pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.05703 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.SR

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Non-LTE Ionization Modeling for Helium and Strontium in Neutron Star Merger Ejecta

Koya Chiba , Masaomi Tanaka , Shinya Wanajo , Sho Fujibayashi , Kyohei Kawaguchi , Kenta Hotokezaka
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.SR
keywords kilonovaneutron star mergerr-process nucleosynthesisnon-LTE ionizationheliumstrontiumGW170817AT2017gfo
0
0 comments X

The pith

Non-LTE models show that 1% helium or 1-10% strontium reproduces the 1-micron absorption in the GW170817 kilonova.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds non-local thermodynamic equilibrium ionization models for helium and strontium that incorporate ionization by high-energy electrons from radioactive decays. These models are used to calculate the minimum mass fractions of each element needed to produce the prominent absorption feature observed around 1 micron in the early spectra of the kilonova AT2017gfo. The derived abundances are then compared with solar r-process patterns and with nucleosynthesis yields to infer the electron fraction and entropy conditions under which the heavy elements formed in the merger.

Core claim

Our modeling indicates that about 1 % of He or 1-10 % of Sr in mass fraction are present in the ejecta moving at v ∼ 0.15 c. This Sr mass fraction nicely agrees with the mass fraction in the solar r-process abundance. Based on comparison with nucleosynthesis calculations, our constraints suggest that r-process nucleosynthesis in GW170817 occurs at relatively low electron fraction (Ye ≲ 0.35) and low entropy (s ≲ 30 k_B/nucleon) conditions. For Ye ≲ 0.15 the feature can instead be carried by helium produced via alpha decays of trans-lead nuclei.

What carries the argument

Non-LTE ionization models for He and Sr that account for ionization by high-energy electrons from radioactive decays.

If this is right

  • The strontium mass fraction required matches the solar r-process value, supporting neutron-star mergers as a dominant r-process site.
  • The allowed Ye and entropy range restricts the possible outflow trajectories that produced the observed kilonova.
  • At the lowest Ye values the feature can be explained by helium from alpha decay of nuclei beyond the third r-process peak, providing an indirect signature of very heavy element production.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If future spectra resolve the velocity structure of the 1-micron feature, the models could be used to map abundance gradients in the ejecta.
  • The same non-LTE framework could be applied to other proposed line carriers such as yttrium or zirconium once atomic data improve.

Load-bearing premise

The 1-micron absorption is produced mainly by He or Sr transitions, and the non-LTE calculations give the correct ionization balance without large contributions from unmodeled elements or ejecta effects.

What would settle it

A detailed multi-element non-LTE spectrum that attributes the 1-micron feature primarily to lanthanide or other lines, or that shows the predicted He/Sr line strengths are inconsistent with the observed depth and width at v ~ 0.15 c, would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.05703 by Kenta Hotokezaka, Koya Chiba, Kyohei Kawaguchi, Masaomi Tanaka, Shinya Wanajo, Sho Fujibayashi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The observed spectra of AT2017gfo over the full wavelength range (left) and around the 1 µm feature (right). The red solid lines show the best-fit models and the gray dashed lines show the continuum component. The wavelength ranges represented by gray shaded regions are not included in the fit due to the telluric contamination (∼ 1.4 µm and ∼ 1.9 µm), the large noise levels at the edge of the detectors (∼ … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schematic atomic structure of He and Sr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Population fractions of the He I 2S states as a function of temperature. The mass density is fixed to be ρ = 1 × 10−14 g cm−3 . The orange and green lines show the population fractions of 23S and 21S states, respectively. The solid and dashed lines show the results with the He mass fractions of XHe = 10−1 and 10−5 , respectively. NIST ASD (A. Kramida et al. 2023). Radiative bound￾bound transition rates of … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Sobolev optical depths of the He I lines as a func￾tion of the mass fraction. The mass density is fixed to be ρ = 1 × 10−14 g cm−3 and the Sobolev optical depth is eval￾uated for t = 1 day. The orange and green lines show the optical depths for 1.08 µm and 2.06 µm lines, respectively. The solid and dashed lines show the cases for T = 2000 and 4000 K, respectively. The blue shaded region represents the rang… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Ionization fractions of Sr for the case with ne = 1 × 108 cm−3 . The solid lines show the ionization fraction for each ionization state given in the panels (Sr VIII+ represents the total fraction of all the ionization states higher than VII). The dashed line shows the population fraction of the Sr II 4D states among all Sr. The left panel shows a LTE case while the right panel shows a non-LTE case with a r… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Average ionization degree of Sr for the case with ne = 1 × 108 cm−3 . The left panel shows a LTE case while the right panel shows a non-LTE case with a radioactive heating rate of ˙q = 1.0 eV s−1 ion−1 . The solid lines show the boundaries to give equal ionization fractions for consecutive charge states. 2000 4000 6000 8000 Temperature [K] 10 6 10 7 10 8 10 9 10 10 n e [ c m 3 ] Sr I Sr II Sr III Sr IV Sr … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Departure coefficient of Sr for different electron density and temperature. The dashed lines show the bound￾aries to give equal ionization fractions for consecutive charge states. tron density and temperature is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Constraints on the mass fractions of He and Sr at the photosphere in each epoch. The solid curves correspond to τ = 1 and the shaded region show the region for 0.5 ≤ τ ≤ 2. The constraint for each epoch is shown in different colors according to the legend. The left panel shows the constraints in the LTE case for Sr, while the right panel shows those in the non-LTE case for Sr. The horizontal dashed and das… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Constraints on the mass density profiles of He (magenta) and Sr (cyan). The density is scaled to that at t = 1 day. Shaded regions correspond to the required densities in the case of 0.5 ≤ τ ≤ 2. The dashed lines show the mass density giving τ = 0.1. The blue solid line shows the constraints on Sr in the LTE case. The gray solid line shows the total density profile we adopt in this constraint (see Equation… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison of our constraints (gray shaded area, see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Spectral evolution of AT2017gfo around 1 µm and 2 µm. The gray shaded regions are the same as in Fig￾ure 1. The velocity offsets in each panel are measured from the He I lines (1.08 µm and 2.06 µm, the vertical solid lines). For comparison, the wavelengths of the Sr II lines are shown as the vertical dashed lines in the left panel and that of the [Te III] line is shown as the vertical dashed-dotted line i… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: is reasonable. 10 7 10 6 10 5 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 1 10 0 XHe 10 7 10 6 10 5 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 1 10 0 X S r DD2-135-135 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 1 M / M [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: compares our constraints in the density pro￾file with the angle-averaged 1D mass density profile of the DD2-135-135 model. In general, the strength of ab￾sorption feature is more directly linked to the mass den￾sities of each element (ρHe/Sr = ρXHe/Sr) rather than the mass fractions (XHe/Sr). As also seen in the mass fraction, the model overproduces both He (at v ∼ 0.15 c) and Sr (at v ∼ 0.20 c). In fact,… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The population fractions of singly ionized He (blue), the He I 21S and 23S states (orange and green), and the Sr II 4D state (purple, LTE and non-LTE cases) as a function of total mass density. The populations are normalized by those at the fiducial density. The conditions of kilonova ejecta at t = 1.43 and 3.41 days are assumed for top and bottom panels, respectively. Jeffery, D. J., & Branch, D. 1990, i… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: 2D density profiles of DD2-135-135 model (top: total mass density, middle: mass density of He, and bottom: mass density of Sr). The density is scaled at t = 1 day. Kozma, C., & Fransson, C. 1992, ApJ, 390, 602, doi: 10.1086/171311 Kramida, A., Yu. Ralchenko, Reader, J., & and NIST ASD Team. 2023, NIST Atomic Spectra Database (ver. 5.11), [Online]. Available: https://physics.nist.gov/asd [2024, May 6]. Nat… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The material ejected from a binary neutron star merger produces "kilonova," a radioactively powered emission at ultraviolet, optical, and infrared wavelengths. The early-phase spectra of the kilonova AT2017gfo, following the gravitational wave event GW170817, exhibit a strong absorption feature around $1\,\mathrm{\mu m}$. Helium (He) and strontium (Sr) have been proposed as the candidate elements contributing to this feature. However, due to the lack of consistent modeling including these two elements simultaneously, the exact contributions of each element to this feature remain unclear. In this study, we develop non-local thermodynamic equilibrium ionization models for He and Sr that take into account ionization by high-energy electrons, and estimate the abundances of each element required to reproduce the observed feature. Our modeling indicates that about $1\, \%$ of He or $1\mathrm{-}10\, \%$ of Sr in mass fraction are present in the ejecta moving at $v \sim 0.15 \, c$. This Sr mass fraction nicely agrees with the mass fraction in the solar $r$-process abundance. Based on comparison with nucleosynthesis calculations, our constraints suggest that $r$-process nucleosynthesis in GW170817 occurs at relatively low electron fraction ($Y_{\rm e} \lesssim 0.35$) and low entropy ($s \lesssim 30 \ k_B/\, \mathrm{nucleon}$) conditions. Interestingly, for $Y_{\rm e}$ $\lesssim 0.15$, the observed feature is reproduced by He with a mass fraction expected from $\alpha$ decays of trans-Pb nuclei, which gives an indirect signature for the production of elements beyond the third $r$-process peak.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops non-LTE ionization models for helium and strontium that incorporate ionization by high-energy electrons. These models are used to estimate the mass fractions of He (~1%) or Sr (1-10%) required to reproduce the ~1 μm absorption feature observed in the kilonova AT2017gfo at v ~ 0.15c. The derived Sr abundance is noted to match solar r-process values, and comparison with nucleosynthesis calculations is used to infer that r-process nucleosynthesis occurred at low electron fraction (Ye ≲ 0.35) and low entropy (s ≲ 30 k_B/nucleon). For Ye ≲ 0.15, the feature could instead be produced by He from α-decays of trans-Pb nuclei.

Significance. If the central modeling holds, the work supplies quantitative abundance constraints from a specific spectral feature that can be directly compared to solar r-process patterns and nucleosynthesis yields, thereby linking kilonova observations to the physical conditions of heavy-element production in neutron-star mergers. The explicit non-LTE treatment of electron-impact ionization is a methodological strength relative to prior LTE approximations.

major comments (2)
  1. [modeling and results sections (opacity estimation)] The headline claim that ~1% He or 1-10% Sr reproduces the 1 μm feature rests on isolated non-LTE calculations for each element. No section demonstrates that the required mass fractions remain unchanged once the total opacity is computed with the full r-process composition (including lanthanides and other ions whose lines may overlap at ~1 μm). If blended opacities from other species contribute appreciably, the inferred He/Sr fractions would be lower or the feature could be explained without them, directly affecting the nucleosynthesis constraints.
  2. [discussion of nucleosynthesis implications] The mapping from modeled abundances to nucleosynthesis conditions (Ye ≲ 0.35, s ≲ 30 k_B/nucleon) is performed by comparison rather than by forward-modeling the full composition and spectrum. The paper does not quantify how uncertainties in the isolated He/Sr opacities propagate into the allowed (Ye, s) region, leaving the robustness of the low-Ye, low-entropy conclusion unclear.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract and introduction] The abstract and introduction would benefit from an explicit statement of the assumed velocity and density profile used when converting mass fractions to optical depth.
  2. [methods] Notation for the electron-impact ionization rates and the definition of the non-LTE departure coefficients should be collected in a single table or appendix for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The comments highlight important limitations in our isolated-element approach and the strength of the nucleosynthesis inferences. We address each point below and have made targeted revisions to improve clarity and acknowledge the caveats.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [modeling and results sections (opacity estimation)] The headline claim that ~1% He or 1-10% Sr reproduces the 1 μm feature rests on isolated non-LTE calculations for each element. No section demonstrates that the required mass fractions remain unchanged once the total opacity is computed with the full r-process composition (including lanthanides and other ions whose lines may overlap at ~1 μm). If blended opacities from other species contribute appreciably, the inferred He/Sr fractions would be lower or the feature could be explained without them, directly affecting the nucleosynthesis constraints.

    Authors: We agree that our calculations treat He and Sr in isolation and do not include a full multi-element opacity calculation with lanthanides and other r-process species. The paper's focus is on developing non-LTE ionization models for these two candidate elements and quantifying the abundances needed for them to produce the observed feature in the absence of strong blending. In the revised manuscript we add an explicit caveat in the results and discussion sections stating that the reported mass fractions represent upper limits if other lines overlap significantly at 1 μm, and we reference recent full-composition opacity studies to place our results in context. We do not claim the fractions are unchanged under full blending. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [discussion of nucleosynthesis implications] The mapping from modeled abundances to nucleosynthesis conditions (Ye ≲ 0.35, s ≲ 30 k_B/nucleon) is performed by comparison rather than by forward-modeling the full composition and spectrum. The paper does not quantify how uncertainties in the isolated He/Sr opacities propagate into the allowed (Ye, s) region, leaving the robustness of the low-Ye, low-entropy conclusion unclear.

    Authors: The nucleosynthesis constraints are obtained by direct comparison of our derived He and Sr mass fractions with yields from published nucleosynthesis calculations that span a range of Ye and entropy. A self-consistent forward model that couples our non-LTE ionization treatment to a full r-process composition and radiative transfer is beyond the scope of the present work, which centers on the atomic modeling of He and Sr. In the revised discussion we now state this limitation explicitly, note that the (Ye, s) bounds are indicative rather than statistically rigorous, and qualitatively describe how plausible opacity uncertainties from blending would primarily relax (rather than invalidate) the low-Ye, low-entropy preference. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; abundance constraints derived from independent non-LTE models applied to data

full rationale

The paper constructs non-LTE ionization models for He and Sr from atomic physics and high-energy electron ionization, then uses them to estimate the mass fractions needed to match the observed 1μm absorption depth at v~0.15c. These estimated fractions are subsequently compared to solar r-process abundances and external nucleosynthesis calculations to constrain Ye and entropy. No quoted step reduces by construction to a self-definition, a fitted parameter relabeled as a prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation chain; the central inference remains an application of an externally grounded model to observational data rather than a tautological restatement of inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on fitting the mass fractions to the spectral feature and assumes standard atomic data for He and Sr; no new entities postulated. Limited information available from abstract only.

free parameters (2)
  • He mass fraction = ~1%
    Estimated to reproduce the observed absorption feature
  • Sr mass fraction = 1-10%
    Estimated to reproduce the observed absorption feature
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The 1μm absorption feature is caused by He or Sr lines
    Central to estimating the abundances from the models
  • domain assumption Non-LTE conditions with high-energy electron ionization apply to the ejecta
    Basis for the ionization modeling

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5643 in / 1645 out tokens · 93256 ms · 2026-05-10T19:33:11.386153+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Exploring the diversity of kilonovae with 3D radiative transfer I. The polar direction

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Dynamical ejecta from neutron star mergers reproduce key spectral properties of AT2017gfo in polar views, with features from Sr II, La III and other ions appearing at earlier times than observed.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2017a, ApJL, 848, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9 2041

  2. [2]

    2017, PhRvL, 119, 161101, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101

    Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2017b, PhRvL, 119, 161101, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.161101

  3. [3]

    2016, ApJ, 829, 110, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/829/2/110

    Barnes, J., Kasen, D., Wu, M.-R., & Mart´ ınez-Pinedo, G. 2016, ApJ, 829, 110, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/829/2/110

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/829/2/110 2016

  4. [4]

    R., Kingston, A

    Bates, D. R., Kingston, A. E., & McWhirter, R. W. P. 1962, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A, 267, 297, doi: 10.1098/rspa.1962.0101

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1962.0101 1962

  5. [5]

    2026, ApJ, 996, 64, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1b8d

    Brethauer, D., Kasen, D., Margutti, R., & Chornock, R. 2026, ApJ, 996, 64, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1b8d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1b8d 2026

  6. [6]

    B., Blakeslee, J

    Cantiello, M., Jensen, J. B., Blakeslee, J. P., et al. 2018, ApJL, 854, L31, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaad64

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaad64 2018

  7. [7]

    Castor, J. I. 1970, MNRAS, 149, 111, doi: 10.1093/mnras/149.2.111

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/149.2.111 1970

  8. [8]

    2022, ApJ, 939, 8, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8c36

    Domoto, N., Tanaka, M., Kato, D., et al. 2022, ApJ, 939, 8, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8c36

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8c36 2022

  9. [9]

    2021, ApJ, 913, 26, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf358

    Domoto, N., Tanaka, M., Wanajo, S., & Kawaguchi, K. 2021, ApJ, 913, 26, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf358

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf358 2021

  10. [10]

    Eichler, D., Livio, M., Piran, T., & Schramm, D. N. 1989, Nature, 340, 126, doi: 10.1038/340126a0 Fern´ andez, R., & Metzger, B. D. 2013, MNRAS, 435, 502, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1312

    work page doi:10.1038/340126a0 1989

  11. [11]

    2023, ApJ, 942, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9ce0

    Fujibayashi, S., Kiuchi, K., Wanajo, S., et al. 2023, ApJ, 942, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9ce0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac9ce0 2023

  12. [12]

    2020, ApJ, 901, 122, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abafc2

    Fujibayashi, S., Wanajo, S., Kiuchi, K., et al. 2020, ApJ, 901, 122, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abafc2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abafc2 2020

  13. [13]

    2024, MNRAS, 529, 2918, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3688

    Bauswein, A. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 2918, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3688

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3688 2024

  14. [14]

    H., & Smartt, S

    Gillanders, J. H., & Smartt, S. J. 2025, MNRAS, 538, 1663, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf287

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf287 2025

  15. [15]

    2022, MNRAS, 515, 631, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1258

    Goriely, S. 2022, MNRAS, 515, 631, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1258

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1258 2022

  16. [16]

    MNRAS424(1), 65–79 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21152.x arXiv:1204.5474 [astro-ph.GA]

    Hachinger, S., Mazzali, P. A., Taubenberger, S., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 70, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20464.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20464.x 2012

  17. [17]

    P., Wheeler, J

    Harkness, R. P., Wheeler, J. C., Margon, B., et al. 1987, ApJ, 317, 355, doi: 10.1086/165283

    work page doi:10.1086/165283 1987

  18. [18]

    D., Woosley, S

    Hoffman, R. D., Woosley, S. E., & Qian, Y. Z. 1997, ApJ, 482, 951, doi: 10.1086/304181

    work page doi:10.1086/304181 1997

  19. [19]

    2020, ApJ, 891, 152, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6a98

    Hotokezaka, K., & Nakar, E. 2020, ApJ, 891, 152, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6a98

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab6a98 2020

  20. [20]

    2021, MNRAS, 506, 5863, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1975

    Hotokezaka, K., Tanaka, M., Kato, D., & Gaigalas, G. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 5863, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1975

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1975 2021

  21. [21]

    2023, MNRAS, 526, L155, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slad128

    Hotokezaka, K., Tanaka, M., Kato, D., & Gaigalas, G. 2023, MNRAS, 526, L155, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slad128

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slad128 2023

  22. [22]

    1990, ApJ, 361, 367, doi: 10.1086/169203

    Hutsemekers, D., & Surdej, J. 1990, ApJ, 361, 367, doi: 10.1086/169203

    work page doi:10.1086/169203 1990

  23. [23]

    Jeffery, D. J. 1993, ApJ, 415, 734, doi: 10.1086/173197 17 10 17 10 16 10 15 10 14 10 13 tot [g cm 3] 10 2 10 1 100 101 102 fpop/f (fid) pop 1.43 days He II He I 23S He I 21S Sr II Sr II (LTE) 10 17 10 16 10 15 10 14 10 13 tot [g cm 3] 10 2 10 1 100 101 102 fpop/f (fid) pop 3.41 days He II He I 23S He I 21S Sr II Sr II (LTE) Figure 14.The population fract...

    work page doi:10.1086/173197 1993

  24. [24]

    J., & Branch, D

    Jeffery, D. J., & Branch, D. 1990, in Supernovae, Jerusalem Winter School for Theoretical Physics, ed. J. C. Wheeler, T. Piran, & S. Weinberg, Vol. 6, 149

    1990

  25. [25]

    2023, MNRAS, 525, 3384, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2430

    Kawaguchi, K., Fujibayashi, S., Domoto, N., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 3384, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2430

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2430 2023

  26. [26]

    2022, ApJ, 933, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6ef7

    Kawaguchi, K., Fujibayashi, S., Hotokezaka, K., Shibata, M., & Wanajo, S. 2022, ApJ, 933, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6ef7

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac6ef7 2022

  27. [27]

    2021, ApJ, 913, 100, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf3bc

    Wanajo, S. 2021, ApJ, 913, 100, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf3bc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf3bc 2021

  28. [28]

    2018, ApJL, 865, L21, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aade02

    Kawaguchi, K., Shibata, M., & Tanaka, M. 2018, ApJL, 865, L21, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aade02

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aade02 2018

  29. [29]

    2023, PhRvL, 131, 011401, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.011401

    Kiuchi, K., Fujibayashi, S., Hayashi, K., et al. 2023, PhRvL, 131, 011401, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.011401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.011401 2023

  30. [30]

    Kiuchi, K., Reboul-Salze, A., Shibata, M., & Sekiguchi, Y. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 298, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02194-y 0° 15° 30° 45° 60° 75° 90°0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 r/ct DD2-135-135 (T otal) 10 20 10 19 10 18 10 17 10 16 10 15 10 14 10 13 10 12 t3 d [g cm 3] 0° 15° 30° 45° 60° 75° 90°0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 r/ct DD2-135-135...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02194-y 2024

  31. [31]

    1992, ApJ, 390, 602, doi: 10.1086/171311

    Kozma, C., & Fransson, C. 1992, ApJ, 390, 602, doi: 10.1086/171311

    work page doi:10.1086/171311 1992

  32. [32]

    Ralchenko, Reader, J., & and NIST ASD Team

    Kramida, A., Yu. Ralchenko, Reader, J., & and NIST ASD Team. 2023, NIST Atomic Spectra Database (ver. 5.11), [Online]. Available:https://physics.nist.gov/asd [2024, May 6]. National Institute of Standards and

    2023

  33. [33]

    Kulkarni, S. R. 2005, arXiv e-prints, astro, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0510256 18

    work page Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0510256 2005

  34. [34]

    and Gompertz, Benjamin P

    Levan, A. J., Gompertz, B. P., Salafia, O. S., et al. 2024, Nature, 626, 737, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06759-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06759-1 2024

  35. [35]

    ApJ507, 59 (1998) https://doi.org/ 10.1086/311680 arXiv:astro-ph/9807272

    Li, L.-X., & Paczy´ nski, B. 1998, ApJL, 507, L59, doi: 10.1086/311680

    work page doi:10.1086/311680 1998

  36. [36]

    Lippuner, J., & Roberts, L. F. 2015, ApJ, 815, 82, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/815/2/82

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/815/2/82 2015

  37. [37]

    Lucy, L. B. 1991, ApJ, 383, 308, doi: 10.1086/170787

    work page doi:10.1086/170787 1991

  38. [38]

    AccretedversusinsituMilkyWayglobularclusters,

    Metzger, B. D., Mart´ ınez-Pinedo, G., Darbha, S., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 406, 2650, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16864.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16864.x 2010

  39. [39]

    S., Krishnan, T

    Meyer, B. S., Krishnan, T. D., & Clayton, D. D. 1998, ApJ, 498, 808, doi: 10.1086/305562

    work page doi:10.1086/305562 1998

  40. [40]

    1978, Stellar atmospheres

    Mihalas, D. 1978, Stellar atmospheres

    1978

  41. [41]

    P., McElroy, N

    Mulholland, L. P., McElroy, N. E., McNeill, F. L., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 532, 2289, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1615

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1615 2024

  42. [42]

    Sneppen, A., & Sim, S. A. 2026, MNRAS, 546, stag237, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stag237

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stag237 2026

  43. [43]

    2020, Atoms, 8, 68, doi: 10.3390/atoms8040068

    Nahar, S. 2020, Atoms, 8, 68, doi: 10.3390/atoms8040068

    work page doi:10.3390/atoms8040068 2020

  44. [44]

    Nahar, S. N. 2010, NewA, 15, 417, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2009.11.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.newast.2009.11.010 2010

  45. [45]

    Nahar, S. N. 2021, Atoms, 9, 73, doi: 10.3390/atoms9040073

    work page doi:10.3390/atoms9040073 2021

  46. [46]

    N., & Hinojosa-Aguirre, G

    Nahar, S. N., & Hinojosa-Aguirre, G. 2024, Atoms, 12, 22, doi: 10.3390/atoms12040022

    work page doi:10.3390/atoms12040022 2024

  47. [47]

    , eprint =

    Narayan, R., Paczynski, B., & Piran, T. 1992, ApJL, 395, L83, doi: 10.1086/186493

    work page doi:10.1086/186493 1992

  48. [48]

    2022, ApJ, 925, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3751

    Perego, A., Vescovi, D., Fiore, A., et al. 2022, ApJ, 925, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3751

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac3751 2022

  49. [49]

    and D’Avanzo, P

    Pian, E., D’Avanzo, P., Benetti, S., et al. 2017, Nature, 551, 67, doi: 10.1038/nature24298

    work page doi:10.1038/nature24298 2017

  50. [50]

    2023, MNRAS, 526, 5220, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3106

    Pognan, Q., Grumer, J., Jerkstrand, A., & Wanajo, S. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 5220, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3106

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3106 2023

  51. [51]

    2022a, MNRAS, 510, 3806, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3674

    Pognan, Q., Jerkstrand, A., & Grumer, J. 2022a, MNRAS, 510, 3806, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3674

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3674

  52. [52]

    , keywords =

    Pognan, Q., Jerkstrand, A., & Grumer, J. 2022b, MNRAS, 513, 5174, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1253

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1253

  53. [53]

    2025, MNRAS, 536, 2973, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2778

    Pognan, Q., Wu, M.-R., Mart´ ınez-Pinedo, G., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 536, 2973, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2778

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2778 2025

  54. [54]

    A new assessment of the solar s- and r-process components

    Prantzos, N., Abia, C., Cristallo, S., Limongi, M., & Chieffi, A. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 1832, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3154

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3154 2020

  55. [55]

    2025, ApJ, 980, 43, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada251

    Rahmouni, S., Tanaka, M., Domoto, N., et al. 2025, ApJ, 980, 43, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada251

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada251 2025

  56. [56]

    K., Kato, T., et al

    Ralchenko, Y., Janev, R. K., Kato, T., et al. 2008, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, 94, 603, doi: 10.1016/j.adt.2007.11.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.adt.2007.11.003 2008

  57. [57]

    B., & Hummer, D

    Rybicki, G. B., & Hummer, D. G. 1978, ApJ, 219, 654, doi: 10.1086/155826

    work page doi:10.1086/155826 1978

  58. [58]

    B., & Lightman, A

    Rybicki, G. B., & Lightman, A. P. 1979, Radiative processes in astrophysics

    1979

  59. [59]

    2025, ApJ, 988, 130, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adecee

    Sadeh, G. 2025, ApJ, 988, 130, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adecee

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adecee 2025

  60. [60]

    J., Collins, C

    Shingles, L. J., Collins, C. E., Vijayan, V., et al. 2023, ApJL, 954, L41, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acf29a

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acf29a 2023

  61. [61]

    J., Chen, T.-W., Jerkstrand, A., et al

    Smartt, S. J., Chen, T. W., Jerkstrand, A., et al. 2017, Nature, 551, 75, doi: 10.1038/nature24303

    work page doi:10.1038/nature24303 2017

  62. [62]

    2023, ApJ, 955, 44, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf200

    Sneppen, A. 2023, ApJ, 955, 44, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf200

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acf200 2023

  63. [63]

    2024, A&A, 692, A134, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451450

    Sneppen, A., Damgaard, R., Watson, D., et al. 2024, A&A, 692, A134, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451450

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451450 2024

  64. [64]

    2023, A&A, 675, A194, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346421

    Sneppen, A., & Watson, D. 2023, A&A, 675, A194, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346421

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346421 2023

  65. [65]

    2023, A&A, 678, A14, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346306

    Sneppen, A., Watson, D., Poznanski, D., et al. 2023, A&A, 678, A14, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346306

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346306 2023

  66. [66]

    2026, PhRvD, 113, 063038, doi: 10.1103/5j43-l6xr

    Sneppen, A., Just, O., Bauswein, A., et al. 2026, PhRvD, 113, 063038, doi: 10.1103/5j43-l6xr

    work page doi:10.1103/5j43-l6xr 2026

  67. [67]

    Sobolev, V. V. 1960, Moving Envelopes of Stars, doi: 10.4159/harvard.9780674864658

    work page doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674864658 1960

  68. [68]

    V., & Fano, U

    Spencer, L. V., & Fano, U. 1954, Physical Review, 93, 1172, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.93.1172

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.93.1172 1954

  69. [69]

    Symbalisty, E., & Schramm, D. N. 1982, Astrophys. Lett., 22, 143

    1982

  70. [70]

    A., et al

    Tanaka, M., Utsumi, Y., Mazzali, P. A., et al. 2017, PASJ, 69, 102, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx121

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psx121 2017

  71. [71]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2302.13061

    Tarumi, Y., Hotokezaka, K., Domoto, N., & Tanaka, M. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2302.13061, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2302.13061

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.13061 2023

  72. [72]

    J., Haggard, D., et al

    Vieira, N., Ruan, J. J., Haggard, D., et al. 2023, ApJ, 944, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acae72

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acae72 2023

  73. [73]

    J., Haggard, D., et al

    Vieira, N., Ruan, J. J., Haggard, D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 962, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1193

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1193 2024

  74. [74]

    2018, ApJ, 868, 65, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae0f2

    Wanajo, S. 2018, ApJ, 868, 65, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae0f2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aae0f2 2018

  75. [75]

    2014, ApJL, 789, L39, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/789/2/L39

    Wanajo, S., Sekiguchi, Y., Nishimura, N., et al. 2014, ApJL, 789, L39, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/789/2/L39

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/789/2/l39 2014

  76. [76]

    J., Selsing, J., et al

    Watson, D., Hansen, C. J., Selsing, J., et al. 2019, Nature, 574, 497, doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1676-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1676-3 2019

  77. [77]

    O., Kushnir, D., & Gal-Yam, A

    Waxman, E., Ofek, E. O., Kushnir, D., & Gal-Yam, A. 2018, MNRAS, 481, 3423, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2441

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2441 2018