arxiv: 2604.08688 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Recognition: unknown

Probing Higgs and Top Interactions through the Muon Lens at multi-TeV Muon Colliders

Tisa Biswas , Anindya Datta , Barbara Mele

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex

keywords muon colliderSMEFTHiggs bosontop quarkdimension-6 operatorsnew physicselectroweak interactions

0 comments

The pith

A 10 TeV muon collider strengthens limits on muon-Higgs-gauge and muon-top interactions by up to an order of magnitude.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how a future 10 TeV muon collider can use processes involving Higgs and top quarks to set tighter limits on new physics effects that modify muon interactions with the Higgs and top sectors. It focuses on dimension-six operators in the effective field theory that are hard to constrain at the LHC, where the analysis shows significant improvements over existing bounds through energy-enhanced effects. This matters because such operators could reveal the scale of new physics beyond the Standard Model, and better limits help guide where to look for it. The study includes simulations of angular distributions and differential spectra to extract these bounds from specific production channels.

Core claim

Through detailed Monte Carlo simulations of μ⁺μ⁻ → Zh, μ⁺μ⁻ → μ⁺μ⁻h, μ⁺μ⁻ → tt̄, and μ⁺μ⁻ → tt̄h at 10 TeV, the analysis derives projected bounds on Wilson coefficients of two-fermion and four-fermion operators that induce vector, axial-vector, dipole, scalar, and tensor interactions. These bounds improve existing limits on muon-Higgs-gauge and muon-top interactions by up to an order of magnitude and exceed even FCC-ee sensitivities, with interpretations in UV models like vector-like leptons and scalar leptoquarks.

What carries the argument

Dimension-6 SMEFT operators generating modified electroweak vector and axial-vector couplings, as well as dipole, scalar, and tensor terms involving muons, whose effects are enhanced at multi-TeV collision energies and extracted via differential cross sections and angular distributions.

If this is right

Tighter constraints on operators affecting Higgs production with muons.
Improved sensitivity to top quark interactions modified by muon couplings.
Ability to probe new physics scales beyond LHC reach through energy growth of the operators.
Better limits than projected for electron-positron colliders like FCC-ee in these specific channels.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Muon colliders may complement electron-positron machines by offering superior reach for lepton-specific effective operators at high energies.
The energy scaling of the effects suggests that designs with higher center-of-mass energies could extend the probed new physics scale even further.
Interpreting the bounds in UV-complete models indicates exclusion potential for certain parameter spaces of vector-like leptons or scalar leptoquarks.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes that the chosen dimension-6 operators dominate any new physics and that the Monte Carlo simulations accurately capture signal efficiencies, backgrounds, and systematic uncertainties at multi-TeV energies without unmodeled effects.

What would settle it

A measurement at a 10 TeV muon collider that finds no significant deviations from Standard Model predictions in the differential distributions of the studied processes, or deviations that cannot be accommodated within the projected SMEFT bounds, would challenge the claimed sensitivity improvement.

read the original abstract

We investigate the sensitivity of a future 10 TeV muon collider to dimension-6 operators in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT), focusing on Higgs and top quark production processes. The analysis includes two-fermion and four-fermion operators that induce electroweak vector and axial-vector interactions, as well as dipole, scalar, and tensor interactions involving muons. Many of these operators are only weakly constrained or difficult to probe at the LHC due to limited sensitivity and large SM backgrounds. We study the processes $\mu^+\mu^- \to Zh$, $\mu^+\mu^- \to \mu^+\mu^-h$, $\mu^+\mu^- \to t\bar t$, and $\mu^+\mu^- \to t\bar t h$, exploiting the energy-enhanced SMEFT effects at multi-TeV scales accessible to a muon collider. Using detailed simulations that incorporate differential information and angular distributions, we derive projected bounds on the relevant Wilson coefficients. We find that a 10 TeV muon collider can strengthen existing limits on muon-Higgs-gauge and muon-top interactions by up to an order of magnitude, surpassing even FCC-ee projections. Finally, we interpret these bounds in the context of representative UV scenarios, including models with vector-like lepton and scalar leptoquarks, highlighting the potential of a muon collider to probe new physics at scales well beyond the LHC reach.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The 10 TeV muon collider projections tighten some SMEFT bounds but rest on simulation details that still need explicit checks for EW corrections and beam effects.

read the letter

A 10 TeV muon collider could improve limits on muon-Higgs-gauge and muon-top SMEFT operators by up to an order of magnitude over current constraints, and in some cases beat FCC-ee projections. That is the main claim here, drawn from four processes: μ+μ− → Zh, μ+μ− → μ+μ−h, μ+μ− → tt̄, and μ+μ− → tt̄h. The paper uses energy-enhanced interference and quadratic terms in dimension-6 operators, then extracts bounds from simulated differential distributions and angular observables rather than rates alone. This is a direct extension of existing SMEFT work to the muon collider environment, and the choice of processes plus the UV model interpretations (vector-like leptons, scalar leptoquarks) is sensible. The angular information adds some extra handle that pure rate analyses miss. The simulations are described as detailed, which is better than many projection papers that stop at parton level. The soft spot is exactly where the stress test flags it. At 10 TeV, electroweak Sudakov logarithms reach 20-40% for processes with W, Z, or Higgs, and muon beam backgrounds from decays and synchrotron radiation are non-negligible. The abstract only says “detailed simulations” without confirming NLO EW resummation or dedicated beam-overlay modeling. If those pieces are missing or optimistic, the quoted gains shrink. The paper does not appear to contain a dedicated section walking through those corrections, so the central sensitivity numbers carry that uncertainty. Collider phenomenologists and people comparing future facility options will find the numbers useful for quick reference. A reader already running global SMEFT fits or muon collider studies gets the most value. The work is coherent on its own terms and shows honest engagement with the operator basis and process selection. It deserves a serious referee so the simulation pipeline can be examined in detail. I would send it to peer review with a request for explicit validation of the high-energy EW and beam modeling.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the sensitivity of a 10 TeV muon collider to dimension-6 SMEFT operators involving Higgs and top interactions with muons. It analyzes the processes μ⁺μ⁻ → Zh, μ⁺μ⁻ → μ⁺μ⁻h, μ⁺μ⁻ → t t-bar, and μ⁺μ⁻ → t t-bar h using detailed Monte Carlo simulations that incorporate differential and angular information to derive projected 95% CL bounds on the relevant Wilson coefficients. The authors claim that these bounds strengthen existing limits by up to an order of magnitude and surpass FCC-ee projections, with interpretations in UV scenarios such as vector-like leptons and scalar leptoquarks.

Significance. If the projected sensitivities are robust, the work underscores the distinctive reach of multi-TeV muon colliders for probing new physics in the muon-Higgs-gauge and muon-top sectors through energy-enhanced SMEFT contributions that are suppressed at lower-energy machines. The use of differential distributions and the mapping to concrete UV models are positive elements that add phenomenological value.

major comments (1)

The central claim of up to an order-of-magnitude improvement in bounds on the muon-Higgs-gauge and muon-top operators rests on the fidelity of the Monte Carlo simulations for signal efficiencies, backgrounds, and systematic uncertainties. The manuscript states only that “detailed simulations” were performed but provides no explicit verification that electroweak Sudakov logarithms (which grow as α_W log²(s/M_W²) and can reach O(20–40%) at √s = 10 TeV) are resummed or included at NLO in both signal and background samples, nor that muon-beam-induced backgrounds from decays and synchrotron radiation are modeled with dedicated overlay simulations. Without these controls, the acceptance and shape of the differential distributions used for the fits may be mis-modeled, directly affecting the quoted sensitivity gain. This issue is load-bearing for the abstract’s strongest claim.

minor comments (1)

The abstract lists the processes but does not name the specific Wilson coefficients (e.g., c_{φl}^{(3)}, c_{tφ}, etc.) being constrained; adding this would improve immediate readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the detailed comment on the simulation methodology. We address the concern point by point below and agree that additional clarification is warranted.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The central claim of up to an order-of-magnitude improvement in bounds on the muon-Higgs-gauge and muon-top operators rests on the fidelity of the Monte Carlo simulations for signal efficiencies, backgrounds, and systematic uncertainties. The manuscript states only that “detailed simulations” were performed but provides no explicit verification that electroweak Sudakov logarithms (which grow as α_W log²(s/M_W²) and can reach O(20–40%) at √s = 10 TeV) are resummed or included at NLO in both signal and background samples, nor that muon-beam-induced backgrounds from decays and synchrotron radiation are modeled with dedicated overlay simulations. Without these controls, the acceptance and shape of the differential distributions used for the fits may be mis-modeled, directly affecting the quoted sensitivity gain. This issue is load-bearing for the abstract’s strongest claim.

Authors: We agree that the manuscript's description of the Monte Carlo setup is concise and does not explicitly document the treatment of electroweak Sudakov logarithms or dedicated modeling of muon-beam-induced backgrounds. This represents a genuine limitation in the current presentation that could affect the perceived robustness of the projected sensitivities. In the revised manuscript we will expand the simulation section to specify the tools and settings employed (including any parton-shower handling of higher-order effects) and will add a dedicated paragraph discussing the expected size of Sudakov logarithms at 10 TeV together with a simple estimate of their impact on the signal and background distributions used in the fits. For beam-induced backgrounds we will include a qualitative assessment, noting that the high-p_T and angular selections applied to the processes μ⁺μ⁻ → Zh, μ⁺μ⁻ → μ⁺μ⁻h, μ⁺μ⁻ → t t-bar and μ⁺μ⁻ → t t-bar h provide substantial rejection, and we will reference existing muon-collider background studies where appropriate. These additions will be incorporated without altering the core analysis; the order-of-magnitude improvement is driven primarily by the kinematic enhancement of the dimension-6 operators at multi-TeV energies rather than by sub-leading efficiency corrections. We will verify that the quoted bounds remain stable under reasonable variations of these effects. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; projections derived from forward simulation

full rationale

The paper performs a standard collider projection study: it generates Monte Carlo samples for the listed processes (μ+μ−→Zh, μ+μ−→μμh, μ+μ−→tt̄, μ+μ−→tt̄h) including dimension-6 SMEFT operators, applies cuts and differential distributions, and extracts 95% CL bounds on Wilson coefficients. This forward simulation chain does not reduce any claimed sensitivity gain to a fitted parameter or self-citation by construction. No load-bearing self-citation, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results is present in the provided text. The result is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks (existing LHC/FCC-ee limits) and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the SMEFT framework at multi-TeV scales and on the fidelity of Monte Carlo simulations for signal and background modeling.

axioms (2)

domain assumption SMEFT dimension-6 operators remain valid and dominant at 10 TeV collision energies
Invoked when using these operators to derive projected limits on Wilson coefficients.
domain assumption Simulations accurately reproduce experimental efficiencies, backgrounds, and angular distributions
Required to translate simulated event rates into quantitative bounds on the operators.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5560 in / 1409 out tokens · 72247 ms · 2026-05-10T16:46:46.678158+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 102 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

[1]

Biswas, E

S. Biswas, E. Gabrielli, M. Heikinheimo, and B. Mele,Dark-photon searches viaZH production ate +e− colliders,Phys. Rev. D96(2017), no. 5 055012, [arXiv:1703.00402]

work page arXiv 2017
[2]

Biswas,Probing the interactions of axion-like particles with electroweak bosons and the Higgs boson in the high energy regime at LHC,JHEP05(2024) 081, [arXiv:2312.05992]

T. Biswas,Probing the interactions of axion-like particles with electroweak bosons and the Higgs boson in the high energy regime at LHC,JHEP05(2024) 081, [arXiv:2312.05992]

work page arXiv 2024
[3]

Fabbrichesi, E

M. Fabbrichesi, E. Gabrielli, and B. Mele,ZBoson Decay into Light and Darkness,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018), no. 17 171803, [arXiv:1712.05412]

work page arXiv 2018
[4]

Biswas, A

T. Biswas, A. Datta, and B. Mukhopadhyaya,Following the trail of new physics via the vector boson fusion Higgs boson signal at the Large Hadron Collider,Phys. Rev. D105(2022), no. 5 055028, [arXiv:2107.05503]. – 35 –

work page arXiv 2022
[5]

Biswas and A

T. Biswas and A. Datta,Exploring Higgs-photon production at the LHC,JHEP05(2023) 104, [arXiv:2208.08432]

work page arXiv 2023
[6]

Adhikary, T

N. Adhikary, T. Biswas, J. Chakrabortty, C. Englert, and M. Spannowsky,Electroweak scalar effects beyond dimension-six in SMEFT,Phys. Rev. D113(2026), no. 3 036003, [arXiv:2501.12160]

work page arXiv 2026
[7]

A. N. Skrinsky and V. V. Parkhomchuk,Cooling Methods for Beams of Charged Particles. (In Russian),Sov. J. Part. Nucl.12(1981) 223–247

1981
[8]

Neuffer,Principles and Applications of Muon Cooling,Conf

D. Neuffer,Principles and Applications of Muon Cooling,Conf. Proc. C830811(1983) 481–484

1983
[9]

V. D. Barger, M. S. Berger, J. F. Gunion, and T. Han,s channel Higgs boson production at a muon muon collider,Phys. Rev. Lett.75(1995) 1462–1465, [hep-ph/9504330]

work page arXiv 1995
[10]

C. M. Ankenbrandt et al.,Status of muon collider research and development and future plans, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams2(1999) 081001, [physics/9901022]

work page arXiv 1999
[11]

Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report: Vol- ume 1, Physics, Experiments, Detectors,

J. de Blas and D. et. al,Physics Briefing Book: Input for the 2026 update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics, tech. rep., Geneva, 2025. [14]FCCCollaboration, M. Benedikt et al.,Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report: Volume 1, Physics, Experiments, Detectors,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025), no. 12 1468, [arXiv:2505.00272]. [15]Muon ColliderC...

work page arXiv 2026
[12]

Aime et al.,Muon Collider Physics Summary,2203.07256

C. Aime et al.,Muon Collider Physics Summary,arXiv:2203.07256

work page arXiv
[13]

T. Han, Y. Ma, and K. Xie,High energy leptonic collisions and electroweak parton distribution functions,Phys. Rev. D103(2021), no. 3 L031301, [arXiv:2007.14300]

work page arXiv 2021
[14]

R. Ruiz, A. Costantini, F. Maltoni, and O. Mattelaer,The Effective Vector Boson Approximation in high-energy muon collisions,JHEP06(2022) 114, [arXiv:2111.02442]

work page arXiv 2022
[15]

Garosi, D

F. Garosi, D. Marzocca, and S. Trifinopoulos,LePDF: Standard Model PDFs for high-energy lepton colliders,JHEP09(2023) 107, [arXiv:2303.16964]

work page arXiv 2023
[16]

Chiesa, F

M. Chiesa, F. Maltoni, L. Mantani, B. Mele, F. Piccinini, and X. Zhao,Measuring the quartic Higgs self-coupling at a multi-TeV muon collider,JHEP09(2020) 098, [arXiv:2003.13628]

work page arXiv 2020
[17]

T. Han, D. Liu, I. Low, and X. Wang,Electroweak couplings of the Higgs boson at a multi-TeV muon collider,Phys. Rev. D103(2021), no. 1 013002, [arXiv:2008.12204]

work page arXiv 2021
[18]

Buttazzo, R

D. Buttazzo, R. Franceschini, and A. Wulzer,Two Paths Towards Precision at a Very High Energy Lepton Collider,JHEP05(2021) 219, [arXiv:2012.11555]

work page arXiv 2021
[19]

Liu and K.-P

W. Liu and K.-P. Xie,Probing electroweak phase transition with multi-TeV muon colliders and gravitational waves,JHEP04(2021) 015, [arXiv:2101.10469]

work page arXiv 2021
[20]

Franceschini and M

R. Franceschini and M. Greco,Higgs and BSM Physics at the Future Muon Collider, Symmetry13(2021), no. 5 851, [arXiv:2104.05770]

work page arXiv 2021
[21]

Chiesa, B

M. Chiesa, B. Mele, and F. Piccinini,Multi Higgs production via photon fusion at future multi-TeV muon colliders,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024), no. 5 543, [arXiv:2109.10109]. – 36 –

work page arXiv 2024
[22]

Forslund and P

M. Forslund and P. Meade,High precision higgs from high energy muon colliders,JHEP08 (2022) 185, [arXiv:2203.09425]

work page arXiv 2022
[23]

Forslund and P

M. Forslund and P. Meade,Precision Higgs width and couplings with a high energy muon collider,JHEP01(2024) 182, [arXiv:2308.02633]

work page arXiv 2024
[24]

Ruhdorfer, E

M. Ruhdorfer, E. Salvioni, and A. Wulzer,Invisible Higgs boson decay from forward muons at a muon collider,Phys. Rev. D107(2023), no. 9 095038, [arXiv:2303.14202]

work page arXiv 2023
[25]

Asadi, H

P. Asadi, H. Bagherian, K. Fraser, S. Homiller, and Q. Lu,Lepton flavor violation: From muon decays to muon colliders,Phys. Rev. D113(2026), no. 1 015003, [arXiv:2509.22771]

work page arXiv 2026
[26]

N. Chen, B. Wang, and C.-Y. Yao,The collider tests of a leptophilic scalar for the anomalous magnetic moments,arXiv:2102.05619

work page arXiv
[27]

Huang, S

G.-y. Huang, S. Jana, F. S. Queiroz, and W. Rodejohann,Probing the RK(*) anomaly at a muon collider,Phys. Rev. D105(2022), no. 1 015013, [arXiv:2103.01617]

work page arXiv 2022
[28]

Azatov, F

A. Azatov, F. Garosi, A. Greljo, D. Marzocca, J. Salko, and S. Trifinopoulos,New physics in b →sµµ: FCC-hh or a muon collider?,JHEP10(2022) 149, [arXiv:2205.13552]

work page arXiv 2022
[29]

Altmannshofer, S

W. Altmannshofer, S. A. Gadam, and S. Profumo,Probing new physics withµ+µ-→bs at a muon collider,Phys. Rev. D108(2023), no. 11 115033, [arXiv:2306.15017]

work page arXiv 2023
[30]

T. Han, D. Liu, I. Low, and X. Wang,Electroweak scattering at the muon shot,Phys. Rev. D 110(2024), no. 1 013005, [arXiv:2312.07670]

work page arXiv 2024
[31]

Glioti, D

A. Glioti, D. Marzocca, and A. Wulzer,Flavor physics at high-energy muon colliders,JHEP 12(2025) 152, [arXiv:2509.08132]

work page arXiv 2025
[32]

T. Han, Z. Liu, L.-T. Wang, and X. Wang,WIMPs at High Energy Muon Colliders,Phys. Rev. D103(2021), no. 7 075004, [arXiv:2009.11287]

work page arXiv 2021
[33]

Bottaro, A

S. Bottaro, A. Strumia, and N. Vignaroli,Minimal Dark Matter bound states at future colliders,JHEP06(2021) 143, [arXiv:2103.12766]

work page arXiv 2021
[34]

Asadi, A

P. Asadi, A. Radick, and T.-T. Yu,Interplay of freeze-in and freeze-out: Lepton-flavored dark matter and muon colliders,Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 3 035022, [arXiv:2312.03826]

work page arXiv 2024
[35]

Di Luzio, R

L. Di Luzio, R. Gr¨ ober, and G. Panico,Probing new electroweak states via precision measurements at the LHC and future colliders,JHEP01(2019) 011, [arXiv:1810.10993]

work page arXiv 2019
[36]

Costantini, F

A. Costantini, F. De Lillo, F. Maltoni, L. Mantani, O. Mattelaer, R. Ruiz, and X. Zhao, Vector boson fusion at multi-TeV muon colliders,JHEP09(2020) 080, [arXiv:2005.10289]

work page arXiv 2020
[37]

Al Ali et al.,The muon Smasher’s guide,Rept

H. Al Ali et al.,The muon Smasher’s guide,Rept. Prog. Phys.85(2022), no. 8 084201, [arXiv:2103.14043]

work page arXiv 2022
[38]

Cesarotti, S

C. Cesarotti, S. Homiller, R. K. Mishra, and M. Reece,Probing New Gauge Forces with a High-Energy Muon Beam Dump,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023), no. 7 071803, [arXiv:2202.12302]

work page arXiv 2023
[39]

Cesarotti and R

C. Cesarotti and R. Gambhir,The new physics case for beam-dump experiments with accelerated muon beams,JHEP05(2024) 283, [arXiv:2310.16110]

work page arXiv 2024
[40]

Buttazzo and P

D. Buttazzo and P. Paradisi,Probing the muong−2anomaly with the Higgs boson at a muon collider,Phys. Rev. D104(2021), no. 7 075021, [arXiv:2012.02769]. – 37 –

work page arXiv 2021
[41]

Paradisi, O

P. Paradisi, O. Sumensari, and A. Valenti,High-energy frontier of the muon g-2 at a muon collider,Phys. Rev. D106(2022), no. 11 115038, [arXiv:2203.06103]

work page arXiv 2022
[42]

Yin and M

W. Yin and M. Yamaguchi,Muon g-2 at a multi-TeV muon collider,Phys. Rev. D106(2022), no. 3 033007, [arXiv:2012.03928]

work page arXiv 2022
[43]

Chattopadhyay and P

U. Chattopadhyay and P. Nath,Upper limits on sparticle masses from g-2 and the possibility for discovery of SUSY at colliders and in dark matter searches,Phys. Rev. Lett.86(2001) 5854–5857, [hep-ph/0102157]

work page arXiv 2001
[44]

Heinemeyer, D

S. Heinemeyer, D. Stockinger, and G. Weiglein,Two loop SUSY corrections to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon,Nucl. Phys. B690(2004) 62–80, [hep-ph/0312264]

work page arXiv 2004
[45]

Banerjee and S

H. Banerjee and S. Roy,Signatures of supersymmetry andL µ −L τ gauge bosons at Belle-II, Phys. Rev. D99(2019), no. 3 035035, [arXiv:1811.00407]

work page arXiv 2019
[46]

Chakraverty, D

D. Chakraverty, D. Choudhury, and A. Datta,A Nonsupersymmetric resolution of the anomalous muon magnetic moment,Phys. Lett. B506(2001) 103–108, [hep-ph/0102180]

work page arXiv 2001
[47]

Parashar, A

S. Parashar, A. Karan, Avnish, P. Bandyopadhyay, and K. Ghosh,Phenomenology of scalar leptoquarks at the LHC in explaining the radiative neutrino masses, muon g-2, and lepton flavor violating observables,Phys. Rev. D106(2022), no. 9 095040, [arXiv:2209.05890]

work page arXiv 2022
[48]

Bhaskar, A

A. Bhaskar, A. A. Madathil, T. Mandal, and S. Mitra,Combined explanation of W-mass, muon g-2, RK(*) and RD(*) anomalies in a singlet-triplet scalar leptoquark model,Phys. Rev. D106(2022), no. 11 115009, [arXiv:2204.09031]

work page arXiv 2022
[49]

K. S. Babu, S. Jana, and V. P. K.,Correlating W-Boson Mass Shift with Muon g-2 in the Two Higgs Doublet Model,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022), no. 12 121803, [arXiv:2204.05303]

work page arXiv 2022
[50]

Status of the semileptonicBdecays and muon g-2 in general 2HDMs with right-handed neutrinos,

S. Iguro and Y. Omura,Status of the semileptonicBdecays and muon g-2 in general 2HDMs with right-handed neutrinos,JHEP05(2018) 173, [arXiv:1802.01732]

work page arXiv 2018
[51]

Li, X.-Q

S.-P. Li, X.-Q. Li, and Y.-D. Yang,Muong−2in aU(1)-symmetric Two-Higgs-Doublet Model,Phys. Rev. D99(2019), no. 3 035010, [arXiv:1808.02424]

work page arXiv 2019
[52]

Combined explanations of (g−2) µ,R D(∗),R K(∗) anomalies in a two-loop radiative neutrino mass model,

S. Saad,Combined explanations of(g−2) µ,R D(∗),R K(∗) anomalies in a two-loop radiative neutrino mass model,Phys. Rev. D102(2020), no. 1 015019, [arXiv:2005.04352]

work page arXiv 2020
[53]

Bobeth, A

C. Bobeth, A. J. Buras, A. Celis, and M. Jung,Patterns of Flavour Violation in Models with Vector-Like Quarks,JHEP04(2017) 079, [arXiv:1609.04783]

work page arXiv 2017
[54]

Capdevilla, D

R. Capdevilla, D. Curtin, Y. Kahn, and G. Krnjaic,No-lose theorem for discovering the new physics of(g−2) µ at muon colliders,Phys. Rev. D105(2022), no. 1 015028, [arXiv:2101.10334]

work page arXiv 2022
[55]

M. M. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski and J. Rosiek,Dimension-six terms in the standard model lagrangian,JHEP10(2010) 085, [arXiv:1008.4884]. [60]Particle Data GroupCollaboration, S. Navas et al.,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 3 030001

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2010
[56]

Dawson, M

S. Dawson, M. Forslund, and P. P. Giardino,NLO SMEFT electroweak corrections to Higgs boson decays to four leptons in the narrow width approximation,Phys. Rev. D111(2025), no. 1 015016, [arXiv:2411.08952]. – 38 – [62]CMSCollaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al.,Search for the decay of a Higgs boson in theℓℓγ channel in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV,JHE...

work page arXiv 2025
[57]

Alibertiet al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: An update, Physics Reports 1143, 1 (2025), arXiv:2505.21476 [hep-ph]

R. Aliberti et al.,The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: an update,arXiv:2505.21476. [65]Muon g-2Collaboration, D. P. Aguillard et al.,Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.20 ppm,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023), no. 16 161802, [arXiv:2308.06230]

work page arXiv 2023
[58]

Aoyamaet al., Phys

T. Aoyama et al.,The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model,Phys. Rept.887(2020) 1–166, [arXiv:2006.04822]. [67]MEGCollaboration, A. M. Baldini et al.,Search for the lepton flavour violating decay µ+ →e +γwith the full dataset of the MEG experiment,Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016), no. 8 434, [arXiv:1605.05081]. [68]CMSCollaboration, A. M. Sir...

work page arXiv 2020
[59]

Falkowski,Lectures on SMEFT,Eur

A. Falkowski,Lectures on SMEFT,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023), no. 7 656. [70]CMSCollaboration, A. Hayrapetyan et al.JHEP12(2023) 068, [arXiv:2307.15761]

work page arXiv 2023
[60]

Ray and S

I. Ray and S. Nandi,Test of new physics effects in B→ D(∗), π ℓ−νℓ decays with heavy and light leptons,JHEP01(2024) 022, [arXiv:2305.11855]

work page arXiv 2024
[61]

Bhattacharya, S

S. Bhattacharya, S. Jahedi, S. Nandi, and A. Sarkar,Probing flavor constrained SMEFT operators through tc production at the muon collider,JHEP07(2024) 061, [arXiv:2312.14872]

work page arXiv 2024
[62]

Huang, Y

Z.-R. Huang, Y. Li, C.-D. Lu, M. A. Paracha, and C. Wang,Footprints of New Physics in b→cτ νTransitions,Phys. Rev. D98(2018), no. 9 095018, [arXiv:1808.03565]

work page arXiv 2018
[63]

de Blas, M

J. de Blas, M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, S. Mishima, M. Pierini, L. Reina, and L. SilvestriniJHEP 12(2016) 135, [arXiv:1608.01509]

work page arXiv 2016
[64]

K. M. Black et al.,Muon Collider Forum report,JINST19(2024), no. 02 T02015, [arXiv:2209.01318]

work page arXiv 2024
[65]

FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology

A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, and B. Fuks,FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology,Comput. Phys. Commun.185(2014) 2250–2300, [arXiv:1310.1921]

work page Pith review arXiv 2014
[66]

The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations

J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro,The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations,JHEP07(2014) 079, [arXiv:1405.0301]. – 39 –

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2014
[67]

An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

T. Sj¨ ostrand, S. Ask, J. R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten, S. Mrenna, S. Prestel, C. O. Rasmussen, and P. Z. Skands,An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2,Comput. Phys. Commun.191(2015) 159–177, [arXiv:1410.3012]. [79]DELPHES 3Collaboration, J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaˆ ıtre, A. Mertens, and M. Selvaggi,DELPHES 3, A m...

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2015
[68]

FastJet user manual

M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez,FastJet User Manual,Eur. Phys. J. C72(2012) 1896, [arXiv:1111.6097]. [81]International Muon ColliderCollaboration, C. Accettura et al.,The Muon Collider, arXiv:2504.21417

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2012
[69]

J. P. Delahaye, M. Diemoz, K. Long, B. Mansouli´ e, N. Pastrone, L. Rivkin, D. Schulte, A. Skrinsky, and A. Wulzer,Muon Colliders,arXiv:1901.06150. [83]International Muon ColliderCollaboration, C. Accettura et al.,Interim report for the International Muon Collider Collaboration (IMCC),CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr.2/2024 (2024) 176, [arXiv:2407.12450]

work page Pith review arXiv 1901
[70]

Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics

G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells,Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics,Eur. Phys. J. C71(2011) 1554, [arXiv:1007.1727]. [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 73, 2501 (2013)]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2011
[71]

Contino, A

R. Contino, A. Falkowski, F. Goertz, C. Grojean, and F. Riva,On the Validity of the Effective Field Theory Approach to SM Precision Tests,JHEP07(2016) 144, [arXiv:1604.06444]

work page arXiv 2016
[72]

Busoni, A

G. Busoni, A. De Simone, E. Morgante, and A. Riotto,On the Validity of the Effective Field Theory for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC,Phys. Lett. B728(2014) 412–421, [arXiv:1307.2253]

work page arXiv 2014
[73]

Bhattacharya and J

S. Bhattacharya and J. WudkaPhys. Rev. D94(2016), no. 5 055022, [arXiv:1505.05264]

work page arXiv 2016
[74]

Celada, T

E. Celada, T. Giani, J. ter Hoeve, L. Mantani, J. Rojo, A. N. Rossia, M. O. A. Thomas, and E. Vryonidou,Mapping the SMEFT at high-energy colliders: from LEP and the (HL-)LHC to the FCC-ee,JHEP09(2024) 091, [arXiv:2404.12809]

work page arXiv 2024
[75]

Cornet-Gomez, V

F. Cornet-Gomez, V. Miralles, M. Miralles L´ opez, M. Moreno Ll´ acer, and M. Vos,Future collider constraints on top-quark operators,JHEP10(2025) 156, [arXiv:2503.11518]

work page arXiv 2025
[76]

Bellafronte, S

L. Bellafronte, S. Dawson, P. P. Giardino, and H. Liu,Probing Top-Quark–Electron Interactions at Future Colliders,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025), no. 25 251801, [arXiv:2507.02039]

work page arXiv 2025
[77]

C. Arzt, M. B. Einhorn, and J. Wudka,Patterns of deviation from the standard model,Nucl. Phys. B433(1995) 41–66, [hep-ph/9405214]

work page Pith review arXiv 1995
[78]

Das Bakshi, J

S. Das Bakshi, J. Chakrabortty, C. Englert, M. Spannowsky, and P. Stylianou,CPviolation at ATLAS in effective field theory,Phys. Rev. D103(2021), no. 5 055008, [arXiv:2009.13394]

work page arXiv 2021
[79]

Chakrabortty, S

J. Chakrabortty, S. U. Rahaman, and K. Ramkumar,One-loop effective action up to dimension eight: Integrating out heavy fermion(s),Nucl. Phys. B1000(2024) 116488, [arXiv:2308.03849]. – 40 –

work page arXiv 2024
[80]

Fuentes-Mart ´ ın, M

J. Fuentes-Mart´ ın, M. K¨ onig, J. Pag` es, A. E. Thomsen, and F. Wilsch,A proof of concept for matchete: an automated tool for matching effective theories,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023), no. 7 662, [arXiv:2212.04510]

work page arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.