv:2004.00610 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  31. [31]

    Chameleon dark energy can resolve the Hubble tension,

    Rong-Gen Cai, Zong-Kuan Guo, Li Li, Shao-Jiang Wang, and Wang-Wei Yu, “Chameleon dark energy can resolve the Hubble tension,” Phys. Rev. D103, L121302 (2021), arXiv:2102.02020 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    First de- tection of the Hubble variation correlation and its scale dependence,

    Wang-Wei Yu, Li Li, and Shao-Jiang Wang, “First de- tection of the Hubble variation correlation and its scale dependence,” (2022), arXiv:2209.14732 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Chameleon early dark en- ergy and the Hubble tension,

    Tanvi Karwal, Marco Raveri, Bhuvnesh Jain, Justin Khoury, and Mark Trodden, “Chameleon Early Dark Energy and the Hubble Tension,” (2021), arXiv:2106.13290 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  34. [34]

    Hubble Ten- sion as a Window on the Gravitation of the Dark Matter Sector,

    Cyril Pitrou and Jean-Philippe Uzan, “Hubble Ten- sion as a Window on the Gravitation of the Dark Matter Sector,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 191001 (2024), arXiv:2312.12493 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Hubble tension as a window on the gravitation of the dark matter sector: Exploration of a family of models,

    Jean-Philippe Uzan and Cyril Pitrou, “Hubble tension as a window on the gravitation of the dark matter sector: Exploration of a family of models,” Phys. Rev. D 109, 103505 (2024), arXiv:2312.12408 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Matching current observational constraints with nonminimally coupled dark energy,

    William J. Wolf, Pedro G. Ferreira, and Carlos Garc´ ıa- Garc´ ıa, “Matching current observational constraints with nonminimally coupled dark energy,” Phys. Rev. D 111, L041303 (2025), arXiv:2409.17019 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Bridge the Cosmological Tensions with Thaw- ing Gravity,

    Gen Ye, “Bridge the Cosmological Tensions with Thaw- ing Gravity,” (2024), arXiv:2411.11743 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Tiwari, U

    Yashi Tiwari, Ujjwal Upadhyay, and Rajeev Ku- mar Jain, “Exploring cosmological imprints of phan- tom crossing with dynamical dark energy in Horn- deski gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 111, 043530 (2025), arXiv:2412.00931 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Chakraborty, P

    Amlan Chakraborty, Prolay K. Chanda, Subinoy Das, and Koushik Dutta, “DESI results: Hint towards coupled dark matter and dark energy,” (2025), arXiv:2503.10806 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Khoury, M.-X

    Justin Khoury, Meng-Xiang Lin, and Mark Trod- den, “Apparent w < −1 and a Lower S8 from Dark Axion and Dark Baryons Interactions,” (2025), arXiv:2503.16415 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    The Cosmologi- cal Evidence for Non-Minimal Coupling,

    William J. Wolf, Carlos Garc´ ıa-Garc´ ıa, Theodore Anton, and Pedro G. Ferreira, “The Cosmologi- cal Evidence for Non-Minimal Coupling,” (2025), arXiv:2504.07679 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Bedroya, G

    Alek Bedroya, Georges Obied, Cumrun Vafa, and David H. Wu, “Evolving Dark Sector and the Dark Dimension Scenario,” (2025), arXiv:2507.03090 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Weinberg’s theorem, phantom cross- ing and screening,

    Philippe Brax, “Weinberg’s theorem, phantom cross- ing and screening,” (2025), arXiv:2507.16723 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Chakraborty, T

    Amlan Chakraborty, Tulip Ray, Subinoy Das, Arka Banerjee, and Vidhya Ganesan, “Hint of dark matter- dark energy interaction in the current cosmological data?” (2024), arXiv:2403.14247 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Wang, Constraining Cosmological Physics with DESI BAO Observations (4 2024).arXiv:2404.06796

    Deng Wang, “Constraining Cosmological Physics with DESI BAO Observations,” (2024), arXiv:2404.06796 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Giar` e, M

    William Giar` e, Miguel A. Sabogal, Rafael C. Nunes, and Eleonora Di Valentino, “Interacting Dark Energy after DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurements,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 251003 (2024), arXiv:2404.15232 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Li, P.-J

    Tian-Nuo Li, Peng-Ju Wu, Guo-Hong Du, Shang-Jie Jin, Hai-Li Li, Jing-Fei Zhang, and Xin Zhang, “Con- straints on Interacting Dark Energy Models from the DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillation and DES Supernovae Data,” Astrophys. J. 976, 1 (2024), arXiv:2407.14934 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Upper limits on dark energy-dark matter interaction from DESI DR2 in a field-theoretic analysis,

    Amin Aboubrahim and Pran Nath, “Upper limits on dark energy-dark matter interaction from DESI DR2 in a field-theoretic analysis,” (2024), arXiv:2411.11177 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Li, G.-H

    Tian-Nuo Li, Guo-Hong Du, Yun-He Li, Peng-Ju Wu, Shang-Jie Jin, Jing-Fei Zhang, and Xin Zhang, “Prob- ing the sign-changeable interaction between dark energy and dark matter with DESI baryon acoustic oscillations and DES supernovae data,” (2025), arXiv:2501.07361 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Sign 7 switching in dark sector coupling interactions as a can- didate for resolving cosmological tensions,

    Miguel A. Sabogal, Emanuelly Silva, Rafael C. Nunes, Suresh Kumar, and Eleonora Di Valentino, “Sign 7 switching in dark sector coupling interactions as a can- didate for resolving cosmological tensions,” Phys. Rev. D 111, 043531 (2025), arXiv:2501.10323 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Interacting dark energy constraints from the full-shape analyses of BOSS DR12 and DES Year 3 measurements,

    M. Tsedrik et al., “Interacting dark energy constraints from the full-shape analyses of BOSS DR12 and DES Year 3 measurements,” (2025), arXiv:2502.03390 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    A low-redshift preference for an interacting dark energy model,

    Yuejia Zhai, Marco de Cesare, Carsten van de Bruck, Eleonora Di Valentino, and Edward Wilson-Ewing, “A low-redshift preference for an interacting dark energy model,” (2025), arXiv:2503.15659 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    In- teracting dark sectors in light of DESI DR2,

    Rahul Shah, Purba Mukherjee, and Supratik Pal, “In- teracting dark sectors in light of DESI DR2,” (2025), arXiv:2503.21652 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Silva, M

    Emanuelly Silva, Miguel A. Sabogal, Mateus Scherer, Rafael C. Nunes, Eleonora Di Valentino, and Suresh Kumar, “New constraints on interacting dark energy from DESI DR2 BAO observations,” Phys. Rev. D 111, 123511 (2025), arXiv:2503.23225 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Interacting dark energy after DESI DR2: a challenge for ΛCDM paradigm?

    Supriya Pan, Sivasish Paul, Emmanuel N. Saridakis, and Weiqiang Yang, “Interacting dark energy after DESI DR2: a challenge for ΛCDM paradigm?” (2025), arXiv:2504.00994 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Toward a simultaneous resolution of the H0 and S8 tensions: early dark energy and an inter- acting dark sector model,

    Mai Yashiki, “Toward a simultaneous resolution of the H0 and S8 tensions: early dark energy and an inter- acting dark sector model,” (2025), arXiv:2505.23382 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Implications of DESI for Dark Matter & Cosmic Bire- fringence,

    Basabendu Barman and Sudhakantha Girmohanta, “Implications of DESI for Dark Matter & Cosmic Bire- fringence,” (2025), arXiv:2506.12589 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Li and X

    Yun-He Li and Xin Zhang, “Cosmic Sign-Reversal: Non-Parametric Reconstruction of Interacting Dark En- ergy with DESI DR2,” (2025), arXiv:2506.18477 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    Coupled Quintessence

    Luca Amendola, “Coupled quintessence,” Phys. Rev. D 62, 043511 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9908023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  60. [60]

    The cosmon model for an asymptotically vanishing time-dependent cosmological ``constant''

    Christof Wetterich, “The Cosmon model for an asymp- totically vanishing time dependent cosmological ’con- stant’,” Astron. Astrophys. 301, 321–328 (1995), arXiv:hep-th/9408025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  61. [61]

    Chameleon fields: Awaiting surprises for tests of gravity in space,

    Justin Khoury and Amanda Weltman, “Chameleon fields: Awaiting surprises for tests of gravity in space,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 171104 (2004), arXiv:astro- ph/0309300 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2004

  62. [62]

    Chameleon cos- mology,

    Justin Khoury and Amanda Weltman, “Chameleon cos- mology,” Phys. Rev. D69, 044026 (2004), arXiv:astro- ph/0309411 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2004

  63. [63]

    Quantum Stability of Chameleon Field Theories

    Amol Upadhye, Wayne Hu, and Justin Khoury, “Quan- tum Stability of Chameleon Field Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 041301 (2012), arXiv:1204.3906 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  64. [64]

    Cosmological Con- sequences of a Rolling Homogeneous Scalar Field,

    Bharat Ratra and P. J. E. Peebles, “Cosmological Con- sequences of a Rolling Homogeneous Scalar Field,” Phys. Rev. D 37, 3406 (1988)

    work page 1988

  65. [65]

    Cosmology with a Time Variable Cosmological Constant,

    P. J. E. Peebles and Bharat Ratra, “Cosmology with a Time Variable Cosmological Constant,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 325, L17 (1988)

    work page 1988

  66. [66]

    Cosmology and the Fate of Dilatation Symmetry

    C. Wetterich, “Cosmology and the Fate of Dilata- tion Symmetry,” Nucl. Phys. B 302, 668–696 (1988), arXiv:1711.03844 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1988

  67. [67]

    The String Dilaton and a Least Coupling Principle

    T. Damour and Alexander M. Polyakov, “The String dilaton and a least coupling principle,” Nucl. Phys. B 423, 532–558 (1994), arXiv:hep-th/9401069

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  68. [68]

    Axions In String Theory

    Peter Svrcek and Edward Witten, “Axions In String Theory,” JHEP 06, 051 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0605206 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  69. [69]

    Non-supersymmetric AdS and the Swampland

    Hirosi Ooguri and Cumrun Vafa, “Non-supersymmetric AdS and the Swampland,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.21, 1787–1801 (2017), arXiv:1610.01533 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  70. [70]

    On the Cosmological Implications of the String Swampland

    Prateek Agrawal, Georges Obied, Paul J. Steinhardt, and Cumrun Vafa, “On the Cosmological Implications of the String Swampland,” Phys. Lett. B784, 271–276 (2018), arXiv:1806.09718 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  71. [71]

    Distance and de Sitter Conjectures on the Swampland

    Hirosi Ooguri, Eran Palti, Gary Shiu, and Cum- run Vafa, “Distance and de Sitter Conjectures on the Swampland,” (2018), arXiv:1810.05506 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  72. [72]

    The impact of the Hubble tension on the evidence for dynamical dark energy,

    Ye-Huang Pang, Xue Zhang, and Qing-Guo Huang, “The impact of the Hubble tension on the evidence for dynamical dark energy,” Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 68, 280410 (2025), arXiv:2503.21600 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  73. [73]

    Wang and Y.-S

    Hao Wang and Yun-Song Piao, “Dark energy in light of recent DESI BAO and Hubble tension,” (2024), arXiv:2404.18579 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  74. [74]

    The Cosmological Constant Prob- lem,

    Steven Weinberg, “The Cosmological Constant Prob- lem,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 1–23 (1989)

    work page 1989

  75. [75]

    Efficient Computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models

    Antony Lewis, Anthony Challinor, and Anthony Lasenby, “Efficient computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models,” Astrophys. J. 538, 473–476 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9911177

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  76. [76]

    IDECAMB: an implemen- tation of interacting dark energy cosmology in CAMB,

    Yun-He Li and Xin Zhang, “IDECAMB: an implemen- tation of interacting dark energy cosmology in CAMB,” JCAP 09, 046 (2023), arXiv:2306.01593 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  77. [77]

    Parametrized Post-Friedmann Framework for Interacting Dark Energy

    Yun-He Li, Jing-Fei Zhang, and Xin Zhang, “Parametrized Post-Friedmann Framework for Interact- ing Dark Energy,” Phys. Rev. D 90, 063005 (2014), arXiv:1404.5220 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  78. [78]

    Effective Field Theory of Cosmic Acceleration: an implementation in CAMB

    Bin Hu, Marco Raveri, Noemi Frusciante, and Alessan- dra Silvestri, “Effective Field Theory of Cosmic Accel- eration: an implementation in CAMB,” Phys. Rev. D 89, 103530 (2014), arXiv:1312.5742 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  79. [79]

    Cobaya: Code for Bayesian Analysis of hierarchical physical models

    Jesus Torrado and Antony Lewis, “Cobaya: Code for Bayesian Analysis of hierarchical physical models,” JCAP 05, 057 (2021), arXiv:2005.05290 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  80. [80]

    Cobaya: Bayesian analysis in cosmology,

    Jes´ us Torrado and Antony Lewis, “Cobaya: Bayesian analysis in cosmology,” Astrophysics Source Code Li- brary, record ascl:1910.019 (2019)

    work page 1910

Showing first 80 references.