arxiv: 2604.04901 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-06 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.AI

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

FileGram: Grounding Agent Personalization in File-System Behavioral Traces

Shuai Liu , Shulin Tian , Kairui Hu , Yuhao Dong , Zhe Yang , Bo Li , Jingkang Yang , Chen Change Loy

show 1 more author

Ziwei Liu

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.AI

keywords AI agent personalizationfile-system behavioral tracesmemory architecturepersona simulationmultimodal groundingprofile reconstructionbottom-up encoding

0 comments

The pith

FileGram grounds AI agent personalization in file-system behavioral traces via simulation and bottom-up memory.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper addresses the data scarcity problem for personalizing coworking AI agents that act inside local file systems, where privacy rules and the cost of collecting real multimodal traces block scalable training. It introduces a three-part framework: an engine that generates large volumes of realistic persona-driven file operations, a benchmark that tests memory systems on profile reconstruction and drift detection from those traces, and an operating system that assembles memory directly from atomic actions and content changes instead of dialogue summaries. If the approach works, agents can learn individual user patterns without exposing private files. Experiments indicate that current memory systems perform poorly on the new benchmark while the proposed engine and memory architecture succeed at scale.

Core claim

FileGramEngine produces scalable multimodal action sequences from simulated personas, FileGramBench evaluates memory systems on profile reconstruction, trace disentanglement, persona drift detection, and multimodal grounding, and FileGramOS encodes atomic actions and content deltas into procedural, semantic, and episodic channels that support query-time abstraction, yielding effective personalization where prior interaction-centric methods fall short.

What carries the argument

FileGramOS, the bottom-up memory architecture that constructs user profiles directly from atomic file-system actions and content deltas rather than high-level summaries, then encodes them into procedural, semantic, and episodic channels.

If this is right

FileGramBench exposes clear weaknesses in existing memory systems when they must handle dense file-system behavioral data.
FileGramEngine supplies large-scale synthetic multimodal traces that enable training without real user data.
FileGramOS shows that starting from atomic actions rather than summaries improves reconstruction and drift detection tasks.
Open release of the full framework allows other researchers to build and compare memory-centric file-system agents.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The simulation-plus-bottom-up pattern could transfer to other private activity domains such as browser histories or email folders.
Direct comparison of simulated versus anonymized real traces would quantify how much the engine must be tuned for different user populations.
On-device deployment of FileGramOS might allow personalization while keeping all raw traces local.

Load-bearing premise

Simulated file-system traces generated by the persona-driven engine capture real-world multimodal behavioral patterns well enough for the bottom-up encoding to generalize.

What would settle it

A test showing that FileGramOS produces inaccurate profile reconstructions or misses persona drift when run on genuine human-collected file-system logs instead of the simulated traces.

read the original abstract

Coworking AI agents operating within local file systems are rapidly emerging as a paradigm in human-AI interaction; however, effective personalization remains limited by severe data constraints, as strict privacy barriers and the difficulty of jointly collecting multimodal real-world traces prevent scalable training and evaluation, and existing methods remain interaction-centric while overlooking dense behavioral traces in file-system operations; to address this gap, we propose FileGram, a comprehensive framework that grounds agent memory and personalization in file-system behavioral traces, comprising three core components: (1) FileGramEngine, a scalable persona-driven data engine that simulates realistic workflows and generates fine-grained multimodal action sequences at scale; (2) FileGramBench, a diagnostic benchmark grounded in file-system behavioral traces for evaluating memory systems on profile reconstruction, trace disentanglement, persona drift detection, and multimodal grounding; and (3) FileGramOS, a bottom-up memory architecture that builds user profiles directly from atomic actions and content deltas rather than dialogue summaries, encoding these traces into procedural, semantic, and episodic channels with query-time abstraction; extensive experiments show that FileGramBench remains challenging for state-of-the-art memory systems and that FileGramEngine and FileGramOS are effective, and by open-sourcing the framework, we hope to support future research on personalized memory-centric file-system agents.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

FileGram builds a simulator-benchmark-memory stack for file-system agent personalization, but all results stay inside the simulator's own generated traces.

read the letter

The paper's main move is to treat local file-system operations as the primary signal for personalizing AI agents instead of relying on dialogue history. They package this as FileGram with three pieces: FileGramEngine generates large-scale synthetic workflows from defined personas, FileGramBench tests memory systems on tasks like reconstructing user profiles from traces and spotting persona drift, and FileGramOS encodes atomic actions and content deltas into procedural, semantic, and episodic channels that can be queried at different abstraction levels. That bottom-up construction from raw file ops is the clearest departure from prior memory work that starts from conversation summaries. It directly targets the privacy barrier that blocks real trace collection, which is a practical constraint in this corner of agent research. The simulator approach lets them scale data and control variables in ways real logs probably cannot. The benchmark tasks themselves look reasonably diagnostic for the intended use case. The central limitation is that every reported result comes from traces produced by the same engine that defines the personas and workflows. This creates a closed loop where success can reflect internal consistency rather than generalization to actual user behavior. The abstract notes the privacy reason real data is unavailable, but that does not remove the need for some external check on whether the simulated distributions match real file-system patterns. Without numbers, error bars, or ablation details visible here, it is hard to judge how large the gains are or whether the three-channel design is doing the heavy lifting. The work is aimed at researchers building memory architectures for local, non-conversational agents. It is coherent on its own terms and engages the relevant literature on agent memory, so it is worth sending out for review even though the synthetic-data issue will need addressing in revisions.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes the FileGram framework to address data scarcity in personalizing coworking AI agents operating on local file systems. It introduces three components: FileGramEngine, a persona-driven simulator that generates scalable multimodal file-system action sequences; FileGramBench, a diagnostic benchmark evaluating memory systems on profile reconstruction, trace disentanglement, persona drift detection, and multimodal grounding; and FileGramOS, a bottom-up memory architecture that encodes atomic actions and content deltas into procedural, semantic, and episodic channels with query-time abstraction. The central claim is that extensive experiments demonstrate FileGramBench's challenge for state-of-the-art memory systems and the effectiveness of FileGramEngine and FileGramOS.

Significance. If the effectiveness claims hold under independent validation, the framework could meaningfully advance memory-centric personalization for file-system agents by providing a scalable simulation-based alternative to real traces blocked by privacy constraints. The bottom-up encoding from atomic actions rather than dialogue summaries represents a distinct technical direction, and open-sourcing the components would enable community follow-up on multimodal behavioral grounding.

major comments (3)

[Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that 'extensive experiments show that FileGramBench remains challenging for state-of-the-art memory systems and that FileGramEngine and FileGramOS are effective' is presented without any quantitative metrics, baselines, error bars, or description of how effectiveness was measured. This absence is load-bearing because the central claims of benchmark difficulty and component effectiveness rest entirely on these unspecified results.
[FileGramEngine and experiments] FileGramEngine and experiments description: All reported results use traces generated by FileGramEngine itself to define personas and workflows. No external validation against real user file-system logs is provided, nor is there a quantitative assessment of how well the simulated multimodal patterns (atomic actions, content deltas) match authentic behavioral distributions. This directly undermines the claim that FileGramOS's procedural/semantic/episodic channels demonstrate real utility and that the benchmark tasks are meaningfully challenging beyond simulator-internal consistency.
[FileGramBench] FileGramBench task definitions: The benchmark tasks (profile reconstruction, trace disentanglement, persona drift) are defined solely in terms of the synthetic personas and traces produced by FileGramEngine. Without an independent check on whether these tasks reflect real-world file-system usage distributions, it is unclear whether superior performance on FileGramBench would translate to improved personalization in deployed agents.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract and Introduction] The abstract and introduction would benefit from a brief explicit statement of the privacy-related data constraints that motivate the simulation approach, including any references to prior work on real file-system trace collection.
[FileGramOS] Notation for the three memory channels (procedural, semantic, episodic) should be introduced with a clear diagram or pseudocode in the FileGramOS section to clarify how atomic actions are mapped at query time.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on the abstract, the simulation-based evaluation, and the synthetic benchmark design. We address each major comment below with the strongest honest defense possible, noting where the manuscript will be revised for clarity and completeness.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that 'extensive experiments show that FileGramBench remains challenging for state-of-the-art memory systems and that FileGramEngine and FileGramOS are effective' is presented without any quantitative metrics, baselines, error bars, or description of how effectiveness was measured. This absence is load-bearing because the central claims of benchmark difficulty and component effectiveness rest entirely on these unspecified results.

Authors: The abstract is intentionally concise and summarizes the key findings at a high level, as is standard. The full manuscript provides the requested quantitative details, including specific metrics, baselines, and error bars, in the Experiments section. We will revise the abstract to incorporate a brief summary of the main quantitative results (e.g., performance deltas on benchmark tasks) to better support the claims without exceeding length constraints. revision: yes
Referee: [FileGramEngine and experiments] FileGramEngine and experiments description: All reported results use traces generated by FileGramEngine itself to define personas and workflows. No external validation against real user file-system logs is provided, nor is there a quantitative assessment of how well the simulated multimodal patterns (atomic actions, content deltas) match authentic behavioral distributions. This directly undermines the claim that FileGramOS's procedural/semantic/episodic channels demonstrate real utility and that the benchmark tasks are meaningfully challenging beyond simulator-internal consistency.

Authors: The exclusive use of simulated traces is a core design decision motivated by privacy regulations that prohibit collection and release of real user file-system logs, as stated in the Introduction. FileGramEngine generates traces from explicit persona and workflow specifications to ensure controllability and scalability. While direct quantitative fidelity metrics against real distributions are not feasible without violating privacy, the simulator incorporates patterns drawn from published studies on file-system behavior. We will add a new subsection detailing the simulator's grounding in prior empirical observations and explicitly discuss this as a limitation, including plans for future indirect validation methods. revision: partial
Referee: [FileGramBench] FileGramBench task definitions: The benchmark tasks (profile reconstruction, trace disentanglement, persona drift) are defined solely in terms of the synthetic personas and traces produced by FileGramEngine. Without an independent check on whether these tasks reflect real-world file-system usage distributions, it is unclear whether superior performance on FileGramBench would translate to improved personalization in deployed agents.

Authors: FileGramBench is explicitly positioned as a diagnostic, controlled benchmark to enable precise, reproducible evaluation of memory capabilities that lack ground truth in real deployments. The synthetic construction allows isolation of factors such as persona drift and multimodal grounding. We recognize the translation gap to real-world settings and will expand the Discussion section to address how benchmark results can guide agent design, while noting that real-world transfer remains an open question for future work involving consented user studies. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: framework components are modular proposals evaluated empirically on generated data without self-referential derivations.

full rationale

The paper introduces FileGramEngine as a simulator, FileGramBench as a diagnostic benchmark, and FileGramOS as a memory architecture. Effectiveness is claimed via 'extensive experiments' on synthetic traces, but no equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the abstract or described structure. The derivation chain consists of independent component definitions followed by external-style empirical testing rather than any reduction by construction. This matches the default expectation of no significant circularity for framework proposals.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 3 invented entities

The central claims rest on the assumption that file-system traces are sufficient and privacy-friendly for personalization, plus the design choices for the three invented components; no numerical free parameters are mentioned.

axioms (2)

domain assumption File-system behavioral traces contain sufficient multimodal information to reconstruct user profiles and detect persona drift.
Invoked in the motivation and in the design of FileGramBench and FileGramOS.
domain assumption Simulated workflows from FileGramEngine produce traces that generalize to real users.
Required for the claim that the engine addresses data constraints.

invented entities (3)

FileGramEngine no independent evidence
purpose: Scalable persona-driven simulator of file-system workflows and multimodal action sequences.
New data generation component introduced to overcome privacy barriers.
FileGramBench no independent evidence
purpose: Diagnostic benchmark for memory systems on profile reconstruction, trace disentanglement, persona drift, and multimodal grounding.
New evaluation suite grounded in file-system traces.
FileGramOS no independent evidence
purpose: Bottom-up memory architecture encoding atomic actions into procedural, semantic, and episodic channels.
New memory system that builds profiles from file deltas rather than dialogue.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5555 in / 1563 out tokens · 56412 ms · 2026-05-10T19:29:57.519349+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

FileGramOS... encodes these traces into procedural, semantic, and episodic channels with query-time abstraction

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

LongMemEval-V2: Evaluating Long-Term Agent Memory Toward Experienced Colleagues
cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

LongMemEval-V2 is a new benchmark where AgentRunbook-C reaches 72.5% accuracy on long-term agent memory tasks, beating RAG baselines at 48.5% and basic coding agents at 69.3%.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 7 internal anchors

[1]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.03515 , year=

Yuanchen Bei, Tianxin Wei, Xuying Ning, Yanjun Zhao, Zhining Liu, Xiao Lin, Yada Zhu, Hendrik Hamann, Jingrui He, and Hanghang Tong. Mem-gallery: Benchmarking multimodal long-term conversational memory for mllm agents.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.03515,

work page arXiv
[2]

Mem0: Building Production-Ready AI Agents with Scalable Long-Term Memory

Prateek Chhikara, Dev Khant, Saket Aryan, Taranjeet Singh, and Deshraj Yadav. Mem0: Building production-ready ai agents with scalable long-term memory.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.19413,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[3]

Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities

Gheorghe Comanici, Eric Bieber, Mike Schaekermann, Ice Pasupat, Noveen Sachdeva, Inderjit Dhillon, Marcel Blistein, Ori Ram, Dan Zhang, Evan Rosen, et al. Gemini 2.5: Pushing the frontier with advanced reasoning, multimodality, long context, and next generation agentic capabilities.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.06261,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[4]

Deshpande, V

Darshan Deshpande, Varun Gangal, Hersh Mehta, Anand Kannappan, Rebecca Qian, and Peng Wang. Memtrack: Evaluating long-term memory and state tracking in multi-platform dynamic agent environments.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.01353,

work page arXiv
[5]

Memp: Exploring Agent Procedural Memory

Runnan Fang, Yuan Liang, Xiaobin Wang, Jialong Wu, Shuofei Qiao, Pengjun Xie, Fei Huang, Huajun Chen, and Ningyu Zhang. Memp: Exploring agent procedural memory.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.06433,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[6]

Aligning llm agents by learning latent preference from user edits, 2024.https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.15269

Ge Gao, Alexey Taymanov, Eduardo Salinas, Paul Mineiro, and Dipendra Misra. Aligning llm agents by learning latent preference from user edits, 2024.https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.15269. Bernal Jiménez Gutiérrez, Yiheng Shu, Yu Gu, Michihiro Yasunaga, and Yu Su. Hipporag: Neurobiologically inspired long-term memory for large language models, 2025.https://arxiv...

work page arXiv 2024
[7]

Evermemos: A self-organizing memory operating system for structured long-horizon reasoning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.02163, 2026

Chuanrui Hu, Xingze Gao, Zuyi Zhou, Dannong Xu, Yi Bai, Xintong Li, Hui Zhang, Tong Li, Chong Zhang, Lidong Bing, et al. Evermemos: A self-organizing memory operating system for structured long-horizon reasoning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.02163,

work page arXiv
[8]

Evaluating memory in llm agents via incremental multi-turn interactions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.05257, 2025

Yuanzhe Hu, Yu Wang, and Julian McAuley. Evaluating memory in llm agents via incremental multi-turn interactions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.05257,

work page arXiv
[9]

Twice: An llm agent framework for simulating personalized user tweeting behavior with long-term temporal features.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.22222,

Bingrui Jin, Kunyao Lan, and Mengyue Wu. Twice: An llm agent framework for simulating personalized user tweeting behavior with long-term temporal features.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.22222,

work page arXiv
[10]

AgencyBench: Benchmarking the Frontiers of Autonomous Agents in 1M-Token Real-World Contexts

Keyu Li, Junhao Shi, Yang Xiao, Mohan Jiang, Jie Sun, Yunze Wu, Shijie Xia, Xiaojie Cai, Tianze Xu, Weiye Si, et al. Agencybench: Benchmarking the frontiers of autonomous agents in 1m-token real-world contexts.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.11044,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[11]

Memos: A memory os for ai system.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.03724,

Zhiyu Li, Chenyang Xi, Chunyu Li, Ding Chen, Boyu Chen, Shichao Song, Simin Niu, Hanyu Wang, Jiawei Yang, Chen Tang, et al. Memos: A memory os for ai system.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.03724,

work page arXiv
[12]

Hippomm: Hippocampal-inspired multimodal memory for long audiovisual event understanding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.10739,

Yueqian Lin, Qinsi Wang, Hancheng Ye, Yuzhe Fu, Hai Li, Yiran Chen, et al. Hippomm: Hippocampal-inspired multimodal memory for long audiovisual event understanding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.10739,

work page arXiv
[13]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.02553 , year=

Jiaqi Liu, Yaofeng Su, Peng Xia, Siwei Han, Zeyu Zheng, Cihang Xie, Mingyu Ding, and Huaxiu Yao. Simplemem: Efficient lifelong memory for llm agents.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.02553,

work page arXiv
[14]

Seeing, listening, remembering, and reasoning: A multimodal agent with long-term memory

Lin Long, Yichen He, Wentao Ye, Yiyuan Pan, Yuan Lin, Hang Li, Junbo Zhao, and Wei Li. Seeing, listening, remembering, and reasoning: A multimodal agent with long-term memory.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.09736,

work page arXiv
[15]

Haipeng Luo, Huawen Feng, Qingfeng Sun, Can Xu, Kai Zheng, Yufei Wang, Tao Yang, Han Hu, and Yan- song Tang

Yihao Lu, Wanru Cheng, Zeyu Zhang, and Hao Tang. Mma: Multimodal memory agent.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.16493,

work page arXiv
[16]

Mmlongbench-doc: Benchmarking long-context document understanding with visualizations, 2024

Yubo Ma, Yuhang Zang, Liangyu Chen, Meiqi Chen, Yizhu Jiao, Xinze Li, Xinyuan Lu, Ziyu Liu, Yan Ma, Xiaoyi Dong, Pan Zhang, Liangming Pan, Yu-Gang Jiang, Jiaqi Wang, Yixin Cao, and Aixin Sun. Mmlongbench-doc: Benchmarking long-context document understanding with visualizations, 2024.https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.01523. Adyasha Maharana, Dong-Ho Lee, Sergey T...

work page arXiv 2024
[17]

Docvqa: A dataset for vqa on document images

https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.00398. Grégoire Mialon, Clémentine Fourrier, Thomas Wolf, Yann LeCun, and Thomas Scialom. GAIA: a benchmark for general AI assistants, 2024.https://openreview.net/forum?id=fibxvahvs3. Jian Mu, Chaoyun Zhang, Chiming Ni, Lu Wang, Bo Qiao, Kartik Mathur, Qianhui Wu, Yuhang Xie, Xiaojun Ma, Mengyu Zhou, Si Qin, Liqun Li, Yu Kang, M...

work page arXiv 2007
[18]

Jiao Ou, Junda Lu, Che Liu, Yihong Tang, Fuzheng Zhang, Di Zhang, and Kun Gai

Accessed: 2026-03-05. Jiao Ou, Junda Lu, Che Liu, Yihong Tang, Fuzheng Zhang, Di Zhang, and Kun Gai. Dialogbench: Evaluating llms as human-like dialogue systems. InProceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 6137–6170,

2026
[19]

Zep: A Temporal Knowledge Graph Architecture for Agent Memory

Preston Rasmussen, Pavlo Paliychuk, Travis Beauvais, Jack Ryan, and Daniel Chalef. Zep: a temporal knowledge graph architecture for agent memory.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.13956,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[20]

Videorag: Retrieval-augmented generation with extreme long-context videos, 2025

Xubin Ren, Lingrui Xu, Long Xia, Shuaiqiang Wang, Dawei Yin, and Chao Huang. Videorag: Retrieval-augmented generation with extreme long-context videos, 2025.https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.01549. Piaohong Wang, Motong Tian, Jiaxian Li, Yuan Liang, Yuqing Wang, Qianben Chen, Tiannan Wang, Zhicong Lu, Jiawei Ma, Yuchen Eleanor Jiang, and Wangchunshu Zhou. O-mem:...

work page arXiv 2025
[21]

Customer-r1: Personal- ized simulation of human behaviors via rl-based llm agent in online shopping.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.07230, 2025

Ziyi Wang, Yuxuan Lu, Yimeng Zhang, Jing Huang, and Dakuo Wang. Customer-r1: Personalized simulation of human behaviors via rl-based llm agent in online shopping.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.07230, 2025b. Tianxin Wei, Noveen Sachdeva, Benjamin Coleman, Zhankui He, Yuanchen Bei, Xuying Ning, Mengting Ai, Yunzhe Li, Jingrui He, Ed H Chi, et al. Evo-memory: Ben...

work page arXiv
[22]

Eventmemagent: Hierarchical event-centric memory for online video understanding with adaptive tool use.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.15329,

13 Siwei Wen, Zhangcheng Wang, Xingjian Zhang, Lei Huang, and Wenjun Wu. Eventmemagent: Hierarchical event-centric memory for online video understanding with adaptive tool use.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.15329,

work page arXiv
[23]

LongMemEval: Benchmarking Chat Assistants on Long-Term Interactive Memory

Rebecca Westhäußer, Frederik Berenz, Wolfgang Minker, and Sebastian Zepf. Caim: Development and evaluation of a cognitive ai memory framework for long-term interaction with intelligent agents, 2025.https://arxiv.org/abs/2505. 13044. Di Wu, Hongwei Wang, Wenhao Yu, Yuwei Zhang, Kai-Wei Chang, and Dong Yu. Longmemeval: Benchmarking chat assistants on long-t...

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[24]

A-MEM: Agentic Memory for LLM Agents

Wujiang Xu, Zujie Liang, Kai Mei, Hang Gao, Juntao Tan, and Yongfeng Zhang. A-mem: Agentic memory for llm agents.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.12110,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[25]

Long time no see! open-domain conversation with long-term persona memory

Xinchao Xu, Zhibin Gou, Wenquan Wu, Zheng-Yu Niu, Hua Wu, Haifeng Wang, and Shihang Wang. Long time no see! open-domain conversation with long-term persona memory. InFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022, pages 2639–2650,

2022
[26]

Visrag: Vision-based retrieval-augmented generation on multi-modality documents

https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10594. Aohan Zeng, Mingdao Liu, Rui Lu, Bowen Wang, Xiao Liu, Yuxiao Dong, and Jie Tang. Agenttuning: Enabling generalized agent abilities for llms. InFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024, pages 3053–3077,

work page arXiv 2024
[27]

Ama-bench: Evaluating long- horizon memory for agentic applications.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.22769, 2026

Yujie Zhao, Boqin Yuan, Junbo Huang, Haocheng Yuan, Zhongming Yu, Haozhou Xu, Lanxiang Hu, Abhilash Shankarampeta, Zimeng Huang, Wentao Ni, et al. Ama-bench: Evaluating long-horizon memory for agentic applications.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.22769,

work page arXiv
[28]

WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents

Shuyan Zhou, Frank F. Xu, Hao Zhu, Xuhui Zhou, Robert Lo, Abishek Sridhar, Xianyi Cheng, Tianyue Ou, Yonatan Bisk, Daniel Fried, Uri Alon, and Graham Neubig. Webarena: A realistic web environment for building autonomous agents, 2024.https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.13854. 14 Appendix This supplementary material is organized into five parts. Section A extends th...

work page Pith review arXiv 2024
[29]

While effective for conversational recall, they lack procedural modeling and cannot ingest non-textual behavioral evidence

Dialogue-based and flat-store systems.First-generation memory frameworks—MemGPT (Packer et al., 2023), Mem0 (Chhikara et al., 2025), SimpleMem (Liu et al., 2026)—extract semantic facts from dialogue and store them in flat or hierarchical key–value stores. While effective for conversational recall, they lack procedural modeling and cannot ingest non-textua...

2023
[30]

incorporate vision-language perception; VideoRAG (Ren et al., 2025), HippoMM (Lin et al., 2025), M3-Agent (Long et al., 2025), and EventMemAgent (Wen et al.,

2025
[31]

organizes user knowledge through an ontology-driven tagging scheme, mapping each interaction to a domain taxonomy before storage; this top-down design contrasts withFileGramOS’s bottom-up approach, where behavioral dimensions emerge from trace statistics rather than a pre-defined ontology. O-Mem (Wang et al., 2025a) introduces a multi-store persona memory...

2025
[32]

Second,episode summarization: for each segment, the LLM generates a title, a third-person narrative of 3–8 sentences, and a one-sentence summary

Trajectories with fewer than 3 events or invalid outputs fall back to a single episode; segments with fewer than 3 events merge with the preceding one. Second,episode summarization: for each segment, the LLM generates a title, a third-person narrative of 3–8 sentences, and a one-sentence summary. Cross-trajectory clustering.During consolidation, episode s...

2024