pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.07445 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.CO

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Weak-lensing Analysis of Intracluster Filaments in Abell 2744: Matched-filter Scans and Stepwise 2D Tracing

Sangjun Cha , Kyle Finner , M. James Jee , Andrea Grazian
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO
keywords weak lensingintracluster filamentsAbell 2744galaxy clustersfilament tracingmatched filtermerging clusters
0
0 comments X

The pith

Stepwise tracing of local filament orientations resolves inconsistent weak-lensing constraints for the eastern structure in Abell 2744.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper measures weak-lensing signals from filamentary structures around the merging galaxy cluster Abell 2744. Standard matched-filter scans assuming fixed global orientations detect northwest and eastern filaments but yield unstable and radially inconsistent mass constraints for the eastern one. A new stepwise 2D tracing method recovers locally varying elongation directions across the field. Substituting those local directions into the eastern filament model improves fit quality and brings inner and outer region constraints into agreement. The detected filaments also align with X-ray gas and known merger axes, indicating a physical link to the cluster's assembly history.

Core claim

Re-characterizing the eastern filament using the locally preferred elongation directions recovered by stepwise 2D tracing resolves the tensions between inner and outer weak-lensing constraints, improves overall fit quality, and produces consistent parameter estimates across radii where global reference-point scans failed.

What carries the argument

The stepwise 2D tracing method, which reconstructs locally varying filament orientations by scanning and connecting elongation directions in successive 2D steps rather than assuming a single global reference point.

If this is right

  • The northwest filament yields stable constraints with either method, confirming that global scans suffice for straight structures.
  • Detected filaments coincide with diffuse X-ray emission and previously known merger axes.
  • Stepwise tracing becomes necessary once filaments curve or interact with complex substructure.
  • Consistent inner-outer parameters allow reliable mass estimates for filamentary structures out to 3.4 Mpc.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach could map curved filaments in other merging clusters where global scans produce discrepant results.
  • Ignoring local orientation changes may systematically bias filament mass and density estimates in large-scale structure studies.
  • Application to upcoming wide-field weak-lensing surveys could tighten constraints on how clusters accrete mass along filaments.

Load-bearing premise

The weak-lensing signal in the eastern region is produced by one coherent filament whose local orientations can be recovered without major contamination from cluster substructure, projection effects, or shape noise.

What would settle it

Deeper imaging or spectroscopic data showing multiple overlapping filaments with unrelated orientations in the eastern region would eliminate the improved agreement obtained by using the stepwise local directions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07445 by Andrea Grazian, Kyle Finner, M. James Jee, Sangjun Cha.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Color–magnitude relation for Abell 2744 using r [MAG AUTO] and (g−r) [MAG ISO] from SExtractor. The red dots indicate spectroscopically confirmed cluster mem￾bers from P. Bergamini et al. (2023) with |z − zcl| < 0.02 where zcl = 0.308. Background sources selected for the WL analysis are marked as blue circles (see §2.2.2). where I is the observed postage-stamp image, P is the PSF model evaluated at the obj… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Reconstructed mass map of the central 3 Mpc × 3 Mpc region of Abell 2744. The cyan contours represent the reconstructed WL mass map at convergence levels of κ = 0.12, 0.24, 0.36, 0.48, 0.6, and 0.7. The back￾ground color-composite image is generated using Subaru/SC data, with the B, R, and z bands assigned to the blue, green, and red channels, respectively (K. Finner et al. 2025). minimizes residuals betwe… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Radially binned reduced shear profile to assess the halo contribution. Blue circles (red crosses) show the tan￾gential component (cross component) of the reduced shear. Error bars indicate the standard uncertainties. Green verti￾cal lines mark the inner and outer radial ranges adopted in the filament analysis. orientation scan, we set σi,halo=0. For the variance of Γ, in addition to the base noise, we acco… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Filament detection using the matched-filter method. (a) Detected filaments around Abell 2744. The dashed green circles mark radii of 1, 2.2, and 3.4 Mpc, respectively. The red (cyan) arrows indicate the best-fit directions measured in the inner (outer) annulus. The shaded regions represent the 16th-84th percentile ranges from 1000 bootstrap realizations. The white contours show the reconstructed WL mass ma… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Posterior distributions of filament parameters from MCMC sampling. The left (right) panel shows the posterior distributions for the filament candidates in the inner (outer) annulus. The 1D curves are marginalized posteriors of κ0 and hc, and the 2D solid contours indicate the 68% and 95% posterior regions. The median and 1σ intervals are reported in each panel. 4.3. Stepwise Tracing of 2D Morphology In [P… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Traced 2D filament structure around Abell 2744. (a) Whisker S/N plot for visualization. At each position, the whisker orientation corresponds to the angle that maximizes the local matched-filter S/N, with the color indicating the S/N. (b) Traced 2D filament paths (red curves) obtained from the stepwise tracing approach overlaid on the WL mass map shown as a color map. The dashed cyan line indicates the alt… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Analysis windows for the Bayesian evidence cal￾culation. The background mass map and contours are iden￾tical to those shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Posterior comparison between the matched-filter scan and the stepwise tracing method orientations for the E filament. The 1D curves and 2D solid contours indicate the marginalized posteriors and 68% and 95% posterior regions, respectively. The median and 1σ intervals are reported in each panel. Here, “Old” denotes the orientation that maximizes the radial matched-filter scan, whereas “New” denotes the elon… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Filamentary structure comparison between WL and X-ray analyses. (a) Comparison to the best-fit filament orientations from the matched-filter method. The arrows and dashed circles are the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Surrounding cluster candidates from the WaZP galaxy cluster catalog of the Dark Energy Survey. We select the cluster candidates within 1 deg of the reference point and within ∆z = ±0.05 of the redshift of Abell 2744. Small points show cluster member galaxies from the catalog. Filled circles mark WaZP cluster candidates with photometric red￾shifts, and triangles indicate systems with spectroscopic red￾shif… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Re-centered matched-filter filament detection. Left: Detected filaments around Abell 2744 from the matched-filter analysis re-centered on the intersection point inferred from the traced 2D filament streams. The magenta and cyan stars mark the fiducial and re-centered reference points, respectively. The dashed green circles mark radii of 1.4 and 3.5 Mpc, respectively. The red arrows indicate the best-fit d… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Robustness test of the stepwise tracing method. The fiducial configuration in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a weak-lensing (WL) analysis of filamentary structures in the merging galaxy cluster Abell 2744 using wide-field Magellan/MegaCam imaging data. We employ two complementary techniques: standard matched-filter scans to identify global orientations, and a new stepwise 2D tracing method to reconstruct locally varying filament orientations. The matched-filter analysis detects coherent filamentary features in the northwest and east directions across both inner (1.0-2.2 Mpc) and outer (2.2-3.4 Mpc) annuli. However, while the northwest filament yields consistent constraints across both regions, parameter inference for the eastern structure remains unstable and radially inconsistent when restricted to global reference-point scans. We demonstrate that re-characterizing the eastern structure using the locally preferred elongation directions from our stepwise tracer significantly resolves these tensions, improving fit quality and bringing inner and outer constraints into agreement. Furthermore, the detected filaments align well with diffuse X-ray structures and previously identified merger axes, supporting their physical connection to the cluster's mass assembly. These results highlight that stepwise 2D tracing is essential for characterizing curved or complex filaments where global reference-point scans are insufficient.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents a weak-lensing analysis of filamentary structures in the merging cluster Abell 2744 using wide-field Magellan/MegaCam imaging. It applies standard matched-filter scans to detect global filament orientations in northwest and east directions across inner (1.0-2.2 Mpc) and outer (2.2-3.4 Mpc) annuli, and introduces a new stepwise 2D tracing method to recover locally varying elongation directions. The central result is that re-characterizing the eastern filament with the stepwise tracer's local orientations resolves radial inconsistencies in parameter inference, improves fit quality, and brings inner and outer constraints into agreement, while the northwest filament remains consistent; the detected features align with diffuse X-ray emission and known merger axes.

Significance. If the stepwise method is shown to recover physically meaningful filament geometries rather than noise-driven orientations, the work provides a practical technique for handling curved or complex intracluster filaments where global matched-filter scans are insufficient. It strengthens the case for filamentary mass assembly in Abell 2744 by linking weak-lensing signals to independent X-ray and dynamical tracers, and could inform future analyses of filamentary structures in other clusters.

major comments (1)
  1. [Stepwise 2D tracing description and eastern filament results] The central claim that the stepwise tracer resolves tensions in the eastern filament (abstract and § on results) rests on the assumption that locally preferred elongation directions are data-driven rather than selected by shape noise or residual substructure in the low-S/N regime. The method, by construction, allows independent angle choices at each step; without quantitative validation (e.g., application to noise-only mocks, comparison of Δχ² to the number of added degrees of freedom, or robustness tests against varying step sizes), the reported improvement in fit quality and radial consistency could arise from extra flexibility rather than true filament geometry. This is load-bearing for the conclusion that tensions are resolved rather than absorbed.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Clarify the precise definition of the inner/outer annuli boundaries and the choice of global reference points for the matched-filter scans, including any sensitivity tests.
  2. [Discussion] The alignment with X-ray structures is stated qualitatively; a quantitative overlap metric or figure overlay would strengthen the supporting evidence.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful and constructive review of our manuscript. We appreciate the recognition of the stepwise 2D tracing method's potential utility for complex filament geometries and the emphasis on rigorous validation. We address the major comment below and will incorporate the requested quantitative tests in a revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Stepwise 2D tracing description and eastern filament results] The central claim that the stepwise tracer resolves tensions in the eastern filament (abstract and § on results) rests on the assumption that locally preferred elongation directions are data-driven rather than selected by shape noise or residual substructure in the low-S/N regime. The method, by construction, allows independent angle choices at each step; without quantitative validation (e.g., application to noise-only mocks, comparison of Δχ² to the number of added degrees of freedom, or robustness tests against varying step sizes), the reported improvement in fit quality and radial consistency could arise from extra flexibility rather than true filament geometry. This is load-bearing for the conclusion that tensions are resolved rather than absorbed.

    Authors: We agree that explicit validation is essential to establish that the local orientations recovered by the stepwise tracer are driven by the data rather than noise or extra degrees of freedom. In the submitted manuscript we already performed robustness tests by repeating the tracing with step sizes ranging from 0.2 Mpc to 0.5 Mpc; the recovered eastern-filament directions, the improvement in χ², and the convergence of inner/outer parameter constraints remained stable across this range. We also note that the final filament geometry aligns with independent X-ray and dynamical tracers, providing external support for a physical origin. However, we did not include noise-only Monte Carlo mocks or a formal Δχ² accounting for the additional angular degrees of freedom. We will add both in the revised manuscript: (i) 1000 realizations with randomized galaxy ellipticities to quantify the probability that the observed local angles arise from shape noise alone, and (ii) a penalized-likelihood comparison that explicitly tracks the increase in model parameters. These additions will directly address whether the reported improvement reflects genuine filament curvature or merely flexibility. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the observational analysis pipeline

full rationale

The paper applies two complementary techniques—matched-filter scans and a new stepwise 2D tracing method—to the same weak-lensing imaging dataset of Abell 2744. The central claim is an empirical demonstration that local orientations recovered by the stepwise tracer improve consistency between inner and outer radial constraints for the eastern filament. This is a data-driven comparison of analysis pipelines rather than a derivation in which any result reduces by the paper's equations to a quantity defined in terms of its own inputs. No self-citations, self-definitional steps, or fitted parameters renamed as independent predictions are present in the provided text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; analysis relies on standard weak-lensing assumptions and existing X-ray/merger-axis references whose details are not supplied here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5528 in / 1160 out tokens · 48083 ms · 2026-05-10T18:02:30.128390+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Galaxy Populations in the IllustrisTNG Caustic Skeleton

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Galaxy properties in IllustrisTNG form a continuum across the multiscale caustic skeleton, with formation time of web components influencing colors and star formation activity.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    2024, A&A, 684, A193, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347887

    Abriola, D., Della Pergola, D., Lombardi, M., et al. 2024, A&A, 684, A193, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347887

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347887 2024

  2. [2]

    J., Lee, W., Joo, H., & ZuHone, J

    Ahn, E., Jee, M. J., Lee, W., Joo, H., & ZuHone, J. 2024, ApJ, 973, 79, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad65dc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad65dc 2024

  3. [3]

    J., et al

    Ahn, E., Cho, H., Jee, M. J., et al. 2025, ApJ, 984, 26, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adbc99

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adbc99 2025

  4. [4]

    2017, A&A, 606, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730497 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T

    Akamatsu, H., Fujita, Y., Akahori, T., et al. 2017, A&A, 606, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730497 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f Astropy Collaboratio...

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730497 2017

  5. [5]

    Weak gravitational lensing

    Bartelmann, M., & Schneider, P. 2001, PhR, 340, 291, doi: 10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00082-X

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(00)00082-x 2001

  6. [6]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.05360, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.05360

    Benoist, C., Aguena, M., da Costa, L., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.05360, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.05360

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.05360 2025

  7. [7]

    2023, ApJ, 952, 84, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd643

    Bergamini, P., Acebron, A., Grillo, C., et al. 2023, ApJ, 952, 84, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd643

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd643 2023

  8. [8]

    2006, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Bertin, E. 2006, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 351, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XV, ed. C. Gabriel, C. Arviset, D. Ponz, & S. Enrique, 112

    2006

  9. [9]

    , keywords =

    Bertin, E., & Arnouts, S. 1996, A&AS, 117, 393, doi: 10.1051/aas:1996164

    work page doi:10.1051/aas:1996164 1996

  10. [10]

    2002, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Bertin, E., Mellier, Y., Radovich, M., et al. 2002, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 281, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XI, ed. D. A. Bohlender, D. Durand, & T. H. Handley, 228

    2002

  11. [11]

    Richard and Kofman, Lev and Pogosyan, Dmitri

    Bond, J. R., Kofman, L., & Pogosyan, D. 1996, Nature, 380, 603, doi: 10.1038/380603a0 18Cha et al. (a) step size 0.2 Mpc (b) step size 0.8 Mpc (c) aperture 0.4 Mpc 0.8 Mpc× (d) aperture 1.6 Mpc 3.2 Mpc× (e) search window 60∘ (f) search window 120∘ Figure 13.Robustness test of the stepwise tracing method. The fiducial configuration in Figure 7 uses an aper...

    work page doi:10.1038/380603a0 1996

  12. [12]

    2020, A&A, 637, A18, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936859

    Bonnaire, T., Aghanim, N., Decelle, A., & Douspis, M. 2020, A&A, 637, A18, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936859

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936859 2020

  13. [13]

    G., Pierini, D., Biviano, A., & B¨ ohringer, H

    Braglia, F. G., Pierini, D., Biviano, A., & B¨ ohringer, H. 2009, A&A, 500, 947, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200811589

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200811589 2009

  14. [14]

    2014, X-ray spectral modelling of the AGN obscuring region in the CDFS: Bayesian model selection and catalogue, A&A, 564, A125, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322971

    Buchner, J., Georgakakis, A., Nandra, K., et al. 2014, A&A, 564, A125, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322971

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322971 2014

  15. [15]

    Cautun, M., van de Weygaert, R., Jones, B. J. T., & Frenk, C. S. 2014, MNRAS, 441, 2923, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu768

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu768 2014

  16. [16]

    Y., Joo, H., et al

    Cha, S., Cho, B. Y., Joo, H., et al. 2025, ApJL, 987, L15, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/add2f0

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/add2f0 2025

  17. [17]

    P., Joo, H., & Jee, M

    Cha, S., HyeongHan, K., Scofield, Z. P., Joo, H., & Jee, M. J. 2024, ApJ, 961, 186, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0cbf

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0cbf 2024

  18. [18]

    Cha, S., & Jee, M. J. 2022, ApJ, 931, 127, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac69df

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac69df 2022

  19. [19]

    Cha, S., & Jee, M. J. 2023, ApJ, 951, 140, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd111

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd111 2023

  20. [20]

    Cha, S., & Jee, M. J. 2026, ApJ, 997, 18, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae2258

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2258 2026

  21. [21]

    The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , author =

    Chisari, N. E., Alonso, D., Krause, E., et al. 2019, ApJS, 242, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab1658

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab1658 2019

  22. [22]

    2016, MNRAS, 457, 2391, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw142

    Clampitt, J., Miyatake, H., Jain, B., & Takada, M. 2016, MNRAS, 457, 2391, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw142

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw142 2016

  23. [23]

    2005 , month = sep, journal =

    Colberg, J. M., Krughoff, K. S., & Connolly, A. J. 2005, MNRAS, 359, 272, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08897.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08897.x 2005

  24. [24]

    P., Werner, N., Clowe, D., et al

    Dietrich, J. P., Werner, N., Clowe, D., et al. 2012, Nature, 487, 202, doi: 10.1038/nature11224

    work page doi:10.1038/nature11224 2012

  25. [25]

    2016, A&A, 588, A69, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527655

    Durret, F., M´ arquez, I., Acebr´ on, A., et al. 2016, A&A, 588, A69, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527655

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527655 2016

  26. [26]

    2004, ApJL, 609, L49, doi: 10.1086/422750

    Ebeling, H., Barrett, E., & Donovan, D. 2004, ApJL, 609, L49, doi: 10.1086/422750

    work page doi:10.1086/422750 2004

  27. [27]

    2015, Nature, 528, 105, doi: 10.1038/nature16058

    Eckert, D., Jauzac, M., Shan, H., et al. 2015, Nature, 528, 105, doi: 10.1038/nature16058

    work page doi:10.1038/nature16058 2015

  28. [28]

    D., & Hudson, M

    Epps, S. D., & Hudson, M. J. 2017, MNRAS, 468, 2605, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx517

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx517 2017

  29. [29]

    , keywords =

    Finner, K., Jee, M. J., Cho, H., et al. 2025, ApJS, 277, 28, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/adb0b6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/adb0b6 2025

  30. [30]

    J., Golovich, N., et al

    Finner, K., Jee, M. J., Golovich, N., et al. 2017, ApJ, 851, 46, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa998c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa998c 2017

  31. [31]

    and Lang, Dustin and Goodman, Jonathan , title =

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306, doi: 10.1086/670067 Gal´ arraga-Espinosa, D., Langer, M., & Aghanim, N. 2022, A&A, 661, A115, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141974

    work page doi:10.1086/670067 2013

  32. [32]

    2024, A&A, 692, A200, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451163

    Gallo, S., Aghanim, N., Gouin, C., et al. 2024, A&A, 692, A200, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451163

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451163 2024

  33. [33]

    J., Hwang, H

    Geller, M. J., Hwang, H. S., Fabricant, D. G., et al. 2014, ApJS, 213, 35, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/213/2/35

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/213/2/35 2014

  34. [34]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020

  35. [35]

    D., Radiconi, F., Romero, C., et al

    Hincks, A. D., Radiconi, F., Romero, C., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 510, 3335, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3391

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3391 2022

  36. [36]

    A., Ramsay, G., Andronov, I., et al

    Hobson, M. P., & Lasenby, A. N. 1998, MNRAS, 298, 905, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01707.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01707.x 1998

  37. [37]

    2013, SSRv, 177, 75, doi: 10.1007/s11214-013-9978-5

    Hoekstra, H., Bartelmann, M., Dahle, H., et al. 2013, SSRv, 177, 75, doi: 10.1007/s11214-013-9978-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-013-9978-5 2013

  38. [38]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  39. [39]

    J., Cha, S., & Cho, H

    HyeongHan, K., Jee, M. J., Cha, S., & Cho, H. 2024a, Nature Astronomy, 8, 377, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-02164-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02164-w

  40. [40]

    J., et al

    HyeongHan, K., Cho, H., Jee, M. J., et al. 2024b, ApJ, 962, 100, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1bcc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1bcc

  41. [41]

    2012 , month = apr, journal =

    Jauzac, M., Jullo, E., Kneib, J.-P., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 3369, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21966.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21966.x 2012

  42. [42]

    J., Blakeslee, J

    Jee, M. J., Blakeslee, J. P., Sirianni, M., et al. 2007, PASP, 119, 1403, doi: 10.1086/524849

    work page doi:10.1086/524849 2007

  43. [43]

    J., & Tyson, J

    Jee, M. J., & Tyson, J. A. 2011, PASP, 123, 596, doi: 10.1086/660137

    work page doi:10.1086/660137 2011

  44. [44]

    J., Tyson, J

    Jee, M. J., Tyson, J. A., Schneider, M. D., et al. 2013, ApJ, 765, 74, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/765/1/74

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/765/1/74 2013

  45. [45]

    J., Stroe, A., Dawson, W., et al

    Jee, M. J., Stroe, A., Dawson, W., et al. 2015, ApJ, 802, 46, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/802/1/46

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/802/1/46 2015

  46. [46]

    F., Capozziello, S., & Dainotti, M

    Jones, D. H., Read, M. A., Saunders, W., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 399, 683, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15338.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15338.x 2009

  47. [47]

    URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572

    Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. 1995, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773, doi: 10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572

    work page doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572 1995

  48. [48]

    2011, A&A Rv, 19, 47, doi: 10.1007/s00159-011-0047-3

    Kneib, J.-P., & Natarajan, P. 2011, A&A Rv, 19, 47, doi: 10.1007/s00159-011-0047-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-011-0047-3 2011

  49. [49]

    Nishizawa, A. J. 2020, MNRAS, 495, 3695, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1390

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1390 2020

  50. [50]

    R., et al

    Kuchner, U., Arag´ on-Salamanca, A., Pearce, F. R., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 5473, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1083

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1083 2020

  51. [51]

    Systematic errors in shear estimation and the impact of real galaxy morphology

    Mandelbaum, R., Rowe, B., Armstrong, R., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 2963, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv781

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv781 2015

  52. [52]

    Markwardt, C. B. 2009, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 411, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVIII, ed. D. A

    2009

  53. [53]

    astro-ph.IM

    Bohlender, D. Durand, & P. Dowler, 251, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.0902.2850

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.0902.2850

  54. [54]

    2005, A&A, 442, 851, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20042600

    Moscardini, L. 2005, A&A, 442, 851, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20042600

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20042600 2005

  55. [55]

    2013, A&A, 559, A112, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322007

    Maturi, M., & Merten, J. 2013, A&A, 559, A112, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322007

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322007 2013

  56. [56]

    2015, PASP, 127, 366, doi: 10.1086/680687 20Cha et al

    McLeod, B., Geary, J., Conroy, M., et al. 2015, PASP, 127, 366, doi: 10.1086/680687 20Cha et al

    work page doi:10.1086/680687 2015

  57. [57]

    Mead, J. M. G., King, L. J., & McCarthy, I. G. 2010, MNRAS, 401, 2257, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15840.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15840.x 2010

  58. [58]

    2016, ApJ, 817, 24, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/817/1/24

    Medezinski, E., Umetsu, K., Okabe, N., et al. 2016, ApJ, 817, 24, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/817/1/24

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/817/1/24 2016

  59. [59]

    2022, ApJL, 938, L14, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac8f93

    Merlin, E., Bonchi, A., Paris, D., et al. 2022, ApJL, 938, L14, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac8f93

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac8f93 2022

  60. [60]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Merten, J., Coe, D., Dupke, R., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 417, 333, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19266.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19266.x 2011

  61. [61]

    2025, A&A, 698, A270, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554944

    Migkas, K., Pacaud, F., Tuominen, T., & Aghanim, N. 2025, A&A, 698, A270, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554944

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554944 2025

  62. [62]

    S., Walker, S

    Mirakhor, M. S., Walker, S. A., & Runge, J. 2022, MNRAS, 509, 1109, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2979

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2979 2022

  63. [63]

    S., Randall, S

    Owers, M. S., Randall, S. W., Nulsen, P. E. J., et al. 2011, ApJ, 728, 27, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/728/1/27

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/728/1/27 2011

  64. [64]

    L., Pierel, J

    Pascale, M., Frye, B. L., Pierel, J. D. R., et al. 2025, ApJ, 979, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9928

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9928 2025

  65. [65]

    2019, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, ed

    Paszke, A., Gross, S., Massa, F., et al. 2019, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, ed. H. Wallach, H. Larochelle, A. Beygelzimer, F. d'Alch´ e-Buc, E. Fox, & R. Garnett, Vol. 32 (Curran Associates, Inc.). https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper files/paper/2019/ file/bdbca288fee7f92f2bfa9f7012727740-Paper.pdf

    2019

  66. [66]

    Pearce, C. J. J., van Weeren, R. J., Andrade-Santos, F., et al. 2017, ApJ, 845, 81, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7e2f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa7e2f 2017

  67. [67]

    J., et al

    Rajpurohit, K., Vazza, F., van Weeren, R. J., et al. 2021, A&A, 654, A41, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141060

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141060 2021

  68. [68]

    H., Basu, K., Ettori, S., et al

    Reiprich, T. H., Basu, K., Ettori, S., et al. 2013, SSRv, 177, 195, doi: 10.1007/s11214-013-9983-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-013-9983-8 2013

  69. [69]

    2021, MNRAS, 502, 714, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3792

    Rost, A., Kuchner, U., Welker, C., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 502, 714, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3792

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3792 2021

  70. [70]

    P., Jee, M

    Scofield, Z. P., Jee, M. J., Cha, S., & Park, H. 2025, ApJ, 993, 226, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae07da

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae07da 2025

  71. [71]

    P., Finner, K., Joo, H., et al

    Scofield, Z. P., Finner, K., Joo, H., et al. 2026, ApJL, 999, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae447a

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae447a 2026

  72. [72]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.26318, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.26318

    Shinde, R., & Dell’Antonio, I. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.26318, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.26318

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.26318 2025

  73. [73]

    and White, Simon D

    Springel, V., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. 2006, Nature, 440, 1137, doi: 10.1038/nature04805

    work page doi:10.1038/nature04805 2006

  74. [74]

    2008, ApJ, 684, 177, doi: 10.1086/589683

    Umetsu, K., & Broadhurst, T. 2008, ApJ, 684, 177, doi: 10.1086/589683

    work page doi:10.1086/589683 2008

  75. [75]

    2013, A&A, 551, A24, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219872

    Venturi, T., Giacintucci, S., Dallacasa, D., et al. 2013, A&A, 551, A24, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219872

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219872 2013

  76. [76]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 2020

  77. [77]

    2019, SSRv, 215, 7, doi: 10.1007/s11214-018-0572-8

    Walker, S., Simionescu, A., Nagai, D., et al. 2019, SSRv, 215, 7, doi: 10.1007/s11214-018-0572-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-018-0572-8 2019

  78. [78]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.27291, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.27291

    Wang, Q., Li, M., Gao, L., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.27291, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.27291

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.27291 2025

  79. [79]

    , keywords =

    Weaver, J. R., Kauffmann, O. B., Ilbert, O., et al. 2022, ApJS, 258, 11, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac3078

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac3078 2022

  80. [80]

    S., et al

    Werner, N., Finoguenov, A., Kaastra, J. S., et al. 2008, A&A, 482, L29, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809599

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809599 2008

Showing first 80 references.