arxiv: 2604.07958 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-09 · 💻 cs.CV

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

ImVideoEdit: Image-learning Video Editing via 2D Spatial Difference Attention Blocks

Changhao Pan, Fan Zhuo, Jiayang Xu, Majun Zhang, Siyu Chen, Tao Jin, Xiaoda Yang, Zehan Wang, Zhou Zhao

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV

keywords video editingimage pair trainingspatial difference attentiontemporal consistencytext-guided gatingefficient trainingfrozen 3D attentiondecoupled spatiotemporal

0 comments

The pith

Video editing can be learned from image pairs by freezing temporal modules and focusing spatial edits with difference attention.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that video editing tasks separate into temporal dynamics that can stay fixed and spatial changes that can be learned from still images. By freezing the 3D attention blocks of a pretrained model and treating each image as a single-frame video, the approach avoids the need for paired video data. A Predict-Update Spatial Difference Attention module extracts and applies differences between source and target frames, while text-guided gating handles edits without masks. Training occurs on only 13K image pairs for five epochs at low cost yet produces editing fidelity and frame-to-frame consistency comparable to models trained on far larger video collections.

Core claim

The central claim is that video editing can be formulated as a decoupled spatiotemporal process: temporal dynamics are preserved by freezing pretrained 3D attention modules while spatial content is selectively modified through 2D spatial difference attention blocks trained exclusively on image pairs, together with text-guided dynamic semantic gating for adaptive control, yielding results that match larger video-trained models despite minimal data and compute.

What carries the argument

The Predict-Update Spatial Difference Attention module, which progressively extracts spatial differences between input and target frames and injects them into the frozen temporal backbone, augmented by text-guided dynamic semantic gating that enables implicit, mask-free modifications.

If this is right

Video editing becomes feasible with existing image datasets instead of costly paired video collections.
Training time and compute drop sharply while preserving editing quality and frame coherence.
Text instructions can drive edits adaptively without manual masks or external segmentation.
Pretrained video generators can be extended to new editing tasks by adding only the spatial difference blocks.
The same frozen-temporal approach may generalize to other tasks that require precise spatial control over time.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The method could reduce barriers for custom video tools in domains like film post-production or social media content creation.
Extending the single-frame training assumption to multi-frame image sequences might improve handling of subtle motions without full video data.
Integration with newer image-editing backbones could further lower data requirements for specialized video effects.
Limits may appear in videos where spatial and temporal changes are tightly coupled, such as fluid dynamics or complex interactions.

Load-bearing premise

Freezing the pretrained 3D attention modules while training only on single-frame image pairs will keep the original temporal dynamics intact and prevent new inconsistencies during spatial edits.

What would settle it

Apply the trained model to videos containing rapid non-rigid motion or long sequences and measure drop in temporal consistency scores relative to a video-trained baseline; a large drop would falsify the decoupling premise.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07958 by Changhao Pan, Fan Zhuo, Jiayang Xu, Majun Zhang, Siyu Chen, Tao Jin, Xiaoda Yang, Zehan Wang, Zhou Zhao.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Illustration of four of ImVideoEdit’s basic editing task. Zoom in for best viewing. be a highly effective surrogate to facilitate the training of video editing models. Building upon this insight, we further propose ImVideoEdit, an innovative method learning video editing from images via 2D spatial difference attention blocks. In order to generate a high-quality dataset, we design a three-stage pipeline: … view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Overview of ImVideoEdit. Left: The overall pipeline processes latents from single image through a frozen 3D DiT, featuring a Predict-Update module parallel to each attention block. Right: Detailed design of the Predict & Update Module. The frozen 3D selfattention safeguards spatiotemporal priors, while the parallel 2D branch extracts spatial features from the reference latent. The Predict Module generates… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Overview of the dataset construction pipeline. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Dataset statistics. 4. Methodology The overall architecture of ImVideoEdit is illustrated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Qualitative Results of ImVideoEdit and baselines [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Qualitative Ablation Results. ual stream into a single-pass 2D attention extraction. Naive Parallel 2D: To validate the necessity of our progressive Predict-Update design, we construct a degraded baseline using a naive parallel 2D topology. In this configuration, spatial features are extracted simultaneously by two independent attention blocks and subsequently subtracted, which is used in ViFedit[43]. A… view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: visualizations of datasets (Part 1). 18 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: visualizations of datasets (Part 2). 19 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Additional qualitative result (Part 1). 20 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Additional qualitative result (Part 2). 21 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Current video editing models often rely on expensive paired video data, which limits their practical scalability. In essence, most video editing tasks can be formulated as a decoupled spatiotemporal process, where the temporal dynamics of the pretrained model are preserved while spatial content is selectively and precisely modified. Based on this insight, we propose ImVideoEdit, an efficient framework that learns video editing capabilities entirely from image pairs. By freezing the pre-trained 3D attention modules and treating images as single-frame videos, we decouple the 2D spatial learning process to help preserve the original temporal dynamics. The core of our approach is a Predict-Update Spatial Difference Attention module that progressively extracts and injects spatial differences. Rather than relying on rigid external masks, we incorporate a Text-Guided Dynamic Semantic Gating mechanism for adaptive and implicit text-driven modifications. Despite training on only 13K image pairs for 5 epochs with exceptionally low computational overhead, ImVideoEdit achieves editing fidelity and temporal consistency comparable to larger models trained on extensive video datasets.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

ImVideoEdit trains spatial video edits from image pairs by freezing 3D attention, but the abstract gives no metrics so the comparable performance claim stays unverified.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this paper trains a video editor using only 13K image pairs by freezing pretrained 3D attention modules and adding 2D blocks for spatial changes. It treats images as single-frame videos to keep temporal behavior intact while learning edits, which is a direct way to sidestep the cost of paired video data. The new Predict-Update Spatial Difference Attention and Text-Guided Dynamic Semantic Gating are the concrete additions that handle progressive difference injection and text-driven masking without rigid external inputs. That decoupling is the part that actually moves the needle on efficiency, and training for just five epochs with low overhead is a clear practical win if the results hold. The approach builds sensibly on existing attention-based editing work without overclaiming a full paradigm change. The soft spots sit mostly in the missing evidence. The abstract asserts editing fidelity and temporal consistency on par with larger video-trained models, yet it shows no numbers, baselines, or ablations. Without those, it is impossible to judge whether the frozen 3D modules really preserve dynamics once the new 2D blocks start altering content. The stress-test point lands: because the spatial modules see only static pairs, there is no training signal for how edits should behave across frames with motion or changing semantics. If the full paper has quantitative tables and motion-specific tests, that would address it; otherwise the central claim rests on an assumption that needs checking. This is for people building practical editing tools who care about lowering data and compute costs rather than pushing theoretical frontiers. A reader working on attention variants or low-resource video models would find the architecture details useful. It deserves a serious referee because the efficiency angle is straightforward and worth verifying with the experiments, even if the current write-up leaves the performance claims open. Send it for review to get the full results and any failure cases on dynamic sequences.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes ImVideoEdit, an efficient video editing framework that learns editing capabilities exclusively from static image pairs. By freezing pretrained 3D attention modules and treating images as single-frame videos, the approach decouples spatial editing from temporal dynamics. The core contributions are a Predict-Update Spatial Difference Attention module for progressive spatial difference injection and a Text-Guided Dynamic Semantic Gating mechanism for adaptive text-driven edits. The central claim is that training on only 13K image pairs for 5 epochs yields editing fidelity and temporal consistency comparable to larger models trained on extensive video datasets, at exceptionally low computational cost.

Significance. If the empirical claims hold, the work would be significant for demonstrating that video editing can be effectively learned from image data alone, substantially reducing the need for costly paired video datasets and lowering computational barriers. The decoupling strategy via frozen 3D modules and the low-overhead training regime represent a practical efficiency advance in computer vision, with potential to influence data-efficient approaches in generative video tasks.

major comments (2)

[Method section (Predict-Update Spatial Difference Attention and training procedure)] The central claim of preserved temporal consistency rests on the assumption that frozen pretrained 3D attention modules will continue to enforce original dynamics after spatial edits are injected by the new 2D modules. However, the training procedure uses only T=1 image pairs with no motion examples, no temporal conditioning on the 2D blocks, and no consistency regularizer, providing no gradient signal for how edits behave under inter-frame motion or changing semantics. This directly undermines the temporal consistency claim and requires explicit validation on multi-frame video inputs with motion.
[Abstract and Experiments section] The abstract asserts 'comparable' editing fidelity and temporal consistency to larger video-trained models, yet the provided text contains no quantitative metrics, baselines, ablation studies, or error analysis (e.g., no PSNR/SSIM, CLIP scores, or user studies on standard benchmarks). Without these in the experiments, the performance claim cannot be evaluated and is load-bearing for the efficiency narrative.

minor comments (2)

[Title and §3] The title refers to '2D Spatial Difference Attention Blocks' while the text introduces 'Predict-Update Spatial Difference Attention module'; clarify the exact relationship and whether the blocks are the same component.
[Method section] Notation for the gating mechanism and difference attention could be formalized with equations to improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful and detailed comments, which help us improve the clarity and rigor of our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, providing our honest assessment and indicating planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Method section (Predict-Update Spatial Difference Attention and training procedure)] The central claim of preserved temporal consistency rests on the assumption that frozen pretrained 3D attention modules will continue to enforce original dynamics after spatial edits are injected by the new 2D modules. However, the training procedure uses only T=1 image pairs with no motion examples, no temporal conditioning on the 2D blocks, and no consistency regularizer, providing no gradient signal for how edits behave under inter-frame motion or changing semantics. This directly undermines the temporal consistency claim and requires explicit validation on multi-frame video inputs with motion.

Authors: We thank the referee for this insightful observation on our validation approach. The design of ImVideoEdit explicitly decouples spatial editing from temporal modeling by freezing the pretrained 3D attention modules (which were trained on large-scale video data to capture dynamics) and applying the new 2D Predict-Update Spatial Difference Attention blocks only to spatial differences extracted from image pairs treated as single-frame videos. This ensures that no temporal parameters are updated, so the original dynamics remain enforced during inference on multi-frame inputs. The Text-Guided Dynamic Semantic Gating further operates adaptively on semantics without temporal conditioning. While this architectural choice provides the theoretical basis for consistency without motion-specific training signals, we agree that direct empirical validation on videos with motion would strengthen the claim. We will add such experiments, including qualitative results on multi-frame sequences with motion, to the revised manuscript. revision: partial
Referee: [Abstract and Experiments section] The abstract asserts 'comparable' editing fidelity and temporal consistency to larger video-trained models, yet the provided text contains no quantitative metrics, baselines, ablation studies, or error analysis (e.g., no PSNR/SSIM, CLIP scores, or user studies on standard benchmarks). Without these in the experiments, the performance claim cannot be evaluated and is load-bearing for the efficiency narrative.

Authors: We agree that quantitative metrics are essential to substantiate the efficiency and performance claims. The manuscript does include comparative evaluations and ablations demonstrating the benefits of the proposed modules, but to ensure the abstract's assertions are fully supported and easily verifiable, we will expand the Experiments section in the revision. This will incorporate explicit quantitative results (e.g., PSNR, SSIM, CLIP similarity), direct baselines against video-trained models, ablation studies isolating each component, error analysis, and user study outcomes on standard benchmarks. These additions will be presented clearly to allow rigorous evaluation of the fidelity and consistency claims. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is architectural and empirical.

full rationale

The paper's core claim rests on an architectural insight (decoupling spatiotemporal processes by freezing pretrained 3D attention modules and training 2D spatial edits on static image pairs) followed by empirical validation. No equations, derivations, or predictions are shown that reduce to self-referential definitions, fitted inputs renamed as outputs, or load-bearing self-citations. The Predict-Update Spatial Difference Attention and Text-Guided Dynamic Semantic Gating modules are presented as novel components trained directly on the 13K image pairs, with no mathematical reduction to prior results by construction. The approach is self-contained against external benchmarks via reported comparisons, yielding a normal non-finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that temporal dynamics can be fully preserved by freezing 3D modules and that spatial differences extracted from image pairs generalize to video sequences. No free parameters are explicitly named in the abstract, but the gating mechanism and difference attention blocks are new invented components without independent evidence of their necessity beyond the reported training run.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Freezing pretrained 3D attention modules preserves temporal dynamics when images are treated as single-frame videos
Invoked in the description of the framework to justify decoupling spatial learning

invented entities (2)

Predict-Update Spatial Difference Attention module no independent evidence
purpose: Progressively extracts and injects spatial differences for editing
New module introduced as the core of the approach
Text-Guided Dynamic Semantic Gating mechanism no independent evidence
purpose: Adaptive text-driven modifications without external masks
New mechanism for implicit editing control

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5501 in / 1376 out tokens · 40231 ms · 2026-05-10T17:46:27.989163+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
By freezing the pre-trained 3D attention modules and treating images as single-frame videos, we decouple the 2D spatial learning process to help preserve the original temporal dynamics. The core of our approach is a Predict-Update Spatial Difference Attention module...
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArithmeticFromLogic.lean LogicNat embedding and J-cost positivity unclear
we introduce an innovative Predict-Update Spatial Difference Attention Module... Hpred = H3D + ZeroLin1(H(1)2D); Hres = Hpred - H(1)2D; Hupdate = Hpred + G ⊙ ZeroLin2(Hdiff)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · 11 internal anchors

[1]

Cosmos World Foundation Model Platform for Physical AI

Niket Agarwal, Arslan Ali, Maciej Bala, Yogesh Balaji, Erik Barker, Tiffany Cai, Prithvijit Chattopadhyay, Yongxin Chen, Yin Cui, Yifan Ding, et al. Cosmos world foun- dation model platform for physical ai.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.03575, 2025. 3

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[3]

Scaling instruction-based video editing with a high-quality synthetic dataset.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.15742, 2025

Qingyan Bai, Qiuyu Wang, Hao Ouyang, Yue Yu, Hanlin Wang, Wen Wang, Ka Leong Cheng, Shuailei Ma, Yanhong Zeng, Zichen Liu, et al. Scaling instruction-based video editing with a high-quality synthetic dataset.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.15742, 2025. 3

work page arXiv 2025
[4]

Gemini 3.0 pro, 2025

Google DeepMind. Gemini 3.0 pro, 2025. 4

2025
[5]

Veo 3 technical report

Google DeepMind. Veo 3 technical report. Technical report, Google DeepMind, 2025. 1

2025
[6]

Stochastic video generation with a learned prior

Emily Denton and Rob Fergus. Stochastic video generation with a learned prior. InInternational conference on machine learning, pages 1174–1183. PMLR, 2018. 3

2018
[7]

Seedance 1.0: Exploring the Boundaries of Video Generation Models

Yu Gao, Haoyuan Guo, Tuyen Hoang, Weilin Huang, Lu Jiang, Fangyuan Kong, Huixia Li, Jiashi Li, Liang Li, Xi- aojie Li, et al. Seedance 1.0: Exploring the boundaries of video generation models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.09113,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[8]

AnimateDiff: Animate Your Personalized Text-to-Image Diffusion Models without Specific Tuning

Yuwei Guo, Ceyuan Yang, Anyi Rao, Zhengyang Liang, Yaohui Wang, Yu Qiao, Maneesh Agrawala, Dahua Lin, and Bo Dai. Animatediff: Animate your personalized text- to-image diffusion models without specific tuning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04725, 2023. 3

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023
[9]

Openve-3m: A large-scale high-quality dataset for instruction-guided video editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.07826, 2025

Haoyang He, Jie Wang, Jiangning Zhang, Zhucun Xue, Xingyuan Bu, Qiangpeng Yang, Shilei Wen, and Lei Xie. Openve-3m: A large-scale high-quality dataset for instruction-guided video editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.07826, 2025. 3

work page arXiv 2025
[10]

Prompt-to-Prompt Image Editing with Cross Attention Control

Amir Hertz, Ron Mokady, Jay Tenenbaum, Kfir Aberman, Yael Pritch, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Prompt-to-prompt im- age editing with cross attention control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.01626, 2022. 3

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022
[11]

Video dif- fusion models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:8633–8646, 2022

Jonathan Ho, Tim Salimans, Alexey Gritsenko, William Chan, Mohammad Norouzi, and David J Fleet. Video dif- fusion models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:8633–8646, 2022. 3

2022
[12]

VBench: Com- prehensive benchmark suite for video generative models

Ziqi Huang, Yinan He, Jiashuo Yu, Fan Zhang, Chenyang Si, Yuming Jiang, Yuanhan Zhang, Tianxing Wu, Qingyang Jin, Nattapol Chanpaisit, Yaohui Wang, Xinyuan Chen, Limin Wang, Dahua Lin, Yu Qiao, and Ziwei Liu. VBench: Com- prehensive benchmark suite for video generative models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vi- sion and Pattern Reco...

2024
[13]

Vace: All-in-one video creation and editing

Zeyinzi Jiang, Zhen Han, Chaojie Mao, Jingfeng Zhang, Yulin Pan, and Yu Liu. Vace: All-in-one video creation and editing. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Con- ference on Computer Vision, pages 17191–17202, 2025. 3, 6

2025
[14]

HunyuanVideo: A Systematic Framework For Large Video Generative Models

Weijie Kong, Qi Tian, Zijian Zhang, Rox Min, Zuozhuo Dai, Jin Zhou, Jiangfeng Xiong, Xin Li, Bo Wu, Jianwei Zhang, et al. Hunyuanvideo: A systematic framework for large video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03603, 2024. 3

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[15]

Gligen: Open-set grounded text-to-image generation

Yuheng Li, Haotian Liu, Qingyang Wu, Fangzhou Mu, Jian- wei Yang, Jianfeng Gao, Chunyuan Li, and Yong Jae Lee. Gligen: Open-set grounded text-to-image generation. InPro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 22511–22521, 2023. 3

2023
[16]

In- context learning with unpaired clips for instruction-based video editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.14648, 2025

Xinyao Liao, Xianfang Zeng, Ziye Song, Zhoujie Fu, Gang Yu, and Guosheng Lin. In-context learning with unpaired clips for instruction-based video editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.14648, 2025. 6

work page arXiv 2025
[17]

Kiwi-edit: Versatile video edit- ing via instruction and reference guidance, 2026

Yiqi Lin, Guoqiang Liang, Ziyun Zeng, Zechen Bai, Yanzhe Chen, and Mike Zheng Shou. Kiwi-edit: Versatile video edit- ing via instruction and reference guidance, 2026. 6

2026
[18]

Kiwi-edit: Versatile video editing via instruction and reference guidance.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.02175, 2026

Yiqi Lin, Guoqiang Liang, Ziyun Zeng, Zechen Bai, Yanzhe Chen, and Mike Zheng Shou. Kiwi-edit: Versatile video edit- ing via instruction and reference guidance.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.02175, 2026. 3

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2026
[19]

Flow Matching for Generative Modeling

Yaron Lipman, Ricky TQ Chen, Heli Ben-Hamu, Maximil- ian Nickel, and Matt Le. Flow matching for generative mod- eling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02747, 2022. 5 10

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022
[20]

Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow

Xingchao Liu, Chengyue Gong, and Qiang Liu. Flow straight and fast: Learning to generate and transfer data with rectified flow.arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.03003, 2022. 5

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022
[21]

T2i-adapter: Learning adapters to dig out more controllable ability for text-to-image diffusion models

Chong Mou, Xintao Wang, Liangbin Xie, Yanze Wu, Jian Zhang, Zhongang Qi, and Ying Shan. T2i-adapter: Learning adapters to dig out more controllable ability for text-to-image diffusion models. InProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, pages 4296–4304, 2024. 3

2024
[22]

Universal few-shot spatial con- trol for diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.07530,

Kiet T Nguyen, Chanhyuk Lee, Donggyun Kim, Dong Hoon Lee, and Seunghoon Hong. Universal few-shot spatial con- trol for diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.07530,

work page arXiv
[23]

Gpt 5.3, 2025

OpenAI. Gpt 5.3, 2025. 4

2025
[24]

Scalable diffusion models with transformers

William Peebles and Saining Xie. Scalable diffusion models with transformers. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF inter- national conference on computer vision, pages 4195–4205,
[25]

Fatezero: Fus- ing attentions for zero-shot text-based video editing

Chenyang Qi, Xiaodong Cun, Yong Zhang, Chenyang Lei, Xintao Wang, Ying Shan, and Qifeng Chen. Fatezero: Fus- ing attentions for zero-shot text-based video editing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 15932–15942, 2023. 3

2023
[26]

SpotEdit: Selective region editing in diffusion transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.22323, 2025

Zhibin Qin, Zhenxiong Tan, Zeqing Wang, Songhua Liu, and Xinchao Wang. Spotedit: Selective region editing in diffu- sion transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.22323, 2025. 3

work page arXiv 2025
[27]

Seedance 1.5 pro: A native audio-visual joint generation foundation model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.13507, 2025

Team Seedance, Heyi Chen, Siyan Chen, Xin Chen, Yan- fei Chen, Ying Chen, Zhuo Chen, Feng Cheng, Tianheng Cheng, Xinqi Cheng, et al. Seedance 1.5 pro: A native audio- visual joint generation foundation model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.13507, 2025. 1, 6

work page arXiv 2025
[28]

Sg-adapter: En- hancing text-to-image generation with scene graph guidance

Guibao Shen, Luozhou Wang, Jiantao Lin, Wenhang Ge, Chaozhe Zhang, Xin Tao, Yuan Zhang, Pengfei Wan, Zhongyuan Wang, Guangyong Chen, et al. Sg-adapter: En- hancing text-to-image generation with scene graph guidance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.15321, 2024. 3

work page arXiv 2024
[29]

Make-A-Video: Text-to-Video Generation without Text-Video Data

Uriel Singer, Adam Polyak, Thomas Hayes, Xi Yin, Jie An, Songyang Zhang, Qiyuan Hu, Harry Yang, Oron Ashual, Oran Gafni, et al. Make-a-video: Text-to-video generation without text-video data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14792,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[30]

Ominicontrol: Minimal and univer- sal control for diffusion transformer

Zhenxiong Tan, Songhua Liu, Xingyi Yang, Qiaochu Xue, and Xinchao Wang. Ominicontrol: Minimal and univer- sal control for diffusion transformer. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 14940–14950, 2025. 3

2025
[31]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.06119 , year=

Zhiyu Tan, Hao Yang, Luozheng Qin, Jia Gong, Meng- ping Yang, and Hao Li. Omni-video: Democratizing uni- fied video understanding and generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.06119, 2025. 3, 6

work page arXiv 2025
[32]

Any-to-any generation via composable diffu- sion.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:16083–16099, 2023

Zineng Tang, Ziyi Yang, Chenguang Zhu, Michael Zeng, and Mohit Bansal. Any-to-any generation via composable diffu- sion.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:16083–16099, 2023. 3

2023
[33]

Lucy edit: Open-weight text-guided video editing, 2025

DecartAI Team. Lucy edit: Open-weight text-guided video editing, 2025. 6

2025
[34]

Kling-omni technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.16776, 2025

Kling Team, Jialu Chen, Yuanzheng Ci, Xiangyu Du, Zipeng Feng, Kun Gai, Sainan Guo, Feng Han, Jingbin He, Kang He, et al. Kling-omni technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.16776, 2025. 3

work page arXiv 2025
[35]

Generating videos with scene dynamics.Advances in neu- ral information processing systems, 29, 2016

Carl V ondrick, Hamed Pirsiavash, and Antonio Torralba. Generating videos with scene dynamics.Advances in neu- ral information processing systems, 29, 2016. 3

2016
[36]

Wan: Open and Advanced Large-Scale Video Generative Models

Team Wan, Ang Wang, Baole Ai, Bin Wen, Chaojie Mao, Chen-Wei Xie, Di Chen, Feiwu Yu, Haiming Zhao, Jianx- iao Yang, et al. Wan: Open and advanced large-scale video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20314, 2025. 3

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[37]

Univideo: Unified understanding, generation, and editing for videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.08377, 2025a

Cong Wei, Quande Liu, Zixuan Ye, Qiulin Wang, Xintao Wang, Pengfei Wan, Kun Gai, and Wenhu Chen. Univideo: Unified understanding, generation, and editing for videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.08377, 2025. 3

work page arXiv 2025
[38]

Qwen-image technical report,

Chenfei Wu, Jiahao Li, Jingren Zhou, Junyang Lin, Kaiyuan Gao, Kun Yan, Sheng ming Yin, Shuai Bai, Xiao Xu, Yilei Chen, Yuxiang Chen, Zecheng Tang, Zekai Zhang, Zhengyi Wang, An Yang, Bowen Yu, Chen Cheng, Dayiheng Liu, De- qing Li, Hang Zhang, Hao Meng, Hu Wei, Jingyuan Ni, Kai Chen, Kuan Cao, Liang Peng, Lin Qu, Minggang Wu, Peng Wang, Shuting Yu, Tingk...
[39]

Fastcomposer: Tuning-free multi- subject image generation with localized attention.Interna- tional Journal of Computer Vision, 133(3):1175–1194, 2025

Guangxuan Xiao, Tianwei Yin, William T Freeman, Fr ´edo Durand, and Song Han. Fastcomposer: Tuning-free multi- subject image generation with localized attention.Interna- tional Journal of Computer Vision, 133(3):1175–1194, 2025. 3

2025
[40]

Omni-video 2: Scaling mllm-conditioned diffusion for unified video generation and editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.08820, 2026

Hao Yang, Zhiyu Tan, Jia Gong, Luozheng Qin, Hesen Chen, Xiaomeng Yang, Yuqing Sun, Yuetan Lin, Mengping Yang, and Hao Li. Omni-video 2: Scaling mllm-conditioned diffu- sion for unified video generation and editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.08820, 2026. 6

work page arXiv 2026
[41]

Confctrl: Enabling precise camera control in video dif- fusion via confidence-aware interpolation, 2026

Liudi Yang, George Eskandar, Fengyi Shen, Mohammad Al- tillawi, Yang Bai, Chi Zhang, Ziyuan Liu, and Abhinav Val- ada. Confctrl: Enabling precise camera control in video dif- fusion via confidence-aware interpolation, 2026. 2

2026
[42]

Con- sistedit: Highly consistent and precise training-free visual editing

Zixin Yin, Ling-Hao Chen, Lionel Ni, and Xili Dai. Con- sistedit: Highly consistent and precise training-free visual editing. InProceedings of the SIGGRAPH Asia 2025 Con- ference Papers, pages 1–11, 2025. 3

2025
[43]

Vifeedit: A video-free tuner of your video diffusion transformer, 2026

Ruonan Yu, Zhenxiong Tan, Zigeng Chen, Songhua Liu, and Xinchao Wang. Vifeedit: A video-free tuner of your video diffusion transformer, 2026. 1, 9

2026
[44]

Veg- gie: Instructional editing and reasoning video concepts with grounded generation

Shoubin Yu, Difan Liu, Ziqiao Ma, Yicong Hong, Yang Zhou, Hao Tan, Joyce Chai, and Mohit Bansal. Veg- gie: Instructional editing and reasoning video concepts with grounded generation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF In- ternational Conference on Computer Vision, pages 15147– 15158, 2025. 3

2025
[45]

Group relative attention guidance for image editing

Xuanpu Zhang, Xuesong Niu, Ruidong Chen, Dan Song, Jianhao Zeng, Penghui Du, Haoxiang Cao, Kai Wu, and An- an Liu. Group relative attention guidance for image editing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.24657, 2025. 3

work page arXiv 2025
[46]

VBench-2.0: Advancing Video Generation Benchmark Suite for Intrinsic Faithfulness

Dian Zheng, Ziqi Huang, Hongbo Liu, Kai Zou, Yinan He, Fan Zhang, Yuanhan Zhang, Jingwen He, Wei-Shi Zheng, Yu 11 Qiao, and Ziwei Liu. VBench-2.0: Advancing video genera- tion benchmark suite for intrinsic faithfulness.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.21755, 2025. 7 12 A. Robustness of VLM-Assisted Dataset Con- struction The cross-validation results of the evalu...

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[47]

Instruction Adherence (Max: 30 points): •Did the editing strictly follow the given instruction? •Are the requested changes accurately reflected without altering unintended elements?
[48]

You must zoom in on high-frequency details

Temporal Consistency & Micro-Stability (Max: 30 points) -STRICT DEDUCTION RULES: •VLM Warning: Do not just look at the overall subject. You must zoom in on high-frequency details. •Scoring Anchor: - 28-30 pts: Perfect stability, identical to the physics of a real camera. - 20-27 pts: Overall stable, but minor ”AI boiling” (micro-flickering of pixels) on e...
[49]

Evaluate the AI rendering quality

Texture Sharpness & Anti-Smoothing (Max: 25 points) -CALIBRATED FOR AI: •Do not compare this to an 8K cinema camera. Evaluate the AI rendering quality. We are looking for SHARPNESS vs. PLASTICITY . •Focus on the materials: the velvet texture of the blue dress, the individual threads of the embroidery, and the natural pores/lighting on the skin. •Scoring A...
[50]

# Output Format Provide your response strictly in the following JSON format

Artifact Absence (Max: 15 points): •Are there any visible AI generation artifacts (e.g., floating pixels, anatomical distortions, weird edge blending)? •The edited areas should blend seamlessly with the original unedited parts. # Output Format Provide your response strictly in the following JSON format. Do not include a total score, only the sub-scores fo...