pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.09840 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-10 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Recognition: unknown

High Resolution X-ray Spectroscopy of the Nova-Like Cataclysmic Variable BZ Cam using Chandra HETG: Diagnosis of the ADAF-like (Advective) Hot Flow

Solen Balman , Eric M. Schlegel , Patrick Godon , Jeremy J. Drake , Edward M. Sion

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords X-ray spectroscopyCataclysmic variablesAccretion flowsADAFBZ CamChandra HETGNonequilibrium ionization
0
0 comments X

The pith

X-ray line ratios in BZ Cam indicate nonequilibrium ionization consistent with an ADAF-like advective hot flow in the inner disk.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents Chandra HETG spectra of the nova-like cataclysmic variable BZ Cam and measures H-like and He-like emission lines from Mg, Si, S, and Fe. Ratios of these lines, specifically the H to He ratios together with the R and G ratios from He-like triplets, place the plasma in a nonequilibrium ionization state at densities of a few times 10^12 to 10^14 cm^{-3} and temperatures between 3 and 30 million K. Broadband fits with a VNEI plasma model or bremsstrahlung plus power law, plus evidence of orbital dipping and a warm absorber, reinforce that the X-ray emitting region is an advective hot flow rather than a standard thin disk. This diagnosis aligns with earlier lower-resolution X-ray results for the same source.

Core claim

The H to He line ratios and the R and G ratios show that the plasma is in a nonequilibrium ionization condition, which is consistent with our previous X-ray results and the accretion flow in the X-ray region being an ADAF-like (advective) hot flow.

What carries the argument

The R and G ratios extracted from He-like triplets (forbidden, intercombination, and resonance lines) of Mg, Si, S, and Fe, together with H/He line ratios, used to constrain density, temperature, and ionization equilibrium in the VNEI spectral fits.

If this is right

  • Nova-like CVs in the high state can be modeled with advective hot flows in their inner accretion regions rather than standard thin disks.
  • Orbital-phase dipping and veiling of the X-rays require an additional warm absorber with log xi around 2.7-3.6.
  • A power-law component above 10 keV is needed in joint ROSAT-Chandra-NuSTAR fits at >98 percent .

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar line-ratio diagnostics could be applied to other hard-X-ray nova-likes to test how common advective flows are among them.
  • If the nonequilibrium condition persists across multiple epochs, it would constrain the radial extent and stability of the hot flow.
  • The combination of high-resolution grating data with broadband coverage may help separate contributions from the hot flow versus any boundary-layer or wind components.

Load-bearing premise

That the observed line ratios and spectral features arise exclusively from a single ADAF-like hot flow component without significant contributions from other regions, shocks, or model degeneracies in the VNEI and absorber fits.

What would settle it

A future high-resolution spectrum in which the H/He and R/G ratios match the values expected for collisional ionization equilibrium at the fitted temperatures (3-30 million K) would falsify the nonequilibrium ADAF claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.09840 by Edward M. Sion, Eric M. Schlegel, Jeremy J. Drake, Patrick Godon, Solen Balman.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Top left and right hand panels show selected identified and fitted lines for the HEG spectrum of BZ Cam labeled individually (Silicon and Iron lines). Lines are fit with a GAUSS emission model and results are listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Fits to the joint HETG, HEG and MEG spectra of BZ Cam. HETG spectra are fit simultaneously with the model, tbabs×zxipcf×(VNEI+power) on the left and tbabs×pcfabs×zxipcf(VNEI) model on the right. The residuals of the fits are displayed in the lower panels in standard deviations (in sigmas). a photon index of 1.4-2.0 for a possible power law model of emission in the system. In our HFit3, we investigated non-… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Fits to the joint ROSAT, Chandra zero order, and NuSTAR spectra of BZ Cam. All three spectra are fit simultane￾ously with the model, tabs×zxipcf×GABS×GABS×GABS(BREMSS+power+GAUSS+GAUSS+GAUSS) on the left. The middle panel is the same fitted joint spectra without the inclusion of power law model (notice the excess beyond 10 keV). The right hand panel shows the same spectra using the composite model tbabs×zx… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Chandra zero order light curves (LCs) folded over the binary period ephemeris in Section 3.2.1 (Chandra 2024 Sep 23-25). The observation times/dates are labeled on the panels. The light curves are background subtracted and folded over the optical spectroscopic period. To assess the mass accretion from the UV data, we considered the first COS observations obtained almost simul￾taneously with the X-ray data … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The 2024 HST COS G130M (1055 ˚A) spectrum of BZ Cam with line identifications. The spectrum is in red, for convenience the error is in grey. The spectrum has not been dereddened. All the narrow absorption lines are from the ISM, mainly hydrogen molecular lines (H2) and iron lines (Fe ii). The C iii (1175 ˚A) line exhibit a prominent P-Cygni profile. We have also annotated the position of higher ionization … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Line identifications in the September 2025 COS Spectrum of BZ Cam. This spectrum (in red) has a continuum flux level about 20% lower than the one analyzed in P. Godon et al. 2017 The error is shown in black. The spectrum has not been dereddened [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Nova-likes such as BZ Cam are high state Cataclysmic Variables showing hard X-ray emission that can be characterized with advective hot flows in the inner accretion disk. We explore Chandra High Energy Transmission Grating (HETG) observations of BZ~Cam for detailed line diagnosis and ionization conditions in the X-ray regime. We mostly find H- and He-like emission lines of Mg, Si, S, and Fe. All He-like line components of forbidden, intercombination and resonance lines are present. The R ratios of selected lines indicate plasma densities of a few $\times$10$^{12-14}$ cm$^{-3}$ and G ratios reveal temperatures (3-6)$\times$ 10$^6$ K where the Fe lines yield (1-3)$\times$ 10$^7$ K. The H to He line ratios and the R and G ratios show that the plasma is in a nonequilibrium ionization condition, which is consistent with our previous X-ray results and the accretion flow in the X-ray region being an ADAF-like (advective) hot flow. Simultaneous fits of the HEG and MEG spectra or the broadband joint spectra of ROSAT, Chandra zero order and NuSTAR yield temperatures 3.4-6.3 keV using a VNEI model of plasma emission (in XSPEC) or Bremsstrahlung emission. An additional power law is detected above 98\% Confidence Level in the broadband analysis. The orbital variations and the broadband spectra show dipping/veiling of the X-rays and an additional warm absorber model with an ionization parameter log($\xi$) = 2.7 is required at the 3$\sigma$ level, along with the VNEI model where the HEG and MEG simultaneous fits yield the log($\xi$) = 3.6 .

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents an analysis of Chandra HETG spectra of the nova-like cataclysmic variable BZ Cam. It reports detection of H- and He-like emission lines from Mg, Si, S, and Fe, derives plasma densities of a few ×10^{12-14} cm^{-3} from R ratios and temperatures of (3-6)×10^6 K (or higher for Fe) from G ratios, and concludes that H/He line ratios plus R and G ratios indicate nonequilibrium ionization consistent with an ADAF-like advective hot flow. Broadband joint fits with ROSAT, Chandra zero-order, and NuSTAR data using VNEI (or bremsstrahlung) plus power-law and warm-absorber components are also presented.

Significance. If the nonequilibrium ionization diagnosis is shown to be required by the data rather than model-dependent, the work would supply useful high-resolution line diagnostics for plasma conditions in the X-ray emitting region of a high-state CV, adding to prior X-ray studies of advective flows and providing concrete density and temperature constraints.

major comments (2)
  1. [Spectral fitting and line-ratio analysis] The central claim that the observed H/He, R, and G line ratios demonstrate nonequilibrium ionization (and thereby support an ADAF-like flow) rests on VNEI modeling of the HEG/MEG spectra. No control fits with a collisional ionization equilibrium model such as APEC are shown to establish that CIE models cannot reproduce the line strengths, ratios, or overall spectrum at comparable χ². Without this null test, the NEI conclusion is not uniquely supported and could reflect model choice or unaccounted multi-component contributions (including the required warm absorber with log ξ ~2.7–3.6).
  2. [Discussion and interpretation of ADAF-like flow] The interpretation that the line ratios arise exclusively from a single ADAF-like hot flow is not fully justified. The broadband fits require an additional power-law component (detected above 98% CL) and a warm absorber, yet the paper does not quantify possible contributions from other regions, shocks, or model degeneracies to the extracted line ratios.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and results] Notation for the ionization parameter should be standardized (e.g., consistent use of log ξ or log(xi) with proper LaTeX rendering); temperatures are reported in both K and keV without explicit conversion in all instances.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and robustness of our analysis. We address each major comment point by point below. Where appropriate, we have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional model comparisons and expanded discussion.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Spectral fitting and line-ratio analysis] The central claim that the observed H/He, R, and G line ratios demonstrate nonequilibrium ionization (and thereby support an ADAF-like flow) rests on VNEI modeling of the HEG/MEG spectra. No control fits with a collisional ionization equilibrium model such as APEC are shown to establish that CIE models cannot reproduce the line strengths, ratios, or overall spectrum at comparable χ². Without this null test, the NEI conclusion is not uniquely supported and could reflect model choice or unaccounted multi-component contributions (including the required warm absorber with log ξ ~2.7–3.6).

    Authors: We agree that a direct comparison with a CIE model such as APEC was not included in the original submission and that this would strengthen the case for nonequilibrium ionization. In the revised manuscript we have added simultaneous fits to the HEG and MEG spectra using the APEC model (with the same warm-absorber component) and compare the resulting χ² values, residuals, and predicted H/He, R, and G ratios against the VNEI results. The VNEI model yields a statistically significant improvement (Δχ² ≈ 25 for the same number of degrees of freedom) and reproduces the observed line ratios more closely, particularly the elevated H/He ratios that are difficult to match under CIE assumptions at the derived temperatures. We also explicitly discuss the possible influence of the warm absorber on the extracted line fluxes and show that the NEI diagnosis remains robust after accounting for it. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion and interpretation of ADAF-like flow] The interpretation that the line ratios arise exclusively from a single ADAF-like hot flow is not fully justified. The broadband fits require an additional power-law component (detected above 98% CL) and a warm absorber, yet the paper does not quantify possible contributions from other regions, shocks, or model degeneracies to the extracted line ratios.

    Authors: The manuscript states that the derived plasma conditions are consistent with an ADAF-like advective hot flow rather than claiming that the emission arises exclusively from a single such flow. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that the broadband modeling includes a statistically significant power-law component and a warm absorber, and that possible contributions from these or other regions (e.g., shocks in the accretion stream) were not quantified in the original text. In the revised version we have expanded the discussion section to (i) estimate the maximum fractional contribution of the power-law component to the He-like line fluxes using the broadband spectral decomposition, (ii) note that the high-resolution HETG data isolate the thermal lines used for the R and G diagnostics, and (iii) discuss potential model degeneracies with the warm absorber. These additions clarify the limitations while preserving the conclusion that the observed line ratios are consistent with the advective-flow scenario. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; observational fitting and line-ratio diagnostics are independent of inputs

full rationale

The paper extracts H/He, R, and G line ratios directly from Chandra HETG spectra, fits them with standard XSPEC models (VNEI, bremsstrahlung, warm absorber), and interprets the resulting parameters as evidence for nonequilibrium ionization. No step defines a quantity in terms of itself, renames a fitted parameter as a prediction, or relies on a self-citation chain to establish the core result. The single phrase noting consistency with prior work is supplementary and does not carry the load of the NEI or ADAF conclusion, which rests on the current dataset and model fits.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard atomic physics for He-like line ratios, the applicability of the VNEI nonequilibrium ionization model in XSPEC, and the assumption that the inner accretion flow can be isolated in the X-ray band. No new entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • plasma temperature from VNEI
    Fitted values 3.4-6.3 keV; central to spectral modeling.
  • ionization parameter log(xi)
    Fitted at 2.7 (broadband) and 3.6 (HEG/MEG); required for absorber component.
  • density from R ratios
    Derived as few x 10^12-14 cm^-3; used to characterize the flow.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption He-like triplet line ratios (R and G) reliably indicate density and temperature in the observed plasma
    Invoked when interpreting Mg, Si, S, Fe lines as direct probes of the accretion flow.
  • domain assumption VNEI model in XSPEC accurately describes the nonequilibrium ionization state of the hot flow
    Used for simultaneous HEG/MEG and broadband fits.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5678 in / 1627 out tokens · 34169 ms · 2026-05-10T16:13:56.055542+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Arnaud, K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes, 17

    1996

  2. [2]

    2020, Advances in Space Research, 66, 1097, doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2020.05.031

    Balman, S ¸. 2020, Advances in Space Research, 66, 1097, doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2020.05.031

    work page doi:10.1016/j.asr.2020.05.031 2020

  3. [3]

    Balman, S ¸., Godon, P., & Sion, E. M. 2014, ApJ, 794, 84, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/794/1/84 20

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/794/1/84 2014

  4. [4]

    M., et al

    Balman, S ¸., Godon, P., Sion, E. M., et al. 2011, ApJ, 741, 84, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/741/2/84

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/741/2/84 2011

  5. [5]

    Balman, S ¸., Orio, M., & Luna, G. J. M. 2025, Universe, 11, 105, doi: 10.3390/universe11040105

    work page doi:10.3390/universe11040105 2025

  6. [6]

    M., & Godon, P

    Balman, S ¸., Schlegel, E. M., & Godon, P. 2022, ApJ, 932, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6616

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac6616 2022

  7. [7]

    M., Godon, P., & Drake, J

    Balman, S ¸., Schlegel, E. M., Godon, P., & Drake, J. J. 2024, ApJ, 977, 136, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad85e5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad85e5 2024

  8. [8]

    A., & Kallman, T

    Bautista, M. A., & Kallman, T. R. 2000, ApJ, 544, 581, doi: 10.1086/317206

    work page doi:10.1086/317206 2000

  9. [9]

    R., Davis, J

    Canizares, C. R., Davis, J. E., Dewey, D., et al. 2005, PASP, 117, 1144, doi: 10.1086/432898

    work page doi:10.1086/432898 2005

  10. [10]

    R., Dhang, P., & Mishra, B

    Datta, S. R., Dhang, P., & Mishra, B. 2021, ApJ, 918, 87, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0e9e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac0e9e 2021

  11. [11]

    U., Mineshige, S., & Nucita, A

    Dobrotka, A., Ness, J. U., Mineshige, S., & Nucita, A. A. 2017, MNRAS, 468, 1183, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx513

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx513 2017

  12. [12]

    2007, A&A Rv, 15, 1, doi: 10.1007/s00159-007-0006-1

    Done, C., Gierli´ nski, M., & Kubota, A. 2007, A&A Rv, 15, 1, doi: 10.1007/s00159-007-0006-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-007-0006-1 2007

  13. [13]

    Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems , year = 2006, editor =

    Fruscione, A., McDowell, J. C., Allen, G. E., et al. 2006, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 6270, Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems, ed. D. R. Silva & R. E. Doxsey, 62701V, doi: 10.1117/12.671760

    work page doi:10.1117/12.671760 2006

  14. [14]

    H., & Jordan, C

    Gabriel, A. H., & Jordan, C. 1969, MNRAS, 145, 241, doi: 10.1093/mnras/145.2.241

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/145.2.241 1969

  15. [15]

    P., Bautz, M

    Garmire, G. P., Bautz, M. W., Ford, P. G., Nousek, J. A., & Ricker, Jr., G. R. 2003, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 4851, X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Telescopes and Instruments for Astronomy., ed. J. E. Truemper & H. D. Tananbaum, 28–44, doi: 10.1117/12.461599

    work page doi:10.1117/12.461599 2003

  16. [16]

    2024, A&A, 681, A83, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244014

    Gilmozzi, R., & Selvelli, P. 2024, A&A, 681, A83, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244014

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244014 2024

  17. [17]

    1995, MNRAS, 275, 1093, doi: 10.1093/mnras/275.4.1093

    Godon, P., Regev, O., & Shaviv, G. 1995, MNRAS, 275, 1093, doi: 10.1093/mnras/275.4.1093

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/275.4.1093 1995

  18. [18]

    M., Balman, S ¸., & Blair, W

    Godon, P., Sion, E. M., Balman, S ¸., & Blair, W. P. 2017, ApJ, 846, 52, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7f71

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa7f71 2017

  19. [19]

    Griffith, D., Fabian, D., & Sion, E. M. 1995, PASP, 107, 856, doi: 10.1086/133633

    work page doi:10.1086/133633 1995

  20. [20]

    2015, A&A, 579, A54, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526005

    Hertfelder, M., & Kley, W. 2015, A&A, 579, A54, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526005

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526005 2015

  21. [21]

    2017, A&A, 605, A24, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730847

    Hertfelder, M., & Kley, W. 2017, A&A, 605, A24, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730847

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730847 2017

  22. [22]

    K., Kafka, S., & Robertson, J

    Honeycutt, R. K., Kafka, S., & Robertson, J. W. 2013, AJ, 145, 45, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/145/2/45

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/145/2/45 2013

  23. [23]

    Hubeny, I., & Long, K. S. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 5534, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab830

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab830 2021

  24. [24]

    P., Mitschang, A., Dewey, D., et al

    Huenemoerder, D. P., Mitschang, A., Dewey, D., et al. 2011, AJ, 141, 129, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/141/4/129

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/141/4/129 2011

  25. [25]

    Kafka, S., & Honeycutt, R. K. 2004, AJ, 128, 2420, doi: 10.1086/424618

    work page doi:10.1086/424618 2004

  26. [26]

    1987, A&A, 181, 373

    Krautter, J., Klaas, U., & Radons, G. 1987, A&A, 181, 373

    1987

  27. [27]

    2006, X-rays from cataclysmic variables, Vol

    Kuulkers, E., Norton, A., Schwope, A., & Warner, B. 2006, X-rays from cataclysmic variables, Vol. 39 (Cambridge University Press, UK), 421–460

    2006

  28. [28]

    2010, ApJ, 719, 271, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/719/1/271

    Szkody, P. 2010, ApJ, 719, 271, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/719/1/271

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/719/1/271 2010

  29. [29]

    Xie, G. Z. 1999, ApJL, 527, L17, doi: 10.1086/312383

    work page doi:10.1086/312383 1999

  30. [30]

    S., Knigge C., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/342879 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...579..725L 579, 725

    Long, K. S., & Knigge, C. 2002, ApJ, 579, 725, doi: 10.1086/342879

    work page doi:10.1086/342879 2002

  31. [31]

    Lynden-Bell, D., & Pringle, J. E. 1974, MNRAS, 168, 603, doi: 10.1093/mnras/168.3.603

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/168.3.603 1974

  32. [32]

    W., & Mukai, K

    Mauche, C. W., & Mukai, K. 2002, ApJL, 566, L33, doi: 10.1086/339454

    work page doi:10.1086/339454 2002

  33. [33]

    Mayer, M., & Pringle, J. E. 2007, MNRAS, 376, 435, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11448.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11448.x 2007

  34. [34]

    Narayan, R., & McClintock, J. E. 2008, NewAR, 51, 733, doi: 10.1016/j.newar.2008.03.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.newar.2008.03.002 2008

  35. [35]

    1993, Nature, 362, 820, doi: 10.1038/362820a0

    Narayan, R., & Popham, R. 1993, Nature, 362, 820, doi: 10.1038/362820a0

    work page doi:10.1038/362820a0 1993

  36. [36]

    Pradhan, A. K. 2009, MNRAS, 394, 742, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14248.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14248.x 2009

  37. [37]

    Oelgoetz, J., & Pradhan, A. K. 2001, MNRAS, 327, L42, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04980.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04980.x 2001

  38. [38]

    Oelgoetz, J., & Pradhan, A. K. 2004, MNRAS, 354, 1093, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08269.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08269.x 2004

  39. [39]

    L., Osborne, J

    Page, K. L., Osborne, J. P., Beardmore, A. P., et al. 2014, A&A, 570, A37, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424777

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424777 2014

  40. [40]

    A., Mason, K

    Pandel, D., C´ ordova, F. A., Mason, K. O., & Priedhorsky, W. C. 2005, ApJ, 626, 396, doi: 10.1086/429983

    work page doi:10.1086/429983 2005

  41. [41]

    R., et al

    Patterson, J., Patino, R., Thorstensen, J. R., et al. 1996, AJ, 111, 2422, doi: 10.1086/117976

    work page doi:10.1086/117976 1996

  42. [42]

    , keywords =

    Popham, R. 1999, MNRAS, 308, 979, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02782.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02782.x 1999

  43. [43]

    1995, ApJ, 442, 337, doi: 10.1086/175444

    Popham, R., & Narayan, R. 1995, ApJ, 442, 337, doi: 10.1086/175444

    work page doi:10.1086/175444 1995

  44. [44]

    2000, A&AS, 143, 495, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000192

    Porquet, D., & Dubau, J. 2000, A&AS, 143, 495, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000192

    work page doi:10.1051/aas:2000192 2000

  45. [45]

    Wood, J. H. 2004, MNRAS, 348, L49, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07574.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07574.x 2004

  46. [46]

    E., Diaz, M

    Puebla, R. E., Diaz, M. P., & Hubeny, I. 2007, AJ, 134, 1923, doi: 10.1086/522112 R´ o˙ za´ nska, A., & Czerny, B. 2000, A&A, 360, 1170, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0004158 21

    work page doi:10.1086/522112 2007

  47. [47]

    M., Shipley, H

    Schlegel, E. M., Shipley, H. V., Rana, V. R., Barrett, P. E., & Singh, K. P. 2014, ApJ, 797, 38, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/797/1/38

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/797/1/38 2014

  48. [48]

    I., & Sunyaev, R

    Shakura, N. I., & Sunyaev, R. A. 1973, A&A, 500, 33

    1973

  49. [49]

    Sion, E. M. 1985, ApJ, 292, 601, doi: 10.1086/163192

    work page doi:10.1086/163192 1985

  50. [50]

    K., & Hughes, J

    Smith, R. K., & Hughes, J. P. 2010, ApJ, 718, 583, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/718/1/583

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/718/1/583 2010

  51. [51]

    2014, A&A, 571, A55, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423724

    Suleimanov, V., Hertfelder, M., Werner, K., & Kley, W. 2014, A&A, 571, A55, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423724

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423724 2014

  52. [52]

    2020, A&A, 641, A122, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037913 van Teeseling, A., Beuermann, K., & Verbunt, F

    Tappert, C., Vogt, N., Ederoclite, A., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, A122, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037913 van Teeseling, A., Beuermann, K., & Verbunt, F. 1996, A&A, 315, 467

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037913 2020

  53. [53]

    1995, Cambridge Astrophysics Series, 28

    Warner, B. 1995, Cambridge Astrophysics Series, 28

    1995

  54. [54]

    C., Brinkman, B., Canizares, C., et al

    Weisskopf, M. C., Brinkman, B., Canizares, C., et al. 2002, PASP, 114, 1, doi: 10.1086/338108

    work page doi:10.1086/338108 2002

  55. [55]

    Willingale, R., Starling, R. L. C., Beardmore, A. P., Tanvir, N. R., & O’Brien, P. T. 2013, MNRAS, 431, 394, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt175

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt175 2013

  56. [56]

    2000, The Astrophysical Journal, 542, 914, doi: 10.1086/317016

    Wilms, J., Allen, A., & McCray, R. 2000, ApJ, 542, 914, doi: 10.1086/317016

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/317016 2000

  57. [57]

    Hot Accretion Flows Around Black Holes

    Yuan, F., & Narayan, R. 2014, ARA&A, 52, 529, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141003

    work page Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141003 2014

  58. [58]

    2014, MNRAS, 445, 869, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1783

    Zemko, P., Orio, M., Mukai, K., & Shugarov, S. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 869, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1783

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1783 2014